10 results on '"Chiari, D"'
Search Results
2. Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey
- Author
-
Mengardo, V, Weindelmayer, J, Veltri, A, Giacopuzzi, S, Torroni, L, de Manzoni, G, Agresta, F, Alfieri, R, Alfieri, S, Antonacci, N, Baiocchi, G, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Capolupo, G, Carboni, F, Casadei, R, Casella, F, Catarci, M, Cerri, P, Chiari, D, Cocozza, E, Colombo, G, Cozzaglio, L, Dalmonte, G, Degiuli, M, De Luca, M, De Luca, R, De Manzini, N, De Pasqual, C, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Di Cosmo, M, Di Leo, A, Di Paola, M, Elio, A, Ferrara, F, Ferrari, G, Fiscon, V, Fumagalli, U, Garulli, G, Gennai, A, Gentile, I, Germani, P, Gualtierotti, M, Guerini, F, Gurrado, A, Inama, M, La Torre, F, Laterza, E, Losurdo, P, Macri, A, Marano, A, Marano, L, Marchesi, F, Marino, F, Massani, M, Menghi, R, Milone, M, Molfino, S, Montuori, M, Moretto, G, Morgagni, P, Morpurgo, E, Abdallah, M, Nespoli, L, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Pallabazer, G, Parise, P, Pasculli, A, Pericoli Ridolfini, M, Pesce, A, Pinotti, E, Pisano, M, Poiasina, E, Postiglione, V, Rausei, S, Rella, A, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossi, G, Rossit, L, Rovatti, M, Ruspi, L, Sacco, L, Saladino, E, Sansonetti, A, Sartori, A, Scaglione, D, Scaringi, S, Schoenthaler, C, Sena, G, Simone, M, Solaini, L, Strignano, P, Tartaglia, N, Testa, S, Testini, M, Tiberio, G, Treppiedi, E, Vagliasindi, A, Valmasoni, M, Vigano, J, Zanchettin, G, Zanoni, A, Zardini, C, Zerbinati, A, Mengardo V., Weindelmayer J., Veltri A., Giacopuzzi S., Torroni L., de Manzoni G., Agresta F., Alfieri R., Alfieri S., Antonacci N., Baiocchi G. L., Bencini L., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Berselli M., Biondi A., Capolupo G. T., Carboni F., Casadei R., Casella F., Catarci M., Cerri P., Chiari D., Cocozza E., Colombo G., Cozzaglio L., Dalmonte G., Degiuli M., De Luca M., De Luca R., De Manzini N., De Pasqual C. A., De Pascale S., De Ruvo N., Di Cosmo M., Di Leo A., Di Paola M., Elio A., Ferrara F., Ferrari G., Fiscon V., Fumagalli U., Garulli G., Gennai A., Gentile I., Germani P., Gualtierotti M., Guerini F., Gurrado A., Inama M., La Torre F., Laterza E., Losurdo P., Macri A., Marano A., Marano L., Marchesi F., Marino F., Massani M., Menghi R., Milone M., Molfino S., Montuori M., Moretto G., Morgagni P., Morpurgo E., Abdallah M., Nespoli L., Olmi S., Palaia R., Pallabazer G., Parise P., Pasculli A., Pericoli Ridolfini M., Pesce A., Pinotti E., Pisano M., Poiasina E., Postiglione V., Rausei S., Rella A., Rosa F., Rosati R., Rossi G., Rossit L., Rovatti M., Ruspi L., Sacco L., Saladino E., Sansonetti A., Sartori A., Scaglione D., Scaringi S., Schoenthaler C., Sena G., Simone M., Solaini L., Strignano P., Tartaglia N., Testa S., Testini M., Tiberio G. A. M., Treppiedi E., Vagliasindi A., Valmasoni M., Vigano J., Zanchettin G., Zanoni A., Zardini