Search

US is a widely available, commonly used, and indispensable imaging modality for breast evaluation. It is often the primary imaging modality for the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer in low-resource settings. In addition, it is frequently employed as a supplemental screening tool via either whole breast handheld US or automated breast US among women with dense breasts. In recent years, a variety of artificial intelligence systems have been developed to assist radiologists with the detection and diagnosis of breast lesions on US. This article reviews the background and evidence supporting the use of artificial intelligence tools for breast US, describes implementation strategies and impact on clinical workflow, and discusses potential emerging roles and future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to confirm the prevalence of incidental cervical extension of normal thymus in children and adolescents undergoing neck ultrasound and describe the ultrasound appearance to minimize future misdiagnosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a single institution. Thyroid and lower neck ultrasound images of the consecutive pediatric subjects between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2017 were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists for the presence of cervical thymus. When identified on sonographic images, cervical thymus was described on the basis of echogenicity, location, and shape. Results: In 278 consecutive cases, the 2 reviewers identified 105 (37.8%) and 103 (37.1%) cases respectively as having sonographically visible tissue in the expected location of cervical extension of the thymus. The internal echotexture was variable with 38.1% of cases being hypoechoic, 37.1% mixed, and 24.8% hyperechoic. Cervical extension of the thymus was most commonly (65.0%) to the left of the trachea or (30.9%) bilateral/anterior to the trachea; isolated right paratracheal thymus was uncommon. Thymic shape was variable: quadrilateral (30.9%), oval (29.9%), triangular (25.8%), and other (13.4%). The logistic regression model including age, gender, and BMI z‐scores showed that, when controlled for sex and BMI z‐scores, younger age was a predictor for the presence of cervical thymic extension (p <.001). Conclusion: Cervical thymic extension is sonographically visible as a soft tissue mass of variable appearance in about a third of children and adolescents undergoing neck ultrasonography with decreasing prevalence with age. Sonographically visible cervical thymic tissue is more common in younger patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]