Search

Background: Insufficient funding is frequently identified as a critical barrier to the implementation and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Thus, increasing access to funding is recognized as an implementation strategy. Policies that create earmarked taxes-defined as taxes for which revenue can only be spent on specific activities-are an increasingly common mental health financing strategy that could improve the reach of EBPs. This project's specific aims are to (1) identify all jurisdictions in the USA that have implemented earmarked taxes for mental health and catalogue information about tax design; (2) characterize experiences implementing earmarked taxes among local (e.g., county, city) mental health agency leaders and other government and community organization officials and assess their perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of different types of policy implementation strategies; and (3) develop a framework to guide effect earmarked tax designs, inform the selection of implementation strategies, and disseminate the framework to policy audiences., Methods: The project uses the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to inform data collection about the determinants and processes of tax implementation and Leeman's typology of implementation strategies to examine the acceptability and feasibility strategies which could support earmarked tax policy implementation. A legal mapping will be conducted to achieve aim 1. To achieve aim 2, a survey will be conducted of 300 local mental health agency leaders and other government and community organization officials involved with the implementation of earmarked taxes for mental health. The survey will be followed by approximately 50 interviews with these officials. To achieve aim 3, quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated through a systematic framework development and dissemination process., Discussion: This exploratory policy implementation process study will build the evidence base for outer-context implementation determinants and strategies by focusing on policies that earmarked taxes for mental health services., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Funders increasingly encourage social and health service organizations to strengthen their impact on public health through the implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs). Local governments in the U.S. often utilize market-based contracting to facilitate EBI delivery via formal relationships with non-governmental community-based organizations (CBOs). We sought to understand how the discourses embedded within contracting to compete and perform influence how CBOs represent and accomplish their work. We draw on qualitative interviews conducted with government administrators (N=16) overseeing contracts for one child welfare EBI, SafeCare ® and the leaders (N=25) of organizations contracted to implement this program. Participants endorsed competition, capacity, and collaboration as ideals within marketized contracting. Yet they expressed doubt about marketplace meritocracy and described the costs incurred in building the necessary organizational infrastructure to deliver EBIs and compete for contracts. We discuss the implications of marketized EBI contracting for CBOs and the limitations it poses for evidence-based public health, especially in socially marginalized communities.