Search

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization has surged in recent years, particularly amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, yet standardization of ECMO-associated infection (EAI) reporting remains lacking. This systematic review assessed 60 studies from 2018 to 2023 in PubMed, which used key words related to EAIs. Adherence to reporting data elements that may bias reporting, including the use of standardized rates of infections per 1,000 patient days, describing the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, infection control, and culture practices, describing the definitions for infection by site, and listing pathogens by infection site were evaluated by study. Our review revealed considerable heterogeneity in data elements and infection definitions. While 51 (85%) studies reported definition by site, only 17 (28%) reported infection control practices, and only 5 (8%) studies adhered to all the identified essential reporting elements. Variation in infection rates was also evident across the definitions, with studies using their own definition having the greatest variability in reported infection rates. Microbiological differences by geographic region further underscored the need for standardized reporting and challenges with generalizability in the EAI literature. Our findings underscore the imperative for consensus on ECMO infection definitions and transparent reporting practices to facilitate meaningful comparisons and advance patient care protocols. • Only 28% of ECMO-associated infection studies reported infection control practices. • Culture practices and antimicrobial prophylaxis vary significantly by ECMO center. • Rates varied widely by study, including those using similar definitions. • Geographic variability makes universal prevention recommendations difficult. • Future studies need standardized reporting practices to improve generalizability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the care of patients with refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. Infectious diseases clinicians must reconcile conflicting evidence from limited studies as they develop practices at their own institutions, which has resulted in considerably different practices globally. This review describes infection control and prevention as well as antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies in this population. Data on diagnostics and treatment for patients receiving ECMO with a focus on diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship is then examined. This review summarizes gaps in the current ECMO literature and proposes future needs, including developing clear definitions for infections and encouraging transparent reporting of practices at individual facilities in future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly used modality of life support with high risk for nosocomial infections. The accuracy of sepsis prediction tools in identifying blood stream infections (BSI) in this population is unknown as measurement of multiple variables commonly associated with infection are altered by the circuit. Methods: This study compares all blood stream infections for patients receiving ECMO between January 2012 and December 2020 to timepoints when blood cultures were negative using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), American Burn Association Sepsis Criteria (ABA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores. Results: Of the 220 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 40 (18%) had 51 blood stream infections and were included in this study. Gram-positive infections composed 57% (n = 29) of infections with E. faecalis (n = 12, 24%) being the most common organism isolated. There were no significant differences in sepsis prediction scores at the time of infection compared to infection-free time points for SOFA (median (IQR) 7 (5–9) vs. 6 (5–8), p = 0.22), LODS (median (IQR) 12 (10–14) vs. 12 (10–13), p = 0.28), ABA (median (IQR) 2 (1–3) vs. 2 (1–3) p = 0.75), or SIRS (median (IQR) 3 (2–3) vs. 3 (2–3), p = 0.20). Conclusions: Our data shows that previously published sepsis scores are elevated throughout a patient's ECMO course, and do not correlate with bacteremia. Better predictive tools are needed to determine the appropriate timing for blood cultures in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]