Search

Background: The aim of the present study was to provide ocular biometry percentile values for Indian children between the ages of 6 and 12 and to validate the usefulness of centiles in predicting myopia development. Methods: The study was part of a longitudinal study—the Sankara Nethralaya Tamil Nadu Essilor Myopia Study (STEM), where objective refraction and ocular biometry were measured for children studying in grades 1, 4, and 6 at baseline (2019–2020). These data were used to generate ocular biometry percentile curves (both for axial length (AL) and AL/corneal curvature (AL/CR) ratios). The usefulness of percentile values in predicting myopia development was estimated from follow-up data (2022). Results: The total number of children in the three grades at baseline was 4514 (age range 6 to 12). Boys represented 54% (n = 2442) of the overall sample. The prevalence of myopia at baseline was 11.7% (95% CI from 10.8 to 12.7%) in these three grades. Both the AL and AL/CR ratio centiles showed a linear trend with an increase in AL and AL/CR with increasing grades (p < 0.001) for all percentiles (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95, 98, and 99) when stratified by sex. In the follow-up data (n = 377), the 75th and 50th percentiles of the AL/CR ratio had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.72 to predict myopia onset for grade 4 and 6 children at baseline. Combining baseline AL with the centile shift in follow-up as a predictor increased the AUC to 0.83. Conclusions: The present study has provided centile values specific for Indian children between the ages of 6 and 12 to monitor and intervene where children are at a higher risk of myopia development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ocular biometry parameters on the predictive accuracy of 10 intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas in patients with high myopia (HM). Methods: We analyzed 202 eyes of 202 patients. The ocular biometry was determined preoperatively using an IOLMaster 700. The associations between the biometry parameters and the prediction error (PE) 1 month postoperatively were assessed. HM was defined as an axial length exceeding 26.50 mm. Results: In patients with HM (n = 108), the K6, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Olsen, and Barrett Universal II (BUII) formulas had the lowest absolute PEs among the 10 formulas. The ocular biometry parameters were not associated with the PE of K6, EVO, Olsen, or BUII. A longer axial length in HM eyes was associated with myopic outcomes by Kane, Hoffer QST, and VRF and hyperopic outcomes by Holladay 2 and T2. Steeper keratometry, a deeper anterior chamber, and a thicker lens were associated with a hyperopic shift in HM eyes when using VRF, Kane, and Hoffer QST, respectively. In patients without HM (n = 94), there was no difference between the formulas in absolute PE. The significant associations between the biometry parameters and PE in patients with HM were not present in patients without HM. Conclusions: K6, EVO, Olsen, and BUII displayed high accuracy in HM eyes and were not influenced by preoperative biometry parameters. For the remaining formulas, the preoperative keratometry, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and axial length were possible error sources underlying an inaccurate IOL power prediction in patients with HM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most common and successful ophthalmic procedures today is the removal of water from the eye and the implantation of a fake intraocular lens. One of the excess issues, notwithstanding, is the precise computation of intraocular lens power important for accomplishing the ideal postoperative refraction. Refractive result following phacoemulsification relies on exactness in different factors utilized in biometry procedure. In this study I have analyzed the intraocular lens power estimation by traditional applanation ultrasound, customary submersion ultrasound and halfway coherence laser interferometer For our tertiary instructional hub, where staff with varying degrees of involvement and mastery in biometry take estimates the context of computation of the intraocular lens that is needed prior to waterfall medical procedure, the review examined visual biometry values using applanation and inundation procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The best overall results with the sum-of-segments biometry were noted with the B II, BTAL, EVO, Hoffer QST, K6, Kane, Olsen, and PEARL-DGS formulas. Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of newer intraocular lens power formulas in long and short eyes measured using the sum-of-segments biometry. Setting: Private practice, Lynwood, California. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: 595 patients scheduled for cataract surgery had their eyes measured using the sum-of-segments biometry. The expected residual refractions were calculated using Barrett Universal II (B II), Barrett True Axial Length (BTAL), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Hill-RBF, Hoffer QST, Holladay 2, Holladay 2-NLR, K6, Kane, Olsen, PEARL-DGS, T2, and VRF formulas and compared with the traditional Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. Results: In the 102 long eyes, all new formulas had a mean absolute error (MAE) equal or lower than the traditional formulas, ranging from 0.29 to 0.32 diopter (D). In the 78 short eyes, BTAL, EVO, Hoffer QST, K6, Olsen, and PEARL-DGS formulas had the lowest MAE (0.33 D, 0.33 D, 0.31 D, 0.36 D, 0.32 D, and 0.32 D, respectively), whereas all traditional formulas exceeded 0.36 D. Conclusions: All new formulas performed equal or better than the traditional formulas with the sum-of-segments biometry. The best overall results in the short and long eyes as well as in the very short and very long eyes were noted with the BTAL, EVO, Hoffer QST, K6, Olsen, and PEARL-DGS formulas, closely followed by the B II and Kane formulas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Axial length (AL) is an important contributor to refraction, and growth curves are gaining importance in the prediction of myopia. This study aimed to profile the distribution of ocular biometry parameters and to identify correlates of spherical equivalent refraction (SE) among school children in South India. Materials and Methods: The School Children Ocular Biometry and Refractive Error study was conducted as part of a school screening program in southern India. The enrolled children underwent tests that included vison check, refraction, binocular vision assessment, and biometry measurements. Results: The study included 1382 children whose mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 10.18 (2.88) years (range: 5-16 years). The sample was divided into 4 groups (grades 1-2, grades 3-5, grades 6-9, and grade 10) based on significant differences in right AL (p<0.001). The mean (SD) AL (range: 20.33-27.27 mm) among the four groups was 22.50 (0.64) mm, 22.88 (0.69) mm, 23.30 (0.82) mm, and 23.58 (0.87) mm, respectively. The mean SE (range: +1.86 to -6.56 D) was 0.08 (0.65 D) in class 1 and decreased with increasing grade to -0.39 (1.20 D) in grade 10. There was a significant difference in all biometry parameters between boys and girls (p<0.001). Age, AL, and mean corneal curvature were the main predictors of SE. Conclusion: This study provides a profile of ocular biometry parameters among school children in South India for comparison against profiles from other regions across the country. The study data will form a reference for future studies assessing myopia in this ethnicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the comparability of ocular biometry measurements and refractive outcomes between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.Methods: This comparative prospective study was conducted from December 2020 to February 2021. A total of 225 patients who had cataracts were enrolled for the study and different parameters such as anterior keratometry (Steep K, Flat K) with axis, Sim K, central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) were evaluated in IOL master 700 first and then with ANTERION. Finally, 203 patients completed the 6-week follow-up and the postoperative refraction was done at the 6th week. To assess the agreement between the devices, intraclass coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used. To analyze the agreement for postoperative residual refractive error between the two devices, Kappa statistics were used.Results: The mean difference for steep K, flat K, and Sim K between ANTERION and IOL Master 700 were - 0.18 +/-0.26 D, -0.13+/- 0.28D, -0.15 +/-0.23, respectively. The CCT, ACD, and LT also showed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.9) but the similarity for the keratometry axis was not up to the mark (ICC = 0.794). For postoperative refractive outcomes, the Kappa value was 0.437, indicating moderate agreement.Conclusion: : ANTERION showed a good agreement for the majority of parameters with IOLMaster 700 in measuring ocular biometry, except for the keratometry. The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers though the IOL power given by ANTERION remained slightly on the hypermetropic side. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the biometric measurements obtained from the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION and calculate the recommended intraocular lens power using the Barrett Formulae. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who underwent biometry using the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION. Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) from each device were measured and compared. These parameters were used to calculate the recommended IOL powers using the Barrett formula. Results: The study included 252 eyes of 153 patients. The IOLMaster had the highest acquisition rate among the two biometers. The Pentacam obtained the shortest mean AL, the IOLMaster measured the highest mean keratometry values, and the ANTERION measured the highest mean ACD. In terms of pairwise comparisons, keratometry and axial length were not significantly different between the Pentacam-IOLMaster and ANTERION-IOLMaster groups, while the rest of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35–45% of patients recommended the same sphere of IOL power. In another 30–40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended an IOL power one step greater than that of the IOLMaster-derived data. 50% of the study population recommended the same toric-cylinder IOL power. Conclusions: The Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION can reliably provide data for IOL power calculations; however, these data are not interchangeable. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35–45% of cases recommended the same sphere IOL power, and in another 30–40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended one-step higher IOL power than the IOLMaster-derived data. In targeting emmetropia, selecting the first plus IOL power is advisable when using the Pentacam and ANTERION to approximate the IOL power calculations recommended by the IOLMaster 700. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the refractive outcomes of long (≥25.00 mm) and short (≤22.00 mm) axial length (AL) eyes undergoing immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent ISBCS were identified and eyes of patients with bilateral long and short ALs were included. Pre- and postoperative biometry, autorefraction, and ocular comorbidities or complications were recorded. The primary outcome was the mean refractive prediction error. Results: Thirty-seven patients (74 eyes) with long ALs and 18 patients (36 eyes) with short ALs were included. The means ± standard deviations of the ALs were 26.40 ± 1.38 mm and 21.44 ± 0.46 mm in the long and short AL groups, respectively. In long AL eyes, the mean absolute error from the biometry-predicted refraction was − 0.16 ± 0.46 D, corresponding to 74% of eyes achieving a refraction within ±0.50 D of the predicted value. In short AL eyes, the mean absolute error was − 0.63 ± 0.73 D, corresponding to 44% of eyes achieving a refraction within ±0.50 D of the predicted value. Eight (44.4%) patients with short AL eyes had a myopic deviation greater than ±0.50 D from the predicted result in both eyes. Conclusions: Compared to patients with long AL eyes, ISBCS in patients with short ALs had a wider variance in refractive outcome and a lower rate of achieving a postoperative refraction within ±0.50 D of the predicted target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The proportion of axial length (AL) occupied by vitreous chamber depth (VCD), or VCD:AL, consistently correlates to ocular biometry in the general population. Relation of VCD:AL to ocular biometry in high myopia is not known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relation of VCD and VCD:AL to ocular biometry of highly myopic eyes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study of records of 214 myopic eyes (<-1 D SE, aged 20-40 years) attending the refractive surgery services. High axial myopia was defined as AL >26.5 mm. Eyes with posterior staphyloma and myopic maculopathy were excluded. Records were assessed for measurements of AL, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white to white diameter (WTW), and vitreous chamber depth (VCD). Groups were formed based on increasing AL, while the sum of CCT, ACD, and LT was recorded as anterior segment depth (AS). The main outcome measure was the correlation of VCD and VCD:AL to ocular biometry. A comparison was also performed based on of degree of axial myopia.Results: Mean age of the patients was 27.0 ± 5.2 years. VCD showed a very strong correlation with AL (R = 0.98, P < 0.001) but did not correlate to any anterior parameter. VCD:AL showed moderate negative relation with AS (R = -0.43, P < 0.001) and ACD (R = -0.3, P < 0.001), while it had a weakly negative relation with LT (R = -0.18, P = 0.006). VCD:AL showed strong negative relation (R > ~0.7) with AS in all individual groups of AL. Among anterior parameters, WTW showed the most consistent relation with ocular biometry.Conclusion: VCD:AL is a better correlate of ocular biometry in high myopia as compared to VCD. However, the correlation is weaker than that noted by previous studies done on the general population. Longitudinal studies of VCD:AL in the younger age group is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry (IA) in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and compare it with conventional IOL formulas.Methods: This was a prospective case series. Eyes with visually significant cataract and axial hyperopia (AL <22.0 mm) underwent IA-assisted phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL (Alcon AcrySof IQ). Postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was compared with predicted SE to calculate the outcomes with different formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 2, Barrett Universal Ⅱ and Hill-RBF). Accuracy of intraoperative aberrometer was compared with other formulas in terms of mean absolute prediction error (MAE), percentage of patients within 0.5 D and 1 D of their target, and percentage of patients going into hyperopic shift.Results: Sixty-five eyes (57 patients) were included. In terms of MAE, both Hoffer Q (MAE = 0.30) and IA (MAE = 0.32) were significantly better than Haigis, SRK/T, and Barrett Universal Ⅱ (P < 0.05). Outcomes within ±0.5 D of the target were maximum with Hoffer Q (80%), superior to IA (Hoffer Q > IA > Holladay 2 > Hill-RBF > Haigis > SRK/T > Barrett Universal Ⅱ). Hoffer Q resulted in minimum hyperopic shift (30.76%) followed by Hill-RBF (38.46%), Holladay 2 (38.46%), Haigis (43.07%), and then IA (46.15%), SRK/T (50.76%) and Barrett Universal Ⅱ (53.84%).Conclusion: IA was more effective (statistically significant) in predicting IOL power than Haigis, SRK/T, and Barrett Universal Ⅱ although it was equivalent to Hoffer Q. Hoffer Q was superior to all formulas in terms of percentage of patients within 0.5 D of their target refractions and percentage of patients going into hyperopic shift. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the ocular biometry of Japanese people through a multicenter approach. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) in the log minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), subjective and objective spherical equivalent values (SE) of ocular refraction, anterior and posterior corneal curvature (ACC and PCC, respectively), anterior and posterior corneal asphericity (ACA and PCA, respectively), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and ocular axial length (AL) were measured in the eyes of 250 participants (mean age = 46.5 ± 18.0 years, range: 20–90 years) across five institutions in Japan. The mean UDVA, CDVA, subjective SE, objective SE, ACC, PCC, ACA, PCA, CCT, ACD, and AL were 0.68, −0.08, −2.42 D, −2.66 D, 7.77 mm, 6.33 mm, −0.31, −0.39, 0.55 mm, 2.92 mm, and 24.78 mm, respectively. Age-related changes and sex-based differences were noted in the visual acuity, refraction, corneal shape, ACD, and AL. Our results serve as basis for future studies aiming to develop refractive correction methods and various vision-related fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and study the effect of axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) on the accuracy of formulas using optic biometry.Methods: This study was performed on 164 eyes of 164 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Ocular biometry values were measured using Lenstar-900, and intraocular lens (IOL) power was calculated using the SRK/T, SRK II, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II formulas. We evaluated the extent of bias within each formula for different ocular biometric measurements and explored the relationship between the prediction error and the ocular parameters by using various IOL formulas.Results: The summarization of refractive prediction error and absolute prediction error for each IOL formulation was performed after adjusting the mean refractive error to zero. The deviation in the error values was minimum for SRK/T (0.265) followed by Holladay 2 (0.327) and Barret (0.382). Further, SRK/T had the lowest median (0.15) and mean (0.198) absolute error as compared to other formulations. For the above formulations, 100% of the eyes were in the diopter range of ±1.0. It was observed that the overall distribution of error was closer to zero for SRK/T, followed by Holladay 2 and then Barrett.Conclusion: In summary, we found that accuracy was better in SRK/T formula. We achieved a better understanding of how each variable in the formulas is relatively weighed and the influencing factors in the refraction prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To understand the ocular biometric parameters characteristics and refractive errors in 3-to 6-year-old preschool children in Chengdu, China, and to investigate the prevalence of refractive errors. Method: A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Chengdu from 2020 to2022 with a total of 666 kindergartens. All children were measured by non-cycloplegic autorefraction and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and ocular biometric parameters. Finally, univariate linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between ocular biometric parameters and refraction. Results: A total of 108,578 preschool children aged 3–6 underwent examinations, revealing a myopia prevalence of 6.1%. The mean axial length (AL), keratometry (K), corneal radius (CR), axial length/corneal radius (AL/CR) Ratio, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and vitreous chamber depth (VCD) were 22.35 ± 0.69 mm, 43.35 ± 1.58 D, 7.80 ± 0.28 mm, 2.87 ± 0.08, 533.31 ± 32.51 μm, 2.70 ± 0.28 mm, 3.91 ± 0.27 mm, and 15.20 ± 0.68 mm, respectively. With increasing age, AL, CR, AL/CR ratio, CCT, ACD, LT, and VCD also increased. Regardless of age, males consistently exhibited longer AL, flatter corneal curvature, shallower ACD, thicker CCT, thinner LT, and longer VCD compared to females. AL, K, CR, LT, and VCD all showed significant linear relationships with SE (all P < 0.001) in univariate linear regression analysis after adjusting for gender and age. Conclusion: The prevalence of myopia among preschool children aged 3–6 in Chengdu is relatively low. Ocular biometric parameters affecting refractive errors include AL, K, CR, LT, and VCD. The preschool period serves as a critical phase for myopia prevention and control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize the distribution of refractive and ocular biometry parameters and analyze the effect factors of the refractive status in cynomolgus monkey colonies. A Population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in adult cynomolgus macaque colonies. Animals were anesthetized with Zoletil 50. Intraocular pressure was measured using the Icare tonometer. Cycloplegic refraction (three drops of 1% tropicamide) and corneal radius of curvature (CRC) were measured using an autorefractor. The spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated. Biometric measurements, including the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL), were obtained by A-scan ultrasonography. The AL-to-CR ratio (AL/CRC) was calculated. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and choroidal thickness (ChT) were measured using the Heidelberg Spectralis HRA OCT. Multiple regression analysis was performed to explore the association between refraction and ocular biometry. Among 263 cynomolgus monkeys (aged 5–26 years), which consisted of 520 eyes, 29.42% had hyperopia, 27.12% had emmetropia, 33.27% had mild-to-moderate myopia and 10.19% had high myopia. The mean SE was −1.27 ± 3.44 Diopters (D). The mean CRC, CCT, AL, and ChT was 5.70 ± 0.22 mm, 454.30 ± 32.40 μm, 18.76 ± 0.89 mm and 188.96 ± 38.19 μm, respectively. The LT was the thickest in the hyperopic eyes. CRC was the lowest, and CCT was the thickest in high myopic eyes. AL increased, while ChT decreased as SE decreased. For the SE variance, AL alone explained 40.5%; age, AL, and CRC together explained 57.5%. The refractive characteristics and biometry parameters of cynomolgus monkeys are highly comparable to those of humans. AL, CRC, and ChT showed the similar variation tendency in cynomolguses when compared to humans. Cynomolgus monkeys with naturally-occurring refractive errors may be a good animal model for refractive studies. • Refractive and biometry range for adult cynomolgus macaque raised in monkey house had been established. Cynomolgus monkeys without any ocular manipulation had high prevalence of myopia. The distribution and the variance tendency of refractive and biometry parameters were comparable to humans'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the effect of the optional biometric parameters lens thickness (LT) and center corneal thickness (CCT) in the Kane formula on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Methods: A cross-sectional study included consecutive cataract patients who received uncomplicated cataract surgery with IOL implantation from May to September 2022 were enrolled. The ocular biometric parameters were obtained using IOLMaster 700 and then inputted into online Kane formula calculator. The IOL power was calculated for targeting emmetropia and compared between groups: not omitting (NO) group, omitting LT and CCT (OLC) group, omitting LT (OL) group and omitting CCT (OC) group. Further, according to the axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and mean keratometry (Km), the eyes were divided into three subgroups, respectively. Results: 1005 eyes of 1005 consecutive patients were included. There was no significant difference in IOL power between NO group and OC group (P = 0.064), and the median absolute difference (MedAD) was 0.05D. The IOL power in NO group showed significant differences from OLC group and OL group respectively (P < 0.001), and both MedAD values were 0.18D. Among AL subgroups, MedAD ranged from 0.06D to 0.35D in short eyes. Among ACD subgroups, the above values ranged from 0.06D to 0.23D in shallow ACD subgroup. Among Km subgroups, these values ranged from 0.05D to 0.31D in steep Km subgroup. Conclusion: The optional biometric parameter CCT has no effect on the calculation results of the Kane formula, whereas the parameter LT has a great influence on the Kane formula results for the IOL power calculation in cataract patients with short AL, shallow ACD and steep Km. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine ocular biometric and refractive profiles of premature children at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), comparing those who did and did not require laser treatment. In this prospective study, premature infants underwent biometry and refraction with their first ROP examination. Study parameters were assessed again at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The main outcome measures were spherical equivalent, axial length, and keratometry. A total of 122 infants (243 eyes) were included. At baseline, infants without ROP, those with ROP who never needed treatment, and those who later needed treatment had overall comparable axial length (P = 0.53) and myopia (P = 0.05); the highest severity group had higher corneal steepness and more myopia at baseline. At 1 year, children with laser-treated ROP had the shortest axial lengths, with the least decrease in keratometry, and the greatest increase in myopia (−2.0 D; P = 0.001). Anisometropia, if present initially, persisted through the 1-year examination. Mean refractive error was more myopic in zone 1 disease (P = 0.3) and in aggressive posterior ROP (P = 0.15). Severe ROP is associated with disruption of emmetropization, and steeper corneas and more myopia at the first ROP examination, before any intervention. In our study cohort, these differences became more marked over the course of 1 year after laser therapy. The myopia in these cases was not axial. Laser therapy did not induce new anisometropia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present a paraxial method to estimate the influence of variations in ocular biometry on changes in refractive error (S) at a population level and apply this method to literature data. Methods: Error propagation was applied to two methods of eye modelling, referred to as the simple method and the matrix method. The simple method defines S as the difference between the axial power and the whole‐eye power, while the matrix method uses more accurate ray transfer matrices. These methods were applied to literature data, containing the mean ocular biometry data from the SyntEyes model, as well as populations of premature infants with or without retinopathy, full‐term infants, school children and healthy and diabetic adults. Results: Applying these equations to 1000 SyntEyes showed that changes in axial length provided the most important contribution to the variations in refractive error (57%–64%), followed by lens power/gradient index power (16%–31%) and the anterior corneal radius of curvature (10%–13%). All other components of the eye contributed <4%. For young children, the largest contributions were made by variations in axial length, lens and corneal power for the simple method (67%, 23% and 8%, respectively) and by variations in axial length, gradient lens power and anterior corneal curvature for the matrix method (55%, 21% and 14%, respectively). During myopisation, the influence of variations in axial length increased from 54.5% to 73.4%, while changes in corneal power decreased from 9.82% to 6.32%. Similarly, for the other data sets, the largest contribution was related to axial length. Conclusions: This analysis confirms that the changes in ocular refraction were mostly associated with variations in axial length, lens and corneal power. The relative contributions of the latter two varied, depending on the particular population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review article attempts to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes. A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted for articles published over the past 21 years, up to July 2021. The mean absolute error was compared by using weighted mean difference, whereas odds ratio was used for comparing the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.0 D of target refraction. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was analyzed by using Chi-square test and I2 test. Fifteen studies including 2,395 eyes and 11 formulae (Barrett Universal II, Full Monte method, Haigis, Hill-RBF, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Olsen, Super formula, SRK/T, and T2) were included. Although the mean absolute error (MAE) of Barrett Universal II was found to be the lowest, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the comparisons. The median absolute error (MedAE) of Barrett Universal II was the lowest (0.260). Holladay 1 and Hill-RBF had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D and ±1.0 D of target refraction, respectively. Yet their comparison with the rest of the formulae did not yield statistically significant results. Thus, to conclude, in the present meta-analysis, although lowest MAE and MedAE were found for Barrett Universal II and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D and ±1.0 D of target refraction was found for Holladay 1 and Hill-RBF, respectively, none of the formulae was found to be statistically superior over the other in eyes with short axial length. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cataract surgery in keratoconic patients is challenging because of the corneal distortion, which can lead to inaccurate keratometry readings. This study is a comparison of the accuracy of keratometry readings by two types of devices in a tertiary hospital. Purpose: To evaluate the comparability of corneal power measurements, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and white-to-white (WTW) distance between Scheimpflug-based tomography (Pentacam AXL; OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and swept-source optical biometry (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) in patients with keratoconus. Methods: This pilot, prospective, interinstrument reliability study included 30 keratoconic eyes of 15 individuals who had not undergone any kind of corneal surgery. Standard K and total refractive power (TK®) of the flattest and steepest axes of the IOLMaster 700 were compared with the standard keratometry (SimK), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometer readings (EKR), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) of the Pentacam. