Search

Introduction: Children rarely complain about their vision, therefore rely on parents’ knowledge and awareness for early detection and management of their ocular problems. Parents’ knowledge and awareness may influence their eye-care seeking behaviour, which in turn helps to reduce the prevalence of childhood eye problems. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate knowledge and awareness about childhood eye problems and eye care seeking behaviour among parents in Malaysia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on parents with either typically developing (TD group) or special needs children (SN group) in Malaysia. Data were collected using a self-administered, validated bilingual questionnaire using Google Form distributed through social medias and associations via purposive sampling. Results: A total of 173 respondents (74 in SN group; 99 in TD group) aged between 20 to 50 years old participated in the study. Participants had the highest and the least knowledge about refractive error and strabismus respectively with social medias been the main source of information. Overall knowledge and attitude scores were significantly higher in SN group compared to TD group (p < 0.05). Level of awareness was high for common symptoms and eye problems with no group differences observed. Conclusion: Misconception and low awareness are still an issue for less common eye conditions. The use of social medias in educating the public about these is recommended as this is the most preferred source of information. This study provides useful insight about parents in Malaysia with regards to children eye care including recommendations for future preventive measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the pattern of eye diseases at the general outpatient department (GOPD) of a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients selected by systematic random sampling at the GOPD of a Nigerian tertiary hospital were studied. Information on sociodemographics and ocular complaints were obtained using interviewer-administered questionnaire. Ocular examination included visual acuity measurement and anterior and posterior segments examinations. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Three hundred and eighty-two patients, comprising 124 (32.5%) males and 258 (67.5%) females, aged between 18 and 86 years, mean 44.8 ± 15.4 years, were studied; 112 (29.3%) had eye diseases but only 88 (78.6%) patients complained of ocular disorder(s). Common complaints were poor vision 53 (60.4%), red eye and grittiness 15 (17.0%) each. Common eye diseases were lens 52 (13.6%) and conjunctiva 46 (12.0%) disorders. Attaining higher education was protective against eye diseases (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Nearly a third of patients at the GOPD have eye diseases. Therefore, primary eye care should be integrated into the GOPD service with provision of relevant manpower and facilities for care of the ophthalmic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Pediatrie pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Treatments for myopia progression are now available, but implementing these into clinical practice will place a burden on the eye care workforce. This study estimated the full‐time equivalent (FTE) workforce required to implement myopia control treatments in the UK and Ireland. Methods: To estimate the number of 6‐ to 21‐year‐olds with myopia, two models utilising separate data sources were developed. The examination‐based model used: (1) the number of primary care eye examinations conducted annually and (2) the proportion of these that are for myopic young people. The prevalence‐based model used epidemiological data on the age‐specific prevalence of myopia. The proportion of myopic young people progressing ≥0.25 dioptres (D)/year or ≥0.50 D/year was obtained from Irish electronic health records and the recommended review schedule from clinical management guidelines. Results: Using the examination and prevalence models, respectively, the estimated number of young people with myopia was 2,469,943 and 2,235,713. The extra workforce required to provide comprehensive myopia management for this target population was estimated at 226–317 FTE at the 0.50 D/year threshold and 433–630 FTE at the 0.25 D/year threshold. Extra visits required for myopia control treatment represented approximately 2.6% of current primary eye care examinations versus 13.6% of hospital examinations. Conclusions: Implementing new myopia control treatments in primary care settings over the medium‐term is unlikely to overwhelm the eye care workforce completely. Further increases to workforce, upskilling of current workforce and tools to reduce chair time will help to ensure sustainability of the eye care workforce into the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eye care is one of the most critical tasks of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. Patients in this unit are exposed to potential ocular problems due to critical conditions. This study aimed to establish a new eye care protocol for preventing ocular surface disorders in patients admitted to ICU. This was a clinical trial study performed on patients admitted to ICU in 2019. The data gathering tools included the demographic questionnaire, the Schirmer test for dry eye, fluorescein staining and slit lamp manual for examining corneal ulcers, and slit lamp manual to check keratitis and conjunctivitis. A type of eye care protocol was performed on the patient's eyes. After five consecutive days of executing the protocol, the data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18. The use of eye care protocol reduced the risk of keratitis (P=0.027), conjunctivitis (P=0.012), eye dryness (P=0.001), and corneal ulcer (P=0.003) in patients admitted to