Search

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies are approved for the treatment of RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but the emergence of resistance mutations restricts their efficacy. We previously showed that RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutant alleles, which appear in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during EGFR blockade, decline upon therapy withdrawal. We hypothesized that monitoring resistance mutations in blood could rationally guide subsequent therapy with anti-EGFR antibodies. We report here the results of CHRONOS, an open-label, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial exploiting blood-based identification of RAS/BRAF/EGFR mutations levels to tailor a chemotherapy-free anti-EGFR rechallenge with panitumumab (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03227926; EudraCT 2016-002597-12). The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety and tolerability of this strategy. In CHRONOS, patients with tissue-RAS WT tumors after a previous treatment with anti-EGFR-based regimens underwent an interventional ctDNA-based screening. Of 52 patients, 16 (31%) carried at least one mutation conferring resistance to anti-EGFR therapy and were excluded. The primary endpoint of the trial was met; and, of 27 enrolled patients, eight (30%) achieved partial response and 17 (63%) disease control, including two unconfirmed responses. These clinical results favorably compare with standard third-line treatments and show that interventional liquid biopsies can be effectively and safely exploited in a timely manner to guide anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy with panitumumab in patients with mCRC. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to formally compare panitumumab rechallenge with standard-of-care therapies in this patient setting.

Supplementary Figure from Temozolomide Treatment Alters Mismatch Repair and Boosts Mutational Burden in Tumor and Blood of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Supplementary Figure S1. LMNA-NTRK1 genetic rearrangement detected in patient's plasma and xeno. Supplementary Figure S2. Acquisition of mutations in the TRKA kinase domain drives secondary resistance to entrectinib in Ba/F3 TRKA WT cells. Supplementary Figure S3. NTRK1 mutations confer resistance to TRKA inhibition. Supplementary Figure S4. Homology alignment of NTRK1 p.G595 and p.G667 variants. Supplementary Table S1. NGS analysis of NTRK1 gene in patient's plasma and xeno. Supplementary Table S2. NGS analysis of patient's derived samples. Supplementary Table S3. Summary of serial ctDNA analyses. Supplementary Table S4. The p.G595R and p.G667C mutations confer resistance to multiple TRK inhibitors. Supplementary Table S5. NTRK1 p. G595R, p.G667C and LMNA-NTRK1 fusion probes for ddPCR.

PDF file - 635K, Supplementary Figure S1. Genotypes included in the combinatorial genetic matrix. PTEN or RB1 were silenced by shRNA in isogenic KI cells.

XLSX file - 144K, Supplementary table S1. List of compounds employed in the present work. Supplementary Table S2. List of t-tests p values comparing the responses of the different mutant cell lines to a given drug concentration with the response of the WT Scramble control cells. Supplementary Table S3. List of the drugs included in the library and tested on HME-1 cell lines.

A critical step toward defining tailored therapy in patients with cancer is the identification of genetic interactions that may impair—or boost—the efficacy of selected therapeutic approaches. Cell models able to recapitulate combinations of genetic aberrations are important to find drug–genotype interactions poorly affected by the heterogeneous genetics of human tumors. In order to identify novel pharmacogenomic relationships, we employed an isogenic cell panel that reconstructs cancer genetic scenarios. We screened a library of 43 compounds in human hTERT-HME1 epithelial cells in which PTEN or RB1 were silenced in combination with the targeted knockin of cancer-associated mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA oncogenes. Statistical analysis and clustering algorithms were applied to display similar drug response profiles and mutation-specific patterns of activity. From the screen, we discovered that proteasome inhibitors show selectivity toward BRAF V600E–mutant cells, irrespective of PTEN or RB1 expression. Preferential targeting of BRAF-mutant cells by proteasome inhibitors was corroborated in a second BRAF V600E isogenic model, as well as in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines by the use of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Notably, carfilzomib also showed striking in vivo activity in a BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors is dependent on persistent BRAF signaling, because BRAF V600E blockade by PLX4720 reversed sensitivity to carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells. Our findings indicated that proteasome inhibition might represent a valuable targeting strategy in BRAF V600E–mutant colorectal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(12); 2950–61. ©2013 AACR.

