13 results on '"Banzi M"'
Search Results
2. Prognostic value of Body Mass Index in stage II/III colon cancer: post-hoc analysis from the TOSCA trial
- Author
-
Basile, D., primary, Rosati, G., additional, Bergamo, F., additional, Garattini, S.K., additional, Banzi, M., additional, Zampino, M., additional, Bozzarelli, S., additional, Marchetti, P., additional, Galli, F., additional, Longarini, R., additional, Zaniboni, A., additional, Ferrari, D., additional, De Placido, S., additional, Frassineti, L., additional, Nicolini, M., additional, Cinieri, S., additional, Priscindiaro, M., additional, Ziranu, P., additional, Caccialanza, R., additional, Pastorino, A., additional, Mosconi, S., additional, and Aprile, G., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. 2248P Capecitabine-based concomitant chemoradiation followed by durvalumab as a neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer (PANDORA trial): Molecular profiling and translational results
- Author
-
Tamberi, S., Marisi, G., Molinari, C., Grassi, E., Petracci, E., Angeli, D., Virga, A., Banchelli, I., Zingaretti, C., Pietrantonio, F., Gelsomino, F., Carandina, I., Banzi, M., Bonetti, A., Frassineti, G.L., Ugolini, G., Santucci, S., Longobardi, J., and Ulivi, P.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients Cared for by the Multidisciplinary Team in the Reggio Emilia Province, Italy.
- Author
-
Mangone L, Marinelli F, Bisceglia I, Braghiroli MB, Banzi M, Damato A, Iori V, Pinto C, Cerullo L, Pellegri C, Zizzo M, Morabito F, Neri A, and Giorgi Rossi P
- Abstract
Colorectal cancer emerged as the third most prevalent malignancy worldwide, affecting nearly 2 million individuals in the year 2020. This study elucidates the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) in influencing the prognosis, as measured by relative survival rates, depending upon the stage and age. Cases recorded in an Italian Cancer Registry between 2017 and 2018 were included. Relative survival was reported at 1 and 3 years after diagnosis comparing MDT vs. no-MDT approaches. During the study period, 605 CRCs were recorded while 361 (59.7%) were taken care of by an MDT. Compared to no-MDT, MDT patients were younger with earlier stages and received more surgery. One year after diagnosis, survival was 78.7% (90% in MDT vs. 62% in no-MDT); stratifying by stage, in the MDT group there was no survival advantage for stage I (97.2% vs. 89.9%) and II (96.8% vs. 89.4%), but an advantage was observed for stage III (86.4% vs. 56.9%) and stage IV (63.7% vs. 27.4%). Similar values were observed at 3 years where a marked advantage was observed for stages III (69.9% vs. 35.1%) and IV (29.2% vs. 5.1%). The univariable analysis confirmed an excess risk in the no-MDT group (HR 2.6; 95% CI 2.0-3.3), also confirmed in the multivariable regression analysis (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.5). Despite the increase in the number of MDT patients in 2018 (from 50% to 69%), this does not correspond to an improvement in outcome., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Characteristics and outcomes of immunotherapy-related liver injury in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma versus other advanced solid tumours.
