Search

Background: A significant increased risk of complications and mortality in immunocompromised patients affected by COVID-19 has been described. However, the impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is an issue still on debate, due to conflicting evidence emerged from different observational studies. Objective: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcome in SOT recipients with COVID-19 compared to general population. Data source: PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus were independently searched until 13 October 2021. Study eligibility criteria: Prospective or retrospective observational studies comparing clinical outcome in SOT recipients versus general populations affected by COVID-19. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Participants: Patients with confirmed COVID-19. Intervention: Solid organ transplant recipients. Assessment of risk of bias: Quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Methods of data synthesis: Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effect model with inverse variance method. Multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate source of heterogeneity. Results: 3,501 articles were screened, and thirty-one observational studies (N=590,375; 5,759 SOT recipients vs. 584,616 general population) were included in the meta-analyses. No difference in 30-day mortality rate was found in primary analysis including studies providing adjustment for confounders (N=17; 3,752 SOT recipients vs. 159,745 general population; OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.94-1.35; I2=33.9%). No evidence of publication bias was reported. Higher risk of ICU admission (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.03-2.63) and occurrence of acute kidney injury (OR 2.50 95%CI 1.81-3.45) was found in SOT recipients. Conclusions: No increased risk in mortality was found in SOT recipients affected by COVID-19 compared to general population when adjusted for demographic and clinical features and COVID-19 severity.

Background. Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is burdened by high mortality rates. However, the correct management of a critically ill patient with suspected IAC is an issue still on debate. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety of pulse high-dose of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in patients with suspected IAC managed with a Beta-D-Glucan (BDG)-guided strategy. Methods. Phase 2 prospective study enrolling adult patients with intra-abdominal sepsis following surgery. Patients received a single dose of L-AmB 5mg/kg on day 1. At day 3, L-AmB was discontinued in case of negativity of basal serum (1, 3)-Beta-D-Glucan (BDG) and was continued (3 mg/kg/daily) in case of positive basal BDG, or microbiologically confirmed IAC. The main endpoint was occurrence of adverse events according with common toxic criteria definition. Results. Overall, 40 patients were enrolled from January 2019 until August 2022. Of them 15 (37.5%) were male, median age was 65 (49–76) years. Urgent surgery accounted for 31 (77.5%) cases, principal indication was secondary/tertiary peritonitis (22, 55%), half of patients had a previous surgical operation within 30 days. Five (12.5%) patients had criteria for septic shock at enrolment. The median APACHE II score at ICU admission was 12 (10–15). In 33 (85%) cases IAC was excluded, whereas 5 (12.5%) and 2 (5%) patients had a probable and proven IAC, respectively. The single dose of L-AmB 5 mg/Kg was well tolerated in all patients, no early and late severe adverse events related to the drug were reported. L-AmB was discontinued in 65% of patients following a negative basal BDG result. All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 15%, in none case death was related to L-AmB administration or uncontrolled IAC. More specifically, mortality rates between patients with and without proven IAC was 0% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.99. Conclusions. The rate of proven IAC among critically ill high-risk patients was low, attesting at 5%. A single dose of L-AmB 5 mg/Kg following prompt withdrawal in case of basal negative BDG result seems to be a safe and effective approach in such population.

The diagnosis of malaria in returning travellers could be a challenge in non-endemic settings. We aimed to assess the performance of LAMP in comparison with standard conventional diagnostic methods using real-time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in case of discordant results.All travellers returning from malaria-endemic areas who presented to our Emergency Department (ED) from January 2017 to December 2020 with signs and symptoms suggestive for malaria were included. Blood microscopy was the reference diagnostic method applied at our laboratory with LAMP implemented as an additional method to aid in malaria diagnosis. PCR was employed only in case of between test's discordant results. Sensitivity and specificity of microscopy compared to LAMP were calculated with the confidence interval of 95%.Four-hundred and eight patients (55.6% male, median age 42 years) were screened for malaria. The diagnosis was confirmed in 49 cases (12%): 44 cases (90%) caused byIn our non-endemic setting LAMP was able to identify malaria cases with low-level parasitaemia otherwise missed by blood microscopy.

