Search

Clinicopathologic features stratified by treatment arm (RNA-seq analysis population).

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor therapy is a developing treatment for AR-positive breast cancer (BC) with ongoing clinical trials. AR splice variant-7 (AR-V7) is a truncated variant of AR that leads to AR inhibitor therapy resistance in prostate cancer; recent studies have identified AR-V7 in BC and theorized that AR-V7 can have a similar impact. This study assessed the prevalence and clinicopathologic features associated with AR-V7 in a large BC cohort. BC samples were evaluated by MSK-Fusion targeted RNAseq for AR-V7 detection and MSK-IMPACT targeted DNAseq, including triple-negative tumors with no driver alteration and estrogen receptor-positive/ESR1 wildtype tumors progressing on therapy. Among 196 primary and metastatic/recurrent cases (196 RNAseq, 194DNAseq), 9.7% (19/196) were AR-V7 positive and 90.3% (177/196) AR-V7 negative. All AR-V7 positive BC were AR-positive by immunohistochemistry (19/19). The prevalence of AR-V7 by receptor subtype (N = 189) was: 18% (12/67) in ER-/PgR-/HER2-negative BC, 3.7% (4/109) in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC, and 15.4% (2/13) in HER2-positive BC; AR-V7 was detected in one ER-positive/HER2-unknown BC. Apocrine morphology was observed in 42.1% (8/19) of AR-V7 positive BC and 3.4% (6/177) AR-V7 negative BC (P

Background: Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), yet targetable drivers of interest are under investigation. A subset of TNBCs express the androgen receptor (AR) and exhibit androgen-dependent growth. The AR-antagonist enzalutamide (ENZA) has shown activity in patients with metastatic AR+ TNBC. In this study, the feasibility of adjuvant ENZA in early-stage, AR+ TNBC was assessed (NCT02750358). As reported previously, this study met its primary endpoint of feasibility (Traina et al., ASCO 2019). Here we report secondary survival endpoints. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, multi-center trial, patients with stage I-III, AR≥1% TNBC (ER/PR Citation Format: Elaine M Walsh, Ayca Gucalp, Sujata Patil, Marcia Edelweiss, Dara S Ross, Pedram Razavi, Shanu Modi, Neil M Iyengar, Rachel Sanford, Tiffany Troso-Sandoval, Mila Gorsky, Jackie Bromberg, Pamela Drullinsky, Diana Lake, Serena Wong, Patricia DeFusco, Nicholas Lamparella, Ranja Gupta, Tasmila Tabassum, Leigh Ann Boyle, Artavazd Arumov, Tiffany A Traina. Adjuvant enzalutamide for the treatment of early-stage androgen-receptor positive, triple negative breast cancer: A feasibility study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-03.

Background: The addition of anti-programmed death 1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) improves progression-free survival when combined with chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive triple-negative MBC. However, novel combination therapies are needed to improve efficacy in hormone receptor positive (HR+) MBC, or in patients with PD-L1-negative disease. Dual ICB with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) has not been studied in depth in MBC despite its success in other solid tumors. Furthermore, MBCs often express the androgen receptor (AR), which can be targeted therapeutically. AR blockade agents have been shown to stimulate thymic production of naïve T-cell clones. It is proposed that ICB in conjunction with AR blockade may facilitate thymopoeisis and subsequent activation of novel, tumor-reactive T-cell clones. Trial design: This is a phase II, open-label trial investigating the combination of ICB (nivolumab 240mg IV q2w; ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV q6w) and AR blockade (bicalutamide, 150mg PO daily) in MBC. Two cohorts will be studied: AR-positive TNBC [ > 1% by IHC, constituting ~50% of TNBCs]; and HR+ MBC (of which the great majority are AR-positive). Eligibility: Patients must have RECIST1.1 measurable disease, ECOG performance score 0-1, and adequate hematological and hepatic function. Subjects may have received no more than 1 prior non-curative chemotherapy. Specific aims: Subjects will be assessed for clinical benefit by iRECIST criteria and safety by CTCAE v4.0, with clinical efficacy defined as >20% improvement in week 24 clinical benefit rate, over historical control (30% per EMBRACE clinical trial). Statistical analysis will be performed by a Simon 2-stage design to minimize futility (n = 46/cohort, stage I: n = 15). As exploratory aims, thymic generation of T-cells will be measured via quantitative deep sequencing of T-cell receptors (TcR, ImmunoSEQ assay), TcR excision circles (TRECs), and flow cytometry using markers of recent thymic emigration. Present accrual: As of 7/8/2021, n=19 subjects are enrolled (4 TNBC, 15 HR+). The trial is open at Providence Cancer Institute (Portland, OR) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY). Target accrual: stage I: n=15 per arm; a maximum of 138 patients (46 per cohort) may be enrolled in expansion cohorts. Contact: Dr. David Page (David.page2@providence.org) Clinicaltrials.gov#: NCT03650894 Citation Format: David B Page, Krystle L Collins, Brie Chun, Zhaoyu Sun, William L Redmond, Maritza Martel, Yaping Wu, Nicole Moxon, Staci L Mellinger, Walter J Urba, Tiffany A Traina, Ayca Gucalp. A phase II study of dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) plus bicalutamide to enhance thymic T-cell production and immunotherapy response in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-18-04.