- Author
-
Celsa C, Cabibbo G, Fulgenzi CAM, Scheiner B, D'Alessio A, Manfredi GF, Nishida N, Ang C, Marron TU, Saeed A, Wietharn B, Pinter M, Cheon J, Huang YH, Lee PC, Phen S, Gampa A, Pillai A, Vivaldi C, Salani F, Masi G, Roehlen N, Thimme R, Vogel A, Schönlein M, von Felden J, Schulze K, Wege H, Galle PR, Kudo M, Rimassa L, Singal AG, El Tomb P, Ulahannan S, Parisi A, Chon HJ, Hsu WF, Stefanini B, Verzoni E, Giusti R, Veccia A, Catino A, Aprile G, Guglielmini PF, Di Napoli M, Ermacora P, Antonuzzo L, Rossi E, Verderame F, Zustovich F, Ficorella C, Di Pietro FR, Battelli N, Negrini G, Grossi F, Bordonaro R, Pipitone S, Banzi M, Ricciardi S, Laera L, Russo A, De Giorgi U, Cavanna L, Sorarù M, Montesarchio V, Bordi P, Brunetti L, Pinto C, Bersanelli M, Cammà C, Cortellini A, and Pinato DJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors adverse effects, Prospective Studies, Immunotherapy adverse effects, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Background & Aims: Immune-related liver injury (irLI) is commonly observed in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to compare the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of irLI between patients receiving ICIs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vs. other solid tumours., Methods: Two separate cohorts were included: 375 patients with advanced/unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh A class treated with first-line atezolizumab+bevacizumab from the AB-real study, and a non-HCC cohort including 459 patients treated with first-line ICI therapy from the INVIDIa-2 multicentre study. IrLI was defined as a treatment-related increase of aminotransferase levels after exclusion of alternative aetiologies of liver injury. The incidence of irLI was adjusted for the duration of treatment exposure., Results: In patients with HCC, the incidence of any grade irLI was 11.4% over a median treatment exposure of 4.4 months (95% CI 3.7-5.2) vs. 2.6% in the INVIDIa-2 cohort over a median treatment exposure of 12.4 months (95% CI 11.1-14.0). Exposure-adjusted-incidence of any grade irLI was 22.1 per 100-patient-years in patients with HCC and 2.1 per 100-patient-years in patients with other solid tumours (p <0.001), with median time-to-irLI of 1.4 and 4.7 months, respectively. Among patients who developed irLI, systemic corticosteroids were administered in 16.3% of patients with HCC and 75.0% of those without HCC (p <0.001), and irLI resolution was observed in 72.1% and 58.3%, respectively (p = 0.362). In patients with HCC, rates of hepatic decompensation and treatment discontinuation due to irLI were 7%. Grade 1-2 irLI was associated with improved overall survival only in patients with HCC (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.96)., Conclusions: Despite higher incidence and earlier onset, irLI in patients with HCC is characterised by higher rates of remission and lower requirement for corticosteroid therapy (vs. irLI in other solid tumours), low risk of hepatic decompensation and treatment discontinuation, not negatively affecting oncological outcomes., Impact and Implications: Immune-related liver injury (irLI) is common in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but whether irLI is more frequent or it is associated with a worse clinical course in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compared to other tumours, is not known. Herein, we compared characteristics and outcomes of irLI in two prospective cohorts including patients treated with ICIs for HCC or for other oncological indications. irLI is significantly more common and it occurs earlier in patients with HCC, also after adjustment for duration of treatment exposure. However, outcomes of patients with HCC who developed irLI are not negatively affected in terms of requirement for corticosteroid therapy, hepatic decompensation, treatment discontinuation and overall survival., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma and brain metastases at baseline treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib.
- Author
-
Aglietta M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Fava P, Guidoboni M, Depenni R, Minisini A, Consoli F, Ascierto PA, Rinaldi G, Banzi M, Marconcini R, Gueli R, Ferraresi V, Tucci M, Tonini G, Lo Re G, Guida M, Del Vecchio M, Marcon IG, and Queirolo P
- Subjects
- Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics, Retrospective Studies, Oximes therapeutic use, Oximes adverse effects, Pyridones therapeutic use, Pyridones adverse effects, Pyrimidinones therapeutic use, Pyrimidinones adverse effects, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Mutation, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms genetics, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma genetics, Melanoma pathology, Brain Neoplasms drug therapy, Brain Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BM) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels above the upper limit of normal (ULN) are associated with poor prognosis in patients with melanoma. Although treatment with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib have demonstrated long-term clinical benefit in patients with melanoma, data on their efficacy in patients with BM are limited., Methods: DESCRIBE Italy is an observational, retrospective, real-world study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in 499 patients with BRAF
