Search

近年來，我國在洗錢防制（Anti-Money Laundering, AML）的立法及執 行上逐漸邁入正軌並與先進國家逐步看齊，國內金融機構多數都已建置基本洗錢防制系統，並配合商業資料庫提供的名單進行認識你的客戶（Know Your Customer, KYC）與客戶盡職調查（Customer Due Diligence, CDD）中的 姓名檢核工作。然而，在實際作業中，金融機構因姓名檢核缺失被主管機關糾正或裁罰案例層出不窮，此皆肇因於姓名檢核作業的困難性以及工作的繁重，法遵洗防單位苦於沒有科技協助只能大量仰賴人力所致。 本文依據國內實際實施的困難並針對現況進行分析，並參照國外的實際 案例作法，以及符合國內情境方式引入新技術來提出建議，期望能為金融機構在採用AI 大數據等新技術執行洗錢防制負面新聞檢核時作為參考。 In recent years, our country has gradually stepped on the right track in the legislation and implementation of anti-money laundering (AML), and has gradually lined up with advanced countries. Most domestic financial institutions have established basic anti-money laundering systems, and perform the name screening operation of know your customers (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) process with the sanction and watchlists provided by the commercial database. However, in practice, financial institutions have been corrected or punished by the FSC (Financial Supervisory Commission R.O.C. (Taiwan)) due to the lack and missing of name screening. This is due to the difficulty and heavy workload of name screening operation. The legal compliance team suffers from the lack of technological assistance. It can only rely heavily on manpower.

Copyright of Taiwan Jurist is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of NCTU Law Review is the property of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, School of Law & Taiwan Technology Law Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Taiwan Law Review is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)