Search

Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) has shown benefits, however, no studies have assessed whether biochemical progression or response depth predicts long-term outcomes. The single-arm I-PRISM phase II trial (NCT02916771) evaluated ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in 55 patients with HR-SMM. The primary endpoint, median progression-free survival (PFS), was not reached (NR) (95% CI: 57.7-NR, median follow-up 50 months). The secondary endpoint, biochemical PFS, was 48.6 months (95% CI: 39.9-NR) and coincided with or preceded SLiM-CRAB in eight patients. For additional secondary objectives, the overall response rate was 93% with 31% achieving complete response (CR) and 45% very good partial response (VGPR) or better. CR correlated strongly with the absence of SLiM-CRAB and biochemical progression. MRD-negativity (10 -5 sensitivity) predicted a 5-year biochemical PFS of 100% versus 40% in MRD-positive patients (p = 0.051), demonstrating that deep responses significantly improve time to progression. Exploratory single-cell RNA sequencing linked tumor MHC class I expression to proteasome inhibitor response, and a lower proportion of GZMB+ T cells within clonally expanded CD8+ T cells associated with suboptimal outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: O.N. reports research support from Takeda and Janssen; advisory board participation for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda, and GPCR therapeutics; and honorarium from Pfizer. M.B. reports consultancy for Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Epizyme, Karyopharm, Menarini Biosystems, and Adaptive. G.B. reports consultancy for Prothena. E.O. reports advisory board participation and/or honoraria from Janssen, BMS, Sanofi, Pfizer, Exact; consulting for Takeda; and steering committee participation with Natera. K.A. reports consultancy for AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Pfizer; and board participation and stock options for Dynamic Cell Therapies, C4 Therapeutics, Next RNA, Oncopep, Starton, and Window. P.G.R. reports advisory board participation or consulting for Celgene (BMS), GSK, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research grants from Oncopeptides and Karyopharm. R.S.P. is a co-founder, equity holder, and consultant for PreDICTA Bioscience. I.M.G.: Consulting/Advisory role: AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Aptitude Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Huron Consulting, Janssen, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sognef, Takeda, Binding Site a part of Thermo Fischer Scientific, Window Therapeutics, and 10X Genomics; speaker fees from Vor Biopharma and Veeva Systems, Inc., and is a co-founder of PreDICTA Bioscience. I.M.G.’s spouse is the CMO and an equity holder of Disc Medicine. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Inclusion and ethics: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as an underrepresented ethnic and/or gender minority in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of the LGBTQIA+ community. We support inclusive, diverse, and equitable conduct of research., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Multiple myeloma is an incurable plasma cell malignancy that evolves over decades through the selection and malignant transformation of monoclonal plasma cells. The evolution from precursor states to symptomatic disease is characterized by an increasing complexity of genomic alterations within the plasma cells and a remodelling of the microenvironment towards an immunosuppressive state. Notably, in patients with advanced disease, similar mechanisms of tumour escape and immune dysfunction mediate resistance to modern T cell-based therapies, such as T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Thus, an increasing number of clinical trials are assessing the efficiency and safety of these therapies in individuals with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge about tumour intrinsic and extrinsic processes underlying progression from precursor states to symptomatic myeloma and discuss the rationale for early interception including the use of T cell-redirecting therapies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: I.M.G. received honoraria from Celgene, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Vor Biopharma; had consultancy/advisory roles with Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Celgene, Cellectar, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, The Binding Site, GSK, AbbVie, Adaptive and 10X Genomics; has received speaker fees from Vor Biopharma and Veeva Systems, Inc.; is a co-founder and equity holder in PreDICTA Biosciences; and her spouse is the CMO and equity holder of Disc Medicine. None of these interests are related to the financing of this Review. D.M.C.d.S., R.T., L.B. and J.