C., Zerbinati A., Mengardo, V, Weindelmayer, J, Veltri, A, Giacopuzzi, S, Torroni, L, de Manzoni, G, Agresta, F, Alfieri, R, Alfieri, S, Antonacci, N, Baiocchi, G, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Capolupo, G, Carboni, F, Casadei, R, Casella, F, Catarci, M, Cerri, P, Chiari, D, Cocozza, E, Colombo, G, Cozzaglio, L, Dalmonte, G, Degiuli, M, De Luca, M, De Luca, R, De Manzini, N, De Pasqual, C, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Di Cosmo, M, Di Leo, A, Di Paola, M, Elio, A, Ferrara, F, Ferrari, G, Fiscon, V, Fumagalli, U, Garulli, G, Gennai, A, Gentile, I, Germani, P, Gualtierotti, M, Guerini, F, Gurrado, A, Inama, M, La Torre, F, Laterza, E, Losurdo, P, Macri, A, Marano, A, Marano, L, Marchesi, F, Marino, F, Massani, M, Menghi, R, Milone, M, Molfino, S, Montuori, M, Moretto, G, Morgagni, P, Morpurgo, E, Abdallah, M, Nespoli, L, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Pallabazer, G, Parise, P, Pasculli, A, Pericoli Ridolfini, M, Pesce, A, Pinotti, E, Pisano, M, Poiasina, E, Postiglione, V, Rausei, S, Rella, A, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossi, G, Rossit, L, Rovatti, M, Ruspi, L, Sacco, L, Saladino, E, Sansonetti, A, Sartori, A, Scaglione, D, Scaringi, S, Schoenthaler, C, Sena, G, Simone, M, Solaini, L, Strignano, P, Tartaglia, N, Testa, S, Testini, M, Tiberio, G, Treppiedi, E, Vagliasindi, A, Valmasoni, M, Vigano, J, Zanchettin, G, Zanoni, A, Zardini, C, Zerbinati, A, Mengardo V., Weindelmayer J., Veltri A., Giacopuzzi S., Torroni L., de Manzoni G., Agresta F., Alfieri R., Alfieri S., Antonacci N., Baiocchi G. L., Bencini L., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Berselli M., Biondi A., Capolupo G. T., Carboni F., Casadei R., Casella F., Catarci M., Cerri P., Chiari D., Cocozza E., Colombo G., Cozzaglio L., Dalmonte G., Degiuli M., De Luca M., De Luca R., De Manzini N., De Pasqual C. A., De Pascale S., De Ruvo N., Di Cosmo M., Di Leo A., Di Paola M., Elio A., Ferrara F., Ferrari G., Fiscon V., Fumagalli U., Garulli G., Gennai A., Gentile I., Germani P., Gualtierotti M., Guerini F., Gurrado A., Inama M., La Torre F., Laterza E., Losurdo P., Macri A., Marano A., Marano L., Marchesi F., Marino F., Massani M., Menghi R., Milone M., Molfino S., Montuori M., Moretto G., Morgagni P., Morpurgo E., Abdallah M., Nespoli L., Olmi S., Palaia R., Pallabazer G., Parise P., Pasculli A., Pericoli Ridolfini M., Pesce A., Pinotti E., Pisano M., Poiasina E., Postiglione V., Rausei S., Rella A., Rosa F., Rosati R., Rossi G., Rossit L., Rovatti M., Ruspi L., Sacco L., Saladino E., Sansonetti A., Sartori A., Scaglione D., Scaringi S., Schoenthaler C., Sena G., Simone M., Solaini L., Strignano P., Tartaglia N., Testa S., Testini M., Tiberio G. A. M., Treppiedi E., Vagliasindi A., Valmasoni M., Vigano J., Zanchettin G., Zanoni A., Zardini C., and Zerbinati A.
- Abstract
Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.
