7 results on '"McCarthy, Michael"'
Search Results
2. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide: A One Year Prospective Comparative Study.
- Author
-
Barajas, Juan N., Hornung, Alexander L., Kuzel, Timothy, Mallow, Gary M., Park, Grant J., Rudisill, Samuel S., Louie, Philip K., Harada, Garrett K., McCarthy, Michael H., Germscheid, Niccole, Cheung, Jason PY., Neva, Marko H., El-Sharkawi, Mohammad, Valacco, Marcelo, Sciubba, Daniel M., Chutkan, Norman B., An, Howard S., and Samartzis, Dino
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,SPINE ,INCOME ,SICK leave ,SURGEONS ,SPINAL surgery ,ELECTIVE surgery - Abstract
Study Design: Survey Objective: In March of 2020, an original study by Louie et al investigated the impact of COVID-19 on 902 spine surgeons internationally. Since then, due to varying government responses and public health initiatives to the pandemic, individual countries and regions of the world have been affected differently. Therefore, this follow-up study aimed to assess how the COVID-19 impact on spine surgeons has changed 1 year later. Methods: A repeat, multi-dimensional, 90-item survey written in English was distributed to spine surgeons worldwide via email to the AO Spine membership who agreed to receive surveys. Questions were categorized into the following domains: demographics, COVID-19 observations, preparedness, personal impact, patient care, and future perceptions. Results: Basic respondent demographics, such as gender, age, home demographics, medical comorbidities, practice type, and years since training completion, were similar to those of the original 2020 survey. Significant differences between groups included reasons for COVID testing, opinions of media coverage, hospital unemployment, likelihood to be performing elective surgery, percentage of cases cancelled, percentage of personal income, sick leave, personal time allocation, stress coping mechanisms, and the belief that future guidelines were needed (P<.05). Conclusion: Compared to baseline results collected at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, significant differences in various domains related to COVID-19 perceptions, hospital preparedness, practice impact, personal impact, and future perceptions have developed. Follow-up assessment of spine surgeons has further indicated that telemedicine and virtual education are mainstays. Such findings may help to inform and manage expectations and responses to any future outbreaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery.
- Author
-
Foley, David, Hardacker, Pierce, and McCarthy, Michael
- Subjects
SPINAL surgery ,TECHNOLOGICAL innovations ,OPERATING rooms ,REOPERATION ,TECHNOLOGICAL progress ,SURGEONS - Abstract
New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Global Perspectives and Practices.
- Author
-
Riew, Grant J., Lovecchio, Francis, Samartzis, Dino, Louie, Philip K., Germscheid, Niccole, An, Howard, Cheung, Jason Pui Yin, Chutkan, Norman, Mallow, Gary Michael, Neva, Marko H., Phillips, Frank M., Sciubba, Daniel, El-Sharkawi, Mohammad, Valacco, Marcelo, McCarthy, Michael H., Makhni, Melvin C., and Iyer, Sravisht
- Subjects
TELEMEDICINE ,POSTOPERATIVE care ,TELEPHONE calls ,SPINAL surgery ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Study Design: Cross-sectional, anonymous, international survey. Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the rapid adoption of telemedicine in spine surgery. This study sought to determine the extent of adoption and global perspectives on telemedicine in spine surgery. Methods: All members of AO Spine International were emailed an anonymous survey covering the participant's experiences with and perceptions of telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses. Responses were compared among regions. Results: 485 spine surgeons participated in the survey. Telemedicine usage rose from <10.0% to >39.0% of all visits. A majority of providers (60.5%) performed at least one telemedicine visit. The format of "telemedicine" varied widely by region: European (50.0%) and African (45.2%) surgeons were more likely to use phone calls, whereas North (66.7%) and South American (77.0%) surgeons more commonly used video (P < 0.001). North American providers used telemedicine the most during COVID-19 (>60.0% of all visits). 81.9% of all providers "agreed/strongly agreed" telemedicine was easy to use. Respondents tended to "agree" that imaging review, the initial appointment, and postoperative care could be performed using telemedicine. Almost all (95.4%) surgeons preferred at least one in-person visit prior to the day of surgery. Conclusion: Our study noted significant geographical differences in the rate of telemedicine adoption and the platform of telemedicine utilized. The results suggest a significant increase in telemedicine utilization, particularly in North America. Spine surgeons found telemedicine feasible for imaging review, initial visits, and follow-up visits although the vast majority still preferred at least one in-person preoperative visit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Spine surgeon perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine: an international study.
- Author
-
Riew, Grant J., Lovecchio, Francis, Samartzis, Dino, Bernstein, David N., Underwood, Ellen Y., Louie, Philip K., Germscheid, Niccole, An, Howard S., Cheung, Jason Pui Yin, Chutkan, Norman, Mallow, Gary Michael, Neva, Marko H., Phillips, Frank M., Sciubba, Daniel M., El-Sharkawi, Mohammad, Valacco, Marcelo, McCarthy, Michael H., Iyer, Sravisht, and Makhni, Melvin C.