V600 -mutant stage III unresectable or stage IV melanoma from various sites across Italy. Here, we analyzed the clinical outcomes for the subgroup of patients receiving first-line treatment and presenting with BM at diagnosis and assessed the impact of predictive factors such as LDH levels and the presence of other metastases on median progression-free survival (mPFS)., Results: Overall, 325 evaluable patients were on first-line therapy and are the focus of this analysis; of these, 76 patients (23.4%) had BM at baseline. mPFS was lower for patients with BM at baseline compared with overall patients (8.7 months vs 9.3 months, respectively). Patients with BM at diagnosis and LDH >ULN had a considerably shorter mPFS compared with patients with LDH ⩽ULN (5.3 months vs 9.9 months, respectively). mPFS was noticeably longer for patients with cerebral metastases only compared with patients with cerebral and other metastases (15.0 months vs 8.7 months, respectively)., Conclusions: Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed effectiveness in a real-world population of patients with advanced BRAFV600 -mutated melanoma and BM at baseline, supporting its use in this population with poor outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MA has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Pharmamar; has received consulting fees from Bayer, BMS, Merck and Novartis; and has received travel support from BMS, Merck and Tesaro. VC-S has received honoraria from MDS, Merck Serono and Novartis; has received travel support from BMS, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; and has participated in advisory boards for Pierre Fabre. MGuidoboni has received consulting fees from BMS and Novartis; has received honoraria from BMS and Pierre Fabre; has received travel support from Pierre Fabre; and has participated in advisory boards for BMS. RD has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi. AM has received honoraria from Merck, Pierre Fabre and Sun Pharma, and has participated in advisory boards for BMS, MSD, Novartis and Pierre Fabre. FC has received honoraria from BMS, Merck, Novartis and Pierre Fabre, and has participated in advisory boards for BMS, Merck and Novartis. PAA has received research funding from BMS, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech and Sanofi; has received consulting fees from 4SC, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Idera, Immunocore, Italfarmaco, iTeos, Lunaphore, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Nouscom, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Roche-Genentech, Sandoz, Sanofi, Seagen and Sun Pharma; and has received travel support from MSD. RM has received consulting fees from BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has received honoraria from BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi; has received travel support from BMS, Ipsen, MSD and Novartis; has participated in advisory boards for BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis and Pierre Fabre. VF has received honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has received travel support from BMS and Pierre Fabre; and has participated in advisory boards for BMS, MSD and Novartis. MT has received institutional research funding from Novartis; has received honoraria from BMS, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has received travel support from MSD; and has participated in advisory boards for Novartis. GT has received honoraria from Molteni, Novartis and Pharmamar. MGuida has participated in advisory boards for BMS, Merck, Novartis and Pierre Fabre. MDV has received consulting fees from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi; has received honoraria from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi; has received travel support from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi; and has participated in advisory boards for BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sanofi. IGM is a Novartis employee. PQ has received consulting fees from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; has received honoraria from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; has received travel support from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; and has participated in advisory boards for BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi. MB, PF, RG, GLR, and GR have no conflict of interest to declare.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Blue skin: Intravascular melanoma metastasis detected by means of dermoscopy.
- Author
-
Zaffonato M, Moscarella E, Piana S, Banzi M, Lai M, Argenziano G, and Longo C
- Subjects
- Humans, Dermoscopy, Melanoma pathology, Skin Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Pigmentation Disorders
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Posthoc Analysis From the TOSCA Trial.
- Author
-
Basile D, Rosati G, Bergamo F, Garattini SK, Banzi M, Zampino M, Bozzarelli S, Marchetti P, Galli F, Galli F, Longarini R, Zaniboni A, Ferrari D, De Placido S, Frassineti LG, Nicolini M, Cinieri S, Priscindiaro M, Ziranu P, Caccialanza R, Pastorino A, Mosconi S, and Aprile G
- Subjects
- Humans, Body Mass Index, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant adverse effects, Neoplasm Staging, Obesity complications, Prognosis, Colonic Neoplasms
- Abstract
Background: High body mass index (BMI) plays a key role in the development of colon cancer (CC). Our post-hoc analysis from the TOSCA trial analyzed the association between BMI and survival outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage II/III CC patients., Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled in the TOSCA trial between 2007-2013 with BMI data entered the study. The prognostic impact of BMI on survival outcomes was investigated through uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses., Results: Overall, 1455 patients with stage II/III CC patients were included. The median follow-up was of 61.5 months; 16.1% of patients relapsed, 11.2% died and 19.5% patients relapsed or died. No impact of BMI on RFS was detected at univariate or multivariable analyses. By univariate analysis for OS, a significantly impact of a BMI > 30 kg/m
2 was reported (HR [>30 vs <25] 1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.47, p = 0.049; HR [>30 vs <30] 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37, p = 0.045). Multivariable analyses did not confirm this data. In the subgroup of stage III patients, a negative survival impact of BMI was found in univariate and multivariable models both for RFS and for OS., Conclusions: In our study, obesity with BMI > 30 kg/m2 was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in CC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of its duration (3 or 6 months). However, the prognostic impact of adiposity and body composition measurement should be considered to better classify patients with high visceral fat and refine their risk assessment., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The Pattern of Progression to First-Line Treatment with Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic, BRAF-Mutated, Cutaneous Melanoma: Results of the Observational T-WIN Study.
