Search

Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis culturing remains the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis remains a great public health problem in developing countries like The Gambia, as most of the methods currently used for bacterial isolation are either time-consuming or costly., Objective: To evaluate the Kudoh swab method in a West African setting in Gambia, with a particular focus on the method's performance when culturing Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2 (MAF2) isolates., Method: 75 sputum samples were collected in the Greater Banjul Area and decontaminated in parallel with both the standard N-acetyl-L-Cysteine-NaOH (NALC-NaOH) and the Kudoh swab method in the TB diagnostics laboratory in the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia between 30th December 2017 and 25th February 2018. These samples were subsequently cultured on standard Löwenstein-Jensen and Modified Ogawa media respectively and incubated at 37°C for mycobacterial growth. Spoligotyping was done to determine if the decontamination and culture methods compared could equally detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 1 and Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2., Result: Among the 50 smear positives, 35 (70%) were culture-positive with Kudoh and 32 (64%) were culture positive with NALC-NaOH, whilst 7(28%) of the 25 smear negative samples were culture positive with both methods (Table 2). There was no significant difference in recovery between both methods (McNemar's test, p-value = 0.7003), suggesting that the overall positivity rate between the two methods is comparable. There were no differences in time-to-positivity or contamination rate between the methods. However, Kudoh yielded positive cultures that were negative on LJ and vice versa. All findings were irrespective of mycobacterial lineages., Conclusion: The Kudoh method has comparable sensitivity to the NALC-NaOH method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. It is easy to perform and could be an add on option for mycobacterial culture in the field in The Gambia, since it requires less biosafety equipment., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Jobarteh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Previous work reported unprecedented differences in the intrinsic in vitro susceptibility of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) to pretomanid (Pa) using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. We tested 125 phylogenetically diverse strains from all known MTBC lineages (1-9) without known Pa resistance mutations and four strains with known resistance mutations as controls. This confirmed that MTBC, unlike most bacteria-antimicrobial combinations, displayed substantial differences in the intrinsic susceptibility relative to the technical variation of Pa MIC testing. This was also the case for the Middlebrook 7H11 (7H11) medium, demonstrating that these differences were not specific to MGIT. Notably, lineage 1 was confirmed to have intrinsically elevated MICs compared with lineages 2, 3, 4, and 7 (L2-4/7), underlining the urgent need for WHO to publish its decision of whether lineage 1 should be deemed treatable by BPaL(M), the now preferred all-oral regimen for treating rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Lineages 5 and 6, which are most frequent in West Africa, responded differently to Pa, with lineage 5 being more similar to L2-4/7 and lineage 6 being more susceptible. More data are needed to determine whether 7H11 MICs are systematically lower than those in MGIT., Importance: This study confirmed that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lineage 1, responsible for 28% of global tuberculosis cases, is less susceptible to pretomanid (Pa). It also refined the understanding of the intrinsic susceptibilities of lineages 5 and 6, most frequent in West Africa, and lineages 8 and 9. Regulators must review whether these in vitro differences affect the clinical efficacy of the WHO-recommended BPaL(M) regimen and set breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing accordingly. Notably, regulators should provide detailed justifications for their decisions to facilitate public scrutiny., Competing Interests: C.U.K. is a consultant for Becton Dickinson, the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, the TB Alliance, and the WHO Global TB Programme. C.U.K.'s consulting for Becton Dickinson involves collaboration with Janssen and Thermo Fisher Scientific. C.U.K. is collaborating with PZA Innovation and is an unpaid advisor to Cepheid and GenoScreen (GenoScreen covered related travel and accommodation expenses only). C.U.K. worked as a consultant for the Stop TB Partnership and the WHO Regional Office for Europe. C.U.K. gave a paid educational talk for Oxford Immunotec. C.U.K. was an unpaid advisor to BioVersys.

In settings with high tuberculosis (TB) endemicity, distinct genotypes of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) often differ in prevalence. However, the factors leading to these differences remain poorly understood. Here we studied the MTBC population in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania over a six-year period, using 1,082 unique patient-derived MTBC whole-genome sequences (WGS) and associated clinical data. We show that the TB epidemic in Dar es Salaam is dominated by multiple MTBC genotypes introduced to Tanzania from different parts of the world during the last 300 years. The most common MTBC genotypes deriving from these introductions exhibited differences in transmission rates and in the duration of the infectious period, but little differences in overall fitness, as measured by the effective reproductive number. Moreover, measures of disease severity and bacterial load indicated no differences in virulence between these genotypes during active TB. Instead, the combination of an early introduction and a high transmission rate accounted for the high prevalence of L3.1.1, the most dominant MTBC genotype in this setting. Yet, a longer co-existence with the host population did not always result in a higher transmission rate, suggesting that distinct life-history traits have evolved in the different MTBC genotypes. Taken together, our results point to bacterial factors as important determinants of the TB epidemic in Dar es Salaam., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Zwyer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (pDST), which relies on growth inhibition in the drug-containing media, remains a challenge for fastidious Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc) isolates due to insufficient growth on the growth controls (GC). Middlebrook 7H11 (M7H11) medium contains casein hydrolysate, which may favor the growth of such strains., Method: In this study, we tested whether M7H11 reduces invalid results due to insufficient growth on the GCs and the turnaround time (TAT) of pDST for MTBc compared to Middlebrook 7H10 (M7H10) without affecting the accuracy of the pDST results and how it differs between rifampicin- and isoniazid-susceptible non multi-drug resistant (non-MDR), MDR and MDR with additional resistance to fluoroquinolones (Pre-XDR) MTBc isolates. We compared the proportions of invalid pDST results due to lack of growth on the GCs, TATs of valid parallel drug-susceptibility testings as an indicator of speed of MTBc growth, and colony-forming unit (CFU) count on the most diluted GC of the parallel pDSTs after equal incubation periods as an indicator of growth abundance on M7H11 and M7H10. We also analyzed the agreement between the pDST results of the same drug or drugs in the same drug class, tested in parallel on both media., Results: For MDR and pre-XDR isolates, relative to M7H10, M7H11 significantly reduced the occurrence of invalid pDST results due to insufficient growth on the GCs (odds ratio [OR] = ∞ [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-∞], P = 0.004 for MDR, OR = ∞ [95% CI 3.3-∞], P = 0.0001 for pre-XDR) and the TAT of pDSTs (OR = 17 [95% CI 2.6-710.4], P = 0.0001 for MDR, OR = 9.3 [95% CI 4.0-26.5], P < 0.0001 for pre-XDR). The growth abundance of MTBc on M7H11 was significantly higher compared to M7H10 (17 CFU on M7H10 vs. 28 on M7H11), irrespective of drug-resistance profiles. The agreement between the pDST results between the two media was high (Cohen's k > 0.98)., Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that M7H11 is preferred over M7H10 for pDSTs of MTBc isolates., Competing Interests: None

Background: Outcomes of treatment of tuberculosis patients with regimens including pretomanid have not yet been systematically reviewed., Objectives: To appraise existing evidence on efficacy and safety of pretomanid in tuberculosis., Data Sources: Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov. and Cochrane library., Study Eligibility Criteria: Quantitative studies presenting original data on clinical efficacy or safety of pretomanid., Participants: Patients with tuberculosis., Interventions: Treatment with pretomanid or pretomanid-containing regimens in minimum one study group., Methods: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data on efficacy (early bactericidal activity, bactericidal activity, end-of-treatment outcomes and acquired resistance) and safety were summarized in tables. Mean differences in efficacy outcomes between regimens across studies were calculated., Results: Eight studies were included; four randomized controlled trials on 2-week early bactericidal activity in rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis, three trials with randomized rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis arms and a single rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis arm (two on 8-week bactericidal activity, one on end-of-treatment outcomes), one single-arm trial with end-of-treatment outcomes in highly resistant tuberculosis. Activity of pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide was superior to standard treatment on daily change in colony-forming units at days 0-2, 0-56 and 7-56 and time to culture conversion in rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis (hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7), but not at end of treatment in one study. This study was stopped due to serious hepatotoxic adverse events, including three deaths, in 4% (95% CI 2-8) patients on pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide and none in controls. In patients with uncomplicated rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis on pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide treatment, 91% (95% CI 59-100) had favourable end-of-treatment outcomes. In patients with highly resistant tuberculosis, 90% (95% CI 83-95) on pretomanid-bedaquiline-linezolid had favourable outcomes six months after treatment, but linezolid-related toxicity was frequent. No acquired resistance to pretomanid was reported., Conclusions: Evidence suggests an important role for pretomanid in rifampicin-resistant and highly resistant tuberculosis. Trials comparing pretomanid to existing core and companion drugs are needed to further define that role., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)