1. Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral detection and whole genome sequencing from COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices: a laboratory evaluation study
- Author
-
Moso, MA, Taiaroa, G, Steinig, E, Zhanduisenov, M, Butel-Simoes, G, Savic, I, Taouk, ML, Chea, S, Moselen, J, Keefe, JO', Prestedge, J, Pollock, GL, Khan, M, Soloczynskyj, K, Fernando, J, Martin, GE, Caly, L, Barr, IG, Tran, T, Druce, J, Lim, CK, Williamson, DA, Moso, MA, Taiaroa, G, Steinig, E, Zhanduisenov, M, Butel-Simoes, G, Savic, I, Taouk, ML, Chea, S, Moselen, J, Keefe, JO', Prestedge, J, Pollock, GL, Khan, M, Soloczynskyj, K, Fernando, J, Martin, GE, Caly, L, Barr, IG, Tran, T, Druce, J, Lim, CK, and Williamson, DA
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been high uptake of rapid antigen test device use for point-of-care COVID-19 diagnosis. Individuals who are symptomatic but test negative on COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices might have a different respiratory viral infection. We aimed to detect and sequence non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses from rapid antigen test devices, which could assist in the characterisation and surveillance of circulating respiratory viruses in the community. METHODS: We applied archival clinical nose and throat swabs collected between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2022, that previously tested positive for a common respiratory virus (adenovirus, influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus [RSV], or seasonal coronavirus; 132 swabs and 140 viral targets) on PCR to two commercially available COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices, the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Self-Test. In addition, we collected 31 COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices used to test patients who were symptomatic at The Royal Melbourne Hospital emergency department in Melbourne, Australia. We extracted total nucleic acid from the device paper test strips and assessed viral recovery using multiplex real-time PCR (rtPCR) and capture-based whole genome sequencing. Sequence and genome data were analysed through custom computational pipelines, including subtyping. FINDINGS: Of the 140 respiratory viral targets from archival samples, 89 (64%) and 88 (63%) were positive on rtPCR for the relevant taxa following extraction from Panbio or Roche rapid antigen test devices, respectively. Recovery was variable across taxa: we detected influenza A in nine of 18 samples from Panbio and seven of 18 from Roche devices; parainfluenza in 11 of 20 samples from Panbio and 12 of 20 from Roche devices; human metapneumovirus in 11 of 16 from Panbio and 14 of 16 from Roche devices; seasonal coronavirus in eight of 19 from Panbio and two of 19 from Roche device
- Published
- 2024