Search

Background: Adolescent siblings of children and young people (CYP) with cancer are at increased risk of psychosocial difficulties, yet many remain overlooked and unsupported. This project aimed to explore the experiences and perceived needs of adolescent siblings of paediatric oncology inpatients to inform service improvement recommendations for sibling support., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 siblings of CYP previously admitted to a paediatric oncology ward. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings were reviewed in consultation with staff and used to identify pragmatic/feasible recommendations for improving sibling support, organized using the three-tier 'Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model' (PPPHM; Families, Systems & Health, 2006, 24, 381)., Results: An overarching narrative of siblings wanting to feel part of the cancer journey was found, including their family's experience on the ward, with three key themes: (i) "what about me?": overlooked and unseen, (ii) "always changing, never knowing": the challenge of uncertainty and (iii) "let me be part of it all": togetherness, communication and connection. These findings informed sibling support recommendations. Such recommendations included providing psychosocial screening, resources and opportunities for family time/communication and developmentally appropriate information to all siblings (universal support), monitoring psychosocial difficulties, siblings having someone to talk to and fostering family and peer connection for siblings requiring additional support (targeted support) and offering one-to-one psychological support and family therapy for persistent and/or escalating distress (clinical/treatment support)., Conclusions: Based on the experiences of siblings, a range of sibling support recommendations have been identified. Implementation and evaluation of these recommendations are warranted., (© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.)

Background: Research suggests that those caring for a loved one with an eating disorder in the UK report unmet needs and highlight areas for improvement. More research is needed to understand these experiences on a wider, national scale., Aims: To disseminate a national survey for adults who had experience caring for a loved one with an eating disorder in the UK, informed by the findings of a smaller scale, qualitative study with parents, siblings and partners in the UK., Method: A cross-sectional web-based survey was disseminated to adults who had experience caring for a loved one with an eating disorder in the UK., Results: A total of 360 participants completed the survey. Participants described experiences of care received in both children and young people's, and adult services. Those receiving care from children and young people's services generally reported more timely care, greater involvement in care and more confidence managing their loved one's symptoms post-discharge. In both settings, participants identified a number of areas for improvement, including more timely access to care, improved transition processes and discharge planning, and increased involvement in their loved one's care., Conclusions: This survey captures the experiences of individuals caring for a loved one with an eating disorder in the UK. There are identified discrepancies between experiences of care in children and young people services compared with adult services. Clinical implications and recommendations for improvement are discussed, including improved transition and discharge processes, increased involvement of and/or support for carers themselves, and more timely access to support services for the unwell individual.

At present, little is known about the outcomes measured in studies assessing the effectiveness of treatments for adults with epilepsy. As part of a wider project developing a Core Outcome Set for clinical trials for adults with epilepsy, we summarised the current outcomes and measurement instruments used in completed phase III and IV clinical trials registered in the clinicaltrials.gov and International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) databases. Of the reviewed studies 104 were deemed eligible. The outcomes that were measured were recorded, and trial registry entries cross referenced against associated peer review publications. In total, 374 unique granular outcome terms were identified, which grouped into 45 outcome concepts across the following domains: seizures, cognitive/behavioural/psychiatric, sleep, general symptom, functional status / disability, emotional functioning, social functioning, delivery of care, life impact, trial processes, side effects / adverse events, pregnancy / offspring, and death. We identified evidence of outcome measurement heterogeneity, with just 10/45 outcome concepts measured in more than half of the identified studies. This association remained when assessing studies grouped by epilepsy chronicity (newly diagnosed vs. chronic/treatment refractory) and epilepsy classification (focal vs. other). These findings highlight the need for a Core Outcome Set for interventional studies for adults with epilepsy to improve