Supplementary Figure S1. White adipose tissue inflammation. A. CLS-B positive breast WAT. H&E (upper panel) and anti-CD68 immunostaining (lower panel); 40x (left panel) and 400x (right panel). Arrow indicates CLS-B. B. CLS-B negative breast WAT. H&E (upper panel) and anti-CD68 immunostaining (lower panel); 40x (left panel) and 400x (right panel). WAT, white adipose tissue; CLS-B, crown-like structures of the breast.

Supplementary Figure 1 - PDF file 44K, Supplementary Figure 1A-D. Median hormone levels at baseline, C2 and EOS

Supplementary Table S1. Pharmacokinetic parameters for enzalutamide administered as a single oral dose administered on day 1 to women with breast cancer and and on day 49 to men with prostate cancer; Supplementary Table S2. Pharmacokinetic parameters for enzalutamide and its active metabolite in patients taking enzalutamide 160 mg once daily to steady state; Supplementary Table S3. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events in more than one patient in the safety population.

Relationships between aromatase inhibitor plasma exposures (AUCtau) and concentrations of (A, B) estradiol and (C, D) estrone in individual patients. Red lines indicate expected estrogen levels with anastrozole or exemestane use

Protocol 12 Supplement File

Supplementary Legend - PDF file 22K, Supplementary Legend

Supplementary figure legends

Purpose:To determine whether the androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, enzalutamide, improves effectiveness of endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer.Patients and Methods:In this phase II trial, patients with HR+/HER2 normal advanced/metastatic breast cancer were randomized 1:1 to exemestane 25 mg with placebo or exemestane 50 mg with enzalutamide 160 mg daily (NCT02007512). Two parallel cohorts enrolled patients with 0 (cohort 1) or 1 (cohort 2) prior ET for advanced disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of each cohort. Biomarkers were evaluated in an exploratory analysis.Results:Overall, 247 patients were randomized (cohort 1, n = 127 and cohort 2, n = 120). PFS was not improved in either cohort of the ITT population [HR, 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–1.26); P = 0.3631 for cohort 1 and HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.66–1.59); P = 0.9212 for cohort 2]. In cohort 1, high levels of AR mRNA were associated with greater benefit of enzalutamide (Pinteraction = 0.0048). This effect was particularly apparent in patients with both high levels of AR mRNA and low levels of ESR1 mRNA [HR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.10–0.60); P = 0.0011]. The most common any grade adverse events in the enzalutamide arms were nausea (39%) in cohort 1 and fatigue (37%) in cohort 2.Conclusions:Enzalutamide with exemestane was well tolerated. While PFS was not improved by the addition of enzalutamide to exemestane in an unselected population, ET-naïve patients with high AR mRNA levels, particularly in combination with low ESR1 mRNA levels, may benefit from enzalutamide with exemestane.

Supplementary Figure 2 - PDF file 275K, Supplementary Figure 2A-D. Changes in hormone levels over time per patient; responders (stable disease >6 months) highlighted in red

Plasma trough concentrations by week for (A) enzalutamide and (B) exemestane The labeled values denote mean (SD). The open circles denote trough concentration values of individual patients. Solid squares and vertical lines denote mean with error bars by one SD in both directions. Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

