Search

OBJECTIVES: Adding maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provided a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the randomized, double-blind PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644). We analyzed PFS by clinical risk and biomarker status. METHODS: Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily for up to 24 months plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total, or placebo plus bevacizumab. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated PFS in patients classified as higher risk (stage III with upfront surgery and residual disease or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; stage IV) or lower risk (stage III with upfront surgery and no residual disease), and by biomarker status. RESULTS: Of 806 randomized patients, 74% were higher risk and 26% were lower risk. After a median 22.9 months of follow-up, PFS favored olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in higher-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.74) and lower-risk patients (0.46; 0.30-0.72). Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit versus bevacizumab alone in the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive subgroup (higher risk: HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.28-0.54 and lower risk: 0.15; 0.07-0.30), with 24-month PFS rates in lower-risk patients of 90% versus 43%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier estimates). CONCLUSIONS: In PAOLA-1, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided a substantial PFS benefit in HRD-positive patients with a reduction of risk of progression or death of 61% in the higher-risk group and of 85% in the lower-risk group compared with bevacizumab alone. ispartof: GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY vol:164 issue:2 pages:254-264 ispartof: location:United States status: published

PURPOSE To compare standard versus extended duration of bevacizumab treatment in combination with front-line chemotherapy in women with newly diagnosed stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer. METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01462890 ), patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by six cycles of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5 once every 3 weeks) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab for either 15 or 30 months, stratified by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage/residual tumor. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Between November 11, 2011, and August 6, 2013, 927 women were randomly assigned. There was no difference in PFS between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.15; unstratified log-rank P = .90). Median PFS was 24.2 versus 26.0 months with standard versus extended duration of bevacizumab, respectively; restricted mean PFS was 39.5 versus 39.3 months, respectively. There was no OS difference between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.23; P = .68). Serious/nonserious adverse events of special interest occurred in 29% versus 34% of patients in the standard versus experimental arms, respectively, and were consistent with the known safety profile of standard bevacizumab. CONCLUSION Longer treatment duration with bevacizumab for up to 30 months did not improve PFS or OS in patients with primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. A bevacizumab treatment duration of 15 months remains the standard of care.

Fertility-sparing treatment in patients with cervical cancer should, in principle, follow identical algorithms to that in patients without future reproductive plans. In recent years, a trend towards non-radical procedures such as conization or simple trachelectomy has become apparent in medical literature, because of their associations with better pregnancy outcomes. However, the published reports included small numbers of patients and heterogenous treatment strategies to ascertain safety of such approaches.Our aims were to collect multi-institutional data regarding the oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing treatment in cervical cancer patients and to identify prognostic risk factors, including the influence of the radicality of individual cervical procedures.Patients aged 18-40 years with FIGO 2018 stage IA1 + lymphovascular space invasion or ≥IA2 cervical cancer who underwent any type of fertility-sparing procedure were eligible for this retrospective observational study, regardless of their histotype, tumor grade, and history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between disease- and treatment-related characteristics with the risk of recurrence were analyzed.A total of 733 patients from 44 institutions across 13 countries were included in this study. Almost half of the patients had stage IB1 cervical cancer (49%), and two-thirds were nulliparous (66%). After a median follow-up of 72 months, 51 patients (7%) experienced recurrence of whom 19 (2.6%) died due to the disease. The most common sites of recurrence were the cervix (53%) and pelvic nodes (22%). The risk of recurrence was three times higher in patients with tumors2 cm in size than in patients with smaller tumors, irrespective of the treatment radicality (19.4% vs. 5.7%; hazard ratio 2.982, 95% CI 1.383-6.431, P = .005). The recurrence risk in patients with tumors ≤2 cm in size did not differ between patients who underwent radical trachelectomy or non-radical (conization and simple trachelectomy) cervical procedures (P = .957), regardless of tumor size subcategory (1 or 1-2 cm) or lymphovascular space invasion.Fertility-sparing non-radical cervical procedures were not associated with increased risk of recurrence compared with radical procedures in patients with tumors ≤2 cm in size in this large, multicenter retrospective study. The risk of recurrence after any type of fertility-sparing procedure was significantly greater in patients with tumors2 cm in size.

To assess the correlation between fetal head regression and levator ani muscle (LAM) co-activation under Valsalva maneuver.This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study on the association between the angle of progression (AoP) and labor outcome. We scanned a group of nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor at rest and under maximum Valsalva maneuver. In addition to the previously calculated AoP, in the present study, we measured the anteroposterior diameter of LAM hiatus (APD) on each ultrasound image. LAM co-activation was defined as APD at Valsalva less than that at rest, whereas fetal head regression was defined as AoP at Valsalva less than that at rest. We calculated the correlation between the two phenomena. Finally, we examined various labor outcomes according to the presence, absence, or co-existence of these two phenomena.We included 469 women. A total of 129 (27.5%) women presented LAM co-activation while 50 (10.7%) showed head regression. Only 15 (3.2%) women showed simultaneous head regression and LAM co-activation. Women with coexisting LAM co-activation and head regression had the narrowest AoP at Valsalva in comparison with other study groups (In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor fetal head regression and LAM co-activation at Valsalva are two distinct phenomena that uncommonly coexist.

5571 Background: In the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial, the addition of maintenance olaparib (ola) to bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) resulted in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly for pts with HRD-positive tumors including a BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm; Ray-Coquard et al. NEJM 2019). Preclinical data suggest that pts with mutations (mut) in the RING domain of BRCA1 are less sensitive to ola. The magnitude of benefit from ola + bev, according to the location of mut in the functional domains (FD) of BRCA , remains to be explored. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed advanced HGOC in response after platinum-based chemotherapy + bev received maintenance bev (15 mg/kg q3w for 15 months [mo]) + either ola (300 mg bid for 24 mo) or placebo (pbo). In this post hoc exploratory analysis, PFS was analyzed in pts with BRCAm according to mut location in the FDs of BRCA1 (RING, DNA-binding domain [DNA-BD], or BRCA1 C terminus [BRCT]) and BRCA2 (RAD51-BD; DNA-BD). Results: Among the 806 randomized pts, 235 (29.2%) harbored a BRCAm: 160 (19.9%) with a BRCA1 mut and 76 (9.4%) with a BRCA2 mut. BRCA1 mut in FDs of RING, DNA-BD and BRCT were detected in 19 (11.8%), 41 (25.6%) and 34 (21.2%) pts, respectively. BRCA2 mut were detected in FDs of RAD51-BD and DNA-BD in 37 (48.7%) and 14 (18.4%) pts, respectively. With a median follow-up of 25.5 mo, 24-mo PFS rates and hazard ratios (HRs) according to mut locations are reported in the Table. In pts with a BRCA1 DNA-BD mut, 24-mo PFS was 89% and 14% (ola + bev vs pbo + bev; HR 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–0.26) compared with 64% and 24% for pts with mut in RING + BRCT + other domains (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19–0.57). In pts with BRCA2 mut, 24-mo PFS for pts with mut in the DNA-BD was 91% vs 100% (ola + bev vs pbo + bev) compared with 82% and 44% for pts with mut in RAD51-BD + other domains (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08–0.54). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, pts with newly diagnosed advanced HGOC and a BRCAm had a PFS benefit from maintenance ola + bev regardless of mut locations in BRCA1/BRCA2. Sensitivity to ola + bev maintenance was particularly high for pts with mut in the DNA-BD of BRCA1. Pts with a mut in the DNA-BD of BRCA2 commonly had excellent outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02477644. [Table: see text]