consistency of outcome measurement and reporting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest James W Mitchell. has received fees for consultancy from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM), to facilitate the development of their epilepsy standard sets for routine practice. Rachel Batchelor has nothing to disclose related to the submitted work. Outside the submitted work, at time of writing RB was a member of the NICE Epilepsies Guideline Committee and was a lived experience representative on the RCPCH Epilepsy Board. Guleed Adan has nothing to disclose related to the submitted work. Adam Noble has nothing to disclose related to the submitted work. Paula R Williamson chairs the COMET management group. Tony Marson has nothing to disclose related to the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Emerging research suggests that a more infant-led approach to complementary feeding may confer benefits for child language, but these findings are based on parent report studies. Using an observational approach this study examines whether different complementary feeding experiences relate to infant language exposure and language use. Fifty-eight parents recorded a typical infant mealtime in the home (mean infant age = 14 months, SD = 4.15). Observations were coded to measure the prevalence of infant-led and parent-led feeding using the Family Mealtime Coding Scheme. Caregiver language use (word types and token directed at the child, mean length of utterances in child-directed speech, responsiveness and initiations) and the number of infant vocalisations were coded in ELAN using CHAT conventions and parents completed the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory short form as a measure of child language. Greater observed infant self-feeding was significantly associated with greater observed exposure to language from caregivers (r = 0.312 percentage of infant self-feeding correlated with caregiver word types directed at the child) and a greater number of infant vocalisations (r = 0.320 percentage of infant self-feeding correlated with number of child vocalisations produced). Structural Equation Modelling showed the relationship between infant self-feeding and infant vocalisations to be significantly mediated by enhanced quality and quantity of caregiver child-directed speech (model fit: χ 2 [5] = 5.01, p = 0.415, CFI = 1.00 [NF = 0.98], RMSEA = 0.006). Differences in the approach to complementary feeding may shape infant's experiences in ways that support language exposure and use. Autonomy associated with infant self-feeding may enhance opportunities for social interaction., (© 2024 The Author(s). Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Hyperlactatemia (HL) is a common phenomenon after cardiac surgery which is related to tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia and associated with poor outcomes. It is also often seen in the postoperative period after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx), but the association between HL and outcomes after OHTx is not well known. We evaluated the incidence and outcome of HL after OHTx., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 209 patients who underwent OHTx between January 2011 and December 2020. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to their peak lactate levels within the first 72 h postoperatively: group 1, normal to mild hyperlactatemia (<5 mmol/L, n = 42); group 2, moderate hyperlactatemia (5-10 mmol/L, n = 110); and group 3, severe hyperlactatemia (>10 mmol/L, n = 57). The primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality or postoperative initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay., Results: Patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels were more commonly transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (33.3 % vs 50.9 % vs 64.9, p < 0.01) and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time [127 min (109-148) vs 141 min (116-186) vs 153 min (127-182), p = 0.02]. Composite primary endpoint was met in 18 patients (8.6 %) and was significantly more common in patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels (0.0 % vs 6.4 % vs 19.3 %, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Severe hyperlactatemia following orthotopic heart transplant was associated with an increased risk of post-transplant VA ECMO initiation and mortality at 30 days., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite increasing recognition of long COVID, the psychosocial impacts of the lived experience on individuals remain underexplored. This systematic review sought to fill this gap by identifying key themes that describe the psychosocial dimensions of long COVID., Objective: The aim of this study is to identify key themes illustrating the psychosocial aspects of individuals' lived experience of long COVID., Search Strategy: Searches were conducted in multiple databases and grey literature sources for qualitative studies published between November 2019 and June 2024., Inclusion Criteria: Eligible studies involved adult participants self-reporting long COVID. The studies needed to provide qualitative data that could be synthesised thematically., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and thematic synthesis were conducted by at least two independent reviewers at each stage. