Search

This paper focuses on seismic fragility and damage scenario assessment of minor Italian historical centres through the development of urban fragility curves. With reference to the case study of Balvano, a small centre located in Basilicata Region of Italy, two hybrid models have been adopted. The first is a mechanic-based hybrid model developed by the authors to derive urban fragility curves specifically; the second is the macroseismic method, originally conceived to derive typological fragility curves for single building classes, expanded to derive urban fragility curve herein. Balvano was strongly struck by 1980 Irpinia-Basilicata earthquake (Ms = 6.90) and hence subjected to an intense reconstruction process during 1980s, where almost the 80% of the buildings were reconstructed with reinforced concrete structures in the place of unreinforced masonry ones. Seismic vulnerability and damage scenarios before and after 1980 have been assessed and compared with the purpose of validating the effectiveness of the urban scale fragility curves obtained through hybrid methodologies and quantifying the effect of the ‘new’ seismic hazard maps and first seismic codes and recommendations released by the Italian Government in the aftermath of 1980 for the construction of new buildings or for retrofitting the existing ones. A good matching between predicted and occurred damage scenario from the research outcomes emerged, confirming the effectiveness of the urban scale hybrid fragility curves to assess seismic vulnerability at urban scale. Moreover, the comparison of the damage scenarios pre and post-reconstruction highlighted the crucial role played by the code prescriptions adopted in that years for reducing the seismic vulnerability of the municipality and the importance of the ‘new’ seismic hazard maps introduced in 1980s. Finally, the differences between mechanical-based hybrid and macroseismic model have been discussed in the paper.

This paper investigates the role of the horizontal axial force on the in-plane shear and flexural strength of masonry spandrels subjected to seismic actions. Strength criteria included in the main national and international codes take into account for geometrical and material properties, but valuable considerations about the influence of the horizontal axial force are missing. Nevertheless, experimental programs and post-earthquake damage scenarios proved that the horizontal axial force within the spandrels can be also significant under seismic actions, especially when they are surrounded by strength and stiff vertical piers or when significantly compressed by the effect of tensile-resistant elements. As main purpose, the strength criteria proposed by the Italian code for the spandrels have been revised accounting for the effect of the horizontal axial force on its shear and flexural strength. A database containing experimental tests conducted on masonry spandrels was elaborated and used to compare experimental with theoretical results. Outcomes showed that the revised criteria match satisfactorily the experimental results when significant axial forces affect the spandrels, both in terms of strength and failure mechanism. Contrariwise, existing code formulations are representative for the spandrels subjected to low axial force such that rocking or pure shear mechanisms tend to prevail.

In 2007 the Italian National Research Council published the technical document CNR-DT 206/2007 “Instructions for the design, execution and control of timber structures”, with the purpose to provide a technical support to the operators of the sector, in line with the most advanced knowledge at that time. Since then, the world of timber engineering has largely used such document, even though the instructions are not mandatory standard rules, so that they became the most common tool in Italy for the structural use of timber, opening the markets and favouring competition and new applications. In latest years new studies, researches and innovative proposals have promoted the development and the growth of timber constructions also in the civil residential field. The framework of standard rules for constructions and products, both Europeans and Italians, has evolved too. For these reasons, CNR has considered as opportune to proceed to the editing of a new version, updated and widened, namely with the acronym DT 206-R1. The document comes from the spontaneous cooperation of an open group of specialists and operators of the sector, based on a wide discussion on the common scientific and technical expertise and knowledge. The current version has already taken into account the results of the public inquiry phase (concluded by now). The paper presents the main contents of the document, evidencing the innovations.

This paper provides a comphrensive review of the critical aspects of nonlinear modeling for evaluating the seismic response of masonry structures, emphasizing the issues relevant to engineering practice. Currently, the specialized technical community shares the opinion that, for a performance-based approach, numerical models are the only tools sufficiently effective to support the seismic assessment of existing buildings. However, their potential often falls short when attempting to accurately describe the behavior of masonry structures. In fact, these structures feature highly complex architectural configurations, different masonry types, and various structural solutions, meaning that extra care is required in numerical modeling. This is especially true when the modelers do not have a solid background in the software chosen and may not be practiced using the vast variety of options offered by the software houses. They are often unaware of the consequences that questionable modeling choices may have on the results obtained by the models. These extremely complex topics are treated in the paper from an engineering practice perspective, providing an in-depth overview of the challenging issues related to the use of different modeling strategies. The paper covers strategies ranging from the Equivalent Frame approach (widelyused in common engineering practice) to more refined techniques like 2D and 3D FiniteElement procedures based on continuous, discrete, and micro-mechanical approaches. Critical aspects in the modeling of both in- and out-of-plane responses of masonry, as well as the critical issues in wall-to-wall connections and diaphragm roles are investigated. All the examined issues are clarified through numerical examples highlighting also how a consistent and integrated use of different procedures may be beneficial. Finally, some of most relevant challenging issues concerning the use of numerical models in seismic assessment with the nonlinear static approach are presented and discussed.

This paper presents a novel hybrid-based methodology devoted to develop urban fragility curves and damage probability matrices to predict likelihood seismic damage scenarios for small and medium Italian urban centres, considering URM buildings only. The concept of urban fragility curve consists of a single curve mean-representative of the seismic fragility of an entire area accounting for the combinations of building classes and their percentage, then they differ from those typological. The methodology has been developed with reference to Rocca di Mezzo, a small Italian urban centre located in the central Apennine area, Italy. Based on CarTiS inventory, building classes have been firstly recognized and urban fragility curves, representative for damage scenarios at Ultimate Limit State, developed. To predict damage scenarios from low to high-intensity earthquakes, an approach to define multi-damage urban fragility curves and damage probability matrices has been also presented. To this aim, a damage scale suffered by building classes has been defined by converting the final outcomes of the AeDES form (used in Italy for post-earthquake surveys) in the damage levels provided by the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS98). Data coming from urban fragility curves have been compared with the actual damage scenario recorded in Rocca di Mezzo after the 2009 L’Aquila’s earthquake, in terms of both peak-ground acceleration and Mecalli-Cancani-Sieberg scale. The achieved results showed a good accordance between theoretical predictions and actual damage scenarios, coherent also with the damage scenarios occurred in other Italian historical centres hit by severe earthquakes over the years. Thus, the methodology can provide a first important indicator to support the development of emergently plans devoted to identify priority of interventions in such areas particularly vulnerable with respect to others.

This paper investigates the potentials of inter-story isolation systems (IIS) for retrofitting irregular masonry buildings by means of an isolated vertical addition realised on the roof of the existing structure. By assuming a case study, a wide parametric analysis is firstly carried out on lumped-masses model for identifying the dynamic properties of the isolated superstructure that minimizes the global seismic response. Hence, a 3D FE model is adopted for the detailed design and analysis of the IIS structure, with different solutions, in order to regularize the global seismic response of the IIS complex. Finally, some general design criteria are suggested.