Search

Purpose: To assess radiomics and deep learning (DL) methods in identifying symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease (CAD) from carotid CT angiography (CTA) images. We further compare the performance of these novel methods to the conventional calcium score., Methods: Carotid CT angiography (CTA) images from symptomatic patients (ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack within the last 3 months) and asymptomatic patients were analysed. Carotid arteries were classified into culprit, non-culprit and asymptomatic. The calcium score was assessed using the Agatston method. 93 radiomic features were extracted from regions-of-interest drawn on 14 consecutive CTA slices. For DL, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with and without transfer learning were trained directly on CTA slices. Predictive performance was assessed over 5-fold cross validated AUC scores. SHAP and GRAD-CAM algorithms were used for explainability., Results: 132 carotid arteries were analysed (41 culprit, 41 non-culprit, and 50 asymptomatic). For asymptomatic vs symptomatic arteries, radiomics attained a mean AUC of 0.96(± 0.02), followed by DL 0.86(± 0.06) and then calcium 0.79(± 0.08). For culprit vs non-culprit arteries, radiomics achieved a mean AUC of 0.75(± 0.09), followed by DL 0.67(± 0.10) and then calcium 0.60(± 0.02). For multi-class classification, the mean AUCs were 0.95(± 0.07), 0.79(± 0.05), and 0.71(± 0.07) for radiomics, DL and calcium, respectively. Explainability revealed consistent patterns in the most important radiomic features., Conclusions: Our study highlights the potential of novel image analysis techniques in extracting quantitative information beyond calcification in the identification of CAD. Though further work is required, the transition of these novel techniques into clinical practice may eventually facilitate better stroke risk stratification., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Aims: The use of statin therapy is deemed to be controversial by mainstream media. Patients increasingly source medical information from the internet, and the use of statins is no exception. This study aims to determine the quality and educational content of statin-focused information on the internet and YouTube., Methods and Results: 'Statin' was searched on Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and YouTube. The first 50 results obtained from each search engine and the first 20 YouTube videos were screened by two assessors. Websites were assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score, University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Evaluation Checklist, and a customized scoring system evaluating statin-focused content for quality. Videos were scored using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Global Quality Score (GQS), and the customized scoring system. Websites scored a median FRE score of 57.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 52.1-62.3], median Michigan score of 36 (IQR 32-41.5), and median content score of 5 (IQR 3.75-7). Good interobserver agreement was demonstrated [Michigan score interobserver coefficient correlation (ICC) = 0.968; content score ICC = 0.944]. Videos scored a median JAMA score of 2, median GQS score of 2.5, and median content score of 2.5. Good interobserver agreement was demonstrated (JAMA ICC = 0.746; GQS ICC = 0.874; content score ICC = 0.946)., Conclusion: Quality and readability of statin-focused online information are poor. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the limitations of the current available sources and design online resources that are accurate and patient-friendly., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Over the last decade, patients have displayed a greater tendency to search for online information related to their health before seeking advice from a clinician. This study aims to determine the current quality and educational content of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs)., Methods: In March 2022, the 3 most popular search engines by market shares (Google, Yahoo!, and Bing) and the video platform YouTube were interrogated for the term "abdominal aortic aneurysm". Validated scoring tools were used to assess quality and readability of the top 50 results for each search engine and to evaluate reliability and educational quality of the first 20 YouTube videos returned by the search. A custom-made scoring system was used to assess content., Results: Forty-five unique websites were analysed, 29% of which held Health on the Net certification. Median Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (interquartile range [IQR]) was 56.4 (50.4-62.75), with the average website falling under the "difficult to read" category. Median Michigan score (IQR) was 38.5 (32-43.5), reflecting "weak" quality. Websites with a higher content-specific score had a significantly higher median Michigan score. Sixty percent of websites discussed benefits and risks related to AAA treatment, and only 31% discussed advantages and disadvantages of open versus endovascular treatment. No websites mentioned the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm surgery. Eight unique YouTube videos were assessed. Median Journal of the American Medical Association score (IQR) was 2 (2-2.25). Median Global Quality Score score (IQR) was 3 (2-4). Median content score was 1 (0-2)., Conclusions: The current average online information on AAA is of 'weak' quality and 'difficult' (i.e., above the standard reading ability of a 13- to 15-year-old) readability. Healthcare providers should focus on the provision of better AAA-focused patient information (e.g., appropriately referenced, regularly reviewed, and limiting advertisements where possible). The involvement of patient advisory groups during resource development is highly recommended., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at a significant risk of cardiovascular events, similar to that of patients who have already experienced a major cardiac event. The European Society for Vascular Society AAA guidelines suggest that antiplatelet therapy and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) should be considered in all patients with AAA. This study explores the overall prevalence and intensity of antithrombotic therapy and LLT, and lipid profile monitoring in a single center AAA surveillance cohort alongside any sex differences., Methods: This was a retrospective, single center, cross-sectional study of 614 patients enrolled in the AAA surveillance program of a tertiary vascular surgery unit. All patients undergoing at least 1 surveillance scan from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, were assessed. Electronic hospital records linked to real-time primary care records were interrogated for data on demographics, comorbidities, antiplatelet and LLT prescriptions, and serum cholesterol laboratory results. An analysis of covariance test was used to account for the effects of confounding comorbidities., Results: Twenty-one percent of patients were not on antithrombotic therapy, and 20% of patients were not on LLT which reflects a group of patients receiving sub-optimal clinical care. In total, 47% of the cohort were on low/moderate intensity statin therapy which reflects a group of patients where care can be improved upon. Female sex was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of being prescribed LLT (P = 0.008, eta squared (η p 2 ) = 0.012, small effect size) but not antithrombotic therapy (P = 0.202). Fewer women underwent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) monitoring (mean difference 9%, P = 0.040) and achieved the European Society of Cardiology-European Atherosclerosis Society- LDL-C target of <1.4 mmol/L (mean difference 9%, P = 0.040)., Conclusions: Overall, there is room for improvement in these aspects of cardiovascular risk prevention for both sexes. Sex differences in the prescription of LLT, the prevalence of lipid profile monitoring, and likelihood of achieving LDL-C targets exist among patients with AAA, with a lower prevalence in women., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Duplex ultrasound surveillance (DUS) is commonly used following infrainguinal vein bypass. The role of DUS following endovascular revascularisation is as yet unclear. This study focuses on the role of DUS in a contemporary group of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass or stent insertion., Methods: All patients undergoing either an infrainguinal vein graft bypass or stent insertion into the femoro-popliteal segment (November 2014 - January 2017) were identified. Patients were followed up for 2 years. Data on entry into DUS, pre-operative characteristics, adjunctive pharmacotherapy and reintervention were collated. The primary outcomes were major lower limb amputation and mortality at 2 years post revascularisation., Results: One hundred and thirty-five patients underwent infrainguinal vein bypass and 100 patients underwent stent insertion. 107 patients in the bypass cohort and 58 patients in the stent cohort entered DUS. For the bypass cohort, entering DUS was associated with a lower mortality rate ( P = .003) but was not associated with an improvement in amputation rates. The odds ratio of major amputation or mortality was greater in the no surveillance group (4.58, 95% CI: 1.855 - 11.364). In the stent cohort, DUS was not associated with a significant improvement in either major amputation or death (odds ratio 2.13 (95% CI 0.903 - 5.051; P = .081)., Conclusion: DUS was associated with improved survival rates in patients undergoing lower limb bypass but had no benefit in those patients undergoing stent insertion. The role of DUS following stent insertion in the femoropopliteal segment needs to be better defined.