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool., Results: The review included 34 studies. Thematic synthesis yielded five themes: 'Debilitation', 'Uncertainty', 'Sources of Support', 'Meaning Making: Adjusting to a New Normal' and 'Experiences with Healthcare Services'. Individuals with long COVID reported experiencing physical, economic, and social challenges. Uncertainty and scepticism from others caused anxiety. Support from healthcare services, friends and online groups played an important role. Acceptance and gratitude were found to be meaningful in adjusting to the new normal. Experiences with healthcare services varied., Discussion and Conclusions: This review provides valuable insights into the psychosocial impact of long COVID, highlighting the profound changes and challenges that individuals face. Healthcare services should adopt a holistic approach to integrate psychosocial support within their management strategies, to improve overall patient outcomes., (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) overcome traditional barriers enabling wider access to mental health support and allowing individuals to manage their treatment. How individuals engage with DMHIs impacts the intervention effect. This review determined whether the impact of user engagement was assessed in the intervention effect in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating DMHIs targeting common mental disorders (CMDs)., Methods: This systematic review was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249503). RCTs published between 01/01/2016 and 17/09/2021 were included if evaluated DMHIs were delivered by app or website; targeted patients with a CMD without non-CMD comorbidities (e.g., diabetes); and were self-guided. Databases searched: Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; and CENTRAL. All data was double extracted. A meta-analysis compared intervention effect estimates when accounting for engagement and when engagement was ignored., Results: We identified 184 articles randomising 43,529 participants. Interventions were delivered predominantly via websites (145, 78.8%) and 140 (76.1%) articles reported engagement data. All primary analyses adopted treatment policy strategies, ignoring engagement levels. Only 19 (10.3%) articles provided additional intervention effect estimates accounting for user engagement: 2 (10.5%) conducted a complier-average-causal effect (CACE) analysis (principal stratum strategy) and 17 (89.5%) used a less-preferred per-protocol (PP) population excluding individuals failing to meet engagement criteria (estimand strategies unclear). Meta-analysis for PP estimates, when accounting for user engagement, changed the standardised effect to -0.18 95% CI (-0.32, -0.04) from - 0.14 95% CI (-0.24, -0.03) and sample sizes reduced by 33% decreasing precision, whereas meta-analysis for CACE estimates were - 0.19 95% CI (-0.42, 0.03) from - 0.16 95% CI (-0.38, 0.06) with no sample size decrease and less impact on precision. DISCUSSION: Many articles report user engagement metrics but few assessed the impact on the intervention effect missing opportunities to answer important patient centred questions for how well DMHIs work for engaged users. Defining engagement in this area is complex, more research is needed to obtain ways to categorise this into groups. However, the majority that considered engagement in analysis used approaches most likely to induce bias., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To determine the reliability of hospital discharge codes for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke compared with adjudicated diagnosis, and to pilot a scalable approach to adjudicate records on a population-based sample., Methods: A population-based sample of 685 people with diabetes admitted (1274 admissions) to one of three Australian hospitals during 2018-2020 were randomly selected for this study. All medical records were reviewed and adjudicated., Results: Cardiovascular diseases were the most common primary reason for hospitalisation in people with diabetes, accounting for ~17% (215/1274) of all hospitalisations, with HF as the leading cause. ICD-10 codes substantially underestimated HF prevalence and had the lowest agreement with the adjudicated diagnosis of HF (Kappa = 0.81), compared with AMI and stroke (Kappa ≥ 0.91). While ICD-10 codes provided suboptimal sensitivity (72%) for HF, the performance was better for AMI (sensitivity 84%; specificity 100%) and stroke (sensitivity 85%; specificity 100%). A novel approach to screen possible HF cases only required adjudicating 8% (105/1274) of records, correctly identified 78/81 of HF admissions and yielded 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity., Conclusions: While ICD-10 codes appear reliable for AMI or stroke, a more complex diagnosis such as HF benefits from a two-stage process to screen for suspected HF cases that need adjudicating. The next step is to validate this novel approach on large multi-centre studies in diabetes., (© 2024 Diabetes UK.)

