Search

This study aimed to determine whether the use of vaginal Endometrin plus intramuscular progesterone on every third day (VIM) in programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to daily intramuscular progesterone (IM). FET data from a single program were collected between November 2018 and December 2021. A total of 903 FETs were analyzed, including 504 FETs in the IM group, and 399 FETs in the VIM group. Inclusion criteria were women undergoing FETs with either 50 mg daily IM progesterone only (control) or 200 mg Endometrin twice daily plus 50 mg IM progesterone on every third day, with the transfer of a single day 5 or 6 frozen embryo. There were no significant differences in patient age at time of FETs, BMI, endometrial thickness, blastocyst quality, or infertility diagnosis between the groups. The VIM had significantly lower positive hCG and clinical pregnancy rates compared to the IM (60.2% vs 72.0% and 40.6% vs 56.7%, respectively, P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001). The live birth rate was 36.1% in the VIM, compared to 49.4% in the IM (P < 0.0001). These findings also remained significant when excluding FETs with donor egg (35.9% vs 50.1%, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrated that VIM in FET cycles yields significantly lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to IM along. IM progesterone alone may be preferable to combined Endometrin and IM progesterone in patients undergoing programmed frozen embryo transfers., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation.)

Background: The purpose of the current study was to determine the utility of early follicular phase follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) testing in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)., Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients from 2012 to 2015 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Included subjects had a normal anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) of 1 to 9 ng/ml and antral follicle count (AFC) of 10 to 29. Patients were stratified by FSH level when associated estradiol was less than 50 ng/ml . In total, 225 patients were categorized into three groups: high FSH (FSH ≥10 IU/L ; n= 36), normal FSH (>5 IU/L and <10 IU/L ; n=170), and low FSH (FSH ≤5 IU/L ; n= 19). ANOVA and multiple logistic regression were used for statistical comparisons and for evaluation of the relationships between variables; significance level was set at <0.05., Results: There were no significant differences in demographics, IVF cycle type, or peak estradiol level between the groups. Patients with a high basal FSH level had a similar clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to controls and patients with low FSH. High FSH level was associated with decreased follicular development (17 versus 22; p<0.01), oocyte yield (15 versus 18; p=0.02), and embryo yield (8 versus 10; p=0.04) despite higher total doses of gonadotropins., Conclusion: Patients with normal AMH and AFC levels could be further stratified into lower responders and starting doses of medications can be adjusted based on high basal FSH levels. Therefore, it is suggested to counsel patients on pregnancy outcomes which seem to be quite similar regardless of the FSH level., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright© 2023, Avicenna Research Institute.)

Study Question: Do women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have a greater risk of adverse pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, cesarean section, placental abnormalities) and neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, small for gestational age, prolonged delivery hospitalization) compared to women without a PCOS diagnosis and does this risk vary by BMI, subfertility and fertility treatment utilization?, Summary Answer: Deliveries to women with a history of PCOS were at greater risk of complications associated with cardiometabolic function, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, as well as preterm birth and prolonged length of delivery hospitalization., What Is Known Already: Prior research has suggested that women with PCOS may be at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, findings have been inconsistent possibly due to lack of consistent adjustment for confounding factors, small samples size and other sources of bias., Study Design, Size, Duration: Massachusetts deliveries among women ≥18 years old during 2013-2017 from state vital records linked to hospital discharges, observational stays and emergency department visits were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) and the Massachusetts All-Payers Claims Database (APCD)., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: PCOS was identified by ICD9 and ICD10 codes in APCD prior to index delivery. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CI for pregnancy and delivery complications were modeled using generalized estimating equations with a log link and a Poisson distribution to take multiple cycles into account and were adjusted a priori for maternal age, BMI, race/ethnicity, education, plurality, birth year, chronic hypertension and chronic diabetes. Tests for homogeneity investigated differences between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI categories (<30, ≥30, <25 and ≥25 kg/m2) and between non-infertile deliveries and deliveries that used ART or had a history of subfertility (defined by birth certificates, SART CORS records, APCD or hospital records)., Main Results and the Role of Chance: Among 91 825 deliveries, 3.9% had a history of PCOS. Women with a history of PCOS had a 51% greater risk of gestational diabetes (CI: 1.38-1.65) and a 25% greater risk of preeclampsia (CI: 1.15-1.35) compared to women without a diagnosis of PCOS. Neonates born to women with a history of PCOS were more likely to be born preterm (RR: 1.17, CI: 1.06-1.29) and more likely to have a prolonged delivery hospitalization after additionally adjusting for gestational age (RR: 1.23, CI: 1.09-1.40) compared to those of women without a diagnosis of PCOS. The risk for gestational diabetes for women with PCOS was greater among women with a pre-pregnancy BMI <30 kg/m2., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: PCOS was defined by ICD documentation prior to delivery so there may be women with undiagnosed PCOS or PCOS diagnosed after delivery included in the unexposed group. The study population is limited to deliveries within Massachusetts among most private insurance payers and inpatient or observational hospitalization in Massachusetts during the follow-up window, therefore there may be diagnoses and or deliveries outside of the state or outside of our sample that were not captured., Wider Implications of the Findings: In this population-based study, women with a history of PCOS were at greater risk of pregnancy complications associated with cardiometabolic function and preterm birth. Obstetricians should be aware of patients' PCOS status and closely monitor for potential pregnancy complications to improve maternal and infant perinatal health outcomes., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This work was supported by the NIH (R01HD067270). S.A.M. receives grant funding from NIH, AbbVie and the Marriot Family Foundation; payment/honoraria from the University of British Columbia, World Endometriosis Research Foundation and Huilun Shanghai; travel support for attending meetings for ESHRE 2019, IASP 2019, National Endometriosis Network UK meeting 2019; SRI 2022, ESHRE 2022; participates on the data safety monitoring board/advisory board for AbbVie, Roche, Frontiers in Reproductive Health; and has a leadership role in the Society for Women's Health Research, World Endometriosis Research Foundation, World Endometriosis Society, American Society for Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE. The other authors have no conflicts of interest., Trial Registration Number: N/A., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Numerous studies have demonstrated that assisted reproductive technology (ART: defined here as including only in vitro fertilization and related technologies) is associated with increased adverse pregnancy, neonatal, and childhood developmental outcomes, even in singletons. The comparison group for many had often been a fertile population that conceived without assistance. The Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) was initiated to define a subfertile population with which to compare ART outcomes. Over more than 10 years, we have used the MOSART database to study pregnancy abnormalities and delivery complications but also to evaluate ongoing health of women, infants, and children. This article will review studies from MOSART in the context of how they compare with those of other investigations. We will present MOSART studies that identified the influence of ART and subfertility/infertility on adverse pregnancy (pregnancy hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes, placental abnormality) and delivery (preterm birth, low birthweight) outcomes as well as on maternal and child hospitalizations. We will provide evidence that although subfertility/infertility increases the risk of adverse outcomes, there is additional risk associated with the use of ART. Studies exploring the contribution of placental abnormalities as one factor adding to this increased ART-associated risk will be described., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: All authors’ institutions received support and travel funds from one or both grants. There are no other conflicts of interest.

