Search

Insertion of tubes in an office setting and automated tube insertion devices were identified as high-priority quality improvement opportunities during the update process for the 2013 clinical practice guideline on tympanostomy tubes from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The guideline update group, however, decided to avoid any recommendations on these topics, based on limited research evidence, and instead selected a subset of group members to author this state of the art review, with the goal of facilitating informed decisions in clinical practice.PubMed through September 2021, Google search of device manufacturer websites, and SmartTots research website for articles on anesthesia neurotoxicity.A state of the art review format emphasizing evidence from the past 5 years, with manual cross-checks of reference lists of identified articles for additional relevant studies.The existing literature is too sparse to make recommendations about procedure setting and optimal technique or assess long-term outcomes. The role of automated devices is uncertain, given the increased equipment cost and limited information on characteristics of the proprietary preloaded tubes, including intubation duration and rates of otorrhea, obstruction, medialization, granulation tissue, and persistent perforation.Whether to undertake in-office tube insertion in awake children should be based on clinician experience, clinician ability to interact with and reassure caregivers, shared decisions with caregivers, and judgment regarding the level of cooperation (or lack thereof) to be expected from a given child. Clinicians should remain alert to new research and expect increasing queries from patients and families.

Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is not well-characterized in infants. Sex- and race/ethnicity-based differences have been described in older children with PVFM. This study's objectives are to characterize demographic and clinical characteristics of infants diagnosed with PVFM and investigate sex- and race-specific differences in presentation.We retrospectively reviewed infants ≤1 year of age diagnosed with PVFM at our institution from 2009 to 2019. Patient demographics, symptoms, and findings on flexible laryngoscopy are described. Sex- and race/ethnicity-based differences were assessed using Fisher's exact test analyses.We identified 22 infants who were diagnosed with PVFM. The average age (range) at diagnosis was 5.7 (0.25-12.0) months, and 45.5% were male. The majority (54.6%) of patients identified as non-Hispanic White. Common comorbidities included GERD (45.5%) and chronic rhinitis (13.6%). Stridor was the only presenting symptom in the majority of patients (95.4%). The most common episode triggers were crying (45.5%), feeding (27.3%), and gastric reflux (9.1%). On flexible laryngoscopy, PVFM was observed in 95.5% of patients. A third of patients (31.8%) were misdiagnosed as having reactive airway disease or laryngomalacia prior to evaluation by otolaryngology. No sex- and race/ethnicity-based differences in presentation were identified.We present the largest case series of PVFM in infants. We found sparse clinical signs/symptoms other than stridor and a high incidence of misdiagnosis, which supports the importance of objective flexible laryngoscopy for the evaluation of stridor in this age group. Previously reported sex- and race/ethnicity-based differences in presentation of PVFM were not observed in this cohort of infants.

This executive summary of the guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for patient selection and surgical indications for managing tympanostomy tubes in children. The summary and guideline are intended for any clinician involved in managing children aged 6 months to 12 years with tympanostomy tubes or children being considered for tympanostomy tubes in any care setting as an intervention for otitis media of any type. The target audience includes specialists, primary care clinicians, and allied health professionals.The purpose of this executive summary is to provide a succinct overview for clinicians of the key action statements (recommendations), summary tables, and patient decision aids from the update of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline: Tympanostomy Tubes in Children (Update)." The new guideline updates recommendations in the prior guideline from 2013 and provides clinicians with trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations on patient selection and surgical indications for managing tympanostomy tubes in children. This summary is not intended to substitute for the full guideline, and clinicians are encouraged to read the full guideline before implementing the recommended actions.The guideline on which this summary is based was developed using methods outlined in the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: A Quality-Driven Approach for Translating Evidence Into Action," which were followed explicitly. The guideline update group represented the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, pediatrics, audiology, anesthesiology, family medicine, advanced practice nursing, speech-language pathology, and consumer advocacy.

Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is the most common ambulatory surgery performed on children in the United States. Tympanostomy tubes are most often inserted because of persistent middle ear fluid, frequent ear infections, or ear infections that persist after antibiotic therapy. All these conditions are encompassed by the termThe purpose of this clinical practice guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2013 and to provide clinicians with trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations on patient selection and surgical indications for managing tympanostomy tubes in children. In planning the content of the updated guideline, the guideline update group (GUG) affirmed and included all the original key action statements (KASs), based on external review and GUG assessment of the original recommendations. The guideline update was supplemented with new research evidence and expanded profiles that addressed quality improvement and implementation issues. The group also discussed and prioritized the need for new recommendations based on gaps in the initial guideline or new evidence that would warrant and support KASs. The GUG further sought to bring greater coherence to the guideline recommendations by displaying relationships in a new flowchart to facilitate clinical decision making. Last, knowledge gaps were identified to guide future research.In developing this update, the methods outlined in the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: A Quality-Driven Approach for Translating Evidence Into Action" were followed explicitly. The GUG was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, pediatrics, audiology, anesthesiology, family medicine, advanced practice nursing, speech-language pathology, and consumer advocacy.The GUG made