Search

Objectives Despite known health benefits of breastfeeding, the Navajo have low reported frequency of breastfeeding initiation and support. We evaluated breastfeeding frequencies and practices in the predominately Navajo community of rural San Juan County, Utah, to identify factors that affect breastfeeding decisions and duration. Methods We performed retrospective chart review for 135 infants aged 0 to 12 months, and surveys of 85 mothers of infants aged 0 to 2 years, and eight primary care providers. We characterized demographic factors using counts/percentages and medians/inter-quartile ranges, and compared mothers who breastfed for 6 months or less versus greater than 6 months. Results In 96 infants with complete feeding documentation, 86 infants (90%) received some breast milk and 36 infants (38%) were exclusively breastfed at age 2 months. In 67 infants with complete feeding documentation at [greater than or equal to] 6 months, 22 infants (33%) were exclusively breastfed 6 months. Most mothers knew about breastfeeding benefits. In 56 mothers whose infants were aged [greater than or equal to] 6 months at the time of the survey, breastfeeding for more than 6 months had been planned by 44 mothers (79%) but performed by only 29 mothers (52%). Mothers who breastfed for > 6 months were more likely to have been influenced by WIC and less likely to have introduced formula at an early age. Barriers to breastfeeding included maternal pain, latch difficulties, and concerns about inadequate milk supply. Primary care providers reported limited confidence in providing breastfeeding support but would support telehealth-driven interventions. Conclusions for Practice Practical, culturally sensitive interventions, including telehealth and improved provider education, may improve breastfeeding outcomes and community health in this underserved population., Author(s): Laura L. Brown [sup.1] , Revina Talker [sup.2] , Gregory J. Stoddard [sup.3] , Jessica Clayton [sup.1] , Morgan M. Millar [sup.4] , Yeonjung Jo [sup.5] , Tyler Bardsley [...]

OBJECTIVES: Medical schools considering longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) have access to literature that provides recommendations for planning, implementation, and sustainability. However, LIC development and implementation remain notoriously challenging. University of Utah's LIC development process was informed by the documented experiences of long-established LIC programs. A literature gap was identified pertaining to more recently implemented LICs. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of faculty in the early stages of LIC development. METHODS: Thirteen representatives from eight LICs implemented after 2015 participated in 2 Zoom focus groups (5 participated in the first and the other 8 participated in the second). Participants were asked questions to assess key supports, barriers, and recommendations. Following the focus groups, participants were asked to rank the responses based on their level of importance. RESULTS: Highest ranked supports included stakeholder and partner involvement; a dedicated coordinator or team; and strong, committed leadership. Highest ranked barriers included difficulty recruiting preceptors and clinical sites; underestimation of the amount of work required to coordinate the LIC; and challenges in providing the needed faculty development. Top recommendations for new LICs included investing in the needs of clinical partners; staffing or assigning a dedicated coordinator early in the development and implementation process; and frequent communication with all stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Despite variation among the types of new LICs represented, there was consensus among participants on the importance of key supports, barriers, and recommendations. Knowledge of these factors can help new schools plan and allocate resources during their LIC development process. Participants found the focus group process and follow-up discussions useful and have formed an ongoing workgroup which meets quarterly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]