Background The role of culturing the graft preservation fluid (PF) is controversial and its impact on graft arteritis development remains unclear. Methods Systematic literature search retrieving all-languages observational studies comparing SOT recipients with culture positive PF versus culture negative PF. Graft site arteritis within 180 days from transplant was selected as primary outcome. Data were independently extracted using a pre-specified form, and quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models. Results 2,492 articles were screened, and twenty-one observational studies (N=2,208 positive PF vs. 4,458 negative) were included in the meta-analyses. Among positive PF, 857 (38.8%) were classified as high-risk group pathogens (fungi, Gram negative, Enterococcus spp., beta-hemolytic streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus) and 1,351 (61.2%) as low-risk (mostly coagulase negative Staphylococci) pathogens. A significant higher risk of graft arteritis was found in SOT recipients with a PF yielding a high-risk pathogen (odds ratio [OR] 18.43, 95%CI 7.83-43.40), with low heterogeneity (I²=2.24%). Similar results were found considering separately high-risk bacteria (OR 12.02, 95%CI 4.88-29.60) and fungi (OR 71.00, 95%CI 28.07–179.56), with no heterogeneity (I²=0%), and in the subgroup analyses of liver (OR 16.78, 95%CI 2.95–95.47) and kidney (OR 19.90, 95%CI 4.78–82.79) recipients. However, data about diagnostic features of graft arteritis were very limited, indeed for only 11 of the 93 events histological or microbiological results were reported. Conclusion Our results may support the performance of PF culturing and a preemptive diagnostic or therapeutic management upon isolation of high-risk pathogen. Further studies based on reliable diagnosis of graft arteritis are needed to confirm our findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at higher risk than general population for complicated COVID-19 course. Moreover COVID-19 vaccination in this setting is associated with a suboptimal immune response. However, the impact of this finding on the risk of breakthrough infection (BI) in SOT recipients has to be yet determined. Methods Single-center prospective longitudinal cohort of adult SOT recipients who received three doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine between February and December 2021 and were followed up to March 30 2022. Patients were tested for antibody response at several timepoints (1 st dose, 2 nd dose, 3±1 month after 1 st dose, and 1 month after 3 rd dose). Main endpoints were: i) BI defined as laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection diagnosed ≥14 day after 2 nd dose; ii) positive antibody response (AbR) defined as anti-rapid binding domain titer ≥5 U/ml determined by Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ECLIA assay (Roche Diagnostics, CH), the last available determination before BI was considered. Results Study cohort consists of 642 SOT (277 kidney, 191 liver, 144 heart, 37 lung) recipients: 63.9% males, median age 54 ± 14.5 years. Of them, 111 (17.8%) developed BI, BI rates were 19.9%, 18.1%, 15.2% and 10.8% among liver, heart, kidney and lung transplant recipients, respectively. Positive-AbR was observed in 60% of all patients, but rates varied from 8.7% to 91.3% among patients with BI and without BI, respectively. Predictors of BI infection at multivariable analysis were liver (vs. other grafts) transplant (OR 2.98, 95%CI 1.47-6.03), mycophenolate (1.63, 0.92-2.88) and steroids (1.8, 1.05- 3.33), while positive-AbR (0.61, 0.35-1.04) and age (0.97, 0.95-0.99) were protective. On the other hand, liver transplant (1.94, 1.02-3.69), time from transplant (1.09, 1.05-1.21), and Moderna vaccine (2.32, 1.46-3.70) were associated with positive-AbR, while age (0.97, 0.95-0.98), heart transplant (0.56, 0.33-0.96), mycophenolate (0.65, 0.39-1.06) and steroids (0.39, 0.23-0.65) with lower probability of positive-AbR. Conclusion Although associated with positive-AbR, liver transplant and younger age were also BI predictors, suggesting the importance of social factors and the controversial role of immune monitoring. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

The role of culturing the graft preservation fluid (PF) is controversial and its impact on graft arteritis development remains unclear.Systematic literature search retrieving observational studies comparing solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with culture-positive PF versus culture-negative PF. The quality of included studies was independently assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models. Graft site arteritis within 180 days from transplant was selected as the primary outcome.Twenty-one observational studies (N = 2208 positive PF vs. 4458 negative) were included. Among positive PF, 857 (38.8%) were classified as high-risk group pathogens and 1351 (61.2%) as low-risk pathogens. Low-risk and negative PF showed similar odds ratios. A significant higher risk of graft arteritis was found in SOT recipients with a PF yielding a high-risk pathogen (odds ratio [OR] 18.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.83-43.40) compared to low-risk and negative PF, with low heterogeneity (IOur results may support the performance of PF culturing and a preemptive diagnostic or therapeutic management upon isolation of high-risk pathogens. Further studies based on a reliable diagnosis of graft arteritis are needed.

Purpose This multicenter observational study was done to evaluate risk factors related to the development of BSI in patients admitted to ICU for COVID-19. Methods All patients with COVID-19 admitted in two COVID-19 dedicated ICUs in two different hospital between 02–2020 and 02–2021 were recruited. Result 537 patients were included of whom 265 (49.3%) experienced at least one BSI. Patients who developed bacteremia had a higher SOFA score [10 (8–12) vs 9 (7–10), p p p p p Conclusion A high SOFA score and a high Charlson score resulted associated with BSI’s development. Conversely, immunosuppressive therapy like steroids and tocilizumab, has no role in increasing the risk of bacteremia.