Search

After about a century, the skull of the holotype and sole specimen of Arambourgia gaudryi from the Eocene of Quercy (France) is here redescribed. Its interest resides in its extreme morphology, such as its very small skull and altirostral condition, that raises questions about its maturity, taxonomic validity, and paleoecology. In order to reveal previously hidden anatomical details, we used computed microtomography (µCT-scan) data to digitally extract the bones of the cranium and mandible, as well as the endocranial structures. Here, we update the osteological description of A. gaudryi, outlining new characters and re-evaluating anatomical details. Comparing it with ontogenetic series of extant crocodylians, we confirm that the specimen is a mature individual of a dwarf species with pedomorphic features. Our phylogenetic analyses indicate that A. gaudryi is an alligatorine. Comparisons with other small alligatoroid taxa show that it is indeed a valid species. The depositional environment of the finding site suggests a continental context with a karstic network. Taking this into account, together with its peculiar anatomy, we propose that A. gaudryi was a semi-terrestrial animal occupying an ecological niche similar to that of extant juvenile or dwarf crocodylians. Finally, we discuss the current knowledge of the paleobiogeography of Alligatoroidea in Europe during the Paleogene. Arambourgia gaudryi was likely part of a group of small early globidontans that arrived in the Old World, probably from North America, around the end of the Paleocene and that dispersed to at least four localities of the ancient European archipelago. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe nearly complete skeletons of basal Anseriformes from the Latest Paleocene to the early Eocene of North America and Europe. Collectively, these birds appear to be representative of anseriforms near the divergence of Anhimae and Anseres, but their exact positions relative to these clades remains uncertain. A new family, Anachronornithidae nov. fam., is erected on the basis of one of these, Anachronornis anhimops nov. gen., nov. gen. et sp., to which the others cannot be confidently assigned. The new fossils augment a growing collection of early Pan-Anseriformes, which in their diversity do not paint an unambiguous picture of phylogeny or character state evolution on the path to or within crown-Anseriformes. Anachronornis nov. gen. is similar in some aspects of both cranial and postcranial anatomy to other well-represented early Paleogene Anseriformes and members of Anseres, such as Presbyornis Wetmore, 1926. However, it exhibits a more landfowl-like bill, like that of Anhimae and unlike the spatulate bill of Anseres. Additional specimens of similar basal Anseriformes of uncertain affinities from the early Eocene of North America and Europe further complicate interpretation of character state polarity due to the mosaicism of primitive and derived characters they exhibit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contrast to the rich collections of articulated spiny-rayed fishes from early Late Cretaceous and Eocene Lagerstätten, similar skeletal remains are sparse in Maastrichtian-Paleocene strata. Here we coin this poorly understood span "Patterson's Gap" and review known articulated skeletons from it, summarizing available information on their phylogenetic affinities, age, and environmental context. Roughly fifty percent of taxa in both the Maastrichtian and Paleocene come from Europe and North America, with percomorphs representing around 60% of the skeletal acanthomorph taxa in each interval. This is higher than the only pre-Maastrichtian assemblage with a reasonable sample of percomorphs, but lower than most Eocene and younger sites. Fossils from Patterson's Gap show a steady accumulation of the principal lineages of spiny-rayed fishes. Material from Paleocene or older strata provides evidence for most of the roughly 20 major acanthomorph divisions recovered by molecular studies. Many fossils from Patterson's Gap remain undescribed and unnamed, and almost none have been included within formal phylogenetic analyses. Revision of existing material, combined with additional fieldwork, should be a priority for future efforts seeking to clarify this murky but significant interval in the evolutionary history of a major vertebrate radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]