-B.A. declare no competing interests., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Detection of light chain (LC) monoclonal gammopathies (MG) traditionally relies on serum free LC (FLC) κ, λ, and their ratio (κ/λ) reference ranges based on a mostly White population. We investigated FLC values in a racially diverse population by screening 10,035 individuals for heavy chain MG, identifying 9,028 negative cases whose FLC were measured. Participants included 4,149 from the PROMISE Study (US, n=2,383; South Africa, n=1,766) and 4,879 from the Mass General Brigham Biobank, with 44% self-identifying as Black. Using standard FLC reference ranges, 1,074 out of 10,035 individuals (10.7%) were diagnosed with LC-MGUS, with 99% being κ-restricted. In the US, 14.8% of Black and 4% of White individuals were diagnosed (p<0.01). Among US participants of African (AFR) and European (EUR) genetic ancestry, 14.4% AFR and 2.9% EUR were diagnosed (p<0.01). Among South Africans (100% Black), 27.8% were diagnosed using standard ranges. To avoid overdiagnosis, we propose a new κ/λ ratio reference range (0.686 to 2.10) for populations of African descent with normal renal function, with standard values for κ and λ being 7.97 to 77.50 mg/L and 6.20 to 49.20 mg/L, respectively. This reduces LC-MGUS overdiagnosis by 91% (10.7% vs. 0.97%). Using the new reference, LC-MGUS accounts for 8.8% of MGUS cases, with 74% being κ-restricted, consistent with LC myeloma rates. These findings highlight the importance of basing disease definitions, such as MGUS, on diverse populations. Adopting our proposed FLC reference values would reduce MGUS overdiagnosis among Black individuals, avoiding unnecessary financial, psychological, and medical consequences., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), marked by the accumulation of somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells, significantly elevates the risk of all-cause mortality, mainly due to cardiovascular events. Therefore, investigating this pathophysiological phenomenon is crucial for understanding cardiovascular aging and enhancing both health span and lifespan. In the present study, we examined samples of subjects enrolled within the angiographically controlled Verona Heart Study (VHS), which provides a robust model for cardiovascular aging, particularly regarding coronary artery disease (CAD). We analyzed 44 older subjects diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 42 healthy, sex- and age-matched controls (CAD-FREE). Employing deep sequencing and an amplicon-based approach, we focused on 11 key genetic regions in ASXL1, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, PPM1D, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, TP53, and U2AF1 genes to investigate clonal hematopoiesis. Subjects in the CAD group exhibited a significantly higher variant burden than those in the CAD-FREE group, both in terms of the total number of somatic variants and disruptive variants affecting protein function. This increased mutational load was notably influenced by six specific genetic regions: ASXL1, DNMT3A, IDH2, JAK2, TET2, and U2AF1, which displayed elevated variant rates in the CAD subjects. Moreover, ASXL1, DNMT3A, IDH2, JAK2, SF3B1, TET2, and TP53 exhibited substantially higher levels of disruptive variants in the CAD group. In summary, our findings highlight a correlation between clonal hematopoiesis and the accumulation of disruptive variants in specific genomic regions in the VHS cohort, thereby shedding light on their potential role in cardiovascular aging., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Aging Association.)

