Search

Background: Given limited data regarding the involvement of disadvantaged groups in paediatric diabetes clinical trials, this study aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic representativeness of participants recruited into a multinational clinical trial in relation to regional and national type 1 diabetes reference populations., Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of a subset of adolescent type 1 diabetes cardiorenal intervention trial (AdDIT) participants from Australia (n = 144), Canada (n = 312) and the UK (n = 173). Validated national measures of deprivation were used: the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD) 2016 (Australia), the Material Resources (MR) dimension of the Canadian Marginalisation index 2016 (Canada) and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2015 (UK). Representativeness was assessed by comparing the AdDIT cohort's distribution of deprivation quintiles with that of the local paediatric type 1 diabetes population (regional), and the broader type 1 diabetes population for which the trial's intervention was targeted (national)., Results: Recruited study cohorts from each country had higher proportions of participants with higher SES, and significant underrepresentation of lower SES, in relation to their national references. The socioeconomic make-up in Australia mirrored that of the regional population (p = 0.99). For Canada, the 2nd least deprived (p = 0.001) and the most deprived quintiles (p < 0.001) were over- and under-represented relative to the regional reference, while the UK featured higher regional and national SES bias with over-representation and under-representation from the least-deprived and most-deprived quintiles (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Significant national differences in trial participation of low SES participants were observed, highlighting limitations in access to clinical research and the importance of reporting sociodemographic representation in diabetes clinical trials., Trial Registration: NCT01581476. Registered on 20 April 2012., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Socioeconomic disparities exist related to accessibility and uptake of diabetes technologies that impact glycemic management. The aims of this study were to describe diabetes technology use (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] and continuous glucose monitoring [CGM]) in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess the mediating effects of each technology on the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and glycemic management. Methods: Single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of children aged 0-18 years ( n  = 813) with T1D and valid postal codes between 2018 and 2020. Extracted data were linked to validated census-based material deprivation (MD) quintiles. Exposures included MD and technology use (CSII, CGM), whereas the primary outcome was glycemic management (HbA1c). Results: Of 813 patients included, 379 (46.6%) and 246 (30.3%) individuals used CGM and CSII, respectively. Real-time CGM (rtCGM) and CSII were associated with both MD and HbA1c, but intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) was not. There was a difference in HbA1c of +1.17% between patients from the most (Q5) and least deprived (Q1) MD quintile ( P  < 0.0001), and significant mediating effects for rtCGM and CSII use, but not isCGM. rtCGM use and CSII use accounted for 0.14% ( P  < 0.0001) and 0.25% ( P  < 0.0001) of the difference in HbA1c between patients from Q1 and Q5 quintiles (indirect effects), representing 12.0% and 23.1% of this difference, respectively. Conclusions: CSII and rtCGM use partially mediated the significant discrepancies observed with SES and glycemic management, highlighting potential benefits of broader access to these technologies to improve diabetes outcomes and help mitigate the negative impact of deprivation on diabetes management.

Purpose: To assess reported rates of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and their association with autoimmune diseases and microvascular complications in adults and children with type 1 diabetes., Methods: The Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale was used to assess GI symptom type and severity in 2370 patients with type 1 diabetes aged 8 to 45 years evaluated as part of a clinical trial screening for celiac disease (CD). The presence and severity of GI symptoms and relationships with demographic, clinical, and other diabetes-related factors were evaluated., Results: Overall, 1368 adults (57.7%) aged 19 to 45 years and 1002 (42.3%) pediatric patients aged 8 to 18 years were studied. At least 1 GI symptom was reported in 34.1% of adults as compared with 21.7% of children (P < 0.0001). Common symptoms in children included upper and lower abdominal pain while adults more frequently reported lower GI symptoms. Participants with GI symptoms had higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (68 ± 14mmol/mol; 8.35 ± 1.37%) than those without symptoms (66 ± 15mmol/mol; 8.22 ± 1.40%; P = 0.041). Patients with microvascular complications (nephropathy, retinopathy, and/or neuropathy) were 1.8 times more likely to report GI symptoms (95% CI: 1.26-2.60; P < 0.01) after adjusting for age and sex. No association was observed between GI symptoms and the presence of autoimmune conditions, including thyroid and biopsy-confirmed CD (odds ratio = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.86-1.42; P = 0.45)., Main Conclusions: These results highlight that GI symptoms are an important clinical morbidity and are associated with increasing age, duration of type 1 diabetes, HbA1c, and microvascular complications but not with autoimmune comorbidities including CD., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)