- Published
- 2022
3. P-087 LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF TROCAR SITE HERNIA: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
- Author
-
Chiari, D, primary, Ricchitelli, S, additional, Moroni, M R, additional, Sorrentino, M, additional, Frascarelli, A, additional, Platto, M, additional, Rovagnati, M, additional, and Zuliani, W, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant hilar obstruction: an international multicenter comparative study
- Author
-
Samanta, J., additional, Nabi, Z., additional, Gkolfakis, P., additional, Crinò, S. F., additional, Gupta, P., additional, Dhar, J., additional, Carpentier, D., additional, Benedetto, M., additional, Chiari, D., additional, Antonio, F., additional, Candi, J., additional, Ruzzenente, A., additional, Chandan, S., additional, Mohan, B. P., additional, Gupta, V., additional, Lakhtakia, S., additional, Deviere, J., additional, and Reddy, D. N., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy ({ADiGe}) survey
- Author
-
Mengardo, Valentina, Weindelmayer, Jacopo, Veltri, Alessandro, Giacopuzzi, Simone, Torroni, Lorena, DE MANZONI, Giovanni, Ferdinando, Agresta, Rita, Alfieri, Sergio, Alfieri, Nicola, Antonacci, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Lapo, Bencini, Bencivenga, Maria, Benedetti, Michele, Mattia, Berselli, Alberto, Biondi, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Fabio, Carboni, Riccardo, Casadei, Casella, Francesco, Catarci, Marco, Paolo, Cerri, Damiano, Chiari, Eugenio, Cocozza, Giovanni, Colombo, Luca, Cozzaglio, Giorgio, Dalmonte, Maurizio, Degiuli, Maurizio De Luca, Raffaele De Luca, Nicol(`(o)) De Manzini, DE PASQUAL, CARLO ALBERTO, Stefano De Pascale, Nicola De Ruvo, DI COSMO, Mariantonietta, DI LEO, Alberto, Massimiliano Di Paola, Amedeo, Elio, Francesco, Ferrara, Giovanni, Ferrari, Valentino, Fiscon, Uberto, Fumagalli, Gianluca, Garulli, Andrea, Gennai, Irene, Gentile, Paola, Germani, Monica, Gualtierotti, Guerini, Francesca, Angela, Gurrado, Inama, Marco, Filippo La Torre, Ernesto, Laterza, Pasquale, Losurdo, Antonio, Macr(`(i)), Alessandra, Marano, Luigi, Marano, Federico, Marchesi, Fabio, Marino, Marco, Massani, Roberta, Menghi, Marco, Milone, Sarah, Molfino, Mauro, Montuori, Moretto, Gianluigi, Paolo, Morgagni, Emilio, Morpurgo, Moukchar, Abdallah, Luca, Nespoli, Stefano, Olmi, Raffaele, Palaia, Giovanni, Pallabazer, Parise, Paolo, Alessandro, Pasculli, Marco Pericoli Ridolfini, Antonio, Pesce, Enrico, Pinotti, Michele, Pisano, Elia, Poiasina, Vittorio, Postiglione, Stefano, Rausei, Antonio, Rella, Fausto, Rosa, Riccardo, Rosati, Gianmaria, Rossi, Luca, Rossit, Massimo, Rovatti, Laura, Ruspi, DAL SACCO, Luca, Saladino, Edoardo, Andrea, Sansonetti, Sartori, Alberto, Donatella, Scaglione, Stefano, Scaringi, Christian, Schoenthaler, Giuseppe, Sena, Michele, Simone, Leonardo, Solaini, Paolo, Strignano, Nicola, Tartaglia, Silvio, Testa, Mario, Testini, Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio, Treppiedi, Elio, Alessio, Vagliasindi, Michele, Valmasoni, Jacopo, Vigan(`(o)), Gianpietro, Zanchettin, Andrea, Zanoni, Zardini, Claudio, Antonio Zerbinati and, Mengardo, V, Weindelmayer, J, Veltri, A, Giacopuzzi, S, Torroni, L, de Manzoni, G, Agresta, F, Alfieri, R, Alfieri, S, Antonacci, N, Baiocchi, G, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Capolupo, G, Carboni, F, Casadei, R, Casella, F, Catarci, M, Cerri, P, Chiari, D, Cocozza, E, Colombo, G, Cozzaglio, L, Dalmonte, G, Degiuli, M, De Luca, M, De Luca, R, De Manzini, N, De Pasqual, C, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Di Cosmo, M, Di Leo, A, Di Paola, M, Elio, A, Ferrara, F, Ferrari, G, Fiscon, V, Fumagalli, U, Garulli, G, Gennai, A, Gentile, I, Germani, P, Gualtierotti, M, Guerini, F, Gurrado, A, Inama, M, La