ICU in the intervention group compared to the control group. Ophthalmology protocols reduced the incidence of keratitis, conjunctivitis, dry eye, and corneal ulcers in ICU patients. Therefore, using this method in ICU patients can improve nursing care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to map evidence of eye care interventions in managing critical or surgical patients submitted to prone positions. Materials and method: This scoping review was prepared according to the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology, following the PRISMA-ScR criteria. A search was conducted from July to August 2020 in the SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed Central, CINAHL, and COCHRANE databases. The following research question was delimited: "What are the strategies and interventions used for eye care in the management of critical patients or surgical patients submitted to the prone position?" The sample consisted of 24 studies after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Eye care interventions in managing critical/surgical patients submitted to the prone position were eye examination, use of lubricants/specific ophthalmic solution, reverse Trendelenburg positioning, and protection with adhesive tape. Conclusions: This review allowed the understanding of eye care for critical/surgical patients in a prone position. Among the care presented, a large part is related to nursing since it is closer to patient care. The findings emphasize the need to implement patient safety policies with eye care as a priority. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The lack of formal eye screening is the main reason for insufficient eye care utilization in rural China. Cataract, in particular, is increasingly prevalent with the aging population, but the treatment rate is relatively low. Village doctors are the most accessible health care resource for rural residents, receiving few empirical investigations into their role in eye care. This study aims to assess the role of village doctors in residents' uptake of eye screening (vision and cataract screening), the first step of cataract treatment. Data come from a community-based, cross-sectional survey conducted in 35 villages of a county of the Gansu Province, Northwestern China, in 2020. Among 1010 residents aged ≥ 50 and 35 village doctors, the multivariate logistic regression shows that village doctors' age, time spent on public health service, and service population were positively associated with residents' uptake of vision and cataract screening. Village doctors were capable of playing an active role in primary eye health services due to their richer knowledge about cataracts than residents (accuracy rate 86.75% vs. 63.50%, p < 0.001), but less than half of them were willing to undertake eye screening. This study highlights the positive role of village doctors in aging residents' eye screening and the potential role in improving the uptake of eye screening by offering health education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telemedicine has been a growing feature in ophthalmology in the UK, particularly since the inception of the Diabetic Retinal Screening Service (DRSS). The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this trend more than anyone would have envisaged and it is likely to remain a key part of care of patients with ophthalmic pathology. It is vital that however many consultations are undertaken, these meet the high-quality standards that patients and regulators expect. For a range of both common and emergency eye conditions that are frequently managed in the community, we explore the examinations and investigations required to provide a comprehensive assessment and accurate diagnosis in the community eye care setting. We also propose parameters and quality standards for each investigation to ensure that the clinician interpreting these has the required information to make an appropriate diagnosis. We suggest that providers of teleophthalmology consultations use these quality standards to minimise their risk of inappropriate diagnosis and treatment based on insufficient or inaccurate information and so to mitigate against the potential legal implications that can result from suboptimal clinical decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The World Health Organization is developing a Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI) to support the integration of eye health care into national health programmes. Interventions included in the PECI should be based on robust evidence where available. Refractive error is a leading cause of blindness and vision impairment and is a PECI priority condition. The aim of this study was to provide high‐quality evidence to support the development of the PECI by identifying and critically appraising clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and extracting recommendations for refractive error interventions. Methods: We searched for CPGs on refractive error published in the last 10 years. We conducted the searches initially in February and March 2019 and repeated them in March 2020. We evaluated the quality of potentially relevant guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Results: We identified 12 high‐quality CPGs relevant to refractive error, written by six organisations from three high‐income countries. Organisations used a variety of frameworks to assess the strength of recommendations based on available evidence, with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) being most common. Vision screening for children aged 3 to 5 years was recommended consistently. Evidence for screening and eye evaluations at other ages was weaker, although ophthalmic professional organisations consistently recommended regular evaluations. Recommendations on