Background: Endometriosis and uterine fibroids are common gynecologic conditions associated with a greater risk for infertility. Previous research has suggested that these conditions are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, potentially because of increased utilization of fertility treatments., Objective: Our objective was to investigate whether women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids had a greater risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and whether this risk varied by infertility history and fertility treatment utilization., Study Design: Deliveries (2013-2017) recorded in Massachusetts' vital records were linked to assisted reproductive technology data, hospital stays, and all-payer claims database. We identified endometriosis and fibroids diagnoses via the all-payer claims database before index delivery. Adjusted relative risks for pregnancy complications were modeled using generalized estimating equations with a log link and Poisson distribution. The influence of subfertility or infertility and assisted reproductive technology was also investigated., Results: Among 91,825 deliveries, 1560 women had endometriosis and 4212 had fibroids. Approximately 30% of women with endometriosis and 26% of women with fibroids experienced subfertility or infertility without utilizing assisted reproductive technology, and 34% of women with endometriosis and 21% of women with fibroids utilized assisted reproductive technology for the index delivery. Women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids were at a greater risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia (endometriosis relative risk, 1.17; fibroids relative risk, 1.08), placental abnormalities (endometriosis relative risk, 1.65; fibroids relative risk, 1.38), and cesarean delivery (endometriosis relative risk, 1.22; fibroids relative risk, 1.17) than women with no history of those conditions. Neonates born to women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids were also at a greater risk for preterm birth (endometriosis relative risk, 1.24; fibroids relative risk, 1.17). Associations between fibroids and low birthweight varied by fertility status or assisted reproductive technology (P homogeneity=.01) and were stronger among noninfertile women., Conclusion: Endometriosis or fibroids increased the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, possibly warranting differential screening or treatment., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate hospitalizations up to 8 years after live birth among women who used assisted reproductive technology (ART) or who were subfertile compared with women who conceived naturally., Design: Retrospective cohort., Setting: Deliveries among privately insured women aged ≥18 years between 2004 and 2017 from Massachusetts state vital records were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System and hospital observational/inpatient stays., Patient(s): We compared patients with ART, medically assisted reproduction (MAR), and unassisted subfertile (USF) delivery with those with fertile delivery., Intervention(s): NA., Main Outcome Measure(s): Postdelivery hospitalization information was derived from the International Classification of Diseases codes for discharges and combined by type. The relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hospitalization for up to the first 8 years postdelivery were modeled., Result(s): Among 492,515 deliveries, 5.6% used ART, 1.6% used MAR, and 1.8% were USF. Compared with fertile deliveries, deliveries that used ART or MAR or were USF were more likely to have hospital utilization (inpatient or observational stay) for any reason for up to 8 years of follow-up (USF, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.25]; MAR, aRR, 1.20 [1.13-1.27]; and ART, aRR, 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Assisted reproductive technology deliveries had an increased risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system (aRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.41]), overweight/obesity (aRR, 1.30 [1.17-1.44]), diabetes (aRR, 1.25 [1.05-1.49]), reproductive tract (aRR, 1.62 [1.47-1.79]), digestive tract (aRR, 1.39 [1.30-1.49]), thyroid (aRR, 2.02 [1.80-2.26]), respiratory system (aRR, 1.13 [1.03-1.24]), and cancer (aRR, 1.40 [1.18-1.65]) up to 8 years after delivery. Deliveries with MAR and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries., Conclusion(s): Women who conceived through fertility treatment or experienced subfertility were at increased risk of subsequent hospitalization resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among adolescent and young-adult female cancer survivors., Methods: The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) data were linked to the Massachusetts Cancer Registry for 90,928 ART cycles in Massachusetts to women ≥ 18 years old from 2004 to 2013. To estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), we used generalized estimating equations with a log link that accounted for multiple cycles per woman and a priori adjusted for maternal age and cycle year. The main outcomes of interest were ART treatment patterns; number of autologous oocytes retrieved, fertilized, and transferred; and rates of implantation, clinical intrauterine gestation (CIG), live birth, and pregnancy loss., Results: We saw no difference in number of oocytes retrieved (aRR: 0.95 (0.89-1.02)) or proportion of autologous oocytes fertilized (aRR: 0.99 (0.95-1.03)) between autologous cycles with and without a history of cancer; however, cancer survivors required a higher total FSH administered (aRR: 1.12 (1.06-1.19)). Among autologous cycle starts, cycles in women with a history of cancer were less likely to result in CIG compared to no history of cancer (aRR: 0.73 (0.65-0.83)); this relationship was absent from donor cycles (aRR: 1.01 (0.85-1.20)). Once achieving CIG, donor cycles for women with a history of cancer were two times more likely to result in pregnancy loss (aRR: 1.99 (1.26-3.16))., Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that cancer may influence ovarian stimulation response, requiring more FSH and resulting in lower CIG among cycle starts., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The purpose of this study was to determine if morphometric parameters that can be measured quantitatively using a time-lapse embryo incubator are associated with aneuploidy. Embryos cultured in a time-lapse incubator and assessed with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were analyzed retrospectively. Morphokinetic analysis included timing of cell divisions. Quantitative morphometric measurements included the distance between the second and first polar body, zona pellucida thickness at the pronuclear stage and at the 2-cell stage, and blastomere area at the 2- and 4-cell stages. Symmetry at the 2-cell stage was determined by percent difference between blastomeres; symmetry at the 4-cell stage was the percent difference between the smallest and largest blastomeres. Maternal age, blastocyst grade and day of biopsy were recorded. Euploid embryo characteristics were compared to aneuploid embryos. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate cell symmetry as a predictor of aneuploidy. Embryos (n = 182) from 21 patients (age 22-43; median = 34) were analyzed. Of the 182 embryos, 45% were euploid. Euploid and aneuploid embryos had similar morphokinetics and morphometry across many measures. As expected, age and blastocyst grade were associated with embryo ploidy. It was notable that, additionally, symmetry at the 4-cell stage (27% vs 31%, p = 0.01) was also associated with embryo ploidy. The optimized cutoff from the ROC curve to predict aneuploidy was determined to be 21%. Embryos with > 21% asymmetry at the 4-cell stage had high rates of aneuploidy while morphokinetic parameters were similar. In conclusion, this suggests that embryo selection models using time-lapse parameters would improve if they incorporate cleavage-stage morphometrics., (© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.)

