Search

Background: 18F-flortaucipir PET received FDA approval to visualize aggregated neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in brains of adult patients with cognitive impairment being evaluated for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, manufacturer’s guidelines for visual interpretation of 18F-flortaucipir PET differ from how 18F-flortaucipir PET has been measured in research settings using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs). How visual interpretation relates to 18F-flortaucipir PET SUVR, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, or longitudinal clinical assessment is not well understood. Objective: We compare various diagnostic methods in participants enrolled in longitudinal observational studies of aging and memory (n = 189, 23 were cognitively impaired). Methods: Participants had tau PET, Aβ PET, MRI, and clinical and cognitive evaluation within 18 months (n = 189); the majority (n = 144) also underwent lumbar puncture. Two radiologists followed manufacturer’s guidelines for 18F-flortaucipir PET visual interpretation. Results: Visual interpretation had high agreement with SUVR (98.4%)and moderate agreement with CSF p-tau181 (86.1%). Two participants demonstrated 18F-flortaucipir uptake from meningiomas. Visual interpretation could not predict follow-up clinical assessment in 9.52% of cases. Conclusion: Visual interpretation was highly consistent with SUVR (discordant participants had hemorrhagic infarcts or occipital-predominant AD NFT deposition) and moderately consistent with CSF p-tau181 (discordant participants had AD pathophysiology not detectable on tau PET). However, close association between AD NFT deposition and clinical onset in group-level studies does not necessarily hold at the individual level, with discrepancies arising from atypical AD, vascular dementia, or frontotemporal dementia. A better understanding of relationships across imaging, CSF biomarkers, and clinical assessment is needed to provide appropriate diagnoses for these individuals.

18F-flortaucipir-PET received FDA approval to visualize tauopathy in the brains of adult patients with cognitive impairment being evaluated for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, manufacturer’s guidelines for the visual interpretation of18F-flortaucipir-PET differs greatly from how18F-flortaucipir-PET has been measured in research settings using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs). How visual interpretation relates to18F-flortaucipir-PET SUVR, CSF biomarkers, or longitudinal clinical assessment is not well understood. Here we compare these various diagnostic methods in participants enrolled in studies of aging and memory (n=189, of whom 23 were cognitively impaired). Visual interpretation had high agreement with SUVR (98.4%); discordant participants had hemorrhagic infarcts or atypical AD tauopathies. Visual interpretation had moderate agreement with CSF p-tau181 (86.1%). Two participants demonstrated18F-flortaucipir uptake from meningiomas. Visual interpretation could not predict follow-up clinical assessment in 9.52% of cases. We conclude that close association between AD tauopathy and clinical onset in group-level studies does not always hold at the individual level, with discrepancies arising from atypical AD, vascular dementia, or frontotemporal dementia. A better understanding of relationships across imaging, CSF biomarkers, and clinical assessment is needed to provide appropriate diagnoses for these individuals.

The apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 allele is strongly linked with cerebral β-amyloidosis, but its relationship with tauopathy is less established. We investigated the relationship between APOE ε4 carrier status, regional amyloid-β (Aβ), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetrics, tau positron emission tomography (PET), APOE messenger RNA (mRNA) expression maps, and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (CSF ptau 181 ). Three hundred fifty participants underwent imaging, and 270 had ptau 181 . We used computational models to evaluate the main effect of APOE ε4 carrier status on regional neuroimaging values and then the interaction of ε4 status and global Aβ on regional tau PET and brain volumes as well as CSF ptau 181 . Separately, we also examined the additional interactive influence of sex. We found that, for the same degree of Aβ burden, APOE ε4 carriers showed greater tau PET signal relative to noncarriers in temporal regions, but no interaction was present for MRI volumes or CSF ptau 181 . This potentiation of tau aggregation irrespective of sex occurred in brain regions with high APOE mRNA expression, suggesting local vulnerabilities to tauopathy. There were greater effects of APOE genotype in females, although the interactive sex effects did not strongly mirror mRNA expression. Pathology is not homogeneously expressed throughout the brain but mirrors underlying biological patterns such as gene expression.

Important insights into the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease can be provided by studies of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. However, it is unclear whether the timing and spatial distribution of amyloid accumulation differs between people with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and those with Down syndrome. We aimed to directly compare amyloid changes between these two groups of people.In this cross-sectional study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) with Down syndrome and sibling controls who had MRI and amyloid PET scans in the first data release (January, 2020) of the Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) study. We also included carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls who were within a similar age range to ABC-DS participants (25-73 years) and had MRI and amyloid PET scans at the time of a data freeze (December, 2020) of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) study. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group. All DIAN study participants had genetic testing to determine PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP mutation status. APOE genotype was determined from blood samples. CSF samples were collected in a subset of ABC-DS and DIAN participants and the ratio of amyloid β42 (Aβ42) to Aβ40 (Aβ42/40) was measured to evaluate its Spearman's correlation with amyloid PET. Global PET amyloid burden was compared with regards to cognitive status, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, age, and estimated years to symptom onset. We further analysed amyloid PET deposition by autosomal dominant mutation type. We also assessed regional patterns of amyloid accumulation by estimated number of years to symptom onset. Within a subset of participants the relationship between amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/40 was evaluated.192 individuals with Down syndrome and 33 sibling controls from the ABC-DS study and 265 carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutations and 169 non-carrier familial controls from the DIAN study were included in our analyses. PET amyloid centiloid and CSF Aβ42/40 were negatively correlated in carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutations (n=216; r=-0·565; p0·0001) and in people with Down syndrome (n=32; r=-0·801; p0·0001). There was no difference in global PET amyloid burden between asymptomatic people with Down syndrome (mean 18·80 centiloids [SD 28·33]) versus asymptomatic mutation carriers (24·61 centiloids [30·27]; p=0·11) and between symptomatic people with Down syndrome (77·25 centiloids [41·76]) versus symptomatic mutation carriers (69·15 centiloids [51·10]; p=0·34). APOE ɛ4 status and sex had no effect on global amyloid PET deposition. Amyloid deposition was elevated significantly earlier in mutation carriers than in participants with Down syndrome (estimated years to symptom onset -23·0 vs -17·5; p=0·0002). PSEN1 mutations primarily drove this difference. Early amyloid accumulation occurred in striatal and cortical regions for both mutation carriers (n=265) and people with Down syndrome (n=128). Although mutation carriers had widespread amyloid accumulation in all cortical regions, the medial occipital regions were spared in people with Down syndrome.Despite minor differences, amyloid PET changes were similar between people with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease versus Down syndrome and strongly supported early amyloid dysregulation in individuals with Down syndrome. Individuals with Down syndrome aged at least 35 years might benefit from early intervention and warrant future inclusion in clinical trials, particularly given the relatively high incidence of Down syndrome.The National Institute on Aging, Riney and Brennan Funds, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.