Search

Background: Guidelines advise eculizumab prophylaxis for most kidney transplant recipients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). However, recurrence rates may be overestimated, and starting eculizumab at relapse ("rescue therapy") may prevent graft loss. Randomized controlled trials have not compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of different treatment strategies. We performed a comparative study, including a previously described Dutch cohort treated with rescue therapy and a UK cohort using eculizumab prophylaxis., Methods: In the Netherlands, we selected all adult patients with aHUS who received a kidney transplant between 2010 and 2021 in the Radboud University Medical Center (n = 30) and enriched this cohort with 8 patients who received rescue therapy in other centers. The UK cohort included all adult patients with aHUS at moderate or high risk of recurrence, transplanted between 2013 and 2017 with prophylactic eculizumab., Results: We included 38 Dutch patients and 35 UK patients. Characteristics were comparable, although the UK cohort included more patients with a complement factor H SCR20 mutation or hybrid gene (31% versus 5%; P < 0.01), and more Dutch patients received living donor kidneys (66% versus 20%; P < 0.001). Follow-up was comparable (the Dutch patients 70.8 mo, range, 10-134; UK patients 55.4 mo, range, 2-95). Eighteen (47%) Dutch patients received rescue therapy. Death-censored graft survival was not significantly different (the Dutch patients 1 y, 3 y, and 6 y: 97.4%, 91.2%, and 87.1%, respectively; UK patients 1 y, 3 y, and 6 y: 97.1%, 88.2%, and 65.6%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.189)., Conclusions: In a population characterized by low prevalence of "very high risk" genes, who were predominantly transplanted using an endothelial protective regime, death-censored graft survival with eculizumab rescue therapy was not inferior to prophylaxis., Competing Interests: N.C.A.J.v.d.K. and J.F.M.W. received grant support from the Dutch Board of Health Insurance Companies to conduct the CUREiHUS study. N.C.A.J.v.d.K. received consultancy fees from Roche Pharmaceuticals and Novartis and is a subinvestigator in the APL2-C3G trial, Apellis. J.F.M.W. received consultancy fees from Alexion and Novartis. C.D. is a subinvestigator in the APL2-G3G trial, Apellis. N.S.S. has provided consultancy for Alexion Pharmaceuticals. D.K. has received consultancy income from Gyroscope Therapeutics, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Apellis, and Sarepta. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Monoclonal gammopathy with cryoactivity (ie, cryoglobulins) that causes glomerulonephritis is considered within the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Cryofibrinogenemia (cryoactivity of coagulation factors) is very rarely associated with glomerulonephritis. We present a 39-year-old woman with a relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Laboratory investigation detected cryofibrinogen; the precipitate consisted of fibrinogen and a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein; IgG-λ), and the latter was also detected in serum (4g/L). Initial conventional immunosuppressive therapy resulted in temporary renal remission. In view of the M-protein, subsequent therapy consisted of bortezomib/dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and resulted in a very good partial hematological response and temporary renal remission. However, after hematological and renal relapse, we performed unique experiments to clarify the role of the M-protein. Mixing patient serum with donor plasma resulted in cryoactivity, composed of M-protein+fibrinogen. Patient plasma deprived of M-protein did not have cryoactivity. Therefore, cryoactivity was dependent on the M-protein. We started lenalidomide, which resulted in very good partial hematological and renal remission. Thus, cryofibrinogenemia can be the consequence of an M-protein, which we suggest should be defined as monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In 2014, a complement assay, which evaluates C5b-9 deposition on endothelial cells, was proposed as a biomarker for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Early diagnosis and/or prediction of aHUS (relapse) is pivotal in aHUS kidney transplant recipients who do not receive eculizumab prophylaxis., Methods: In this pilot study, serum samples of transplanted patients with aHUS in remission without eculizumab and patients with other primary kidney diseases (controls) were blinded and evaluated in the complement assay., Results: We included 13 patients with aHUS (4 males, 9 females) of median age of 54 years (range: 35-69) and median of 5.9 years (range: 0.25-14.1) after transplantation; and 13 controls (7 males, 6 females) of median age of 42 years (range: 27-60) and median of 5.8 years (range: 1.6-11.7) after transplantation. There were no significant differences in C5b-9 deposits between patients with aHUS and controls on resting cells (median of 136% [range: 93%-382%] and 121% [range: 75%-200%], respectively) and activated cells (median of 196% [range: 99%-388%] and 170% [range: 113%-260%], respectively). Three patients with aHUS and 4 controls showed elevated C5b-9 deposits on resting cells, which should correspond to active aHUS. None of these patients had laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). During follow-up (15.8 months, range: 6-21), estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable in all. In 5 patients with aHUS with a genetic variant, no increase in C5b-9 deposits was found on activated endothelial cells, which contrasts with the literature suggesting that the test should identify carriers of a genetic variant., Conclusion: Our data question the routine use of the ex vivo complement assay in kidney transplant patients. Future studies should evaluate the test characteristics of assay in kidney transplant patients., (© 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Kidney damage, a common condition in patients with aHUS, may result in proteinuria. Because proteinuria may affect the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins such as eculizumab, the aim of our study was to investigate the effect of proteinuria on eculizumab pharmacokinetics., Methods: This study was an ancillary study of a previously performed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of eculizumab in aHUS. Proteinuria, measured as urinary protein-creatinine ratios (UPCR), was investigated as covariate for eculizumab clearance. Thereafter, we evaluated the effect of proteinuria on the exposure to eculizumab in a simulation study for the initial phase and for a 2-weekly and 3-weekly interval in the maintenance phase., Results: The addition of UPCR as a linear covariate on clearance to our base model resulted in a statistically improved fit ( P < 0.001) and reduction of unexplained variability in clearance. From our data, we predicted that in the initial phase, 16% of the adult patients