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between the measurements of both devices. The pairedsamples t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed to compare the mean values of the variables obtained with the devices. Results: The K1 value of the IOLMaster 700 was significantly higher from EKR K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.79 diopters, p = 0.01), 4-mm (mean difference: 1.01 D, p = 0.01), and 4.5-mm zones (mean difference: 1.20 D, p = 0.01) and TNP K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.88 D, p < 0.001) and 4-mm zones (mean difference: 0.97 D, p < 0.001). The TK1 value was significantly higher from EKR K1 along the 2-mm (mean difference: 0.42 D, p = 0.04), 3-mm (mean difference: 0.83 D, p = 0.003), 4-mm (mean difference: 1.05 D, p = 0.004), and 4.5-mm zones (mean difference: 1.24 D, p = 0.005) and TNP K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.92 D, p < 0.001) and 4-mm zones (mean difference: 1.01 D, p < 0.001). The K2 value of the IOLMaster 700 was significantly higher from TK2 (mean difference: 0.11 D, p = 0.04) and all the corresponding variables of the Pentacam device. The TK2 value was significantly higher from all the corresponding variables of the Pentacam device. The Pentacam also yielded significantly lower values for the WTW distance (mean difference: 0.31 mm, p < 0.001) and no significant difference in terms of ACD values (p = 0.9). Conclusion: The IOLMaster measured significantly greater keratometry readings in the steep axis for all the variables studied. The keratometry and WTW measurements of the investigated devices cannot be used interchangeably in keratoconus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the surgical outcomes of basic-type exotropia in patients with hyperopia. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent surgery for basic-type exotropia and had been followed up for ≥ 2 years were retrospectively recruited. Patients with myopia and spherical equivalent (SE) < -1.0 diopters (D) were excluded. The patients were classified according to the SE: group H had a SE ≥ + 1.0 D, and group E had -1.0 ≤ SE < + 1.0 D. The surgical success rate and sensory outcome were compared. Surgical success was defined as exodeviation ≤ 10 prism diopters (PD) and esodeviation ≤ 5 PD at 6 m fixation. Stereoacuity was measured using the Titmus Preschool Stereoacuity Test. Results: Seventy-five patients (24 males and 51 females, mean age 5.1 ± 2.6 years, range 2.7–14.8) were included. The SE ranged from -0.9 to 4.4 and 21 patients were classified into group H and 54 into group E. The success rates were higher in group H than in group E during the entire follow-up period, but the differences were significant only at the final examination. At the final follow-up, 11 of the 21 (52.4%) patients in group H and 15 of the 54 (27.7%) in group E maintained successful alignment, whereas 10 (47.6%) and 38 (70.4%) patients exhibited recurrence. Overcorrection was exhibited in one (1.9%) patient in group E. Sensory results were comparable between the groups. The follow-up period did not differ between the two groups. The survival analysis showed no difference in the surgical results between the two groups. Conclusions: Surgery for basic-type intermittent exotropia resulted in superior outcomes in patients with hyperopia compared to those with emmetropia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate the effects of pretreatment for dry eye disease (DED) on the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.Methods: Patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were included in the study. IOL power was determined using the SRK/T and Barrett Universal II (Barrett) formulas. The patients were divided into non-pretreatment and pretreatment groups, and those in the pretreatment group were treated with topical 0.5% loteprednol etabonate and 0.05% cyclosporin A for 2 weeks prior to cataract surgery. Ocular biometry was performed in all groups within 2 days before surgery. The mean prediction error, mean absolute error (MAE), and proportions of refractive surprise were compared between the non-pretreatment and pretreatment groups at 1 month postoperatively. Refractive surprise was defined as MAE ≥ 0.75D.Results: In a total of 105 patients, 52 (52 eyes) were in the non-pretreatment group and 53 (53 eyes) in the pretreatment group. The MAE was 0.42 ± 0.33, 0.38 ± 0.34 (SRK/T, Barrett) and 0.23 ± 0.19, 0.24 ± 0.19 in the non-pretreatment and pretreatment groups, respectively (p < 0.001/=0.008). The number of refractive surprises was also significantly lower in the pretreatment group. [non-pretreatment/pretreatment: 9/2 (SRK/T); 8/1 (Barrett); p = 0.024/0.016]. Pretreatment of DED was related to a reduction in postoperative refractive surprise. [SRK/T/Barrett: OR = 0.18/0.17 (95% CI: 0.05-0.71/0.05-0.60), p = 0.014/0.006].Conclusions: The accuracy of IOL power prediction can be increased by actively treating DED prior to cataract surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Kane formula with Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) and Barrett Universal II in predicting intraocular lens (IOL) power in Indian eyes.Methods: This retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care eye hospital. Data from patients having uneventful cataract surgery with Tecnis ZCB00 IOL implantation were obtained from Lenstar and electronic medical records. Eyes were divided into subgroups based on axial length (AL) as short (<22.0 mm), medium (22-24 mm), and long (>24 mm). The predicted refractive outcome for each patient was calculated after optimizing the lens constant. Prediction error was calculated by subtracting the predicted spherical equivalent from achieved spherical equivalent 1 week post-surgery. The mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 D were calculated for each formula. Friedman test, Cochrane Q test were used for statistical analysis.Results: Out of the 350 eyes included in the study, we found that without lens constant optimization, Barrett formula performed better than SRK/T and Kane (P < 0.0001). Over the entire range of axial lengths, Kane formula performed slightly inferior compared to Barrett and SRK-T, both of which performed equally well (P = 0.006). On subgroup analysis, Kane formula performed inferiorly for medium eyes as compared to the other two. No significant differences were noted between the formulae for short and long eyes.Conclusion: Kane formula did not outperform Barrett Universal II and SRK/T in Indian eyes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The major challenge these days in pediatric cataract surgery is not the technique of surgery or intraocular lens (IOL) used but the postoperative refractive error. Amblyopia occurring due to postoperative refractive error which the child has; destroys the benefit obtained by a near-perfect and timely surgery. Even if we settle the debate as to what should be the ideal postoperative target refraction, there is a postoperative surprise that is not explained by our conventional insights of an accurate power calculation in children. The role of IOL power calculation formulae in affecting the postoperative refractive error should not be underestimated. Therefore, which age-appropriate formula is to be used for children is unclear. This review is an update on major IOL power calculation formulas used in pediatric eyes. We have tried to define why we should not be using these formulas made for adult eyes and review the literature in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the relationship between an oval optic disc and the occurrence of myopic foveoschisis (MF) using swept-source optic coherence tomography (SS-OCT).Methods: Fifty eyes of 25 patients with unilateral MF were included in this retrospective observational study. The biometric features of the optic disc and peripapillary structures were evaluated using SS-OCT.Results: The ovality index (OI) of the optic disc was significantly smaller (P = 0.003) and the optic disc tilt angle was greater (P = 0.023) in the eyes with MF than in the contralateral eyes. The optic disc tilt angle was significantly correlated with the OI (P = 0.000). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model (linear regression) demonstrated that spherical equivalent refraction (P = 0.001), narrow macular staphyloma (P = 0.001) and the occurrence of MF (P = 0.026) were the independent factors associated with the OI. Narrow macular staphyloma was more frequent (P = 0.020) and the staphyloma was deeper (P = 0.006) in eyes with MF. GEE model (logistic regression) revealed that narrow macular staphyloma was the only independent factor related to the occurrence of MF (P = 0.013).Conclusions: An oval optic disc in eyes with MF resulted from the increased tilt around the vertical disc axis. The optic disc tilt was related to narrow macular staphyloma, which was the only independent factor associated with the occurrence of MF. The clinical relevance needs further exploration through longitudinal analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the distribution of eccentricity and its association with some biometric and demographic parameters.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the target population was primary school children aged 6 to 12 years from Shahroud, northeast Iran. Scheimpflug imaging was done using the Pentacam. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to study the association between Eccentricity (ECC) and independent variables like age, sex, living place as well as biometric parameters.Results: Of the 6624 selected students, 5620 participated in the study of whom 4968 were eligible for analysis in this study. About half (52.4%) of the students were boys. The mean ECC was 0.600 (95% CI: 0.597-0.602) in total, 0.597 (95% CI: 0.594-0.600) in boys and 0.603 (95% CI: 0.599-0.607) in girls. The mean ECC was 0.611 in 6-year-old and 0.588 in 12-year-old children. The mean ECC was 0.590 in rural and 0.601 in urban children. The mean ECC was 0.600, 0.604, and 0.604 in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic children, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that ECC decreased with age (Coefficient: -0.004; 95%CI: -0.006 to -0.003), was higher in urban areas (Coefficient: 0.008; 95%CI: 0.002 to 0.014), had a direct association with axial length, and had an indirect association with lens thickness, central corneal thickness, and anterior chamber depth.Conclusion: The cornea had a prolate shape in children and eccentricity value decreased with age. The results of this study add to the existing knowledge and can be used in differentiating normal from abnormal corneal shapes in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of nine conventional and newer-generation formulae in calculating intraocular lens power in eyes with axial myopia. Setting: Tertiary eye care center, Bengaluru, India. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional, comparative study conducted in India. Methods: Patients undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification in eyes with axial length >26 mm were included. Preoperative biometry was done using Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland). Single eye of patients undergoing bilateral implantation was randomly selected. Optimized lens constants were used to calculate the predicted postoperative refraction of each formula, which was then compared with the actual refractive outcomes to give the prediction errors, following which subgroup analysis was performed. The Kane formula, Barrett universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Hill Radial Basis Function (Hill RBF) 3.0, Olsen formula, along with Wang Koch-adjusted four formulae, that is, Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T), Holladay 1, Haigis, and Hoffer Q formula, were compared for intraocular lens power calculations. Results: One hundred and sixty-five eyes that fulfilled all the inclusion criteria were studied. Hill RBF 3.0 had the lowest mean and median absolute prediction errors (0.355 and 0.275, respectively) compared to all formulas. In subgroup analysis (26-28, >28-30, and >30 mm), significant difference was seen only in extremely long eyes (>30 mm). The Hill RBF 3.0 formula generated the maximum percentage of eyes with refractive errors within ±0.25, ±0.5, ±0.75, and ±1 D (46%, 76.2%, 89.9%, and 95.8%, respectively). Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating all the formulas exclusively in the myopic eyes. Hill RBF 3 was found to be superior in accuracy to all other formulas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the association between parental myopia and high myopia with children's refraction and ocular biometry in large-scale Chinese preschool children from the Beijing Hyperopia Reserve Study. Subjects/Methods: This cross-sectional kindergarten-based study enrolled children aged 3–6 years. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), and corneal radius (CR) were measured for all children. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire about refractive status (no myopia, mild myopia <−3 D, moderate myopia ≥−3 D and ≤−6, and high myopia >−6 D). Results: The study enrolled 2,053 children (1,069 boys and 984 girls), with a mean age of 4.26 ± 0.96 years and mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of 1.11 ± 0.97 diopter. Of the children, 90.7% had at least one myopic parent, and 511 children (24.9%) had at least one highly myopic parent. SER decreased significantly with increasing severity of parental myopia (p < 0.001). Preschool children's myopia was independently associated with parental myopia (OR, 10.4 and 11.5 for one and two highly myopic parent[s]). Age (OR = 1.1), gender (OR = 1.7; girls as references), near work time (OR = 1.2), and both maternal (OR, 1.4 and 2.0 for moderate and high myopia) and paternal myopia (OR, 1.6 and 1.9 for moderate and high myopia) were independent risk factors for lacking hyperopia reserve. Conclusion: Severe parental myopia was associated with a lower SER, longer AL, and higher AL/CR ratio in preschool children. Parental myopia and near work may predispose children to faster elimination of hyperopia reserves before exposure to higher educational stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presbyopia is an age-related physiological phenomenon in which eye gradually losses its ability to accommodate. It is one of the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide, especially in adults above the age of 40. If uncorrected, it can significantly impair a patient's quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the factors which affects patient's need and willingness to accept presbyopic correction. This cross-sectional analytical study was carried out in a semi urban tertiary care hospital from Jan 2021 to June 2022 among patients aged 40 and above who presented to Outpatient department (OPD). Demographic details, medical history, presenting ocular complaints pertaining to presbyopia, spectacle use and decision regarding using near vision correction were noted. Ocular examination included refraction and ocular biometry. Factors that may have influenced complaints of presbyopia or willingness to accept presbyopic correction were analysed. Three hundred and forty two patients with a mean age of 48.55 ± 6.68 years were included. Of these, 262 (76.61%) patients presented with chief complaints related to presbyopia. Those with higher educational qualification (p = 0.031), hypermetropia (p = 0.021), shallower AC depth (p = 0.028) and on medications for systemic ailments (p = 0.01), were more likely to present with chief complaints attributable to presbyopia. Among them, those with higher educational qualifications (p = 0.02) and skilled workers were more likely to accept near vision glasses (p = 0.02), while those with lower Hb (p = 0.01) and myopia (p = 0.01) were less likely to accept correction for presbyopia. Among the 80 patients without chief complaints related to presbyopia, 35 (43.75%) were not willing to accept near vision glasses. Those with higher BMI (p = 0.04) and hypermetropes (p = 0.05) were more willing to accept presbyopic correction. Presbyopia constitutes a significant reason for patients above the age of 40 visiting eye care facility. Multiple socio-economic, systemic and ocular factors influenced both the chief complaints related to presbyopia and willingness to accept presbyopic correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations among IOL formulas after phacovitrectomy. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 206 eyes of 206 patients who underwent 25-gauge phacovitrectomy, without gas tamponade, for macular pathology. Pre-operative optical biometry used the IOLMaster 700 to calculate the IOL power with the new formulas, i.e. the Barrett Universal II (BU II), Emmetropia Verifying Optical version 2.0, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) version 3.0, Kane, and Ladas Super Formula, and conventional formulas, i.e. Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T (SRK/T). A single-piece foldable IOL was implanted in all cases. Manifest refractions were measured before and 3 months after surgery. Results: The BU II formula showed the lowest standard deviation and mean and median absolute errors and had the highest percentage of eyes with a refractive prediction error within ± 0.25 D. The absolute error was significantly lower with the four new formulas, except the Hill-RBF, than with the Hoffer Q (all p = ≤ 0.010) and Holladay 1 formulas (all p = < 0.010). The absolute error with the BU II formula was also lower than that with the Holladay 2 (p = 0.012) and SRK/T (p = 0.024) formulas. Conclusion: Overall, the new IOL formulas, except the Hill-RBF, were superior to some of the conventional formulas for calculating IOL power in phacovitrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To the Editor, We appreciate the interest of Biswas and Choi et al. in our paper 'Near work, light levels and dioptric profile - Which factor dominates and influence the short-term changes in axial length? Near work, light levels and dioptric profile - Which factor dominates and influence the short-term changes in axial length? 2015; 34: 112 - 6. 14 Meyer JJ, Kim MJ, Kim T. Effects of contact lens wear on biometry measurements for intraocular lens calculations. Given that time spent outdoors is considered to delay the onset of myopia but may not be effective in individuals who have already developed myopia,[[4]] we purposefully recruited more emmetropes. [Extracted from the article]