Additional copies of chromosome 1 long arm (1q) are frequently found in multiple myeloma (MM) and predict high-risk disease. Available data suggest a different outcome and biology of patients with amplification (Amp1q, ≥4 copies of 1q) vs. gain (Gain1q, 3 copies of 1q) of 1q. We evaluated the impact of Amp1q/Gain1q on the outcome of newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the FORTE trial (NCT02203643). Among 400 patients with available 1q data, 52 (13%) had Amp1q and 129 (32%) Gain1q. After a median follow-up of 62 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.2 months in the Amp1q group, 54.9 months in Gain1q, and not reached (NR) in Normal 1q. PFS was significantly hampered by the presence of Amp1q (HR 3.34 vs. Normal 1q, P < 0.0001; HR 1.99 vs. Gain1q, P = 0.0008). Patients with Gain1q had also a significantly shorter PFS compared with Normal 1q (HR 1.68, P = 0.0031). Concomitant poor prognostic factors or the failure to achieve MRD negativity predicted a median PFS < 12 months in Amp1q patients. Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone plus autologous stem cell transplantation treatment improved the adverse effect of Gain1q but not Amp1q. Transcriptomic data showed that additional 1q copies were associated with deregulation in apoptosis signaling, p38 MAPK signaling, and Myc-related genes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is the current standard technique to define minimal residual disease (MRD) outside the bone marrow (BM) in multiple myeloma (MM), recently standardised applying the Deauville scores (DS) to focal lesions (FS) and bone marrow uptake (BMS) and defining the complete metabolic response (CMR) as uptake below the liver background (DS <4)., Methods: In this analysis, we aimed at confirming the role of CMR, and complementarity with BM multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10 -5 , in an independent cohort of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible MM patients previously enrolled in the phase II randomised FORTE trial. 109 of the 474 global patients enrolled in the trial between February 23, 2015, and April 5, 2017, who had paired PET/CT (performed at baseline [B] and preceding maintenance therapy [PM]) and MFC evaluation, were included in this analysis., Findings: At B, 93% of patients had focal lesions within the bones (FS ≥4 in 89%) and 99% increased BM uptake (BMS ≥4 in 61%). At PM, CMR was achieved in 63% of patients, which was a strong predictor for prolonged PFS in univariate analysis at landmark time PM (HR 0.40, P  = 0.0065) and in Cox multivariate analysis (HR 0.31, P  = 0.0023). Regarding OS, a trend in favour of CMR was present in univariate (HR 0.44, P  = 0.094), and Cox multivariate model (HR 0.17, P  = 0.0037). Patients achieving both PET/CT CMR and MFC negativity at PM showed significantly extended PFS in univariate (HR 0.45, P  = 0.020) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.41, P  = 0.015)., Interpretation: We herein confirm the applicability and validity of DS criteria to define CMR and its prognostic relevance and complementarity with MFC at the BM level., Funding: Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Italian Ministry of Health (RC-2022-2773423)., Competing Interests: EZ receives honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda. SO has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Janssen, Amgen, and Takeda. FG has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline; has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oncopeptides, bluebird bio, and Pfizer. MD has received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AB has served on the advisory board for Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline. MGa has received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline. RZ has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. BG has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. AV received honoraria from Novartis, Advanced Accelerator Applications and GE Healthcare. FP receives honoraria and travel accommodation support from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda and has served on the advisory boards for Celgene BMS, Janssen, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline. PT has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer; has served on the data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Amgen. KM has received honoraria from Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen. MB has received honoraria from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline; has received research funding from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Mundipharma. PM has received honoraria from and/or served on scientific boards for AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astellas, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. MC has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Adaptive Biotechnologies; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer; has served on the speakers’ bureaus for Janssen, Celgene, and Sanofi. CN has been PET revisor for Keosys-Sanofi. The other authors declare no competing financial interests., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) represent an unmet medical need. In the FORTE trial, lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus carfilzomib (KRd) induction resulted in a higher proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response as compared with carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (KCd), and carfilzomib plus lenalidomide maintenance prolonged progression-free survival compared with lenalidomide maintenance. In this prespecified analysis of the FORTE trial, we described the outcomes of enrolled patients according to their cytogenetic risk., Methods: The UNITO-MM-01/FORTE was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done at 42 Italian academic and community practice centres, which enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma aged 18-65 years. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on standard International Myeloma Working Group criteria, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60%, and had not received any previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy. At enrolment, patients were stratified according to International Staging System stage (I vs II/III) and age (<60 years vs 60-65 years) and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to KRd plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; four 28-day induction cycles with KRd, melphalan at 200 mg/m 2 and ASCT [MEL200-ASCT], followed by four 28-day KRd consolidation cycles), 12 28-day KRd cycles, or KCd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with KCd, MEL200-ASCT, and four 28-day KCd consolidation cycles), using a web-based system (block randomisation, block size of 12). Carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, followed by 36 mg/m 2 intravenously administered on days 8, 9, 15, and 16 of cycle 1, and then 36 mg/m 2 intravenously administered for all subsequent doses on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16; lenalidomide 25 mg was administered orally on days 1-21; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2 was administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally or intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. After the consolidation phase, patients were stratified according to induction-consolidation treatment and randomly assigned (1:1; block size of 8) to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone. Carfilzomib 36 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously on days 1-2 and days 15-16, every 28 days for up to 2 years, and lenalidomide 10 mg was administered orally on days 1-21 every 28 days until progression or intolerance in both groups. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction with KRd versus KCd and progression-free survival with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance treatment. In this preplanned analysis, we included patients enrolled in the FORTE trial with complete cytogenetic data on del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), del(1p), gain(1q) (3 copies), and amp(1q) (≥4 copies) assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis on CD138-positive sorted cells. We assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease negativity, and 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity according to the presence of zero, one, and two or more HRCA across treatment groups. The FORTE trial is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02203643., Findings: Between Feb 23, 2015, and April 5, 2017, 477 patients were enrolled, of whom 396 (83%) had complete cytogenetic data and were analysed (176 [44%] of whom were women and 220 [56%] were men). The median follow-up from first randomisation was 51 months (IQR 46-56). 4-year progression-free survival was 71% (95% CI 64-78) in patients with zero HRCA, 60% (95% CI 52-69) in patients with one HRCA, and 39% (95% CI 30-50) in patients with two or more HRCA. Compared with patients with zero HRCA, the risk of progression or death was similar in patients with one HRCA (hazard ratio [HR] 1·33 [95% CI 0·90-1·97]; p=0·15) and higher in patients with two or more HRCA (HR 2·56 [95% CI 1·74-3·75]); p<0·0001) across the induction-intensification-consolidation groups. Moreover, the risk of progression or death was also higher in patients with two or more HRCA versus those with one HRCA (HR 1·92 [95% CI 1·34-2·76]; p=0·0004). 4-year overall survival from the first randomisation was 94% (95% CI 91-98) in patients with zero HRCA, 83% (95% CI 76-90) in patients with one HRCA, and 63% (95% CI 54-74) in patients with two or more HRCA. Compared with patients with zero HRCA, the risk of death was significantly higher in patients with one HRCA (HR 2·55 [95% CI 1·22-5·36]; p=0·013) and two or more HRCA (HR 6·53 [95% CI 3·24-13·18]; p<0·0001). Patients with two or more HRCA also had a significantly higher risk of death than those with one HRCA (HR 2·56 [95% CI 1·53-4·28]; p=0·0004). The rates of 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity were similar in patients with zero HRCA (53 [35%] of 153] and with one HRCA (57 [41%] of 138) and were lower in patients with two or more HRCA (25 [24%] of 105). The median duration of follow-up from second randomisation was 37 months (IQR 33-42). 3-year progression-free survival from the second randomisation was 80% (95% CI 74-88) in patients with zero HRCA, 68% (95% CI 59-78) in patients with one HRCA, and 53% (95% CI 42-67) in patients with two or more HRCA. The risk of progression or death was higher in patients with one HRCA (HR 1·68 [95% CI 1·01-2·80]; p=0·048) and two or more HRCA (2·74 [95% CI 1·60-4·69], p=0·0003) than in patients with zero HRCA., Interpretation: This preplanned analysis of the FORTE trial showed that carfilzomib-based induction-intensification-consolidation regimens are effective strategies in patients with standard risk (zero HRCA) and high-risk (one HRCA) myeloma, resulting in similar rates of progression-free survival and 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity. Despite promising progression-free survival, patients with ultra-high-risk disease (those with 2 or more HRCA) still have an increased risk of progression and death and therefore represent an unmet medical need., Funding: Amgen and Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RM has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, and Amgen; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Amgen; and has received consultancy fees from Janssen, Takeda, and Sanofi. PM has received honoraria from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Novartis, Gilead, Jazz, Sanofi, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKlin; and has served on scientific advisory boards for Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Jazz, Sanofi, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline. LP has received honoraria from Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and