optical and laser correction of refractive error were limited and did not consider implications for low resource settings. Interventions for slowing myopia progression in children were recommended, but these will need regular updating as new evidence emerges. Conclusions: Current high‐quality guidelines on refractive error have been formulated in high‐income countries. Recommendations focused on prevention and treatment of refractive error in low‐and middle‐income countries are lacking. Regular updating of systematic reviews and CPGs is essential to ensure that robust evidence is promptly appraised and incorporated into recommendations for eye health care practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: Blindness; COVID-19; equity; eye health; Indigenous Australians; inequality; telehealth; vision impairment; vision loss EN Blindness COVID-19 equity eye health Indigenous Australians inequality telehealth vision impairment vision loss 215 217 3 03/08/23 20230301 NES 230301 COVID-19 and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander eye health Over recent years there have been notable improvements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander eye health outcomes, such as an increase in overall screening and treatment coverage rates of common eye diseases and decreasing rates of blindness.[[1], [3]] However, vision loss remains at least three times more prevalent amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples than among other Australians. Similarly, in rural South Australia, where travel was restricted for approximately four months in 2020, and again from December 2021 to March 2022, the regional health service initiated a tele-optometry program that utilised an ophthalmic nurse and an off-site optometrist to collaborate in providing refractive and eye health assessments approaching that which is available with traditional face-to-face care. Examples of successful models include a health service in the Northern Territory, where an ACCHS-employed Aboriginal eye health coordinator acted as a central point of contact for both the optometrist and the primary health care staff of the region, facilitating effective patient triage and support. [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: Collaborative care; indigenous health; outreach eye care; rural eye care; telemedicine; teleophthalmology EN Collaborative care indigenous health outreach eye care rural eye care telemedicine teleophthalmology 222 224 3 03/08/23 20230301 NES 230301 Introduction Delivering equitable eye services for rural and remote communities represents a unique challenge to healthcare providers. Telemedicine has the potential to enhance collaborative care by combining optometry assessments with virtual review by an ophthalmologist using "store-and-forward" telemedicine modalities. [Extracted from the article]

Dr. G. Natchiar headed the out-reach eye camps, conducted by the AECS team, to provide doorstep care to the rural communities. - Dr. G Natchiar Dr. G. Natchiar is a woman with phenomenal organizational consciousness and a vivid personal style. Having played a pivotal role in shaping up AECS and dedicating over four decades in eye care, Dr. Natchiar now pursues her passion, something that was always close to her heart - farming. [Extracted from the article]

The article explores the crucial connection between vision care and dementia, highlighting the increased risk of cognitive decline associated with impaired eyesight. Topics discussed include the pivotal role of optometrists in routine monitoring for age-related eye conditions, facilitating regular eye care for individuals living with dementia, and promoting awareness among healthcare professionals about the intersection of eyesight and cognitive health.

Purpose: To report the ocular features of patients with PD who presented with visual complaints to a tertiary eye care center.Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out between January 2015 and March 2020 at the Neuro-Optometry clinic of a tertiary eye care center in Southern India. All PD patients with ocular complaints examined by the neuro- ophthalmologists were referred to Neuro-Optometry Clinic for detailed evaluation. Patients with other neurodegenerative disorders, brain injury, and other causes of vision loss or extraocular motility disorders were excluded.Results: A total of 43 patients (7 females, 36 males) between 50 and 86 years of age (mean: 70 ± 8.9 years) with a mean duration of PD of 4.5 ± 4.5 years were studied. Decreased vision associated with reading difficulty (40%) was common in PD patients. In terms of gaze restriction, vertical gaze involvement (35%) was more than horizontal involvement (7%). Convergence insufficiency (CI) was the most common binocular vision dysfunction (30%), followed by CI with oculomotor dysfunction (14%) and vertical gaze palsy (18%). Ground prisms were recommended for 26 patients (61%) and home vision therapy for 5 patients (12%) as corrective measures.Conclusion: Binocular vision dysfunction is highly prevalent among PD patients. This could potentially contribute to the reading difficulties and double vision encountered by these patients. Assessment of binocular vision and oculomotor parameters thus becomes important to understand and manage the reading difficulties in patients with PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report on the factors associated with severe vision loss from fireworks-related ocular trauma during celebrations, including festivals. Methods: Tertiary eye care hospitals in 5 countries and private ophthalmology practices in the Netherlands. Patients included received treatment for fireworks-related ocular trauma during celebrations. Demographic and clinical data for patients affected were analyzed and associations with severe vision