Background: Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) requests are common in countries where they are legal. Loneliness and social isolation are modifiable risk factors for mental illness and suicidal behaviour and are common in terminal illness. Our objective was to summarise available literature to clarify whether these and related measures of social connectedness might contribute to requests for EAS., Methods: We conducted a pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42019160508) systematic review and narrative synthesis of quantitative literature investigating associations between social connectedness and a) requested/actual EAS, b) attitudes towards EAS, and c) a desire for hastened death (DHD) by searching six databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) from inception to November 2022, rating eligible peer-reviewed, empirical studies using the QATSO quality assessment tool., Results: We identified 37 eligible studies that investigated associations with a) requested/actual EAS (n = 9), b) attitudes to EAS (n = 16), and c) DHD (n = 14), with limited overlap, including 17,359 participants. The majority (62%) were rated at medium/high risk of bias. Focussing our narrative synthesis on the more methodologically sound studies, we found no evidence to support an association between different constructs of social connectedness and requested or actual EAS, and very little evidence to support an association with attitudes to EAS or an association with DHD., Conclusions: Our findings for all age groups are consistent with a those of a previous systematic review focussed on older adults and suggest that poor social connectedness is not a clear risk factor for EAS or for measures more distally related to EAS. However, we acknowledge low study quality in some studies in relation to sampling, unvalidated exposure/outcome measures, cross-sectional design, unadjusted analyses, and multiple testing. Clinical assessment should focus on modifying established risk factors for suicide and EAS, such as hopelessness and depression, as well as improving any distressing aspects of social disconnectedness to improve quality of life., Funding: UKRI, NIHR., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The adverse effects of COVID-19 and the associated restrictions on eating disorder populations have been discussed in recent literature. However, little is known about the presentation of cases with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) during this period., Aims: To explore the extent of the literature on the presentation of ARFID, and ARFID-like cases, during the COVID-19 pandemic., Method: Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid) and Medline (Ovid) were searched for publications between March 2020 and May 2023. Google Scholar and reference lists were hand searched. At least two reviewers independently screened each paper. Narrative synthesis was used., Results: Seven papers were included: four case reports and three cohort studies (total ARFID sample of 46). Included papers were assessed as having high ( n = 3) or moderate ( n = 4) quality. Findings did not suggest an increase in ARFID cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, although it is unclear if this is because of a lack of impact or underrecognition of ARFID. A need for a multidisciplinary approach to differentiate between ARFID and organic causes of ARFID-like presentations (e.g. gastrointestinal effects of COVID-19) was highlighted., Conclusions: Publications specifically pertaining to ARFID presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic have been few. Papers found have been of small sample sizes and lack subanalyses for ARFID within broader eating disorder samples. Continued surveillance is needed to evaluate any COVID-19-specific effects on the development, identification, treatment and outcomes of ARFID.

Objective: Most paediatric epilepsies with MRI visible lesions do not respond to antiseizure pharmacotherapy. Such medication resistance, which often takes years to become formally defined, is commonly required for surgical candidacy. Expedited surgical referral at lesional epilepsy diagnosis may result in better seizure, cognitive and developmental prognoses. This study explored the views of patients, parents and carers regarding epilepsy surgery, treatment priorities, and participation in a proposed expedited surgery trial., Methods: 205 patients, parents and carers (61% UK-based, 26% North American) responded to electronic surveys from February to May 2022. Participants were recruited through social media sites, epilepsy charities and societies. Categorical choice and free-text questions were used to investigate participant perspectives, and Pearson's chi-squared test was utilised to detect meaningful differences amongst respondent subgroups., Results: Almost 90% of respondents who had experienced epilepsy surgery (either themselves or their child) reported seizure cessation or reduction. Postoperative outcome measures prioritised most frequently were seizure freedom (66%), quality of life (47%), seizure severity (30%), seizure frequency (28%) and independence (27%). Most participants support expedited surgery in suitable patients (65%), with just over half (51%) willing to participate in the proposed trial. Many participants (37%) were undecided, often due to fears surrounding neurosurgery. Subgroup perspectives were broadly similar, with more parents and caregivers favouring expedited surgery compared to patients (p = .016) and more UK-based participants willing to take part in an expedited surgery trial compared to those from North America (p = .01)., Conclusions: Patients, parents and carers are open to considering expedited surgery for lesional epilepsies and would support a trial exploring this approach. Priorities from treatment were largely similar between participant subgroups, with seizure, quality of life and neuropsychological outcomes ranked highly. Accounting for these preferences will facilitate the delivery of a trial that is patient- and caregiver-focused, enhancing feasibility, satisfaction and benefit for prospective participants., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Many children with lesional epilepsies progress to drug resistance, a criterion required for surgical referral. Expedited surgery may reduce exposure of the developing brain to uncontrolled seizures, improving cognitive outcomes. Designing a trial comparing early surgery with standard care necessitates input from specialist clinicians regarding feasibility and measurable outcomes, which this study investigated., Methods: Online surveys were disseminated from June-July 2022 via regional paediatric epilepsy networks and professional societies. 