Torre, F, Laterza, E, Losurdo, P, Macri, A, Marano, A, Marano, L, Marchesi, F, Marino, F, Massani, M, Menghi, R, Milone, M, Molfino, S, Montuori, M, Moretto, G, Morgagni, P, Morpurgo, E, Abdallah, M, Nespoli, L, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Pallabazer, G, Parise, P, Pasculli, A, Pericoli Ridolfini, M, Pesce, A, Pinotti, E, Pisano, M, Poiasina, E, Postiglione, V, Rausei, S, Rella, A, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossi, G, Rossit, L, Rovatti, M, Ruspi, L, Sacco, L, Saladino, E, Sansonetti, A, Sartori, A, Scaglione, D, Scaringi, S, Schoenthaler, C, Sena, G, Simone, M, Solaini, L, Strignano, P, Tartaglia, N, Testa, S, Testini, M, Tiberio, G, Treppiedi, E, Vagliasindi, A, Valmasoni, M, Vigano, J, Zanchettin, G, Zanoni, A, Zardini, C, Zerbinati, A, Mengardo, Valentina, Weindelmayer, Jacopo, Veltri, Alessandro, Giacopuzzi, Simone, Torroni, Lorena, de Manzoni, Giovanni, and de Manzini, Nicolo
- Subjects
Surgeons ,Postoperative Complications ,Gastrectomy ,Stomach Neoplasms ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Drain ,Drainage ,Gastric cancer ,Survey ,Humans ,Surgery - Abstract
Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.
- Published
- 2022
6. Risk factors for recurrence and complications after laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia using a double-layered ePTFE/PP mesh: results of a retrospective study.
- Author
-
Chiari D, Jovanovic S, Borroni G, Morenghi E, Moroni MR, and Zuliani W
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Mesh, Herniorrhaphy adverse effects, Herniorrhaphy methods, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local etiology, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local surgery, Risk Factors, Incisional Hernia epidemiology, Incisional Hernia surgery, Incisional Hernia etiology, Hernia, Ventral surgery, Hernia, Ventral etiology, Laparoscopy adverse effects, Laparoscopy methods
- Abstract
Background: The objective was to analyse, risk factors for recurrence (primary outcome) and complications (secondary outome) after the implantation of a double layer ePTFE (expanded PolytTetraFluoroEthylene) / PP (PolyPropylene) mesh to treat incisional hernias (IH) using the Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) technique., Methods: We included all elective laparoscopic IH repairs with intraperitoneal placement of a ePTFE / PP mesh (Relimesh
® - Herniamesh S.r.l.) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2017 at Humanitas Mater Domini Clinical Institute in Castellanza (Italy) and at the Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery of Niš (Serbia). Performance was defined as long-term recurrence rate., Results: A total of 284 patients were enrolled. According to the European Hernia Society (EHS) hernias were classified as: W1 (<4 cm) 60.29%, W2 (≥4-10 cm) 35.02% and W3 (≥10 cm) 4.69%; medial 90.85%, lateral 6.69%, both medial and lateral 2.11%. Average follow-up was 48 (11-110) months. The 30-days complication rate was 4.23%. Hernia recurrence rate was 3.36%. Long-term complication rate was 6.34%. At multivariable analysis, an increased risk of short-term complications was associated to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 7.59 [2.23-25.83], P=0.001); an increased risk of long-term complications was associated to diabetes (OR 6.21 [1.80-21.42], P=0.004), an increased risk of recurrence was correlated to COPD (OR 13.40 [1.36-131.9], P=0.026) and hernia defects larger than 6 cm (OR 19.2 [1.12-329.9], P=0.042)., Conclusions: Elective laparoscopic IH repair with a double-layered ePTFE/PP mesh is safe and effective. Compliance with indications and preoperative patients evaluation are essential to improve outcomes.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The crossroad between autoimmune disorder, tissue remodeling and cancer of the thyroid: The long pentraxin 3 (PTX3).
