Search

To investigate whether an electronic health record (EHR)–integrated decision tool, combined with supportive interventions, results in more appropriate antibiotic prescribing in nursing home (NH) residents with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI), without negative consequences for residents. Cluster randomized controlled trial with NHs as the randomization unit; intervention group NHs received the EHR-integrated decision tool and supportive interventions, and control group NHs provided care as usual. 212 residents with suspected UTI, from 16 NHs in the Netherlands. Physicians collected data at index consultation (ie, UTI suspicion) and during a 21-day follow-up period (March 2019–March 2020). Overall antibiotic prescribing data at NH level, 12 months prior to and during the study, was derived from the electronic prescribing system. The primary study outcome was the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected UTI that was appropriate, at index consultation. Secondary study outcomes included changes in treatment decision, complications, UTI-related hospitalization, and mortality during follow-up; and pre-post study changes in antibiotic prescribing at the NH level. 295 suspected UTIs were included (intervention group: 189; control group: 106). The between-group difference in appropriate antibiotic prescribing was 13% [intervention group: 62%, control group: 49%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% CI 0.57-3.62]. In both groups, complications (2% vs 3%), UTI-related hospitalization (2% vs 1%), and possible UTI-related mortality (2% vs 2%) were rare. The pre-post study difference in antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 resident-care days was −0.95 in the intervention group NHs and −0.05 in the control group NHs (P =.02). Although appropriate antibiotic prescribing improved in the intervention group, this does not provide sufficient evidence for our multidisciplinary intervention. Despite this inconclusive result, our intervention could potentially still be effective, because we established a large reduction in the number of antibiotic prescriptions in the intervention group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated logistics, process data, and barriers/facilitators for the implementation and use of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) for suspected lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in nursing home (NH) residents. This process evaluation was performed alongside a cluster randomized, controlled trial (UPCARE study) to evaluate the effect of CRP POCT on antibiotic prescribing for suspected LRTIs in NH residents. Eleven NHs in the Netherlands. Data sources for process data regarding intervention quality included a questionnaire among NH staff, logs, reports, and CRP POCT-analyzer records. Barriers and facilitators for implementation were assessed in focus group interviews with physicians and nurses from 3 NHs. Correct patient selection for CRP POCT and generally continued CRP POCT use indicated good fidelity. The initial training and training of new employees seemed to fit the need, but some POCT-user group sizes had increased over time, which could have impeded frequent use. Users were generally satisfied with CRP POCT and perceived its use feasible and relevant. Facilitators for implementation were initial commitment and active initiation, followed by continued attention and enthusiasm for building routine practice and trust. Short lines of communication between staff, short distance to the POCT-analyzer, 24/7 coverage of staff, and a clear task division facilitated continued attention and routine practice. This process evaluation showed sufficient quality of providing CRP POCT in Dutch NHs. We processed findings of intervention quality and implementation knowledge into key recommendations for CRP POCT implementation in this setting. Future research could focus on CRP POCT use in countries with different organization of care in NHs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]