51 UK clinicians responded, mostly paediatricians, paediatric neurologists and epilepsy specialist nurses. Candidacy for epilepsy surgery, outcome measures and support for the proposed study were surveyed. Clinician views were compared by speciality, using Pearson's chi-squared tests to explore differences., Results: 76-98 % of clinicians would refer children for presurgical evaluation at/before drug resistance development across four subgroups (those younger/older than two years, and those with/without a detectable lesion). Earlier referral, at/before epilepsy diagnosis, was considered mostly in those with visible lesions (53 %) and those under two years (31 %). 73 % would consider early surgery before drug resistance is established. Top outcomes to measure were seizure freedom (39 %) and quality of life (22 %). Views of paediatric neurologists and paediatricians did not differ (p > .05)., Significance: Clinician opinions generally aligned with published guidance regarding epilepsy surgery referral. Some remain cautious to refer young children with lesions prior to trialling more than one antiseizure medication. Most support early surgery in appropriate patients, with seizure and quality of life outcomes rated highly. Incorporating these perspectives will aid future trial design, recruitment and clinical utility., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Renewed interest in psychedelic substances in the 21 st century has seen the exploration of psychedelic treatments for various psychiatric disorders including substance use disorder (SUD). This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of psychedelic treatments for people with SUD and those falling below diagnostic thresholds (i.e. substance misuse). We systematically searched 11 databases, trial registries, and psychedelic organization websites for empirical studies examining adults undergoing psychedelic treatment for SUD or substance misuse, published in the English language, between 2000 and 2021. Seven studies investigating treatment using psilocybin, ibogaine, and ayahuasca, alone or adjunct with psychotherapy reported across 10 papers were included. Measures of abstinence, substance use, psychological and psychosocial outcomes, craving, and withdrawal reported positive results, however, this data was scarce among studies examining a wide range of addictions including opioid, nicotine, alcohol, cocaine and unspecified substance. The qualitative synthesis from three studies described subjective experience of psychedelic-assisted treatments enhanced self-awareness, insight, and confidence. At present, there is no sufficient research evidence to suggest effectiveness of any of the psychedelics on any specific substance use disorder or substance misuse. Further research using rigorous effectiveness evaluation methods with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is required.

Background: Previous work in individuals with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) has demonstrated a range of psycho-social difficulties such as increased anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as well as difficulties in work and with interpersonal interactions. However, making inferences regarding the stability of these psycho-social difficulties from previous studies is challenging, due to lack of a control group and known frequentist statistical issues., Methods: 134 participants, 40 healthy controls (HC) and 94 participants with AN, completed self-reported measures designed to explore eating disorder concerns, body mass index, mood symptoms, work and social functioning as well as traits associated with autism at two time points, two years apart. A principal component analysis and Bayesian mixed effects models were used to build and explore group differences in bio-psychosocial profiles at time points., Results: The Bayesian models demonstrated evidence for individuals with AN having higher scores for a component representing psycho-social difficulties and lower scores for a component representing biological difficulties compared to HC, at both time points. There was no evidence of a group difference for a component representing autism., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that persistent psycho-social difficulties are a feature in individuals with AN., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Low uptake of COVID vaccines within Black communities is a concern given the stark racial inequities associated with the pandemic. Prior research details COVID vaccine perceptions within the general population and Black communities specifically. However, Black individuals with long COVID may be more or less receptive to future COVID vaccination than their peers without long COVID. The impact of COVID vaccination on long COVID symptoms is still controversial, since some studies suggest that vaccination can improve long COVID symptoms, whereas other studies report no significant change in symptoms or a worsening of symptoms. In this study, we aimed to characterize the factors influencing perceptions of COVID vaccines among Black adults with long COVID to inform future vaccine-related policies and interventions., Design: We conducted 15 semi-structured, race-concordant interviews over Zoom with adults who reported physical or mental health symptoms that lingered for a month or more after acute COVID infection. We transcribed and anonymized the interviews and implemented inductive, thematic analysis to identify factors influencing COVID vaccine perceptions and the vaccine decision-making process., Results: We identified five themes that influenced vaccine perceptions: (1) Vaccine safety and efficacy; (2) Social implications of vaccination status; (3) Navigating and interpreting vaccine-related information; (4) Possibility of abuse and exploitation by the government and scientific community; and (5) Long COVID status. Safety concerns were amplified by long COVID status and mistrust in social systems due to mistreatment of the Black community., Conclusions: Among the factors influencing COVID vaccine perceptions, participants reported a desire to avoid reinfection and a negative immune response. As COVID reinfection and long COVID become more common, achieving adequate uptake of COVID vaccines and boosters may require approaches that are tailored in partnership with the long COVID patient community.