- Author
-
Del Vecchio M, Chiarion Sileni V, Quaglino P, Rinaldi G, Minisini A, Troiani T, Consoli F, Sponghini A, Banzi M, Morelli MF, Palleschi D, Rossi E, Marconcini R, Depenni R, Carnevale-Schianca F, Marcon I, and Queirolo P
- Abstract
In patients with B-RAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma, targeted therapies are the treatment of choice to achieve a rapid response. In this multicentric, prospective, observational study, patients with B-RAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma who were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib were categorized in two cohorts (cohort A: limited disease (n = 104) and cohort B: bulky disease (n = 97)) according to lactate dehydrogenase levels. The primary endpoint was the progression pattern; the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety data. From baseline to time of progression, there was a progression from nodal to other sites of disease in cohort A and from skin and nodal to other sites in cohort B. In both the cohorts, the number of involved organs and metastases at each location decreased. The median OS was 32.4 months (95% CI: 20.1 months (not estimable)) for cohort A, and 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.3-14.4 months) for cohort B; median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 10.9-17.0 months) for cohort A, and 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.4 months) for cohort B. No new safety signals were reported. This study describes the patterns of first-line treatment progression with dabrafenib and trametinib in Italian clinical practice. The effectiveness and safety data were consistent with previous trials and extended to a real-world heterogeneous population.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Diving Into the Blue: A Case of Melanoma Arising in a Giant Congenital Blue Nevus During Pregnancy.
- Author
-
Curti A, Piana S, Banzi M, Castagnetti F, Lai M, and Longo C
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Characteristics and management of skin cancers in very elderly patients: A real-world challenge for clinicians.
- Author
-
Lai M, Pampena R, Mirra M, Raucci M, Benati E, Borsari S, Lombardi M, Banzi M, Castagnetti F, Palmieri T, Piana S, Ramundo D, Pellacani G, and Longo C
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell epidemiology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell pathology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell therapy, Keratosis, Actinic, Melanoma epidemiology, Melanoma pathology, Melanoma therapy, Skin Neoplasms epidemiology, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
The increase life expectancy led to an expected increase in skin cancer incidence in older patients. Their treatment can require a complex decision-making process. Limited data are available on characteristics, management and outcome of skin tumours in nonagenarian and centenarian patients. The aim of our study was to describe epidemiology, clinical-pathological features and treatment strategies of skin cancers in a cohort of patients aged ≧95 years. A total of 116 patients ≧95 years of age presented for the evaluation of 225 skin lesions (mean of 1.94 lesions per patient). The mean age was 97.4 years, 57.8% were women. Most patients had an ECOG score of 3 (49.3%) or 4 (32%). Lesions were mainly located on the head and neck area (74.2%), upper (7.1%) and lower (6,2%) limbs. The majority of patients presented with non-melanoma skin cancers (183/225; 81.3%), 25/225 (11.1%) had actinic keratosis, 5 (2.2%) melanoma and 2 (0.9%) atypical fibroxanthoma. Forty-eight lesions (21.3%) were treated with surgery, 58 (25.8%) with radiotherapy. The management of 73 lesion (32.4%) was discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting. One patient died for the progression of a squamous cell carcinoma; 74 patients died for causes unrelated to skin tumours, 36 are still alive after a mean follow-up of 27.27 months. This cohort study confirms that age is not per se a contraindication for treatment of skin cancers in elderly patients. Our results support the importance of a patient-centred care approach that should take into consideration patient's preferences, comorbidities, compliance and possible adverse events., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Long Term Survival With Regorafenib: REALITY (Real Life in Italy) Trial - A GISCAD Study.