Purpose: KRAS mutations confer adverse prognosis to colorectal cancer, and no targeted therapies have shown efficacy in this patient subset. Paracrine, nongenetic events induced by KRAS-mutant tumor cells are expected to result in specific deregulation and/or relocation of tumor microenvironment (TME) proteins, which in principle can be exploited as alternative therapeutic targets.Experimental Design: A multimodal strategy combining ex vivo/in vitro phage display screens with deep-sequencing and bioinformatics was applied to uncover TME-specific targets in KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Expression and localization of BCAM and LAMA5 were validated by immunohistochemistry in preclinical models of human hepatic metastasis and in a panel of human specimens (n = 71). The antimetastatic efficacy of two BCAM-mimic peptides was evaluated in mouse models. The role of BCAM in the interaction of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells with TME cells was investigated by adhesion assays.Results: BCAM and LAMA5 were identified as molecular targets within both tumor cells and TME of KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer, where they were specifically overexpressed. Two BCAM-mimic peptides inhibited KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis in preclinical models. Genetic suppression and biochemical inhibition of either BCAM or LAMA5 impaired adhesion of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells specifically to endothelial cells, whereas adhesion to pericytes and hepatocytes was unaffected.Conclusions: These data show that the BCAM/LAMA5 system plays a functional role in the metastatic spreading of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer by mediating tumor–TME interactions and as such represents a valuable therapeutic candidate for this large, currently untreatable patient group. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4923–33. ©2016 AACR.

The file lists Supplementary Materials and Methods and relative References.

Supplementary Table S3

Supplementary Legends and Figures

Although recent clinical trials of BRAF inhibitor combinations have demonstrated improved efficacy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, emergence of acquired resistance limits clinical benefit. Here, we undertook a comprehensive effort to define mechanisms underlying drug resistance with the goal of guiding development of therapeutic strategies to overcome this limitation. We generated a broad panel of BRAF-mutant resistant cell line models across seven different clinically relevant drug combinations. Combinatorial drug treatments were able to abrogate ERK1/2 phosphorylation in parental-sensitive cells, but not in their resistant counterparts, indicating that resistant cells escaped drug treatments through one or more mechanisms leading to biochemical reactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Genotyping of resistant cells identified gene amplification of EGFR, KRAS, and mutant BRAF, as well as acquired mutations in KRAS, EGFR, and MAP2K1. These mechanisms were clinically relevant, as we identified emergence of a KRAS G12C mutation and increase of mutant BRAF V600E allele frequency in the circulating tumor DNA of a patient at relapse from combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. To identify therapeutic combinations capable of overcoming drug resistance, we performed a systematic assessment of candidate therapies across the panel of resistant cell lines. Independent of the molecular alteration acquired upon drug pressure, most resistant cells retained sensitivity to vertical MAPK pathway suppression when combinations of ERK, BRAF, and EGFR inhibitors were applied. These therapeutic combinations represent promising strategies for future clinical trials in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Res; 76(15); 4504–15. ©2016 AACR.

The supplementary material includes Supplementary Methods, two Supplementary Tables, and six Supplementary Figures Table S1. Complete set of BCAM-mimic peptides. Table S2. Characterization of human CRC cell lines in animal models. Figure S1. Quality control of the phage display experiments: sequencing readout. Figure S2. BCAM protein expression in the complete panel of human hepatic metastases. Figure S3. BCAM protein expression in human primary CRCs. Figure S4. BCAM protein and mRNA expression in all cell lines. Figure S5. Photographic documentation of the experimental hepatic metastasis models. Figure S6. HT-55, DLD-1, LIM1215 and SW-48 cells cannot be reduced to adhesion-functional monocellular suspensions.

Supplementary Tables S1-S3 - List of drug concentrations to generate resistant cell lines (S1); Drug concentrations applied in the screening depicted in Figure 6 (S2); Primers for gene amplification and sequencing (S3). Supplementary Figure S1. Synergistic activity of targeted therapy combinations in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells. Supplementary Figure S2. Amplification of mutant BRAF V600E confers resistance to combined EGFR and MEK targeting in colorectal cancer cells. Supplemental Figure S3. Cytotoxicity induced by ERK inhibition in VACO432 resistant to BRAF combination therapies.