Individuals with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) typically experience discrimination and stigma, resulting in poor identification and delayed care. We conducted a review to examine and synthesize qualitative studies exploring experiences of stigma and discrimination among individuals with BPD. In August 2021, we systematically searched the following databases: Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Cinhal. We also hand searched reference lists and Google Scholar. We then synthesized studies using meta-ethnography. We included seven articles in the study, all of high or moderate quality. Five themes were identified: (1) resistance from clinicians (withholding information), (2) othering, (3) negative impact on self-image/esteem, (4) hopelessness surrounding the perceived permanency of BPD, and (5) feeling like a burden. This review highlights the need for improved understanding of BPD across health care services. We also discussed the need to introduce a standardized pathway of care across health services following a BPD diagnosis.

Young adulthood is a critical developmental period which having epilepsy tends to complicate, suggesting support could be useful. This study aimed to examine the experiences and perspectives of peer support among young adults with epilepsy (YAWE). An online survey was completed by 144 YAWE. Most YAWE reported not having access to peer support but perceived several potential benefits which could support their mental health including mutual understanding, fostering friendships and reducing loneliness, and promoting self-management and coping strategies. Reported barriers to accessing peer support included practical barriers such as travel and time constraints, emotional barriers (e.g., anxiety), and peers not feeling confident or skilled enough to support others. The need for epilepsy peer support groups specifically designed for young adults, university students, and individuals with co-occurring conditions such as autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were also recognised as well as online delivery to address some of the identified barriers. Appropriate training for facilitators and group moderation were noted as important. Overall, these preliminary findings support the acceptability of peer support among YAWE, indicating peer support could be a worthy focus of policy and care pathway development. However, future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of peer support for epilepsy populations., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: A Core Outcome Set (COS) is a standardised list of outcomes that should be reported as a minimum in all clinical trials. In epilepsy, the choice of outcomes varies widely among existing studies, particularly in clinical trials. This diminishes opportunities for informed decision-making, contributes to research waste and is a barrier to integrating findings in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Furthermore, the outcomes currently being measured may not reflect what is important to people with epilepsy. Therefore, we aim to develop a COS specific to clinical effectiveness research for adults with epilepsy using Delphi consensus methodology., Methods: The EPSET Study will comprise of three phases and follow the core methodological principles as outlined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. Phase 1 will include two focused literature reviews to identify candidate outcomes from the qualitative literature and current outcome measurement practice in phase III and phase IV clinical trials. Phase 2 aims to achieve international consensus to define which outcomes should be measured as a minimum in future trials, using a Delphi process including an online consensus meeting involving key stakeholders. Phase 3 will involve dissemination of the ratified COS to facilitate uptake in future trials and the planning of further research to identify the most appropriate measurement instruments to use to capture the COS in research practice., Discussion: Harmonising outcome measurement across future clinical trials should ensure that the outcomes measured are relevant to patients and health services, and allow for more meaningful results to be obtained., Core Outcome Set Registration: COMET Initiative as study 118 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Renal impairment post-percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) is a well-described adverse effect following the administration of contrast media. Within a large cohort of registry patients, we aimed to explore the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of renal impairment post-PCI., Methods: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry is an Australian state-based clinical quality registry focusing on collecting data from all PCI capable centres. Data from 36 970 consecutive PCI cases performed between 2014 and 2018 were analysed. Patients were separated into three groups based on post-procedure creatinine levels (new renal impairment (NRI), defined as an absolute rise in serum creatinine>44.2 µmol/L or>25% of baseline creatinine; new renal impairment requiring dialysis (NDR), defined as worsening renal failure that necessitated a new requirement for renal dialysis; no NRI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of NRI and NDR on clinical outcomes., Results: 3.1% (n=1134) of patients developed NRI, with an additional 0.6% (n=225) requiring dialysis. 