Search

The aim of this publication is to demonstrate similarities and differences in the association of risk factors with the prevalence of different manifestations of chronic venous disease (CVD), like varicose veins (VV), venous oedema (C3) and severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in the population-based cross-sectional Bonn Vein Study 1 (BVS). Background: The aim of this publication is to demonstrate similarities and differences in the association of risk factors with the prevalence of different manifestations of chronic venous disease (CVD), like varicose veins (VV), venous oedema (C3) and severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in the population-based cross-sectional Bonn Vein Study 1 (BVS). Patients and methods: In the BVS 1 between 13.11.2000 and 15.3.2002, 3.072 participants, 1350 men and 1722 women, from a simple random sample of the general population of the city of Bonn and two rural townships aged 18-79 years were included. The overall response proportion was 59%. All participants answered a standardized questionnaire including information about socio-economic data, lifestyle, physical activity, medical history, and quality of life. Venous investigations were performed clinically and by a standardized duplex examination by trained investigators. The CEAP classification in the version of 1996 was used to classify the findings. Logistic regression models were performed for the association of possible risk factors with VV, venous edema (C3) and severe CVI (C4-C6). The predictive risk (PR) describes the association of the diseases and the possible influencing factors. Results: VV, venous oedema (C3) and severe CVI (C4-C6) have common risk factors like higher age, number of pregnancies, family history of VV and overweight or obesity. Female gender is significantly associated with VV and C3 but not with severe CVI (C4-C6). High blood pressure and urban living are only associated with C3 and C4-C6 disease whereas prolonged sitting is associated with C3 and lower social class with C4-C6 exclusively. Discussion: In many epidemiological studies risk factors were associated with chronic venous disorders in general. Our data show that VV, venous edema and severe CVI may have different risk profiles. Venous edema is more often associated with arterial hypertension and sedentary lifestyle whereas lower social class seems to be a risk factor for severe CVI including venous ulcers. Conclusions: The differences in the association of risk factors to VV, venous edema and severe CVI should be considered if prevention and treatment of chronic venous diseases are planned. As examples, compression stockings could be proposed in sitting profession to prevent oedema, VV patients with risk factors like obesity might benefit from early treatment for VV and obesity. More longitudinal evaluation of risk factors is necessary to evaluate the true risk profile of CVD.

Background: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) pose significant burdens to patients and healthcare systems. While the two diseases share a number of commonalities in risk factors and pathophysiology, they are often assessed and managed separately. This can lead to a worsening of comorbidities and limitations in a patient's quality of life. This project aims to develop recommendations to enhance the identification and treatment of patients with concomitant CVI and DM., Methods: Using a modified Delphi method, a panel of experts developed 38 Likert Scale and two multiple choice questions across six key themes. These were used to form an online survey which was disseminated through a convenience sampling approach to CVI and DM healthcare professionals across Europe, Central America, South America, and the Middle East. The threshold for consensus was set at ≥75%., Results: A total of 238 responses were received. 27/38 statements attained >90% agreement, nine of 38 attained between 75-90%, and two failed to meet the threshold (<75%). The awareness around the impact of the two diseases was high, but a gap was highlighted in the identification of patients with concomitant CVI and DM., Conclusions: The high level of agreement shows that healthcare professionals are aware of the gaps in identification and treatment of patients with concomitant CVI and DM, and of the need to approach this as a combined therapy area. An algorithm is proposed to help the identification of at-risk patients and to provide recommendations on the management of patients with concomitant disease.

Background and Aims: Medical compression stockings (MCS) are indicated for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of all stages and are an indispensable component in lymphedema therapy. In all, 8% of the German population has been prescribed MCS by a physician-more women than men (12% vs. 5%), and especially persons aged 60 years and older (17%). Patient adherence is relevant for successful treatment with MCS. We examined MCS use from the patient's perspective., Patients and Methods: This study examined the quality of care through structured interviews with 414 representative users in 2019. Findings are discussed taking into consideration scientific evidence on the efficacy of MCS., Results: Venous conditions are the most common reason for prescription (44%), followed by lymphedema (22%) or multiple indications (27%). Patients generally wear MCS daily and on average 11 h/day. In all, 89% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with MCS, whereby efficacy was dependent on the indication. This reflects the extensive scientific evidence on the clinical efficacy of MCS. An important factor for patient adherence is physician training and education., Conclusion: MCS are well accepted by patients. When prescribing them, practical aspects such as donning and doffing, recommended wearing time and frequency, and the mechanism of action of MCS should be clearly communicated., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: This single center prospective randomized study was performed to compare the effect of endovenous laser flush ablation (EVLAf) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) close to the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) with a standard ablation (EVLAs) up to two cm distally of the SFJ on reflux in the GSV stump. Patients and methods: Between April 2013 and January 2016, 146 legs in 146 consecutive patients, meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, were treated by EVLA. All patients were randomized into 2 groups. In group 1 EVLAf started from the SFJ level, and in group 2 EVLAs started two cm below the SFJ. The primary endpoint was reflux in the GSV stump after 900 days. Secondary endpoints were reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins related to reflux in the stump and/or the AASV. Results: At day 900, 27 patients were lost to follow-up. Reflux in the stump was detected in 3.6% in group 1 and in 22.2% in group 2 (p<0.05). Reflux in the AASV was present in 7.1% in group 1 and in 17.46% in group 2 (p=0.09). Proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins were observed in 8.9% in group 1 and in 19.1% in group 2 (p=0.12). The greatest diameter of the stump was significantly larger in group 2 (group 1: 0.41 cm, group 2: 0.6 cm, p<0.001). Conclusions: EVLAf is associated with a significantly lower incidence of reflux in the GSV stump, with a trend to a lower incidence of reflux in the AASV and with a lower incidence of proximal recurrent varicose veins after 900 days follow-up compared to EVLAs. EVLAf may improve the clinical recurrence rate after EVLA of the GSV.