Search

Meat and its by-products offer a rich source of bioactive compounds which have potential applications in both the food and pharmaceutical industries. In this review, we present several extraction methods and report the identification and properties of bioactive peptides. We also examine the challenges and limitations associated with their use in food applications. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation using starts cultures are common methods for generating bioactive peptides from meat proteins. Additionally, natural gastrointestinal digestion can also produce bioactive peptides. However, emerging technologies like high hydrostatic pressure, subcritical extraction and pulsed electric fields can improve hydrolysis and increase the yield of bioactive peptides. Online bioinformatics applications have emerged as an established method for identifying potentially bioactive peptides. These tools reduce the cost and time required for traditional methods of research. Finally, incorporating bioactive peptides into diets for specific purposes such as supporting vulnerable populations like children and the elderly ensures safety and efficacy

Ciguatoxins are marine compounds that share a ladder-shaped polyether structure produced by dinoflagellates of the genus Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa, and include maitotoxins (MTX1 and MTX3), ciguatoxins (CTX3C) and analogues (gambierone), components of one of the most frequent human foodborne illness diseases known as ciguatera fish poisoning. This disease was previously found primarily in tropical and subtropical areas but nowadays, the dinoflagellates producers of ciguatoxins had spread to European coasts. One decade ago, the European Food Safety Authority has raised the need to complete the toxicological available data for the ciguatoxin group of compounds. Thus, in this work, the in vivo effects of ciguatoxin-related compounds have been investigated using internationally adopted guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Intraperitoneal acute toxicity was tested for maitotoxin 1 at doses between 200 and 3200 ng/kg and the acute oral toxicity of Pacific Ciguatoxin CTX3C at 330 and 1050 ng/kg and maitotoxin 1 at 800 ng/kg were also evaluated showing not effects on mice survival after a 96 h observation period. Therefore, for the following experiments the oral subchronic doses were between 172 and 1760 ng/kg for gambierone, 10 and 102 ng/kg for Pacific Ciguatoxin CTX3C, 550 and 1760 ng/kg for maitotoxin 3 and 800, 2560 and 5000 ng/kg for maitotoxin 1. The results presented here raise the need to reevaluate the in vivo activity of these agents. Although the intraperitoneal lethal dose of maitotoxin 1 is assumed to be 50 ng/kg, without chemical purity identifications and description of the bioassay procedures, in this work, an intraperitoneal lethal dose of 1107 ng/kg was obtained. Therefore, the data presented here highlight the need to use a common procedure and certified reference material to clearly establish the levels of these environmental contaminants in food