1. Safety of mid-thigh exit site venous catheters in multidrug resistant colonized patients.
- Author
-
Bartoli A, Donadoni M, Quici M, Rizzi G, La Cava L, Foschi A, Calloni M, Casella F, Martini E, Taino A, Cogliati C, and Gidaro A
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Risk Factors, Incidence, Thigh blood supply, Risk Assessment, Time Factors, Rectum microbiology, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Catheter-Related Infections microbiology, Catheter-Related Infections diagnosis, Catheter-Related Infections epidemiology, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Catheterization, Central Venous adverse effects, Catheterization, Central Venous instrumentation, Central Venous Catheters, Catheters, Indwelling, Femoral Vein, Catheterization, Peripheral adverse effects, Catheterization, Peripheral instrumentation
- Abstract
Introduction: Venous catheters inserted in superficial femoral vein and with mid-thigh exit site have emerged as a feasible and safe technique for central or peripheral tip's venous access, especially in agitated, delirious patients. The spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDR) strains is an emerging clinical problem and more and more patients are being colonized by these types of bacteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in mid-thigh catheters in patients with positive rectal swabs to evaluate the safety of this procedure and the real infection risk., Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data on patients with mid-tight catheters inserted from May 2021 to November 2022. All surveillance rectal swabs were recorded. In addition, to collect data on CLABSI and CRBSI, the results of all blood and catheter tip cultures performed during the hospital stay were acquired., Results: Six hundred two patients were enrolled, 304 patients (50.5%) had a rectal swab; 128 (42.1%) swabs were positive for MDR. Nine CLABSI (only two in patients with a positive rectal swab) and three CRBSI were detected. No statistical difference in the absolute number of CLABSI and CRBSI and in the number of infections per 1000 catheter days emerged between the overall population and patients with positive rectal swabs (respectively p = 0.45 and p = 0.53). Similarly, no statistical difference in the number of CLABSI and CRBSI was found among patients with a negative swab and patients with a positive one (respectively p = 0.43 and p = 0.51)., Conclusions: According to our data, cannulation of the superficial femoral vein represents a safe location in patients with positive rectal swabs., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF