Search

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In these settings, accurate patient prognostication is both difficult and essential for high-quality patient care. With the ultimate goal of enhancing TBI triage in LMICs, we aim to develop the first deep learning model to predict outcomes after TBI and compare its performance with that of less complex algorithms.TBI patients' data were prospectively collected in Kampala, Uganda, from 2016 to 2020. To predict good versus poor outcome at hospital discharge, we created deep neural network, shallow neural network, and elastic-net regularized logistic regression models. Predictors included 13 easily acquirable clinical variables. We assessed model performance with 5-fold cross-validation to calculate areas under both the receiver operating characteristic curve and precision-recall curve (AUPRC), in addition to standardized partial AUPRC to focus on comparisons at clinically relevant operating points.We included 2164 patients for model training, of which 12% had poor outcomes. The deep neural network performed best as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.941) and standardized partial AUPRC in region maximizing recall (0.291), whereas the shallow neural network was best by the area under the precision-recall curve (0.770). In several other comparisons, the elastic-net regularized logistic regression was noninferior to the neural networks.We present the first use of deep learning for TBI prognostication, with an emphasis on LMICs, where there is great need for decision support to allocate limited resources. Optimal algorithm selection depends on the specific clinical setting; deep learning is not a panacea, though it may have a role in these efforts.

Hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) could benefit from decision support technologies to reduce time to triage, diagnosis, and surgery for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) and International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) are robust examples of TBI prognostic models, although they have yet to be validated in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Moreover, machine learning and improved data quality in LMICs provide an opportunity to develop context-specific, and potentially more accurate, prognostic models. We aim to externally validate CRASH and IMPACT on our TBI registry and compare their performances to that of the locally derived model (from the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center [KCMC]). We developed a machine learning-based prognostic model from a TBI registry collected at a regional referral hospital in Moshi, Tanzania. We also used the core CRASH and IMPACT online risk calculators to generate risk scores for each patient. We compared the discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration before and after Platt scaling (Brier, Hosmer-Lemeshow Test, and calibration plots) for CRASH, IMPACT, and the KCMC model. The outcome of interest was unfavorable in-hospital outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1-3. There were 2972 patients included in the TBI registry, of whom 11% had an unfavorable outcome. The AUCs for the KCMC model, CRASH, and IMPACT were 0.919, 0.876, and 0.821, respectively. Prior to Platt scaling, CRASH was the best calibrated model (χ