loss reported. Results: Of 388 patients, 71 (18.3 %) had severe vision loss (worse than 6/60) at 4-week follow-up due to fireworks-related ocular trauma. Mean age overall was 20.6 years (range 2 to 83 years), and there was a male predominance of 4:1. Clinical factors associated with severe vision loss included penetrating injury (OR 4.874 [95% CI 1.298–18.304; p = 0.02]) and lens injury (OR 7.023 [95% CI 2.378–20.736; p = 0.0004]). More patients with closed-globe injuries (CGIs) had improved vision after 4 weeks (OR 3.667, 1.096–12.27) compared to those with open-globe injuries (OGI) (p = 0.035). Eye protection use was reported by 7 patients, and 39.4% patients < 18 years were unsupervised by an adult at the time of injury. Conclusions: Severe vision loss from fireworks-related ocular trauma occurred during celebrations in a variety of countries and was associated with penetrating and/or lens injury and poor presenting vision. New initiatives are needed to prevent severe vision loss associated with these injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is a major cause of vision impairment in children worldwide. Cases are often detected through a school-based vision screening program and then treated in a follow-up appointment. This requires parents or guardians ('parents') to adhere to referrals for the eye exam and care plan. We aim to understand the reasons for parents' referral non-adherence in Cross River State, Nigeria, using qualitative methods. Methods: Ten focus groups were held with parents who had not adhered to the referral for a follow-up eye examination. Participants were recruited with help from staff in schools hosting the vision screening programme. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, audio taped and transcribed verbatim. After identifying relevant quotes, the researchers labelled each one with a descriptive code/subcode label. Then they clustered the data into categories and overarching themes. Results: Forty-four parents participated in 10 focus group discussions with 28 women and 16 men. Three themes and participated in the focus group discussions with 28 women (63%). Twelve themes were generated. The three megathemes were Modifiable Factors (with 4 themes), Contextual Factors (with 6 themes), and Recommendations (with 2 themes). Conclusion: Participants identified modifiable barriers that make it difficult for parents to adhere to a referral for a follow-up eye exam. These include not believing their child has a vision problem or the screening test, and issues with the referral letter. They also described important contextual factors such as poverty, logistical problems, parental attitudes towards their children and beliefs about appropriate care. Many of these issues could be addressed by following their recommendation to educate the public on the importance of child eye care and correct parents' misconceptions. These themes will be used by the Nigerian government to enhance and scale up its child eye health programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The unforeseen circumstance of income loss from Medicare rebates and the additional cost per patient in the form of personal protective equipment and use of disposable contact equipment means that optometrists and practice owners will need to develop financially sustainable strategies to ensure that they can continue to safely provide effective primary eye care. Keywords: Coronavirus; eye care; personal protective equipment; primary care; SARS-CoV-2 EN Coronavirus eye care personal protective equipment primary care SARS-CoV-2 728 733 6 08/03/21 20211101 NES 211101 Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first identified in December 2019. A similar approach has been previously described for self-tonometry using devices like the Icare HOME.[13],[14] Like any health care plan involving patient compliance, the deployment of remote testing technologies still requires patients to use the devices in an accurate and timely fashion to maximise their effectiveness and validity. Could telehealth help eye care practitioners adapt contact lens services during the COVID-19 pandemic?. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose/Aim: In the United States, high rates of vision impairment and eye disease disproportionately impact those who lack access to eye care, specifically vulnerable populations. The objective of our study was to test instruments, implement protocols, and collect preliminary data for a larger 5-year study, which aims to improve detection of eye diseases and follow-up eye care in vulnerable populations using community health workers (CHW) and patient navigators. In the study, trained CHWs conducted vision screening and patient navigators scheduled on-site eye exams and arranged appointments for those referred to ophthalmology to improve adherence to follow-up eye care. Materials and Methods: Eligible individuals age 40-and-older were recruited from the Riverstone Senior Center in Upper Manhattan, New York City. Participants underwent on-site vision screening (visual acuity with correction, intraocular pressure measurements, and fundus photography). Individuals who failed the vision screening were scheduled with an on-site optometrist for an eye exam; those with ocular pathologies were referred to an ophthalmologist. Participants were also administered the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-8 (NEI-VFQ-8) and Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) test by community health workers. Results:Participants (n = 42) were predominantly older adults, with a mean age of 70.0 ± 9.8, female (61.9%), and Hispanic (78.6%). Most individuals (78.6%, n = 33) failed vision screening. Of those who failed, 84.8% (n = 28) attended the on-site eye exam with the optometrist. Ocular diagnoses: refractive error 13/28 (46.4%), glaucoma/glaucoma suspect 9/28 (32.1%), cataract 7/28 (25.0%), retina abnormalities 6/28 (21.4%); 13 people required eyeglasses. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using CHWs and patient navigators for reducing barriers to vision screening and optometrist-based eye exams in vulnerable populations, ultimately improving early detection of eye disease and linking individuals to additional eye care appointments. The full five-year study aims to further examine these outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Pandemic of 2020 impacted conducting in-person research. Our proposed project already had an asynchronous online component but was later morphed to add a synchronous online component, thereby eliminating the need for in-person assessment. The project compares the results of various tests between a group of children with Cerebral Visual Impairments (CVI) (N = 4) and an age-matched sample of children without CVI (N = 3) from a pediatric low vision clinic. This model was trialed with a small convenient sample of typically developing children in the same age range (N = 4). Given the positive feedback, recruitment for the larger study was done via encrypted e-mail rather than through traditional mailing. The asynchronous components included recruitment, pre-assessment information, the Flemish CVI questionnaire, Vineland-3 comprehensive parent questionnaire for assessment of age equivalent, and vision function tests, such as contrast sensitivity. The synchronous components were administered via Zoom telehealth provided by necoeyecare.org and included assessment of visual acuity via the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT) electronic software and assessment of visual perceptual batteries via the Children's Visual Impairment Test for developmental ages 3–6-years (CVIT 3–6). Our virtual testing protocol was successful in the seven participants tested. This paper reviews and critiques the model that we utilized and discusses ways in which this model can be improved. Aside from public health considerations during the pandemic, this approach is more convenient for many families. In a broader perspective, this approach can be scaled for larger N studies of rare conditions, such as CVI without being confined by proximity to the researcher. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Good vision during childhood is vital for visual, educational, and social development. Previous research highlights challenges in the accessibility of eye care for children. This study investigates the accessibility of primary eye care for young children with typical development and those with autism in England. Methods: A telephone survey was conducted using four hypothetical scenarios (a child aged 1, 3, 5 years and a 13‐year‐old with autism). Four hundred community optometric practices (100 different practices for each scenario) were contacted to explore the availability of an eye examination. The caller acted as a parent, asking about the availability of an eye examination for their child and raising concerns regarding the child. Key barriers and enablers to the accessibility of primary eye care were identified through an analysis of qualitative information. Results: Of the 400 practices, only three (<1%) stated that they do not perform eye examinations on children. Fifty‐six practices (14%) stated that they would examine a child at any age, the remainder (n = 341, 85%) specifying a minimum age at which they would perform eye examinations on children. Lack of 'communication' from the child and 'equipment' were identified as barriers to accessing eye care for young children. Eye care for children with autism was enabled by factors related to adaptability and appointment time. Conclusion: Our results suggest that communication and a lack of appropriate equipment for examining children are potential barriers to accessing primary eye care. No clear barriers were identified for an older child with autism. Eye examinations are more accessible for older children in these scenarios (aged 5 with typical development and 13 years with autism) than younger children (aged 1 and 3 years old). While the UK General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) terms do not permit contract holders to exclude categories of patients from a GOS eye exam, our findings suggest this is taking place. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Vision health is an important and underutilized health service among newly arrived refugees in Canada, yet the body of literature on eye-care delivery in this population is limited. The study objective was to identify patterns of eye-care utilization among refugee patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) under an interdisciplinary clinic model comprised of family physicians, eye-care providers, and settlement services. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at the Memorial University Family Medicine clinic. All patients with a new T2DM diagnosis between 2015–2020 were included. Data were described using basic statistics and unpaired t-tests. This study received full ethics approval. Results: Seventy-three (18 refugee, 55 non-refugee) patients were included. Refugees had a higher rate of referral to an eye-care provider (p = 0.0475) and were more likely to attend their eye-care provider appointment than non-refugees (p = 0.016). The time from diagnosis to referral was longer for refugees than non-refugees (p = 0.0498). A trend towards longer time from referral to appointment attendance for refugees than non-refugees was noted (p = 0.9069). Discussion: Refugee patients had higher rates of referral to eye-care providers and utilization of eye-care services. However, refugees also experienced a longer time to access vision screening services suggesting