Purpose: Several lines of evidence support targeting the androgen signaling pathway in breast cancer. Enzalutamide is a potent inhibitor of androgen receptor signaling. Preclinical data in estrogen-expressing breast cancer models demonstrated activity of enzalutamide monotherapy and enhanced activity when combined with various endocrine therapies (ET). Enzalutamide is a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducer, and ETs are commonly metabolized by CYP3A4. The pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions, safety, and tolerability of enzalutamide monotherapy and in combination with ETs were assessed in this phase I/Ib study.Experimental Design: Enzalutamide monotherapy was assessed in dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts of patients with advanced breast cancer. Additional cohorts examined effects of enzalutamide on anastrozole, exemestane, and fulvestrant PK in patients with estrogen receptor–positive/progesterone receptor–positive (ER+/PgR+) breast cancer.Results: Enzalutamide monotherapy (n = 29) or in combination with ETs (n = 70) was generally well tolerated. Enzalutamide PK in women was similar to prior data on PK in men with prostate cancer. Enzalutamide decreased plasma exposure to anastrozole by approximately 90% and exemestane by approximately 50%. Enzalutamide did not significantly affect fulvestrant PK. Exposure of exemestane 50 mg/day given with enzalutamide was similar to exemestane 25 mg/day alone.Conclusions: These results support a 160 mg/day enzalutamide dose in women with breast cancer. Enzalutamide can be given in combination with fulvestrant without dose modifications. Exemestane should be doubled from 25 mg/day to 50 mg/day when given in combination with enzalutamide; this combination is being investigated in a randomized phase II study in patients with ER+/PgR+ breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4046–54. ©2017 AACR.

Individual and mean plasma exposures (AUCtau or Cmin) to endocrine therapies alone or in combination with enzalutamide. Note: Box plots provide the mean (red line), median (black line), and 25%/75% quartiles with whiskers to the last point within 1.5-times interquartile range. Sample sizes are reported in Table 2 in the article.

Purpose: Obesity, insulin resistance, and elevated levels of circulating proinflammatory mediators are associated with poorer prognosis in early-stage breast cancer. To investigate whether white adipose tissue (WAT) inflammation represents a potential unifying mechanism, we examined the relationship between breast WAT inflammation and the metabolic syndrome and its prognostic importance.Experimental Design: WAT inflammation was defined by the presence of dead/dying adipocytes surrounded by macrophages forming crown-like structures (CLS) of the breast. Two independent groups were examined in cross-sectional (cohort 1) and retrospective (cohort 2) studies. Cohort 1 included 100 women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer risk reduction (n = 10) or treatment (n = 90). Metabolic syndrome–associated circulating factors were compared by CLS-B status. The association between CLS of the breast and the metabolic syndrome was validated in cohort 2, which included 127 women who developed metastatic breast cancer. Distant recurrence-free survival (dRFS) was compared by CLS-B status.Results: In cohorts 1 and 2, breast WAT inflammation was detected in 52 of 100 (52%) and 52 of 127 (41%) patients, respectively. Patients with breast WAT inflammation had elevated insulin, glucose, leptin, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and IL6 and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adiponectin (P < 0.05) in cohort 1. In cohort 2, breast WAT inflammation was associated with hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes (P < 0.05). Compared with patients without breast WAT inflammation, the adjusted HR for dRFS was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.07–3.13) for patients with inflammation.Conclusions: WAT inflammation, a clinically occult process, helps to explain the relationship between metabolic syndrome and worse breast cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2283–9. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Table 1 - PDF file 4K, Supplementary Table 1. Median hormone levels at baseline, start of cycle 2 (C2), and end of study (EOS) and the percent change in levels from baseline to C2 and C2 to EOS

AimsThe most appropriate timing of exercise therapy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) among patients initiating chemotherapy is not known. The effects of exercise therapy administered during, following, or during and following chemotherapy were examined in patients with breast cancer.Methods and resultsUsing a parallel-group randomized trial design, 158 inactive women with breast cancer initiating (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were allocated to receive (1:1 ratio): usual care or one of three exercise regimens—concurrent (during chemotherapy only), sequential (after chemotherapy only), or concurrent and sequential (continuous) (n = 39/40 per group). Exercise consisted of treadmill walking three sessions/week, 20–50 min at 55%–100% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) for ≈16 (concurrent, sequential) or ≈32 (continuous) consecutive weeks. VO2peak was evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment), immediately post-chemotherapy, and ≈16 weeks after chemotherapy. In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference in the primary endpoint of VO2peak change between concurrent exercise and usual care during chemotherapy vs. VO2peak change between sequential exercise and usual care after chemotherapy [overall difference, −0.88 mL O2·kg−1·min−1; 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.36, 1.59, P = 0.48]. In secondary analysis, continuous exercise, approximately equal to twice the length of the other regimens, was well-tolerated and the only strategy associated with significant improvements in VO2peak from baseline to post-intervention (1.74 mL O2·kg−1·min−1, P < 0.001).ConclusionThere was no statistical difference in CRF improvement between concurrent vs. sequential exercise therapy relative to usual care in women with primary breast cancer. The promising tolerability and CRF benefit of ≈32 weeks of continuous exercise therapy warrant further evaluation in larger trials.

Chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A subset of TNBCs express the androgen receptor (AR), representing a potential new therapeutic target. This study assessed the feasibility of adjuvant enzalutamide, an AR antagonist, in early-stage, AR-positive (AR +) TNBC.This study was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial in which patients with stage I-III, AR ≥ 1% TNBC who had completed standard-of-care therapy were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg/day orally for 1 year. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of 1 year of adjuvant enzalutamide, defined as the treatment discontinuation rate of enzalutamide due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other events related to tolerability. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and genomic features of recurrent tumors.Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five patients completed 1 year of therapy, thereby meeting the prespecified trial endpoint for feasibility. Thirty-two patients elected to continue with an optional second year of treatment. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were uncommon. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS were 94%, 92% , and 80%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached.This clinical trial demonstrates that adjuvant enzalutamide is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in patients with an early-stage AR + TNBC. Randomized trials in the metastatic setting may inform patient selection through biomarker development; longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of anti-androgens on DFS and OS in this patient population.

Purpose/Objective(s) We hypothesize that there is an oligoprogressive state in metastatic cancer, in which disease control can be improved with local therapy to progressive lesions only. This study therefore evaluated the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to sites of oligoprogression in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer with 1-5 progressive lesions. Materials/Methods We enrolled patients with metastatic NSCLC or breast cancer who received ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy and had oligoprogressive lesions amenable to SBRT. There was no upper limit of non-progressive lesions. Oligoprogression was defined as Response Evaluation or Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors documented progression ≤ 5 individual lesions. Stratification factors included number of progressive sites (1 vs. 2-5), prior systemic therapy (immunotherapy vs. other), primary tumor (NSCLC vs. breast), and tumor marker status (driver mutation and hormone receptor status). Patients were randomized 1:1 between SBRT to all progressive sites plus palliative standard of care (SOC) vs. palliative SOC only. Systemic therapy was per physician's discretion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). We used a randomized phase II design with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, yielding a target accrual of 160 patients. PFS was compared using one-sided stratified log-rank test. One interim analysis was planned. Results From January 2019 to May 2021, 102 patients were randomized - 58 NSCLC (30 in the SBRT arm) and 44 breast (22 in each arm). Median age was 67. Most patients (75%) had > 1 site of oligoprogression and 47% had > 5 total metastatic lesions. Fifty-five (54%) patients received immunotherapy. The majority of NSCLC (86%) did not harbor an actionable driver mutation and 32% of breast cancer were triple negative. Baseline factors were balanced between arms. At a median follow-up of 51 weeks, 71 patients progressed and 30 died. Median PFS was 22 weeks in the SBRT arm vs. 10 weeks in the palliative SOC arm (p=0.005). This was driven entirely by the PFS benefit from SBRT in the NSCLC patients (44 weeks with SBRT vs. 9 weeks with SOC; p=0.004). No difference in median PFS was seen in the breast cohort (18 weeks with SBRT vs. 17 weeks with SOC; p=0.5). In multivariable Cox model inclusive of stratification factors, age, sex, lines of systemic therapy, and change of systemic therapy, the PFS benefit of SBRT remained substantial in the NSCLC cohort (Hazard Ratio: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18-77; p=0.007). Grade ≥2 adverse events occurred in 8 patients in the SBRT arm, including 1 grade 3 pneumonitis. Conclusion Inthis pre-planned interim analysis of the first and largest randomized trial of radiotherapy for oligoprogressive metastatic NSCLC and breast cancer, we demonstrated the benefit of SBRT to sites of oligoprogression on overall PFS, meeting the primary endpoint. The mechanism of the differential benefits between NSCLC and breast cohorts merits further evaluation.