Background: myopia prevalence is high among Japanese schoolchildren, but the underlying causes are unclear. Objective: To examine the distributions of ocular biometry and refraction and their associations with lifestyle variables among Japanese schoolchildren. Methods: This cross-sectional school-based study included 2140 children aged 3–14 years in Tokyo, Japan, and evaluated the distributions under non-cycloplegic conditions and the associated environmental factors. Results: The prevalence of spherical equivalent (SE) ≤−0.75 diopter among preschoolers (aged 3–6 years), elementary school students (aged 6–11 years), and junior high school students (aged 12–14 years) was 49.7%, 72.4%, and 87.7%, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the time spent using digital devices was associated positively with lens thickness (β = 0.010; p < 0.050) but not SE, axial length, or vitreous chamber depth. The time spent reading was associated negatively with lens thickness (β = −0.012; p < 0.050), SE (β = −0.152; p < 0.010), axial length (β = 0.110; p < 0.001), and vitreous chamber depth (β = 0.110; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The data indicated that almost half of preschoolers may be myopic. The association with the lens thickness differed depending on the type of near work performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate residual refractive astigmatism using the Panacea and enVista toric calculators, compared to the gold-standard Barrett toric calculator. Design: A retrospective and comparative study was conducted in one center. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with a diagnosis of senile cataracts and regular corneal astigmatism, without previous corneal or intraocular surgery, who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a toric intraocular lens, who had pre- and postoperative corneal topography, biometry, and refraction measurements. Results: The frequency of preoperative astigmatism according to the axis was 70 (84%) eyes showing with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, 9 (14%) eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism, and 1 (2%) eye with oblique astigmatism. Regarding astigmatism prediction errors, there were statistically significant differences between the enVista and Panacea calculators (median of 0.39, 0.18, and 0.52 for Barrett, enVista, and Panacea, respectively). The residual astigmatism prediction error centroid was similar for the Barrett and enVista toric calculators, and both were lower compared to the Panacea calculator (x-component p < 0.001). Conclusions: The enVista toric calculator incorporating the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) toric calculator provides similar results to the gold-standard Barrett calculator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To evaluate the corneal epithelial thickness (CET) profiles and their correlations with axial length (AL) and anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm F) across different refractive error groups. Methods: A total of 1225 eyes of 616 normal patients were included. CET mapping, AL, and Rm F were obtained using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, optical biometry, and Scheimpflug corneal tomography, respectively. In the CET map, one central (2 mm), eight paracentral (2–5 mm), and eight peripheral (5–6 mm) quadrants were evaluated separately. The subjects were divided into four groups based on their refractive status: hyperopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ≥ +0.50 D), emmetropia (SE > −0.50 D and < +0.50 D), low myopia (SE ≤ −0.50 D and > −3.0 D), and moderate–high myopia (SE ≤ −3.0 D) groups. Linear mixed model analysis with Bonferroni correction was used to compare CET according to refractive error groups. The correlations between the CET profile and the AL and Rm F were analyzed. Results: The central CET was 53.7 ± 3.3 μm in hyperopia (n = 34), 53.2 ± 2.9 μm in emmetropia (n = 353), 52.8 ± 2.9 μm in low myopia (n = 677), and 52.0 ± 3.1 μm in moderate–high myopia (n = 161). Although thinning was observed in CET in all quadrants from hyperopia to moderate–high myopia, it was only significant in the superior and superonasal quadrants at the 2–5 mm and 5–6 mm-diameter rings. While AL and CET were significantly positively correlated (r range 0.17–0.28) in the moderate–high myopia group, Rm F and CET were significantly positively correlated (r range 0.08–0.10) in the low and moderate–high myopia groups. Conclusion: CET varied according to different refractive error groups and was positively correlated with AL and Rm F, particularly in the moderate–high myopia group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry (IA) for predicting postoperative refraction between eyes with emmetropia and myopia targets. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with axial myopia (axial length ≥ 25.0 mm) who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery with IA to achieve emmetropia (plano to − 0.5 D) or intentional myopia (− 2.5 D to − 5.0 D). Preoperative ocular biometry was performed in all eyes using an IOLMaster. Refractive prediction errors in IA were compared between eyes with emmetropia and myopia targets. Refractive prediction errors in IA for both groups were also compared with those predicted by intraocular lens power calculation formulas including the SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, Haigis, and Barrett Universal II formulas. Results: Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients with a target of emmetropia and 22 eyes of 22 patients with a target of intentional myopia were included in the final analysis. The mean numerical error was significantly different from zero (myopic trend) in myopia-targeted eyes (− 0.37 ± 0.54 D, one-sample t-test, P = 0.004, 95% confidence interval: − 0.61 to − 0.14), while it was close to zero in emmetropia-targeted eyes. The mean absolute error was significantly smaller in emmetropia-targeted eyes (0.28 ± 0.27 D) than in myopia-targeted eyes (0.51 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.01). IA was revealed as the most accurate method for predicting postoperative refraction in eyes with emmetropia target, whereas Barrett Universal II formula was found to be the most accurate for eyes with myopia target. Conclusion: In patients with axial myopia, the performance of IA was altered when targeting intentional myopia compared with emmetropia. Myopic shift in the refractive outcome should be considered when IA is used to target myopia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We used baseline data from the PICNIC longitudinal study to investigate structural, functional, behavioural and heritable metrics that may predict future myopia in young children. Methods: Cycloplegic refractive error (M) and optical biometry were obtained in 97 young children with functional emmetropia. Children were classified as high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) for myopia based on parental myopia and M. Other metrics included axial length (AXL), axial length/corneal radius (AXL/CR) and refractive centile curves. Results: Based on the PICNIC criteria, 46 children (26 female) were classified as HR (M = +0.62 ± 0.44 D, AXL = 22.80 ± 0.64 mm) and 51 (27 female) as LR (M = +1.26 ± 0.44 D, AXL = 22.77 ± 0.77 mm). Based on centiles, 49 children were HR, with moderate agreement compared with the PICNIC classification (k = 0.65, p < 0.01). ANCOVA with age as a covariate showed a significant effect for AXL (p < 0.01), with longer AXL and deeper anterior chamber depth (ACD) (p = 0.01) in those at HR (differences AXL = 0.16 mm, ACD = 0.13 mm). Linear regression models showed that central corneal thickness (CCT), ACD, posterior vitreous depth (PVD) (=AXL – CCT – ACD‐lens thickness (LT)), corneal radius (CR) and age significantly predicted M (R = 0.64, p < 0.01). Each 1.00 D decrease in hyperopia was associated with a 0.97 mm elongation in PVD and 0.43 mm increase in CR. The ratio AXL/CR significantly predicted M (R = −0.45, p < 0.01), as did AXL (R = −0.25, p = 0.01), although to a lesser extent. Conclusions: Although M and AXL were highly correlated, the classification of pre‐myopic children into HR or LR was significantly different when using each parameter, with AXL/CR being the most predictive metric. At the end of the longitudinal study, we will be able to assess the predictability of each metric. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the Barrett (BTC) and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) Toric Calculators' performance with regards to prediction of residual post-operative astigmatism after cataract surgery. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of de-identified data that was collected as part of a prospective multicenter clinical trial in which 109 eyes from 109 patients were implanted with a monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). Post-operative biometry was used to calculate the predicted post-operative residual astigmatism for each eye using the two different calculators. The vector difference between the actual and predicted residual astigmatism was calculated. Results: The mean absolute astigmatism prediction errors were 0.59 ± 0.38 D and 0.59 ± 0.36 D for the BTC and EVO calculators, respectively (p = 0.98). The centroid of the prediction errors were 0.18 D @ 89° ± 0.68 D and 0.20 D @ 89° ± 0.66 D, respectively (p = 0.21). The proportion of eyes in which the astigmatism prediction error was ≤ 0.5 D was 50% for BTC and 46% for EVO (p = 0.28). The proportion of eyes in which the post-operative astigmatism orientation was correctly predicted as being against-the-rule, with-the-rule, or oblique was 81% for BTC and 77% for EVO (p = 0.15). Conclusion: The Barrett and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Toric Calculators had similar performance with regards to their astigmatism prediction accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for predicting the postoperative refraction in eyes with a target of emmetropia or intentional myopia. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at Kobe City Eye Hospital, Kobe, Japan. Fifty eyes of 50 patients with axial myopia who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification and single-type IOL implantation for a target of emmetropia (plano to − 0.5 D) or intentional myopia (− 2.0 D to − 3.0 D) were selected. Preoperative ocular biometry was performed using IOLMaster700 in all eyes. Refractive prediction errors of 6 IOL formulas integrated into IOLMaster700 were compared between eyes with a target of emmetropia and intentional myopia. Results: The mean numerical errors of SRK/T (Sanders, Retzlaff, and Kraft/theoretical), Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 2 significantly differed between the two groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, 0.02, and 0.007, respectively). The values for mean numerical errors in eyes with a target of intentional myopia were smaller, showing relatively myopic outcome, as compared with those in eyes with a target of emmetropia. In eyes with a target of emmetropia, the mean numerical errors of Holladay 1 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.63), Hoffer Q (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.42), and Barrett Universal II (p = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.35) were significantly different from zero (hyperopic trend). Furthermore, in eyes with a target of intentional myopia, the mean numerical error of SRK/T (p = 0.001, 95% CI: − 0.61 to − 0.17) and Holladay 2 (p = 0.023, 95% CI: − 0.43 to − 0.04) were significantly different from zero (myopic trend). Conclusion: In patients with axial myopia, some IOL formulas may show a myopic trend in the refractive outcome when targeting intentional myopia as compared to emmetropia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The effect of body mass index (BMI) and central fat distribution (CFD) reduction after bariatric surgery on ocular refraction is not well established. We assessed association between anthropometric parameters and refraction errors with other ocular and metabolic parameters 1 year after the surgery. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study with patients underwent bariatric surgery and had at least 1 year follow-up. Data were extracted from the bariatric and ophthalmology outpatient clinic records of the participants. Measurements of metabolic, anthropometric, and ocular parameters including BMI, CFD, refraction status, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), optic coherence tomography (OCT), and biometry test of the eyes were evaluated. Results: Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients had a mean follow-up of 14.4 ± 1.7 months after the surgery. Mean BMI and percentage of CFD decreased from 47.5 ± 6.7 to 33.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2 (p < 0.01) and 28.5 ± 5.74 to 17.8 ± 4.64 (p < 0.001) after 1 year, respectively. Mean refractive errors of the right and left eyes changed from − 0.62 ± 1.23 D to − 0.17 ± 1.36 D and from − 0.79 ± 1.39 to − 0.34 ± 1.56 after 1 year of the surgery (p < 0.001). Mean IOP was significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Unlike BMI, reduction in CFD was significantly correlated with refraction change in both eyes (right eyes; r = 0.783, left eyes; r = 0.791, p < 0.001) after 1 year. No significant differences were found in the other parameters. Conclusion: Bariatric surgery induced significant refractive change in eyes, which is significantly associated with CFD reduction after 1 year. Bariatric surgery should be considered as a risk factor in patients with unexpected refractive error changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared ultrasonic ocular axial length and vitreous chamber depth, and physical anthropometry in normal and myopic African adults due to sparse related data in this setting. This was a hospital-based, case-control study in which 175 myopes and 175 emmetropes, recruited by convenience sampling, at General Hospital Epe, Lagos, had their anthropometry and refractive status determined; and ocular axial length and vitreous chamber depth measured with A- and B-mode ocular ultrasonography. Data was analyzed using appropriate inferential statistics and level of significance set at 0.05. Mean ocular axial length in normal, mild, moderate and severe myopia was 22.45mm, 23.54mm, 23.79mm, and 25.56mm while mean vitreous chamber depth in normal, mild, moderate, and severe myopia was 15.45mm, 16.63mm, 16.84mm, and 18.68mm, respectively. Males had significantly longer axial length and vitreous chamber depth than females. Correlation between weight, height and BMI and refractive status among myopes was insignificant. There was consistency between A- and B-mode ultrasonography ocular axial length and vitreous chamber measurements with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.888 and 0.842, respectively (p<0.001). Ocular axial length and vitreous chamber depth increased with the severity of myopia with no correlation of anthropometry with refractive status among African myopes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate and determine the choroidal thickness (CT) in healthy emmetropic Turkish subjects aged between 20 and 40 years using Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (EDI-OCT). Methods: This study included 194 eyes of 194 healthy emmetropic subjects. All participants underwent a detailed ophthalmologic examination. Axial length (AL) was measured with optical biometry. CT measurements were performed at subfoveal, 1.0 mm temporal, and 1.0 mm nasal using the EDI-OCT. Central macular thickness (CMT) measurements were also performed at the same time. Participants were divided into two groups; Group 1 (age between 20 and 30 years) and Group 2 (age between 31 and 40 years). CT and CMT were compared among two groups. Results: The mean age of all the subjects was 26.61±6.08 years, the mean AL was 23.44±0.72 mm, and the mean spherical equivalent was -0.11±0.28 Diopter. The mean subfoveal, nasal, and temporal CT was 389.27±86.61 pm, 354.54±86.86 μm, and 368.25±78.69 pm, respectively. Subfoveal and nasal CT of female participants were found thinner than male participants (p=0.013 and p=0.008, respectively). CT and CMT were found similar between Group 1 and Group 2. Conclusion: This study showed that mean subfoveal CT and CMT was 389.27±86.6lpm and 268.I7±I8.76 pm, respec- tively, among healthy emmetropic Turkish subjects. Females had thinner CT in subfoveal and nasal quadrants. In addition, age did not affect CT between 20 and 40 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Refractive accuracy is crucial for increasing patient satisfaction after cataract surgery. Tear film instability caused by dry eye can lead to inaccurate measurement of corneal power, which is one of the most important factors for postoperative refractive calculation. This study investigated the effect of 2% rebamipide ophthalmic suspension on the predicted refractive accuracy for cataract surgery in patients with dry eye. Methods: This single-center, prospective, open-label study included 35 dry eyes (with tear breakup time < 5 s) who underwent cataract surgery. The patients were treated with rebamipide for 4 weeks before the preoperative examination. In addition to the usual evaluation of biometric variables essential for cataract surgery, tear breakup time (TBUT), superficial punctate keratopathy in the central part of the cornea (C-SPK), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and predicted postoperative spherical equivalent (P-SE) were evaluated at baseline and 4 weeks after dry eye treatment. The patients' subjective spherical equivalent (S-SE) was evaluated 1 month postoperatively. The difference between S-SE and P-SE was used to assess the accuracy of the P-SE. Improvement in TBUT, C-SPK, HOA, and the accuracy of P-SE after dry eye treatment were analyzed. Results: The accuracy of the biometry readings for the achieved P-SE was within 0.25 D in 42.9% and 54.3%; within 0.5 D in 71.4% and 88.6%; and within 0.75 D in 88.6% and 97.1% of eyes before and after rebamipide treatment, respectively (p < 0.01). TBUT, C-SPK, and HOAs significantly improved after rebamipide treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Rebamipide significantly improved the corneal surface condition and accuracy of the predicted postoperative refraction in dry eyes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. To compare implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) and acrylic implantable phakic contact lenses (IPCLs) in the treatment of myopia in adults, as regards refractive outcome and adverse effects. Methods. Prospective, randomized comparative study with phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) was carried out for treatment of myopia. Patients were randomized into two groups: one for ICL and the other for IPCL. Preoperative assessments included a full examination, pentacam, endothelial cell count, and biometry. We compared the adverse effects and refractive outcomes between both groups. The study was registered in clinical trials and the registration number is NCT04624035. Results. Sixty eyes of sixty patients (28 in the ICL group and 32 in the IPCL group) with a follow-up period of 12 months. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −12.7 ± 3.4 D and −13.6 ± 4.4 D in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively (P = 0.37). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent value was ±0.4 ± 0.2 D and ±0.6 ± 0.1 D in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) has improved from 1.3 ± 0.06 to 0.15 ± 0.02 Log MAR in the ICL group (P < 0.001) and from 1.3 ± 0.02 to 0.15 ± 0.01 Log MAR in the IPCL group (P < 0.001). The mean endothelial cell count was reduced by 3.3% in the IPCL group and by 3.2% in the IPCL group. Conclusion. Both ICL and IPCL are effective methods to correct high myopia in adults with no statistically significant differences between the two lenses as regarding adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the introduction of the first toric intraocular lens (IOLs) in the early 1990s, these lenses have become the preferred choice for surgeons across the globe to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery. These lenses allow patients to enjoy distortion-free distance vision with excellent outcomes. They also have their own set of challenges. Inappropriate keratometry measurement, underestimating the posterior corneal astigmatism, intraoperative IOL misalignment, postoperative rotation of these lenses, and IOL decentration after YAG-laser capsulotomy may result in residual cylindrical errors and poor uncorrected visual acuity resulting in patient dissatisfaction. This review provides a broad overview of a few important considerations, which include appropriate patient selection, precise biometry, understanding the design and science behind these lenses, knowledge of intraoperative surgical technique with emphasis on how to achieve proper alignment manually and with image-recognition devices, and successful management of postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of the present study was to prepare stable and high bioavailability ocular atropine loaded films (ATR-films) as potential ocular drug delivery systems for the treatment of myopia. Methods: ATR-films were prepared by the solvent casting method and the physical properties of films were evaluated including thickness, water content, light transparency, disintegration time, and mechanical properties. FT-IR, DSC, XRD, TGA, AFM, and Raman spectroscopy were performed to characterize the film. The stability test was conducted under different conditions, such as high humidity, high temperature, and strong light. The pharmacokinetic study and irritation assessment were conducted in rabbits. The efficacy of ATR-films was evaluated by refraction and ocular biometry in myopia guinea pigs. Result: After optimizing the formulation, the resulting ATR-film was flexible and transparent with lower water content (8.43% ± 1.25). As expected, the ATR-film was stable and hydrolysate was not detected, while the content of hydrolysate in ATR eye drops can reach up to 8.1867% (limit: < 0.2%) in the stability study. The safety assessment both in vitro and in vivo confirmed that the ATR-film was biocompatible. Moreover, the bioavailability (conjunctiva 3.21-fold, cornea 2.87-fold, retina 1.35-fold, sclera 2.05-fold) was greatly improved compared with the ATR eye drops in vivo pharmacokinetic study. The pharmacodynamic study results showed that the ATR-film can slow the progress of form-deprivation myopia (~ 100 ± 0.81D), indicating that it has a certain therapeutic effect on form-deprivation myopia. Conclusion: The ATR-film with good stability and high bioavailability will have great potential for the treatment of myopia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report variation of the axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) among keratoconic (KC) eyes compared to myopic and emmetropic eyes in an African population sample. Study Design: Cross sectional observational. Place and Duration of Study: Al-Faisal Eye Hospital at Khartoum state of Sudan from January 2022 to September 2022. Methods: One-hundred and twenty-four eyes of 62 patients were divided into KC group (n =17, eyes = 34), myopic group (n = 28, eyes = 56), and an age/gender matched emmetropic group (n = 17, eyes = 34). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using ultrasonic pachymeter, AL, ACD and keratometry readings (K-reading) were recorded for each patient using non-contact partial coherence interferometry with an IOL Master. Results: Mean age of the sample population was 22.27 ± 6.05 (range; 10 - 40 years). KC patients had the highest spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) (-6.19±3.91 dioptres), highest k-reading (48.98±5.68 dioptres) and the thinnest CCT. Myopic participants had a longer AL compared to other refractive error groups (AL = 24.99 ± 2.39, p < 0.001). KC patients exhibited a larger ACD in comparison to emmetropes and myopes (ACD=3.69 ± 0.26, p < 0.001). Among all participants, SER exhibited the highest correlation with AL (r = -0.71, p < 0.001) followed by a weaker correlation with ACD (r= -0.26, p = 0.003). However, among KC patients, SER exhibited a weaker correlation with AL compared to myopes (r = -0.55, p = 0.001), and a higher correlation with ACD compared to myopes (r= -0.38, p = 0.03). Conclusion: ACD and corneal curvature were the most significantly detrimental parameters in KC. KC participants demonstrated a lower correlation between SER and AL and higher correlation between SER and ACD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the relationship between anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT), as well as its three main components (anterior and posterior cortex and nucleus thickness), in cataractous and non-cataractous eyes, depending on the axial length (AxL). Methods: Anterior and posterior cortex and nucleus thickness of the crystalline lens, ACD, and AxL were measured using optical low-coherence reflectometry in cataractous and non-cataractous eyes. They were also classified into hyperopia, emmetropia, myopia, and high myopia, depending on AxL; thus, eight subgroups were created. A minimum sample size of 44 eyes (of 44 patients) for each group was recruited. Linear models were fitted for the whole sample and each AxL subgroup to assess if there were differences in the relationships between the crystalline lens variables and ACD, including age as a covariate. Results: Three hundred seventy cataract patients (237 females, 133 males) and 250 non-cataract controls (180 females, 70 males), aged 70.5 ± 9.4 and 41.9 ± 15.5 years, respectively, were recruited. The mean AxL, ACD, and LT for the cataractous and non-cataractous eyes were 23.90 ± 2.05, 24.11 ± 2.11, 2.64 ± 0.45, and 2.91 ± 0.49, 4.51 ± 0.38, 3.93 ± 0.44 mm, respectively. The inverse relationship of LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus thickness with ACD was not significantly (p ≥ 0.26) different between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes. Further subclassification of the sample depending on AxL showed that the inverse relationship between the posterior cortex and ACD was no longer significant (p > 0.05) for any non-cataractous AxL group. LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus thickness was not significantly (p ≥ 0.43) different between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes for the whole sample, and all AxL groups after adjusting for age. Conclusions: The presence of cataracts does not modify the inverse relationship of the LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus with ACD. And this relationship does not seem to depend importantly on AxL. Besides, the possible differences in LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes may not be caused by lens opacification, but possibly by the progressive lens growth due to aging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of five new-generation intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) Formula, Hill-Radial Basis Function (Hill-RBF), Kane Formula, and Ladas Super Formula (LSF).Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective single-surgeon study from a refractive clinic and clinical research center in Draper, UT, USA. The primary outcome measures were mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE). Secondary outcome measures were the standard deviation (SD) of each formula's refractive prediction errors (RPE) and the percentage of eyes within ± 0.50D. Refractive predictions were compared to the postoperative spherical equivalent to determine the RPE for each formula. RPEs were optimized, and MAE, MedAE, SD of the AME, and percent of eyes achieving RPEs within the specified ranges of ± 0.125 D, ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, ± 0.75 D, ± 1.0 D were calculated. Subgroup analysis between different axial lengths was attempted but yielded insufficient statistical power to draw meaningful conclusions.Results: A total of 103 eyes of 103 patients were included in our study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to 606 eyes from 2019 to 2021. Formulas ranked in ascending order by MAE were Kane, EVO, BUII, Hill-RBF, and LSF. The ascending rankings of MedAE were Kane, BUII, Hill-RBF, EVO, Ladas. Kane had a significantly lower MAE than Hill-RBF (p< 0.001). EVO had the lowest SD of AMEs and the highest percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D. According to heteroscedastic testing, EVO also had a statistically significant lower SD than Hill-RBF.Conclusion: Kane was the most accurate formula in terms of MAE and MedAE. EVO and BUII achieved marginally higher MAEs than Kane, suggesting these three formulas are comparable in performance. With the exception EVO and Hill-RBF, the heteroscedastic test yielded no significant differences in SD between the formulas. Although there were multiple statistically significant differences between the formulas in terms of MAE, MedAE, and SD, these differences may not be appreciable clinically. Lastly, there were no statistically significant differences in the percent of eyes with RPEs within ± 0.50 D, suggesting similar clinical performance between formulas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression in children. However, treatment effects may be different in a routine clinical setting. We performed a retrospective analysis of our clinical data from children to investigate the effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression in a routine clinical setting. Methods: Atropine-treated children were asked to instill one drop of 0.01% atropine in each eye every evening at 5 days a week. Myopic children who did not undergo atropine treatment served as controls. Objective refraction and ocular biometry of 80 atropine-treated and 103 untreated children at initial visit and 1 year later were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Myopic refractions in the treated and untreated children at initial visit ranged from −0.625 to −15.25 D (−4.21 ± 2.90 D) and from −0.125 to −9.375 D (−2.92 ± 1.77 D), respectively. Ages at initial visit ranged from 3.2 to 15.5 years (10.1 ± 2.7 years) in the treated and from 3.4 to 15.5 years (11.2 ± 3.0 years) in untreated children. Two-factor ANOVA for age and atropine effects on axial length growth confirmed that axial length growth rates declined with age (p<0.0001) and revealed a significant inhibitory effect of atropine on axial length growth (p<0.0015). The atropine effect on axial length growth averaged to 0.08 mm (28%) inhibition per year. Effects on refraction were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The observed atropine effects were not very distinctive: Statistical analysis confirmed that atropine reduced axial length growth, but to an extent of minor clinical relevance. It was also shown that beneficial effects of 0.01% atropine may not be obvious in each single case, which should be communicated with parents and resident ophthalmologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]