Search

Abstract Background Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. Methods This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Discussion Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014.

Background and purpose: In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST. Patients/material and methods: MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST comprise 14 cohorts with different targeted agents and immunotherapies. Results and interpretation: PROFILER has recruited 5,991 patients in 10 years, MOST and MOST Plus 875 patients since 2014 and MEGAMOST 172 patients since 2020, and are still ongoing. We provide a description of the local, national and international implications of these initiatives, and we review the results of the sorafenib and olaparib cohorts.

Personalised medicine (PM) research programmes represent the modern paradigm of complex cross-disciplinary research, integrating innovative methodologies and technologies. Methodological research is required to ensure that these programmes generate robust and reproducible evidence. The PERMIT project developed methodological recommendations for each stage of the PM research pipeline. A common methodology was applied to develop the recommendations in collaboration with relevant stakeholders. Each stage was addressed by a dedicated working group, specializing in the subject matter. A series of scoping reviews that mapped the methods used in PM research and a gap analysis were followed by working sessions and workshops where field experts analyzed the gaps and developed recommendations. Through collaborative writing and consensus building exercises, the final recommendations were defined. They provide guidance for the design, implementation and evaluation of PM research, from patient and omics data collection and sample size calculation to the selection of the most appropriate stratification approach, including machine learning modeling, the development and application of reliable preclinical models, and the selection and implementation of the most appropriate clinical trial design. The dissemination and implementation of these recommendations by all stakeholders can improve the quality of PM research, enhance the robustness of evidence, and improve patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Discussion: Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST. Patients/material and methods: MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST comprise 14 cohorts with different targeted agents and immunotherapies. Results and interpretation: PROFILER has recruited 5,991 patients in 10 years, MOST and MOST Plus 875 patients since 2014 and MEGAMOST 172 patients since 2020, and are still ongoing. We provide a description of the local, national and international implications of these initiatives, and we review the results of the sorafenib and olaparib cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Real-world data studies usually consider biases related to measured confounders. We emulate a target trial implementing study design principles of randomized trials to observational studies; controlling biases related to selection, especially immortal time; and measured confounders. Methods This comprehensive analysis emulating a randomized clinical trial compared overall survival in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), receiving as first-line treatment, either paclitaxel alone or combined to bevacizumab. We used data from 5538 patients extracted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics–MBC cohort to emulate a target trial using advanced statistical adjustment techniques including stabilized inverse-probability weighting and G-computation, dealing with missing data with multiple imputation, and performing a quantitative bias analysis for residual bias due to unmeasured confounders. Results Emulation led to 3211 eligible patients, and overall survival estimates achieved with advanced statistical methods favored the combination therapy. Real-world effect sizes were close to that assessed in the existing E2100 randomized clinical trial (hazard ratio = 0.88, P  = .16), but the increased sample size allowed to achieve a higher level of precision in real-world estimates (ie, reduced confidence intervals). Quantitative bias analysis confirmed the robustness of the results with respect to potential unmeasured confounding. Conclusion Target trial emulation with advanced statistical adjustment techniques is a promising approach to investigate long-term impact of innovative therapies in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics–MBC cohort while minimizing biases and provides opportunities for comparative efficacy through the synthetic control arms provided. Database registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03275311. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Metastatic endocrine-resistant breast cancer (MBC) is a disease with poor prognosis and few treatment options. Low lymphocyte count is associated with limited overall survival. In a prospective cohort of lymphopenic patients with HER-2 negative MBC, we assessed the clinical and biological impact of pembrolizumab combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide. Experimental Design: This multicenter Phase II study evaluated the safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab (intravenous (IV), 200mg, every 3 weeks) combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide (50mg/day, per os) in lymphopenic adult patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated by at least one line of chemotherapy in this setting according to a Simon's minimax two-stage design. Blood and tumor samples were collected to assess the impact of the combined treatment on circulating immune cells and the tumor immune microenvironment through multiparametric flow cytometry and multiplex immunofluorescence analyses. Primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at 6 months of treatment (CBR-6M). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Two out of the twenty treated patients presented clinical benefit (one Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB)-high patient with complete response (CR) and one patient with objective response (OR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST V1.1) associated with a strong increase of cytokine-producing and proliferating CD4+ T cells and higher CD8+ T cells to macrophage ratios in the tumor. This impact on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell polyfunctionality was still observed more than one year for the patient with CR. A decreased in their absolute number of CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells was observed in other patients. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide was well tolerated, and displayed limited anti-tumoral activity in lymphopenic MBC. Correlative translational data of our trial advocates for additional studies with other chemotherapy combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Metastatic endocrine-resistant breast cancer (MBC) is a disease with poor prognosis and few treatment options. Low lymphocyte count is associated with limited overall survival. In a prospective cohort of lymphopenic patients with HER-2 negative MBC, we assessed the clinical and biological impact of pembrolizumab combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide., Experimental Design: This multicenter Phase II study evaluated the safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab (intravenous (IV), 200mg, every 3 weeks) combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide (50mg/day, per os) in lymphopenic adult patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated by at least one line of chemotherapy in this setting according to a Simon's minimax two-stage design. Blood and tumor samples were collected to assess the impact of the combined treatment on circulating immune cells and the tumor immune microenvironment through multiparametric flow cytometry and multiplex immunofluorescence analyses. Primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at 6 months of treatment (CBR-6M). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Two out of the twenty treated patients presented clinical benefit (one Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB)-high patient with complete response (CR) and one patient with objective response (OR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST V1.1) associated with a strong increase of cytokine-producing and proliferating CD4 + T cells and higher CD8 + T cells to macrophage ratios in the tumor. This impact on CD4 + and CD8 + T cell polyfunctionality was still observed more than one year for the patient with CR. A decreased in their absolute number of CD4 + and CD8 + memory T cells was observed in other patients., Conclusion: Pembrolizumab combined with metronomic cyclophosphamide was well tolerated, and displayed limited anti-tumoral activity in lymphopenic MBC. Correlative translational data of our trial advocates for additional studies with other chemotherapy combinations., Competing Interests: Benoîte Mery and Christine Ménétrier-Caux are co-first authors for this study. Bertrand Dubois and Olivier Trédan are co-last authors for this study. Dr Pierre-Etienne Heudel reports personal fees, non-financial support from PFIZER, GILEAD, NOVARTIS, SEAGEN, LILLY; personal fees from MSD, during the conduct of the study. Professor Isabelle Ray-Coquard reports grants, personal fees from MSD and BMS; personal fees from Astra ZENECA, GSK, CLOVIS, ROCHE, DAICHI, MERSANA, Immunogen, Pharmamar, during the conduct of the study. Dr Thomas Bachelot reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Pfizer; grants, personal fees from SeaGen, outside the submitted work. Dr Paule Augereau reports personal fees, non-financial support from AstraZeneca, GSK, Seagen; personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr David Perol reports personal fees, travel funding from ROCHE, personal fees from TAKEDA, ASTRAZENECA, BAYER, BOEHRINGHER-INGELHEIM, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB, DAIICHI-SANKYO, ELI-LILLY, IPSEN, NOVARTIS, MERCK SHARP AND DOHME, JANSSEN, PFIZER, outside the submitted work. Dr Olivier Trédan reports grants, personal fees from MSD, during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Mery et al.)