96.3% (n=35 611) of patients did not develop NRI. Those who developed renal impairment were more comorbid, with higher rates of diabetes (22% vs 38% vs 38%, p<0.001), peripheral vascular disease (3.4% vs 8.2% vs 11%, p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (19% vs 49.7% vs 54.2%) and severe left ventricular dysfunction (5% vs 22% vs 40%, p<0.001). Multivariable analysis found that when compared with the no NRI group, those in the combined NRI/NDR group were at a greater risk of 30-day mortality (OR 4.77; 95% CI 3.89 to 5.86, p<0.001) and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (OR 3.72; 95% CI 3.15 to 4.39, p<0.001)., Conclusions: NRI post-PCI remains a common occurrence, especially among comorbid patients, and is associated with a significantly increased morbidity and mortality risk., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Psychoeducation delivered face-to-face is effective in alleviating mental health morbidities in family carers of individuals with psychosis. However, research in such interventions delivered online is scarce. We evaluated the effectiveness of a digital multicomponent intervention-COPe-support-in improving carers' mental wellbeing and caregiving-related outcomes., Methods: In this two-arm, individually randomised, superiority trial, people aged 18 years or older who provided at least weekly support in any format for a relative or close friend affected by psychosis across England were randomly assigned (1:1) to either COPe-support or a passive online information resource using an independent online system. Participants were recruited through 30 mental health UK National Health Service trusts. The study team were masked to allocation and assessment of outcomes as all data collection took place online. Participants had access to either condition for 40 weeks and were advised to spend at least half an hour per week over the initial 20 weeks to go through materials at their own pace and to allow time to integrate knowledge and skills learned into practice. It was not feasible to mask participants or the online facilitator to intervention allocation. COPe-support provided psychoeducation on psychosis-related caregiving strategies and forums with professionals and other carers, and the control intervention comprised a passive online information resource. The primary outcome at 20 weeks was mental wellbeing measured by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS; minimally clinically important difference [MCID] 3). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, 89563420., Findings: Between March 1, 2018, and Feb 14, 2020, 407 participants were randomly assigned, with 204 allocated to COPe-support and 203 allocated to control. The participants (mean age 53·1 years, SD 13·2) were mostly female (330 [81%] of 407 participants) and White (359 [88%] of 407 participants). 346 (85%) of 407 participants provided primary endpoint data, 174 (85%) of 204 participants in the COPe-support group and 172 (85%) of 203 participants in the control group. The mean WEMWBS score at 20 weeks was 44·5 (SD 8·31) for the COPe-support group and 43·3 (9·19) for the control group. We found no evidence of a difference in wellbeing between the two groups (adjusted mean difference 0·37, 95% CI -1·14 to 1·88; p=0·63). In the COPe-support group, 106 (52%) of 204 participants met the complier definition of a minimum of two logins in separate weeks. The complier average causal effect analysis increased the difference in WEMWBS scores (adjusted difference 0·83, 95% CI -1·45 to 3·11; p=0·47), but this was lower than the MCID. There were no adverse events., Interpretation: Our findings did not support the use of COPe-support over a passive online information resource. However, further research to optimise digital interventions adjunctive to face-to-face support for carers remains important., Funding: National Institute for Health Research., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Given the links between the built environment and loneliness, there is interest in using place-based approaches (addressing built environment characteristics and related socio-spatial factors) in local communities to tackle loneliness and mental health problems. However, few studies have described the effectiveness, acceptability, or potential harms of such interventions. This review aimed to synthesize the literature describing local community-based interventions that target place-based factors to address loneliness and mental health problems, informing the development of future public health approaches. We searched PsycINFO, Medline, and Embase using a structured search strategy to identify English-language studies evaluating the effectiveness, acceptability, and potential harms of place-based community interventions in addressing loneliness and mental health problems, both in general and clinical populations. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, classified as evaluating provision of community facilities (such as clubhouses), active engagement in local green spaces, and housing regeneration. None were randomised trials. Quantitative and qualitative findings suggested promising effects and/or acceptability of six interventions, with minimal potential harms. There is a clear need for randomised trials or quasi-experimental studies of place-based interventions to describe their effectiveness in addressing loneliness and mental health problems, as well as complementary qualitative work investigating acceptability. This will inform future policy development.