possible gaps in accessible care delivery. This suggests that the interdisciplinary model of care may be effective in referring refugee patients for vision screening and there may be a role for increased collaboration across family physicians, eye-care providers, and settlement services to improve accessibility of vision screening services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chisom T Madu, Oluwafisayo Adeoye, Imani Nwokeji City University of New York School of Medicine, Ophthalmology Specialty Interest Group, New York, NY, USA Correspondence: Chisom T Madu, City University of New York School of Medicine, Ophthalmology Specialty Interest Group, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA, Email [email protected] View the original paper by Dr Rohn and colleagues Dear editor In their report on the six-year implementation of the UCSD Eyemobile for Children (EyeMobile) within an underserved San Diego school district for screening and treating pediatric refractive error, Rohn et al reveal a high level of compliance among children in completing eye examination referrals and in wearing spectacles prescribed through the program.[1] With the EyeMobile program proving to be successful in both diagnosing and treating pediatric vision impairment, it would be interesting to further investigate the potential for such a program to be used in preventative care. REFERENCES 1 Rohn MCH, O'Sullivan F, Brown SI, Hernandez E, Borooah S, Molina I. Pediatric Eye Care Treatment Rates and Community Compliance to a Spectacle Provision Program in an Underserved School District in San Diego, CA. With the prevalence of pediatric eye conditions such as myopia continuing to increase, there is a growing need to prioritize efforts toward prevention.[2] Within the EyeMobile program, general eye care information was given only to the parents of children who had already failed a vision screening. [Extracted from the article]

In the current model, some of our primary care technicians who manage our primary eye care "vision centres" shut them down when they service home care patients. Vulnerable communities like the elderly saw significantly poor access to eye care during the first and second waves of the pandemic.[[4]] To address this inequitable access today and for the future, we have developed a pyramidal model of eye care service delivery which brings eye care closer to communities that need them. Dear Editor, Projections show that the elderly in India will touch 19% of the country's population by 2050.[[1]] This increase will lead to a bigger demand for geriatric health care. [Extracted from the article]

To analyze rates of follow-up eye care for students that failed school vision screenings over a 7-year period in 238 Arkansas school districts. In this cross-sectional study, vision screening, demographic, socioeconomic, academic, and eye care provider data were collected. The main outcomes were referral rates, rates of follow-up eye care for students with failed vision screenings, and estimated associations between the rate of follow-up and school district and county-level characteristics, such as race, poverty, insurance coverage, academic achievement, and the number of eye care providers. A total of 1,744,805 vision screenings over 7 academic years (2013-2020) were included. The average screening rate was 35.4% across the study years. The screening failure rate ranged from 8.0% to 9.4%. Two-thirds of districts had a follow-up rate between 20% and 50%. 91% had follow-up rates of <60%. School districts with higher concentrations of White students (P < 0.001), higher graduation rates (P = 0.024), higher percentages of students on government-assisted insurance (P = 0.035), and higher standardized scores (P < 0.001) had higher rates of follow-up. There were no statistically significant relationships between the rate of follow-up eye care and the number of school nurses per school district or the number of ophthalmologists or optometrists per county. Arkansas children in our study cohort that failed vision screenings had inadequate follow-up eye care. Follow-up rates were associated with several key indicators of socioeconomic status.▪ [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effective vision screening programs for children require follow-up with eye care providers, but studies demonstrate poor follow-up rates after failed screenings. Programs have attempted to address this issue by providing free examinations and glasses after failed screenings. This study presents data from a mobile clinic program that provides instrument-based vision screening, eye examinations, and free glasses directly to children at school. Between 2018 and 2021, a nonprofit organization provided in-school instrument-based screening and noncycloplegic examinations and refractions in elementary, middle, and high schools. Deidentified screening and clinic data were reviewed retrospectively. Information about each school regarding total student enrollment, enrollment based on race, and number of economically disadvantaged students was obtained from the Virginia Department of Education. In the 2019-2020 school year, 14,006 students from 58 schools were screened, and 4,238 (30.3%) were referred. The percentage of economically disadvantaged students was positively correlated to referral rate (R 2 = 0.406). Between 2019 and 2020, the mobile clinic examined 3,095 students from the same 58 schools. Of these, 72.9% were prescribed glasses, and 16.3% were referred for a more comprehensive eye examination and treatment. Students were also diagnosed with cataracts, nystagmus, amblyopia, and strabismus. A combined screening program and mobile clinic traveling directly to schools can provide a pipeline for delivering eye care to vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]