- Author
-
Chiari D, Pirali B, Perano V, Leone R, Mantovani A, and Bottazzi B
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Immunity, Innate, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Carcinogenesis, Autoimmune Diseases, Thyroid Neoplasms
- Abstract
Thyroid is at the crossroads of immune dysregulation, tissue remodeling and oncogenesis. Autoimmune disorders, nodular disease and cancer of the thyroid affect a large amount of general population, mainly women. We wondered if there could be a common factor behind three processes (immune dysregulation, tissue remodeling and oncogenesis) that frequently affect, sometimes coexisting, the thyroid gland. The long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is an essential component of the humoral arm of the innate immune system acting as soluble pattern recognition molecule. The protein is found expressed in a variety of cell types during tissue injury and stress. In addition, PTX3 is produced by neutrophils during maturation in the bone-marrow and is stored in lactoferrin-granules. PTX3 is a regulator of the complement cascade and orchestrates tissue remodeling and repair. Preclinical data and studies in human tumors indicate that PTX3 can act both as an extrinsic oncosuppressor by modulating complement-dependent tumor-promoting inflammation, or as a tumor-promoter molecule, regulating cell invasion and proliferation and epithelial to mesenchymal transition, thus suggesting that this molecule may have different functions on carcinogenesis. The involvement of PTX3 in the regulation of immune responses, tissue remodeling and oncosuppressive processes led us to explore its potential role in the development of thyroid disorders. In this review, we aimed to highlight what is known, at the state of the art, regarding the connection between the long pentraxin 3 and the main thyroid diseases i.e., nodular thyroid disease, thyroid cancer and autoimmune thyroid disorders., Competing Interests: AM and BB are inventors of a patent on PTX3 and obtain royalties on related reagents. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Chiari, Pirali, Perano, Leone, Mantovani and Bottazzi.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Rivaroxaban vs placebo for extended antithrombotic prophylaxis after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
- Author
-
Becattini C, Pace U, Pirozzi F, Donini A, Avruscio G, Rondelli F, Boncompagni M, Chiari D, De Prizio M, Visonà A, De Luca R, Guerra F, Muratore A, Portale G, Milone M, Castagnoli G, Righini M, Martellucci J, Persiani R, Frasson S, Dentali F, Delrio P, Campanini M, Gussoni G, Vedovati MC, and Agnelli G
- Subjects
- Anticoagulants adverse effects, Fibrinolytic Agents adverse effects, Hemorrhage drug therapy, Humans, Rivaroxaban adverse effects, Colorectal Neoplasms chemically induced, Colorectal Neoplasms complications, Colorectal Neoplasms surgery, Laparoscopy adverse effects, Venous Thromboembolism drug therapy, Venous Thromboembolism etiology, Venous Thromboembolism prevention & control
- Abstract
The clinical benefit of extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after laparoscopic surgery for cancer is unclear. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for this indication are unexplored. PROphylaxis of venous thromboembolism after LAParoscopic Surgery for colorectal cancer Study II (PROLAPS II) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated, superiority study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of extended prophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Consecutive patients who had laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or a placebo to be started at 7 ± 2 days after surgery and given for the subsequent 3 weeks. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin from surgery to randomization. The primary study outcome was the composite of symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE, asymptomatic ultrasonography-detected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or VTE-related death at 28 ± 2 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patient recruitment was prematurely closed due to study drug expiry after the inclusion of 582 of the 646 planned patients. A primary study outcome event occurred in 11 of 282 patients in the placebo group compared with 3 of 287 in the rivaroxaban group (3.9 vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.94; log-rank P = .032). Major bleeding occurred in none of the patients in the placebo group and 2 patients in the rivaroxaban group (incidence rate 0.7%; 95% CI, 0-1.0). Oral rivaroxaban was more effective than placebo for extended prevention of VTE after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer without an increase in major bleeding. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03055026., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Multimodal treatment of colorectal postsurgical leaks: long-term results of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) application.
- Author
-
Chiari D, LA Raja C, Mangiavillano B, Veronesi P, Platto M, and Zuliani W
- Subjects
- Anastomotic Leak surgery, Combined Modality Therapy, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms surgery, Surgical Instruments
- Abstract
Background: Postsurgical anastomotic colorectal leaks often require a surgical second look with a definite morbidity and the risk of delaying adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term results of the endoscopic closure of colorectal leak following low anterior resection (LAR) using the over-the-scope (Ovesco™; Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany) clip., Methods: Patients who were submitted to endoscopic closure of a colorectal leak of maximum 2 cm with an Ovesco™ clip following LAR from 2016 to 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study (Humanitas Mater Domini Clinical Institute, Italy). The follow-up was obtained through radiologic and clinic assessments., Results: In the analyzed study period, 48 patients were submitted to LAR. Six patients were enrolled in the study. The median diameter of the leak was 7 mm. 14/6t or 12/6t OTSC
® clip was applied. Three patients were managed exclusively endoscopically, 2 of them had a protective ileostomy; 3 patients underwent urgent laparotomy with ostomy and then underwent endoscopic procedure. Complete healing was reached in all patients in a median of 23 days. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated and performed in 4 patients after a median of 64 days from the surgery. Among the 5 carriers of an ostomy, 4 patients underwent recanalization. The median follow-up was 21.5 months. During the follow-up no leak reoccurrence or complications were reported., Conclusions: In the multimodal management of anastomotic leaks following LAR, Ovesco™ clipping system appears a safe and effective technique in the closure of small leaks (<2 cm), allowing an early recanalization of the bowel and not delaying adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated.- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Blended practical learning in compliance with COVID-19 social distancing.
- Author
-
Agnelli B, Oldani S, Loppini M, Cananzi F, Chiari D, Montagna L, and Vinci V
- Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has imposed great changes in everyday life. Starting from January 2020, Humanitas University proposed to students digital instruction for continuing medical education, in particular, concerning practical activities. The latter, defined as Professionalizing activities, were transformed into complete online learning. From September 2020, in accordance to the imposed rules of social distancing, we modified the approach to Professionalizing activities. Despite following the new constrains, we came up with a blend online and face-to-face education program. The Kirkpatrick's evaluation model has been followed for validation of the project. Two ad hoc satisfaction questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate the project. Different approaches to blended learning have been described in literature; however, we propose a new method application, which fits to the post-pandemic era, with the purpose of sharing our experience in the field. Advantages and limitations are described. According to students, the overall satisfaction was rated 6.8, while tutors evaluated it with 7.4. The qualitative analysis of data confirms the advantage of the blended learning activities in order to guarantee a continuation of the clinical curriculum. Although it highlighted the necessity for, an increased technical support and an improvement in organization of the meetings. Blended learning is becoming more accepted among academic communities because it combines "the best of both worlds." However, its effectiveness depends on several factors. With our approach, we propose a method, specifically designed to make effective this kind of teaching, which can be considered essential in the pandemic era we are facing., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. No financial support or benefits have been received by any author. We are not in a relationship with any commercial source which is related directly or indirectly to the work., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.