Background: Hysteroscopy requires accurate collection of unabsorbed distension media to measure patient fluid absorption. We assessed the effectiveness and usability of a novel total capture drape compared with a standard drape during hysteroscopy., Method: Simulation trials were followed by an early-phase study to compare fluid-capture efficiency and measures of drape usability during hysteroscopy randomizing the total capture drape compared with a standard drape., Experience: Simulation trials indicated complete collection of unabsorbed fluid with the total capture drape and progressive loss of unabsorbed fluid with the standard drape. An early-phase study with 68 women found no statistical difference between groups for the hysteroscopic fluid deficit, but saw fewer cases with lost fluid in the total capture drape compared with the standard drape. Direct observation and focus group data indicated a trend for better capture of unabsorbed fluid with the total capture drape, along with increased usability once surgeons became familiar with correct placement., Conclusion: Simulation and early-phase study results are favorable for the total capture drape, demonstrating comparable fluid collection with the standard drape. With repeated use and in-service training, surgeons expressed greater confidence in the accuracy of the hysteroscopic fluid deficit with the total capture drape compared with the standard drape. Design modifications should improve overall usability and fluid-capture efficiency., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Paul B. Marshburn, M.D. disclosed being the inventor of U.S. patent No. 10,182,877 granted on January 22, 2019, covering the Total Capture Drape design and use. He reported no funding or financial gain from the patented drape. Paul B. Marshburn disclosed a payment for consulting from Cardinal Health. Brittany L. Anderson-Montoya disclosed receiving funding from the Society for Simulation in Healthcare for Associate Editor duties for the Journal and Mission Health for a guest speaker lecture. Leslie Hansen-Lindner reports receiving funding for expert testimony. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)