Legends

Purpose:Defects in the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway are of clinical interest due to sensitivity of HR-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors. We were interested in defining PARP vulnerability in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carrying KRAS and BRAF mutations who display poor prognosis, have limited therapeutic options, and represent an unmet clinical need.Experimental Design:We tested colorectal cancer cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDO), and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) enriched for KRAS and BRAF mutations for sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor olaparib, and the chemotherapeutic agents oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Genomic profiles and DNA repair proficiency of colorectal cancer models were compared with pharmacologic response.Results:Thirteen of 99 (around 13%) colorectal cancer cell lines were highly sensitive to clinically active concentrations of olaparib and displayed functional deficiency in HR. Response to PARP blockade was positively correlated with sensitivity to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cell lines as well as patient-derived organoids. Treatment of PDXs with olaparib impaired tumor growth and maintenance therapy with PARP blockade after initial oxaliplatin response delayed disease progression in mice.Conclusions:These results indicate that a colorectal cancer subset characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options is vulnerable to PARP inhibition and suggest that PDO-based drug-screening assays can be used to identify patients with colorectal cancer likely to benefit from olaparib. As patients with mCRC almost invariably receive therapies based on oxaliplatin, “maintenance” treatment with PARP inhibitors warrants further clinical investigation.

Supplemental Methods and Figure Legends

Supplemental Figure 1: ephrin A1 and α11 integrin are barely detectable in mouse models of neuroblastoma

Supplemental Figure 2: expression levels of NPTX2 and NPTXR in vitro and in vivo

Supplemental Figure 5: NPTX2 and NPTXR are barely or not expressed in normal human tissues

Supplemental Figure 4: neuroblastoma cells migrate towards microenvironment-derived cells

Supplemental Figure 3: NPTX2 and NPTXR are barely or not expressed in normal mouse tissues

The majority of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) are mismatch repair (MMR) proficient and unresponsive to immunotherapy, whereas MMR-deficient (MMRd) tumors often respond to immune-checkpoint blockade. We previously reported that the treatment of colorectal cancer preclinical models with temozolomide (TMZ) leads to MMR deficiency, increased tumor mutational burden (TMB), and sensitization to immunotherapy. To clinically translate these findings, we designed the ARETHUSA clinical trial whereby O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)–deficient, MMR-proficient, RAS-mutant mCRC patients received priming therapy with TMZ. Analysis of tissue biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revealed the emergence of a distinct mutational signature and increased TMB after TMZ treatment. Multiple alterations in the nucleotide context favored by the TMZ signature emerged in MMR genes, and the p.T1219I MSH6 variant was detected in ctDNA and tissue of 94% (16/17) of the cases. A subset of patients whose tumors displayed the MSH6 mutation, the TMZ mutational signature, and increased TMB achieved disease stabilization upon pembrolizumab treatment. Significance: MMR-proficient mCRCs are unresponsive to immunotherapy. We provide the proof of concept that inactivation of MMR genes can be achieved pharmacologically with TMZ and molecularly monitored in the tissue and blood of patients with mCRC. This strategy deserves additional evaluation in mCRC patients whose tumors are no longer responsive to standard-of-care treatments. See related commentary by Willis and Overman, p. 1612. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1599

Introduction: Immunotherapy based on PD1/PDL1 and/or CTLA4 blocking antibodies has shown efficacy in the molecular subgroup of colorectal cancers (CRCs) characterized by deficient mismatch repair (MMRd). This feature, present in only 4-5% of metastatic CRCs, causes a significant increase of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigens, ultimately leading to immune rejection. On the other hand, for the majority of MMR proficient (MMRp) CRCs, cytotoxic chemotherapy ± targeted agents still constitute the mainstay of the treatment Interestingly, even though it is known that cytotoxic agents induce mutations, their immunogenic potential is still not fully understood. The aim of this work is to systematically investigate the immunogenicity of chemotherapy-induced mutations in CRC. Methods: We performed a two-step experiment: first, murine CRC models were exposed to chemotherapy agents in an immune-free context (priming phase) and then challenged in immune-deficient and -proficient contexts (editing phase). Chemotherapy agents included the commonly used cytotoxic drugs 5-fluorouracil (5FU), oxaliplatin, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), cisplatin, and temozolomide, used as single drugs or combinations, in a pulsatile schedule using weekly ‘cycles’ (2 days on/5 days off) in order to mimic drug exposure in clinical settings. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed at baseline, and after both the priming and the editing phases. Results and discussion: WES analysis showed that cisplatin-based treatment is associated with the highest increase in TMB and predicted neoantigens when compared to 5FU-based combinations. Multiple mutational processes contribute to the accumulation of mutations upon exposure to chemotherapy, as revealed by analysis of mutational signatures. A statistically significant growth delay and increased survival was reported for tumors primed with cisplatin/temozolomide and 5FU/Oxaliplatin/SN38 (FOLFOXIRI) combinations compared to unprimed tumors in immunocompetent but not in immunodeficient mice, suggesting the active involvement of the immune system in controlling tumor growth. Sequencing data of residual (escaped) tumors at the end of the editing phase revealed a preferential loss of mutations etiologically linked to chemotherapy in the immunocompetent models, pinpointing an active immune-editing of chemotherapy-induced mutations. Conclusions: Cisplatin/temozolomide and FOLFOXIRI treatment effectively prime murine CRC models for subsequent immune rejection. These results suggest that the anticancer effect of chemotherapy treatment may be in part mediated by the immune-editing of chemotherapy-induced mutant cancer subclones. Citation Format: Pietro Paolo Vitiello, Rosaria Chilà, Giuseppe Rospo, Gaia Grasso, Giovanni Crisafulli, Alice Bartolini, Vito Amodio, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Giovanni Germano, Alberto Bardelli. The effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy on colorectal cancer immunogenicity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6402.

