Search

Background: Children tend to endorse psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) at higher rates than adults, although little is known about how specific symptom endorsement changes across the span of development. Here we take an observational approach to examine trends in PLE endorsement by age in two non-clinical samples: one of school-aged children and another of late adolescents and early adults., Methods: Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief (child and adult versions) responses were investigated in individuals ages 9-13 (n = 11865) and 16-24 (n = 3209) from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study (ABCD) and the Multisite Assessment of Psychosis-risk Study (MAP), respectively. Item-level endorsement and distressing item frequencies were examined by age throughout both cohorts., Results: Unusual perceptual experiences were generally endorsed more heavily in childhood, while other PLEs were endorsed in adolescents and adults up to 4.8 times more frequently than in children. Additionally, certain experiences were endorsed by as many as 73 percent of the older sample., Conclusions: Considerations for the measurement of PLEs in childhood and adolescence are underscored. Findings from these two samples provide a window into the course of these PLEs and may serve as a scaffold for future research investigating normative versus risk-related experiences during development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Brief questionnaires, such as the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ) positive scale, have been used to pre-screen individuals who may be at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis. Despite the apparent utility of the PQ, few studies have examined response styles in non-clinical settings, which this study aimed to assess., Methods: Response frequencies were examined for PQ positive subscale items in 3584 students (ages 18-35) from a nationally representative, semi-public undergraduate institution. Highly endorsed items were evaluated further in conjunction with established cutoffs and associated symptom ratings from the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) in a smaller subset of participants (n = 162). Positive subscale and distressing item responses were also evaluated by gender, race, and ethnicity using measurement invariance analyses and by comparing the relative proportion of individuals above established cutoffs., Results: Fifteen symptoms were endorsed by over 20 % of the sample with as high as 71 % of respondents endorsing them. Responses to 12 of these items were not associated with ratings on the SIPS. The PQ functioned similarly across demographic characteristics with strong evidence found for gender and race invariance across items and strong ethnicity invariance and partial invariance for positive subscale items and distressing items, respectively., Conclusions: These findings suggest that a commonly used psychosis-risk questionnaire may not be appropriate for non-clinical samples, with the possibility of high false positive rates of those at CHR for psychosis. Future large-scale epidemiological studies should evaluate if psychosis-risk screeners can be improved to identify CHR individuals in community settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the work described., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)