Background: Frailty in vascular surgery patients is increasingly recognized as a marker of poor outcome. This provides particular challenges for patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease who require surgical revascularization. This study aimed to assess the impact of frailty on short- and long-term outcome in this specific patient group using a specialty specific frailty score., Methods: Patients undergoing open surgical revascularization for chronic limb ischemia (January 2015-December 2016) were assessed. Demographics, mode of admission, diagnosis, and site of surgery were recorded alongside a variety of frailty-specific characteristics. We calculated the previously validated Addenbrookes Vascular Frailty Score (AVFS) and Long AVFS (LAVFS). Primary outcome was 3-year mortality., Results: Two hundred and sixty-one patients (75% men, median age 69 years) were studied. The median length of stay was 6 days with a 3-year mortality of 23%. The predictive power of vascular frailty scores showed that for 3-year mortality, area under the receiver operator curve values (AUROC) were specific for both the AVFS score (AUROC: 0.724, 95% CI: 0.654-0.794) and LAVFS Score (AUROC: 0.741, 95%CI: 0.670-0.813). Furthermore, the cumulative AVFS and LAVFS scores both predicted mortality over the follow-up period (P=0.0001) with increased mortality among patients with higher scores., Conclusions: Incremental worsening of frailty, determined using a specialty specific frailty score, predicts mortality risk in patients undergoing lower limb surgical revascularization.

Objective: The optimal timing and modality of surveillance after endovascular intervention for peripheral arterial disease is controversial, and no randomized trial to assess the value of peripheral endovascular intervention has ever been performed. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the practice of surveillance after peripheral endovascular intervention in randomized trials., Methods: We used the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and WHO trial registry databases in this systematic review of the literature to capture surveillance strategies used in randomized trials comparing endovascular interventions. Surveillance protocols were assessed for completeness, modalities used, duration, and intensity., Results: Ninety-six different surveillance protocols were reported in 103 trials comparing endovascular interventions. Protocol specification was incomplete in 32% of trials. The majority of trials used multiple surveillance modalities (mean of 3.46 modalities), most commonly clinical examination (96%), ankle-brachial index (80%), duplex ultrasound examination (75%), and digital subtraction angiography (51%). Trials involving infrapopliteal lesions used more angiographic surveillance than trials with femoropopliteal lesions (P = .006). The median number of surveillance visits in the first 12 months after intervention was three and the mean surveillance duration was 21 months. Trials treating infrapopliteal vessels had a higher surveillance intensity compared with those treating femoropopliteal lesions in the first 12 months after endovascular intervention (mean 5 vs 3 surveillance visits; P = .017). Trials with drug-eluting devices had longer surveillance duration compared with those without (mean 26 vs 19 months; P = .020)., Conclusions: There is a high level of variation in the modality, duration, and intensity of surveillance protocols used in randomized trials comparing different types of peripheral endovascular arterial intervention. Further research is required to determine the value and impact of postprocedural surveillance on patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Optical molecular imaging using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) light is an emerging high-resolution imaging approach to image a wide range of molecular and cellular species in vivo. Imaging using NIR wavelengths (650-900 nm) enables deeper photon penetration into tissue and reduced tissue autofluorescence, resulting in higher sensitivity to detect exogenously administered NIR fluorophores (injectable molecular imaging agents). Greater imaging depth of several centimeters is further achievable in the NIR window as blood absorption is as an order of magnitude lower than in the visible range. Furthermore, as optical imaging is routinely performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (e.g., optical coherence tomography), intravascular NIRF offers a promising translational approach for clinical coronary and peripheral arterial imaging. To this point, the first human intravascular NIRF imaging study recently demonstrated the ability to detect NIR autofluorescence in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. This study provides a foundation for targeted intravascular NIRF molecular imaging studies in coronary patients. In this chapter, we detail system engineering, imaging agents and translational applications of intravascular NIRF molecular imaging., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)