Search

Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in Cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care. Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary CTA, CAD-RADS, Reporting and Data System, Stenosis Severity, Report Standardization Terminology, Plaque Burden, Ischemia Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is published synchronously in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, Journal of the American College of Radiology, and International Journal for Cardiovascular Imaging. © 2022 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by RSNA with permission.

This article, published in the journal Circulation, discusses the past, present, and future of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a diagnostic tool for cardiovascular disease. The essay traces the historical milestones and technological advancements that have shaped cardiac CT, highlighting its ability to provide noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease and other cardiovascular conditions. The article also discusses the role of CCTA in the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, as well as its potential for risk stratification and guiding preventive treatments. The authors conclude that ongoing advancements in technology and clinical research will continue to enhance the role of cardiac CT in modern cardiology. [Extracted from the article]

Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in Cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This consensus of nomenclature and classification for congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy is evidence-based and intended for universal use by physicians (both pediatricians and adults), echocardiographers, advanced cardiovascular imaging specialists, interventional cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, pathologists, geneticists, and researchers spanning these areas of clinical and basic research. In addition, as long as new key and reference research is available, this international consensus may be subject to change based on evidence-based data1.

Since its inaugural issue in 2019, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has disseminated the latest scientific advances and technical developments in cardiac, vascular, and thoracic imaging. In this review, we highlight select articles published in this journal between October 2021 and October 2022. The scope of the review encompasses various aspects of coronary artery and congenital heart diseases, vascular diseases, thoracic imaging, and health services research. Key highlights include changes in the revised Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0, the value of coronary CT angiography in informing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, cardiac MRI findings after COVID-19 vaccination or infection, high-risk features at CT angiography to identify patients with aortic dissection at risk for late adverse events, and CT-guided fiducial marker placement for preoperative planning for pulmonary nodules. Ongoing research and future directions include photon-counting CT and artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging. Keywords: Pediatrics, CT Angiography, CT-Perfusion, CT-Spectral Imaging, MR Angiography, PET/CT, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Pulmonary, Vascular, Aorta, Coronary Arteries © RSNA, 2023., Competing Interests: Disclosures of conflicts of interest: D.M. Grants or contracts from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (no. 5T32EB009035); consulting fees from Segmed; stock or stock options in Segmed; member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. G.J.A. Member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. K.G.O. Payment or honoraria from Grand Rounds for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; president of the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; associate editor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. D.V. Treasurer of the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging; member of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging editorial board; mentor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging trainee editorial board. D.F. Deputy editor for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. S.A. Royalties from Elsevier for textbook authorship; member of the board of directors of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; editor of Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. K.H. Payment or honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; associate editor and trainee editorial board lead for Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging., (© 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.)

Editor's Note .- RadioGraphics Update articles supplement or update information found in full-length articles previously published in RadioGraphics . These updates, written by at least one author of the previous article, provide a brief synopsis that emphasizes important new information such as technological advances, revised imaging protocols, new clinical guidelines involving imaging, or updated classification schemes.

BACKGROUND . Postoperative prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Reliable predictors of the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation after abdominal or pelvic surgeries are lacking. OBJECTIVE . The purpose of this study was to explore associations between preoperative thoracic CT findings and the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation after major abdominal or pelvic surgeries. METHODS . This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent abdominal or pelvic surgeries during the period from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2018, and had undergone preoperative thoracic CT. Case patients were patients who required postoperative mechanical ventilation. Control patients and case patients were matched at a 3:1 ratio on the basis of age, sex, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking status, and surgery type. Two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) reviewed the CT images. Findings were compared between groups. RESULTS . The study included 165 patients (70 women, 95 men; mean age, 67.0 ± 9.7 [SD] years; 42 case patients and 123 matched control patients). Bronchial wall thickening and pericardial effusion were more frequent in case patients than control patients for reader 2 (10% vs 2%, p = .03; 17% vs 5%, p = .01) but not for reader 1. Pulmonary artery diameter (mean ± SD) was greater in case patients than control patients for reader 2 (2.9 ± 0.5 cm vs 2.8 ± 0.5 cm, p = .045) but not reader 1. Right lung height was lower in case patients than control patients for reader 1 (18.4 ± 2.9 cm vs 19.9 ± 2.7 cm, p = .01) and reader 2 (18.3 ± 2.9 cm vs 19.8 ± 2.7 cm, p = .01). Left lung height was lower in case patients than control patients for reader 1 (19.5 ± 3.1 cm vs 21.1 ± 2.6 cm, p = .01) and reader 2 (19.6 ± 2.4 cm vs 20.9 ± 2.6 cm, p = .01). Anteroposterior (AP) chest diameter was greater for case patients than control patients for reader 1 (14.0 ± 2.3 cm vs 12.9 ± 3.7 cm, p = .02) and reader 2 (14.2 ± 2.2 cm vs 13.2 ± 3.6 cm, p = .04). In a multivariable regression model using pooled reader data, bronchial wall thickening exhibited an odds ratio (OR) of 4.6 (95% CI, 1.3-16.5; p = .02); pericardial effusion, an OR of 5.1 (95% CI, 1.7-15.5; p = .004); pulmonary artery diameter, an OR of 1.4 per 1-cm increase (95% CI, 0.7-3.0; p = .32); mean lung height, an OR of 0.8 per 1-cm increase (95% CI, 0.7-1.001; p = .05); and AP chest diameter, an OR of 1.2 per 1-cm increase (95% CI, 1.013-1.4; p = .03). CONCLUSION . CT features are associated with the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation after abdominal or pelvic surgery. CLINICAL IMPACT . Many patients undergo thoracic CT before abdominal or pelvic surgery; the CT findings may complement preoperative clinical risk factors.