- Subjects
TELEMEDICINE ,COVID-19 pandemic ,SPINE ,SURGEONS ,PATIENT satisfaction - Abstract
Introduction: While telemedicine usage has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains little consensus about how spine surgeons perceive virtual care. The purpose of this study was to explore international perspectives of spine providers on the challenges and benefits of telemedicine.Methods: Responses from 485 members of AO Spine were analyzed, covering provider perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine. All questions were optional, and blank responses were excluded from analysis.Results: The leading challenges reported by surgeons were decreased ability to perform physical examinations (38.6%), possible increased medicolegal exposure (19.3%), and lack of reimbursement parity compared to traditional visits (15.5%). Fewer than 9.0% of respondents experienced technological issues. On average, respondents agreed that telemedicine increases access to care for rural/long-distance patients, provides societal cost savings, and increases patient convenience. Responses were mixed about whether telemedicine leads to greater patient satisfaction. North Americans experienced the most challenges, but also thought telemedicine carried the most benefits, whereas Africans reported the fewest challenges and benefits. Age did not affect responses.Conclusion: Spine surgeons are supportive of the benefits of telemedicine, and only a small minority experienced technical issues. The decreased ability to perform the physical examination was the top challenge and remains a major obstacle to virtual care for spine surgeons around the world, although interestingly, 61.4% of providers did not acknowledge this to be a major challenge. Significant groundwork in optimizing remote physical examination maneuvers and achieving legal and reimbursement clarity is necessary for widespread implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Provider confidence in the telemedicine spine evaluation: results from a global study.
- Author
-
Lovecchio, Francis, Riew, Grant J., Samartzis, Dino, Louie, Philip K., Germscheid, Niccole, An, Howard S., Cheung, Jason Pui Yin, Chutkan, Norman, Mallow, Gary Michael, Neva, Marko H., Phillips, Frank M., Sciubba, Daniel M., El-Sharkawi, Mohammad, Valacco, Marcelo, McCarthy, Michael H., Makhni, Melvin C., and Iyer, Sravisht
- Subjects
TELEMEDICINE ,SPINE ,CONFIDENCE ,PHYSICAL diagnosis ,DIAGNOSIS ,MEDICAL telematics - Abstract
Purpose: To utilize data from a global spine surgeon survey to elucidate (1) overall confidence in the telemedicine evaluation and (2) determinants of provider confidence. Methods: Members of AO Spine International were sent a survey encompassing participant's experience with, perception of, and comparison of telemedicine to in-person visits. The survey was designed through a Delphi approach, with four rounds of question review by the multi-disciplinary authors. Data were stratified by provider age, experience, telemedicine platform, trust in telemedicine, and specialty. Results: Four hundred and eighty-five surgeons participated in the survey. The global effort included respondents from Africa (19.9%), Asia Pacific (19.7%), Europe (24.3%), North America (9.4%), and South America (26.6%). Providers felt that physical exam-based tasks (e.g., provocative testing, assessing neurologic deficits/myelopathy, etc.) were inferior to in-person exams, while communication-based aspects (e.g., history taking, imaging review, etc.) were equivalent. Participants who performed greater than 50 visits were more likely to believe telemedicine was at least equivalent to in-person visits in the ability to make an accurate diagnosis (OR 2.37, 95% C.I. 1.03–5.43). Compared to in-person encounters, video (versus phone only) visits were associated with increased confidence in the ability of telemedicine to formulate and communicate a treatment plan (OR 3.88, 95% C.I. 1.71–8.84). Conclusion: Spine surgeons are confident in the ability of telemedicine to communicate with patients, but are concerned about its capacity to accurately make physical exam-based diagnoses. Future research should concentrate on standardizing the remote examination and the development of appropriate use criteria in order to increase provider confidence in telemedicine technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. P39. Telehealth and spine care: Surgeon experiences and perceptions.
- Author
-
Riew, Grant, Lovecchio, Francis C., Samartzis, Dino, Louie, Philip, McCarthy, Michael H., Makhni, Melvin C., and Iyer, Sravisht
- Subjects
- *
TELEMEDICINE , *COVID-19 pandemic , *SPINE , *POSTOPERATIVE care , *SURGEONS , *SPINAL surgery - Abstract
Telehealth use in spine surgery has become widespread due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The degree of global adoption remains unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first global survey to directly evaluate provider perspectives surrounding telemedicine use-cases. To elicit the extent of adoption of international spine telehealth. We aimed to explore telemedicine platform used, ease of use, and acceptable use-cases. Cross-sectional email survey, international. Spine Surgeons. Perspectives and practices of spine telemedicine. An anonymous, cross-sectional email survey was sent to the members of AO Spine. Survey questions covered provider experiences with and perceptions of telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses and responses were compared amongst regions. A total of 485 spine providers responded to the survey. As of May 2020, telemedicine usage comprised >39.0% of all visits — up from <10.0% of visits pre-pandemic. A majority of providers (60.5%) performed at least 1 telemedicine visit. The format of "telemedicine" varied widely by region: African (45.2%) and European (50.0%) providers were more likely to use phone calls (no video), whereas North (66.7%) and South American (77.0%) surgeons more commonly used audio-visual telemedicine (p<0.001). North American providers used telemedicine the most during COVID-19 (>60.0% of all visits). There were 81.9% of all providers who "agreed/strongly agreed" telemedicine was easy to use. Respondents tended to "agree" that imaging review, the initial appointment, and postoperative care could be performed using telemedicine. Almost all (95.4%) surgeons preferred at least one in-person visit prior to the day of surgery. Our study noted significant geographical differences in the rate of telemedicine usage and the platform of telemedicine utilized. Spine surgeons found telemedicine feasible for imaging review, initial visits, and follow-up visits although the vast majority still preferred at least one in-person preoperative visit. This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.