with severe proteinuria (UPCR >3.1 g/g) will have inadequate complement inhibition (classical pathway activity >10%) on day 7 of treatment, compared with 3% of the adult patients without proteinuria. None of the pediatric patients will have inadequate complement inhibition at day 7 of treatment. For the 2- and 3-weekly dosing intervals, we predicted that, respectively, 18% and 49% of the adult patients and, respectively, 19% and 57% of the pediatric patients with persistent severe proteinuria will have inadequate complement inhibition, compared with, respectively, 2% and 13% of the adult patients and, respectively, 4% and 22% of the pediatric patients without proteinuria., Conclusions: Severe proteinuria is associated with a higher risk of underexposure to eculizumab., Clinical Trial Registry Name and Registration Number: CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register, NTR5988/NL5833., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Eculizumab is a lifesaving yet expensive drug for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Current guidelines advise a fixed-dosing schedule, which can be suboptimal and inflexible in the individual patient., Methods: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) [classical pathway (CP) activity levels] of eculizumab in 48 patients, consisting of 849 time-concentration data and 569 CP activity levels. PK-PD modelling was performed with non-linear mixed-effects modelling. The final model was used to develop improved dosing strategies., Results: A PK model with parallel linear and non-linear elimination rates best described the data with the parameter estimates clearance 0.163 L/day, volume of distribution 6.42 L, maximal rate 29.6 mg/day and concentration for 50% of maximum rate 37.9 mg/L. The PK-PD relation between eculizumab concentration and CP activity was described using an inhibitory Emax model with the parameter estimates baseline 101%, maximal inhibitory effect 95.9%, concentration for 50% inhibition 22.0 mg/L and  Hill coefficient 5.42. A weight-based loading dose, followed by PK-guided dosing was found to improve treatment. On day 7, we predict 99.95% of the patients to reach the efficacy target (CP activity <10%), compared with 94.75% with standard dosing. Comparable efficacy was predicted during the maintenance phase, while the dosing interval could be prolonged in ∼33% of the population by means of individualized dosing. With a fixed-dose 4-week dosing interval to allow for holidays, treatment costs will increase by 7.1% and we predict 91% of the patients will reach the efficacy target., Conclusions: A patient-friendly individualized dosing strategy of eculizumab has the potential to improve treatment response at reduced costs., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA.)

Introduction: Since 2016, kidney transplantation in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the Netherlands is performed without eculizumab prophylaxis. Eculizumab is given in case of posttransplant aHUS recurrence. Eculizumab therapy is monitored in the CUREiHUS study., Methods: All participating kidney transplant patients who received eculizumab therapy for a suspected posttransplant aHUS recurrence were evaluated. Overall recurrence rate was monitored prospectively at Radboud University Medical Center., Results: In the period from January 2016 until October 2020, we included 15 (12 females, 3 males; median age 42 years, range 24-66 years) patients with suspected aHUS recurrence after kidney transplantation in this study. The time interval to recurrence showed a bimodal distribution. Seven patients presented early after transplantation (median 3 months, range 0.3-8.8 months), with typical aHUS features: rapid loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eight patients presented late (median 46 months, range 18-69 months) after transplantation. Of these, only 3 patients had systemic TMA, whereas 5 patients presented with slowly deteriorating eGFR without systemic TMA. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in improvement or stabilization of eGFR in 14 patients. Eculizumab discontinuation was tried in 7 patients; however, it was successful only in 3. At the end of the follow-up (median 29 months, range 3-54 months after start of eculizumab), 6 patients had eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Graft loss had occurred in 3 of them. Overall, aHUS recurrence rate without eculizumab prophylaxis was 23%., Conclusions: Rescue treatment of posttransplant aHUS recurrence is effective; however, some patients suffer from irreversible loss of kidney function, likely caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment and/or too aggressive discontinuation of eculizumab. Physicians should be aware that recurrence of aHUS can present without evidence of systemic TMA., (© 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with rare but severe complications characterized by thrombosis and thrombocytopenia., Methods and Results: Here we present three patients who developed de novo or relapse atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in native kidneys, a median of 3 days (range 2-15) after mRNA-based (Pfizer/BioNTech's, BNT162b2) or adenoviral (AstraZeneca, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccination. All three patients presented with evident hematological signs of TMA and AKI, and other aHUS triggering or explanatory events were absent. After eculizumab treatment, kidney function fully recovered in 2/3 patients. In addition, we describe two patients with dubious aHUS relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. To assess the risks of vaccination, we retrospectively evaluated 29 aHUS patients (n=8 with native kidneys) without complement-inhibitory treatment, who received a total of 73 COVID-19 vaccinations. None developed aHUS relapse after vaccination., Conclusion: In conclusion, aHUS should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia, especially if co-occuring with mechanical hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Still, the overall risk is limited and we clearly advise continuation of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a previous episode of aHUS, yet conditional upon clear patient instruction on how to recognize symptoms of recurrence. At last, we suggest monitoring serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, MAHA parameters, and blood pressure days after vaccination., Competing Interests: JW is a member of the international advisory board of Alexion and also received a grant from Alexion. NvdK has received a consultancy fee from Roche Pharmaceuticals and Novartis and is a sub-investigator in the APL2-C3G trial, Apellis. AB received a consultancy fee from Novartis, is a member of the DSMB Zoster-047 trial, GSK, and a sub-investigator in the Belatacept study, BMS. VG is sub-investigator in the APL2-C3G trial, Apellis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bouwmeester, Bormans, Duineveld, van Zuilen, van de Logt, Wetzels and van de Kar.)