Patients affected by colorectal cancer (CRC) with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), often respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapies, while those with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) tumors generally do not. Interestingly, a subset of MMRp CRCs contains variable fractions of MMRd cells, but it is unknown how their presence impacts immune surveillance. We asked whether modulation of the MMRd fraction in MMR heterogeneous tumors acts as an endogenous cancer vaccine by promoting immune surveillance. To test this hypothesis, we use isogenic MMRp (Mlh1+/+) and MMRd (Mlh1-/-) mouse CRC cells. MMRp/MMRd cells mixed at different ratios are injected in immunocompetent mice and tumor rejection is observed when at least 50% of cells are MMRd. To enrich the MMRd fraction, MMRp/MMRd tumors are treated with 6-thioguanine, which leads to tumor rejection. These results suggest that genetic and pharmacological modulation of the DNA mismatch repair machinery potentiate the immunogenicity of MMR heterogeneous tumors.

The majority of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) are mismatch repair (MMR) proficient (MMRp) and unresponsive to immunotherapy, while MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors often respond to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We previously reported that treatment of CRC preclinical models with temozolomide (TMZ) leads to MMR deficiency, increased tumor mutational burden (TMB) and, sensitization to immunotherapy. To clinically translate these findings, we designed the ARETHUSA clinical trial whereby O6-Methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) deficient, MMR proficient and KRAS mutant mCRC patients receive priming therapy with TMZ. Analysis of solid tissue biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) obtained after TMZ treatment revealed the emergence of TMZ mutational signature, alterations in MMR genes and increased TMB in 14 out of 16 patients. Genetic mutations induced by TMZ were dose-dependent and multiple alterations in the nucleotide context favored by the TMZ signature emerged in MMR genes such as the MSH6 T1219I variant which was detected in ctDNA and tissue of 13/14 (93%) of the cases. A subset of the patients whose tumors after TMZ priming displayed the MSH6 mutation, the TMZ mutational signature and increased TMB, achieved disease stabilization upon pembrolizumab treatment. Overall, we provide proof-of-concept that treatment of MGMT deficient/MMR proficient KRAS mutant mCRCs with TMZ can be tracked by mutational signature analysis and lead to inactivation of the MMR pathway, emergence of the TMZ mutational signature, TMB increase, and, in some cases, to disease stabilization during ICB. Citation Format: Giovanni Crisafulli, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Luca Lazzari, Filippo Pietrantonio, Alessio Amatu, Marco Macagno, Ludovic Barault, Andrea Cassingena, Alice Bartolini, Paolo Luraghi, Gianluca Mauri, Paolo Battuello, Nicola Personemi, Valeria Pessei, Pietro Paolo Vitiello, Federica Tosi, Laura Idotta, Emanuele Valtorta, Emanuela Bonoldi, Giovanni Germano, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Silvia Marsoni, Salvatore Siena, Alberto Bardelli. Emergence of tumor mismatch repair deficiency and increased mutational burden in blood and tissue of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with temozolomide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6262.