- Author
-
Lai E, Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Cremolini C, Lonardi S, Banzi M, Mariani S, Liscia N, Cinieri S, Dettori M, Mencoboni M, Nappo F, Piacentini G, Labianca R, Zucchelli G, Boccaccino A, Conca V, Pusceddu V, Zaniboni A, and Scartozzi M
- Subjects
- Humans, Phenylurea Compounds, Pyridines, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Regorafenib is a key agent in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but no validated factors predicting longer survival are available., Patients and Methods: REALITY was a retrospective multicenter trial in regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with overall survival (OS) ≥ 6 months. We aimed to assess the association between clinical parameters and outcome to define a panel identifying long term survivors among regorafenib candidates. Primary and secondary endpoints were OS and progression free survival (PFS), respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; independent role of significant variables at univariate analysis: logistic regression)., Results: Hundred regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with OS ≥ 6 months were enrolled. Median OS was 11.5 m (95%CI:9.60-12.96); median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI:3.43-43.03). The absence of liver progression and of dose and/or schedule changes during the first 4 cycles (mainly for good tolerability) were independently correlated at multivariate analysis with OS (Exp(b)1.8869, P= .0277and Exp(b)2.2000, P = .0313) and PFS (Exp(b)2.1583, P = .0065 and Exp(b)2.3036, P= .0169). Patients with neither of these variables had a significantly improved OS (n = 14, 20.8 months; 95% CI:12.967-55.267) versus others (n = 86, 10 months; 95% CI:8.367-12.167; HR = 0.4902, P = .0045) and PFS (11.3 months, 95%CI:4.267-35.8 vs. 3.9 months, 95% CI:3.167-43.033; HR = 0.4648, P = .0086)., Conclusion: These 2 factors might allow clinicians to better identify patients more likely to benefit from regorafenib. Toxicity management remains crucial., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Retrospective Chart Review of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAF V600-Mutant Melanoma Treated in the Individual Patient Program (DESCRIBE Italy).
- Author
-
Aglietta M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Fava P, Guidoboni M, Depenni R, Minisini A, Consoli F, Ascierto P, Rinaldi G, Banzi M, Marconcini R, Gueli R, Ferraresi V, Tucci M, Tonini G, Lo Re G, Guida M, Del Vecchio M, Marcon IG, and Queirolo P
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Humans, Imidazoles, Mutation, Oximes pharmacology, Oximes therapeutic use, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics, Pyridones pharmacology, Pyridones therapeutic use, Pyrimidinones, Retrospective Studies, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma genetics, Melanoma pathology, Neoplasms, Second Primary etiology, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Real-world data on extended follow-up of patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma are limited. We investigated dabrafenib plus trametinib (dab + tram) outside of a clinical trial setting (Individual Patient Program; DESCRIBE Italy)., Objective: To describe the baseline features, treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma who had received dab + tram as part of the Managed Access Program (MAP) in Italy., Patients and Methods: An observational, retrospective chart review was conducted in Italian patients with BRAF V600-mutant unresectable stage III/IV melanoma receiving dab + tram as part of the MAP. Baseline features, treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety outcomes were evaluated., Results: Overall, 499 patients were included in this analysis. BRAF V600E mutation was seen in 81.4% of patients. Overall response rate achieved in 243 of the 390 evaluable patients was 62.3% (95% CI 57.5-67.1). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months (95% CI 8.6-10.6). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and ≤ three metastatic sites without brain metastases at baseline had better outcomes. With normal LDH at baseline, median PFS for patients with one or two metastatic sites other than cerebral was 18 months. No new safety signals were observed. Treatment was permanently discontinued because of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in 9.2% of patients, and pyrexia (27.3%) was the most common TEAE, with a lower incidence than that in the phase 3 studies of dab + tram., Conclusion: Treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic melanoma with dab + tram in the real-world setting was effective and safe, including the unselected population with several patients having a high tumor burden - concordant with the results of the pivotal phase 3 studies of dab + tram., (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.