1023 Background: Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive and heterogeneous cancer with limited therapeutic options. PARP inhibitors (PARPi), approved to treat patients with HER2- breast cancer with a germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation, have not shown efficacy in homologous recombination repair (HRR) proficient tumors. In pre-clinical models, the BET inhibitor (BETi) ZEN-3694 sensitizes wild-type (WT) BRCA1/2 tumors to PARPi through downregulation of HRR gene expression, providing a rationale for combination therapy. We previously reported results from the Ph 1b portion of the trial evaluating the combination of ZEN-3694 plus talazoparib, in TNBC patients without gBRCA1/2 mutations; here we present results from the completed Ph 1b/2 study. Methods: A Ph 1b dose finding portion (n = 15) was followed by a single arm Ph 2 Simon 2-stage portion (n = 17+20 (37)). The primary endpoint of the Ph 1b portion of the study was safety and recommended Ph 2 dose (RP2D). The secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR = confirmed objective response rate (ORR) + stable disease > 16 weeks). Ph 2 measured CBR as the primary endpoint, ORR and duration of response (DOR) as key secondary endpoints. Eligibility criteria for Ph 1b included TNBC (ER/PR < 10%, HER2-), WT gBRCA1/2, and > 1 prior cytotoxic regimen for mTNBC, and in the Ph2 portion ER/PR < 1% and < 2 prior cytotoxic regimens for mTNBC. Patients were dosed daily in continuous 28 day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events, PK, and PD in whole blood and tissue biopsies were assessed. Response endpoints were assessed per RECIST 1.1 every 2 cycles. Results: RP2D was determined to be 48mg qd ZEN-3694 plus 0.75mg qd talazoparib. The most common AE for the Ph 1b/2 study was thrombocytopenia (TCP) (55% any grade, 34% G3/4), which was managed with dose holds and reductions. Dose intensity analysis showed average daily doses of ZEN-3694 and talazoparib could be maintained above 40mg and 0.5mg, respectively, over 8 cycles. Robust target engagement was demonstrated using BET-dependent and HRR transcripts assessed in paired tumor biopsies. Ph 2 portion of the trial met its primary endpoint with a CBR of 30% (11/37). For the Ph 1b/2 trial, investgator assessed ORR was 22% (11/50), including 2 CR, CBR was 35% (18/51) and the median DOR was 24 weeks. For the subset of TNBC at diagnosis patients (no history of HR+ disease), ORR was 32% (11/34), and CBR was 44% (15/34). Conclusions: Combination of ZEN-3694 and talazoparib demonstrated anti-cancer activity in pretreated mTNBC WT gBRCA1/2 patients. All confirmed responses were observed in TNBC at diagnosis patients, whose tumors are expected to be more sensitive to the combination due to their basal-like properties. The trial is being expanded to Ph. 2b to accrue an additional 80 TNBC at diagnosis patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03901469.

12022 Background: Late alopecia is defined as incomplete hair regrowth > 6 months following cytotoxic chemotherapy or from initiation of endocrine therapy. It has been reported in up to 25-30% of cancer survivors and is associated with decreased quality of life and reduced dose intensity of cancer therapies. Minoxidil is an aminopyridine potassium channel opener, resulting in vasodilation and premature entry of resting hair follicles into the anagen (growth) phase and increase in hair follicle size. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and adverse events of oral minoxidil for the treatment of cancer therapy-related late alopecia. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all women with late alopecia treated with oral minoxidil (1.25 mg daily) evaluated at an oncodermatology referral program between 1/2018-5/2021. Outcomes were assessed by standardized photography (4 views) and trichoscopy (HairMetrix, Canfield Scientific, Inc.). Trichoscopy recorded hair density (hair count/cm2) and hair thickness (shaft diameter) at uniform frontal and occipital target areas (12 and 36 cm midline from the glabella, respectively). Adverse events were recorded and graded using CTCAE v5.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Changes in trichoscopy measurements from baseline to follow-up were estimated using paired t-tests. Results: Two hundred and sixteen patients (mean age 57.8±13.7) were included for analysis. Thirty-one (14%) received chemotherapy alone, 65 (30%) endocrine monotherapy, and 120 (56%) chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy. The majority of patients (n = 170, 79.1%) had a history of breast cancer. Standardized photography assessments (n = 119) after a median of 105 days (IQR = 70) on oral minoxidil revealed clinical improvement in 88 (74%). Trichoscopy assessments (n = 42) after a median of 91 days (IQR = 126) demonstrated increased frontal hair density (124.2 vs 153.2 hairs/cm2, p = 0.008) and occipital hair density (100.3 vs 123.5 hairs/cm2, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in average frontal or occipital hair thickness (69.3 vs 67.3 μm, p = 0.22, and 70.3 vs 69.9 μm, p = 0.84, respectively). No patients reported discontinuation of oral minoxidil due to adverse effects. Conclusions: Oral minoxidil may benefit both frontal and occipital late alopecia in cancer survivors treated with cytotoxic and/or endocrine therapy. This regimen was well tolerated by patients. Prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.