Background: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) is a non-malignant but locally aggressive tumour driven by overexpression of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1). CSF1R inhibitors are potential therapeutic strategies for patients not amenable to surgery. We report here the long-term outcome of nilotinib in patients with advanced D-TGCT treated within a phase II prospective international study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01261429)., Methods: Patients were enrolled between December 2010-September 2012 at 11 cancer centres. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed D-TGCT, not amenable to surgery. Patients received nilotinib until evidence of progression, toxicity or a maximum of one year. Long-term data were retrospectively collected after the completion of the phase II trial. Patients with nilotinib treatment ≥12 weeks and follow-up ≥12 months were included for long-term analysis., Results: Forty-eight of 56 enrolled patients were included. Median treatment duration was 11 months; 31 (65%) patients completed the treatment protocol. After 102 months of follow-up (median; range 12-129), 25 patients (52%) had progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 77 months. The five-year PFS rate was 53%. Fifteen patients (n = 15/46; 33%) experienced clinical worsening after 11 months (median). Twenty-seven patients (58%) received additional treatment, after which eleven patients (n = 11/27; 41%) had a second relapse. Nine patients required a subsequent treatment, primarily other CSF1R inhibitors (n = 6/9; 67%). No unfavourable long-term effects were observed., Conclusion: This long-term analysis of nilotinib for advanced D-TGCT showed that about half of the patients had progression and underwent additional treatment after 8.5 years follow-up. Contrarily, several patients had ongoing disease control after limited treatment duration, demonstrating the mixed effect of nilotinib., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Peter Grimison, Christine Chevreau, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Axel Le Cesne, Virginia Ferraresi, Antoine Italiano, Florence Duffaud, Nicolas Penel, Severine Metzger, Sylvia Chabaud, Lizz van der Heijden, Jean-Yves Blay, Hans Gelderblom declare no conflict of interest within the present study. Silvia Stacchiotti has no conflict of interest to declare within the present study; she reports institutional research funding from Amgen Dompe, Advenchen, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Deciphera, Eli Lilly, Epizyme, Daiichi Sankyo Pharma, GSK, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, SpringWorks, and Hutchinson MediPharma International Inc; honoraria from Bayer, Deciphera, Eli Lilly, Daiichi, Maxivax, and Novartis; invited speaker fees/meeting support from GSK and PharmaMar; fees for expert testimony from Bavarian Nordic and Epizyme; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Bayer, Deciphera, Eli Lilly, Daiichi, Maxivax, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Geert Spierenburg and Michiel van de Sande report institutional research funding from Daichii-Sankyo outside the submitted work. David Perol received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringher-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Takeda., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)