Search

The incidence of osteoporosis in children is increasing because of the increased survival rate of children with chronic diseases and the increased use of bone-damaging drugs. As childhood bone fragility has several etiologies, its management requires a thorough evaluation of all potentially contributing pathogenetic mechanisms. This review focuses on the main causes of primary and secondary osteoporosis and on the benefits and limits of the different radiological methods currently used in clinical practice for the study of bone quality. The therapeutic and preventive strategies currently available and the most novel diagnostic and treatment strategies are also presented. Optimal management of underlying systemic conditions is key for the treatment of bone fragility in childhood. DXA still represents the gold standard for the radiologic evaluation of bone health in children, although other imaging techniques such as computed tomography and ultrasound evaluations, as well as REMS, are increasingly studied and used. Bisphosphonate therapy is the gold standard for pharmacological treatment in both primary and secondary pediatric osteoporosis. Evidence and experience are building up relative to the use of monoclonal antibodies such as denosumab in cases of poor response to bisphosphonates in specific conditions such as osteogenesis imperfecta, juvenile Paget's disease and in some cases of secondary osteoporosis. Lifestyle interventions including adequate nutrition with adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, as well as physical activity, are recommended for prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report on a 4-year-old boy affected by Gaucher disease (GD) type 3, who presented with splenomegaly and a history of oculomotor apraxia. GD is a rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by glucocerebrosidase deficiency with multi-organ involvement. Besides common clinical features such as hepatosplenomegaly and skeletal involvement, less frequent neurological symptoms, such as oculomotor apraxia, are indicative of neuronopathic forms of the disease, namely GD type 3, to be confirmed both by enzyme activity and genetic testing. Overall, GD management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving metabolic pediatricians, neurologists, psychologists, and geneticists, and currently relies on early enzyme replacement therapy. Although enzyme replacement therapy has proved to be effective in improving systemic signs and symptoms, it is unable to alleviate neurological complications once these have occurred, as it does not pass across the blood–brain barrier. Neurological improvements may occur through indirect mechanisms. Thus, our case report aims to highlight the importance of considering GD in the differential diagnosis of pediatric patients presenting with splenomegaly associated with neurological manifestations, as early intervention may significantly modify the disease progression and prevent further irreversible complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]