Background: Caring for a loved one with an eating disorder typically comes with a multitude of challenges, yet siblings and partners are often overlooked. It is important to understand if current clinical guidance for supporting carers are effective and being utilised for these groups, to help meet their needs., Aims: To identify the experiential perspectives of siblings and partners of a loved one with an eating disorder compared with guidance for improving the adequacy of support provided to carers published by Beat and Academy for Eating Disorders., Method: Three online focus groups were held for ten siblings and five partners from across the UK (12 females and three males). Carers had experience of caring for a loved one with anorexia nervosa (13 carers) or bulimia nervosa (two carers), across a range of therapeutic settings. Focus group transcriptions were analysed with thematic analysis., Results: Four key themes were identified: (a) role-specific needs, (b) challenges encountered by siblings and partners, (c) generic needs and helpful strategies or approaches, and (d) accounts of service provision and family support., Conclusions: Overall, the majority of experiences reported by siblings and partners did not meet the published guidance. Consequently, clinical practice recommendations were identified for services, alongside the charity sector, to take a proactive approach in detecting difficulties, providing skills training and emotional/practical support, adapting/tailoring peer support groups and supporting online facilitation. Our findings part-informed the design of our national online survey on loved ones' experiences of care in eating disorders.

Background: While there is increased concern around mental health problems in universities, the experience of students with eating disorders (EDs) has received less attention. This is problematic as the detrimental consequences of a lack of adequate support are profound., Methods: A qualitative study was adopted to investigate students' perspectives of the availability, accessibility and suitability of support services. One hundred university students with experience of EDs completed an online survey. A further 18 students completed semi-structured interviews. Descriptive data are reported alongside analysis of qualitative data., Results: Three overarching themes were identified; awareness of support, confidence in asking for help and early experiences with services. Most students were aware of support through their GP and university counselling services. Few identified ED-specific sources of support. Barriers to help-seeking included self-stigma and gaps in service availability. Early experiences with services were often negative, problems included; difficulty accessing services, a lack of ED specific support and continuity of care between home and university., Conclusions: There is substantive progress to be made in ensuring that students with EDs receive the support they need to thrive at university. While it is important that good treatments exist, the pathway to accessing these treatments equally important. As universities increasingly recognise the need for action around student mental health attention must also be directed towards EDs and the provision of specific services., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Web-based mental health interventions offer a novel, accessible, and self-paced approach to care delivery to family carers (ie, relatives and close friends who support a loved one with psychosis). We coproduced COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support), a psychoeducational intervention delivered via an enriched web-based learning environment with network support from professionals and peers. In addition to the rigorous investigation of the effectiveness of COPe-support on the well-being of carers and mental health outcomes, it is imperative to understand the experiences of using the web-based intervention by carers and its associated web-based implementation and facilitation strategies., Objective: This study aims to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of COPe-support and its different components, how carers found engagement with COPe-support affected their own well-being and caregiving, and the ideas of carers for improving COPe-support and its delivery to inform any future wider implementation., Methods: We conducted a qualitative study, individually interviewing 35 carers, following their use of COPe-support for 8 months through a web-based, randomized controlled trial across England. A semistructured guide with open-ended questions was used to explore the experiences of carers and perceived acceptability of the intervention and their ideas to improve the provision. All interviews were conducted remotely through mobile phones or internet communication media, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a thematic analysis framework to analyze the data., Results: Three key themes were identified: remote, flexible, and personalized support; impacts on well-being and outlook on caregiving; and future implementation and integration with existing services. Overall, carers found COPe-support a flexible source of knowledge and support from professionals and peers that they could personalize to suit their own needs and convenience. Participants described gaining self-confidence, hope, and a sense of connectivity with others in a similar situation, which helped ameliorate isolation and perceived stigma. Most importantly, COPe-support promoted self-care among the carers themselves. Participants' experiences, use, and activity on COPe-support varied greatly and differed among carers of various ages and levels of computer literacy., Conclusions: Nearly all participants had a positive experience with COPe-support and supported its wider implementation as a beneficial adjunctive support resource for carers in the future. Any future scale-up of such an intervention needs to consider feedback from carers and suggestions for further improvement. These included having more graphics and audiovisual content materials, improving the navigation, and building in more interactional and customization options to suit various user styles, such as emoji reactions, live web-based chat, opting in and out of updates, and choosing the frequency of reminders. To ensure successful implementation, we should also consider factors pertinent to reaching more carers and integrating the web-based resources with other conventional services., Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 89563420; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89563420., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1186/s12888-020-02528-w., (©Rachel Batchelor, Sarah Gulshan, Halpana Shritharan, Elen Williams, Claire Henderson, Steve Gillard, Luke A Woodham, Victoria Cornelius, Jack Elkes, Jacqueline Sin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.02.2022.)