Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected breast cancer patients by causing delays in diagnosis and treatment processes. This study aims to investigate the effects of the pandemic on the treatment process and short-term outcomes of breast cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study included 414 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at the Inonu University General Surgery Clinic between March 2018 and June 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: pre-pandemic (Pre-COVID-19; n = 240) and pandemic (COVID-19 Era; n = 174) periods. The groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, and histopathological variables. Results: During the pandemic period, the use of neoadjuvant therapy (from 21.3% to 34.5%) and preoperative PET-CT imaging (from 80.4% to 90.8%) rates increased, while breast-conserving surgery (from 27.9% to 19.0%) and the presence of comorbid diseases (from 45.0% to 29.9%) decreased significantly. While there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the time from diagnosis to surgery (25 vs. 28.5 days, p = 0.121), the time to report the pathology result after surgery decreased during the pandemic period (28 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of immunohistochemical (ER, PR, Ki-67, E-cadherin, and c-erbB2), histopathological (lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, comedo necrosis, modified Bloom–Richardson grade, and TNM classification), and clinical (recurrence, metastasis, and axillary lymph node metastasis) features of the tumor. The mortality rate in the Pre-COVID-19 group (7.1%) was significantly higher than in the COVID-19 Era group (2.3%) (p = 0.049). Finally, in terms of the survival analysis, a statistically significant difference was found between the Pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 Era groups in terms of the mean follow-up duration of the patients (p = 0.044). Conclusions: The study results show that the use of neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery preference increased in breast cancer treatment during the pandemic period, but there was no significant change in tumor biology and histopathological features. Breast-conserving surgery rates, comorbidity rates, and pathology reporting times were significantly shortened. Long-term follow-up periods of 3 and 5 years are needed to see the impact of the pandemic on breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gallbladder cancers are relatively rare malignancies. While early-stage cases can achieve good outcomes with cholecystectomy, the 5-year survival rate in advanced stages is extremely low. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive liver disease characterized by inflammation of the bile ducts and is associated with an increased risk of gallbladder cancers. A 32-year-old male patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis was referred for liver transplantation. Imaging revealed a suspicious polypoid lesion, 2.5 cm in diameter, in the gallbladder. With a Meld score of 30, the patient was placed on the transplant waiting list. After waiting period of one month a deceased donor liver transplant was performed. The hepatectomy specimen revealed T2 gallbladder cancer. No recurrence or metastasis was detected during 1 year of follow-up. There is no consensus on the management of suspicious gallbladder lesions in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Cholecystectomy in these patients carries a risk of decompensation in cirrhosis. Considering the decompensated liver cirrhosis and high Meld score, we preferred transplantation over cholecystectomy. Therefore, liver transplantation can be considered as primary treatment option instead of cholecystectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and laboratory changes of ischemia and reperfusion injury in the remnant livers of donors with and without Pringle maneuver. Furthermore, we evaluated the recipients who have been transplanted with liver grafts from these donors. Methods and Materials: A total of 108 patients (54 living liver donors and 54 liver recipients) who underwent donor hepatectomy and recipients who living donor liver transplantation, were included in this randomized double-blind study between February 2021 and June 2021. The donors were divided into two groups: Pringle maneuver applied (n = 27) and Pringle maneuver not applied (n = 27). Similarly, recipients with implanted liver obtained from these donors were divided into two groups as the Pringle maneuver was performed (n = 27) and not performed (n = 27). Blood samples from donors and recipients were obtained on pre-operative, post-operative 0 h day (day of surgery), post-operative 1st day, post-operative 2nd day, post-operative 3rd day, post-operative 4th day, post-operative 5th day, and liver tissue was taken from the graft during the back table procedures. Liver function tests and complete blood count, coagulation tests, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and β-galactosidase measurements, and histopathological findings were examined. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the parameters of biochemical analyses for ischemia-reperfusion injury at all periods in the donors with and without the Pringle maneuver. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between in the recipients in who received liver grafts harvested with and without the Pringle maneuver. There was no statistically significant difference between the two recipient groups in terms of perioperative bleeding and early bile duct complications (p = 0.685). In the histopathological examinations, hepatocyte damage was significantly higher in the Pringle maneuver group (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Although the histological scoring of hepatocyte damage was found to be higher in the Pringle maneuver group, the Pringle maneuver did not augment ischemia-reperfusion injury in donors and recipients that was evaluated by clinical and laboratory analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]