Janssen; and has received consultancy fees from Janssen. BG has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; and has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. AP has served on the advisory board for Amgen; has received support for meeting fees, travel, and lodging expenses from Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen; and has received non-financial support from Celgene, Janssen, Roche, Takeda, and Amgen. NG has received research grants from Celgene and Janssen Pharmaceutical; has received sponsorship for clinical studies from Janssen Pharmaceutical and Millennium Pharmaceutical; has served on the advisory boards for Celgene, Takeda, and Janssen Pharmaceutical; and has received support for attending meetings from Janssen Pharmaceutical, Celgene, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AG has received honoraria from Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, and Janssen; and has served on the advisory boards for Takeda and Janssen. MC has received advisory fees from Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; and has received research funding from Celgene. SB has received honoraria from Sanofi, Celgene, Takeda, and Janssen. EZ has received honoraria from and served on the advisory boards for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Sanofi, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Oncopeptides. AB has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Janssen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, and Takeda. MB has received honoraria from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline; and has received research funding from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Mundipharma. FG has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline; and has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oncopeptides, bluebird bio, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: High levels of circulating tumor plasma cells (CTC-high) in patients with multiple myeloma are a marker of aggressive disease. We aimed to confirm the prognostic impact and identify a possible cutoff value of CTC-high for the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in the context of concomitant risk features and minimal residual disease (MRD) achievement., Methods: CTC were analyzed at diagnosis with two-tube single-platform flow cytometry (sensitivity 4 × 10 -5 ) in patients enrolled in the multicenter randomized FORTE clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02203643). MRD was assessed by second-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (sensitivity 10 -5 ). We tested different cutoff values in series of multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazards regression analyses on PFS outcome and selected the value that maximized the Harrell's C-statistic. We analyzed the impact of CTC on PFS and OS in a MV analysis including baseline features and MRD negativity., Results: CTC analysis was performed in 401 patients; the median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range, 45-54 months). There was a modest correlation between the percentage of CTC and bone marrow plasma cells ( r = 0.38). We identified an optimal CTC cutoff of 0.07% (approximately 5 cells/µL, C-index 0.64). In MV analysis, CTC-high versus CTC-low patients had significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.97, P < .001; 4-year PFS 38% v 69%) and OS (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.56; P < .001; 4-year OS 68% v 92%). The CTC levels, but not the bone marrow plasma cell levels, affected the outcome. The only factor that reduced the negative impact of CTC-high was the achievement of MRD negativity (interaction P = .039)., Conclusion: In multiple myeloma, increasing levels of CTC above an optimal cutoff represent an easy-to-assess, robust, and independent high-risk factor. The achievement of MRD negativity is the most important factor that modulates their negative prognostic impact.

The current strategies for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, thanks to effective drug classes and combination therapies, for both the upfront and relapsed settings. Clinical trials for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients led to the approval of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) in combination with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), to be administered during the induction phase before transplantation and during maintenance treatment, with lenalidomide recommended until relapse. In relapsed/refractory patients, the complex treatment scenario currently includes several options, such as triplets with anti-CD38 mAbs plus IMiDs or PIs, and novel targeted molecules. Comparisons among clinical trials and real-world data showed a good degree of reproducibility of some important results, particularly in terms of overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This may help clinicians towards a proper selection of the best treatment options, particularly in real-world settings. However, as compared with the management of real-world settings, clinical trials have some pitfalls in terms of outcome and especially in terms of safety and quality of life. In fact, trials include younger and presumably healthier patients, excluding those with worst clinical conditions due to MM features (e.g., renal insufficiency or bone disease, which can impair the performance status) and comorbidities (e.g., cardiac and pulmonary disease), thus resulting in a possible lack of representativeness of data about the patients enrolled. In this review, we analyze comparable and discrepant results from clinical trials vs. real-world settings published in the last 10 years, focusing on different drugs and combinations for the treatment of MM and providing an overview of treatment choices., Competing Interests: Author SO has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Janssen, Amgen, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bertamini, Bertuglia and Oliva.)