Search

* Context.--Assessing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug levels by reliable laboratory assays is necessary in a number of clinical scenarios. Objective.--To evaluate the performance of DOACspecific assays for various concentrations [...]

Background: Most pediatric patients show a decline in platelet counts while on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and require multiple platelet transfusions. To better understand platelet loss during ECLS, this study estimated platelet loss rates due to diagnostic phlebotomy, platelet activation, bleeding and other causes. Methods: We collected data on 91 patients (1d‐20y, 50 M, 41F). Platelet losses were estimated based on changes in platelet count, patient+circuit blood volume, and transfused platelet volumes. Platelet extracellular vesicles were measured by flow cytometry. Results: Median platelet loss was 2.8 × 109/L/hr, more than twice the normal rate of platelet removal and equivalent to a 67 000/μl decrease in platelet count per day. While platelet loss was correlated with platelet transfusion (r2 = 0.51), transfusion underestimated platelet loss in patients with large decreases in platelet count and over‐estimated platelet loss in neonates where the circuit volume > patient blood volume. Patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation before or significant bleeding during ECLS have double the rate of platelet loss. Platelet activation accounted for ~32% of total platelet loss, bleeding ~36% and phlebotomy 4%, with the remaining one‐third due to other causes. Annexin‐negative platelet extracellular vesicle release, a measure of platelet damage, was increased 9‐fold during ECLS. Conclusion: Our study is the first to quantitate total, phlebotomy and activation related platelet loss during ECLS. Platelet activation accounts for ~32% of total platelet loss, while bleeding doubles the platelet loss rate. The etiology of the remaining platelet loss is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the primary test used to monitor intravenous (IV) direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) but has many limitations. The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) has shown better correlation with DTI levels than aPTT. This study compared dose-response curves for dTT and aPTT in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin.Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients treated with argatroban (n = 45) or bivalirudin (n = 14) monitored with dTT and aPTT.Results: The dTT assay was calibrated to report DTI concentrations in µg/mL for argatroban and bivalirudin with good analytic sensitivity and specificity. The dTT was fivefold more likely to show a stable dose-response slope than the aPTT (P < .0002; odds ratio, 4.9). For patients in whom both dTT and aPTT showed a significant correlation between dose and assay results, dTT had a higher average correlation factor compared with aPTT (P = .007). Argatroban dose-response slopes showed more inter- and intrapatient variation than bivalirudin (dose-response slope coefficient of variation, 132% vs 52%).Conclusions: The dTT assay was more likely to show a stable dose response and have a stronger correlation with DTI dose than aPTT. Argatroban shows more variation in dose response than bivalirudin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context.--Assessing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug levels by reliable laboratory assays is necessary in a number of clinical scenarios. Objective.--To evaluate the performance of DOAC-specific assays for various concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, assess the interlaboratory variability in measurement of these DOACs, and investigate the responsiveness of the routine clotting assays to various concentrations of these oral anticoagulants. Design.--College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey data from 2013 to 2016 were summarized and analyzed. Results.--For dabigatran, the interlaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) of ecarin chromogenic assay was broad (ranging from 7.5% to 29.1%, 6.3% to 15.5%, and 6.8% to 9.0% for 100-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The CV for diluted thrombin time for dabigatran was better overall (ranging from 11.6% to 17.2%, 9.3% to 12.3, and 7.1% to 11.2% for 100 ng/mL, 200 ng/mL, and 400 ng/mL, respectively). The rivaroxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay CVs also showed variability (ranging from 11.5% to 22.2%, 7.2% to 10.9%, and 6.4% to 8.1% for 50-ng/mL, 200-ng/mL, and 400-ng/mL targeted drug concentrations, respectively). The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) showed variable dose- and reagent-dependent responsiveness to DOACs: PT was more responsive to rivaroxaban and aPTT to dabigatran. The undiluted thrombin time showed maximum prolongation across all 3 dabigatran concentrations, making it too sensitive for drug-level monitoring, but supporting its use as a qualitative screening assay. Conclusions.--DOAC-specific assays performed reasonably well. While PT and aPTT cannot be used safely to determine DOAC degree of anticoagulation, a normal thrombin time excludes the presence of dabigatran. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]