Search

Mineral processing plants remain nowadays infamous for their low energy efficiency. Economic model predictive control (EMPC), by directly considering the energy costs, could possibly help reduce their footprint, but its environmental benefits are yet to be clearly quantified. In an attempt to cast some light on this topic, this paper compares the response to a given ore feed size and hardness disturbance sequence of an EMPC to that of basic and advanced regulatory control systems using the profits and the specific energy (power draw/ore feed rate) as metrics. The simulated circuit comprises a high-pressure grinding rolls (HPGR), a ball mill, and a flotation circuit. It is based on population balance modeling and is an extension of previous works. The basic regulatory control (BRC) system comprises only single-input–single-output control loops with proportional–integral (PI) controllers and operates at a fixed feed rate. The advanced regulatory control (ARC) system consists of PI controllers maximizing the plant feed rate with override constraint handling. The results show that (1) ARC generates more revenue and maintains a lower circuit specific energy consumption than BRC, (2) ARC can produce the same economic performance as EMPC because the constraints of the system define the economic optimum, and (3) EMPC can trade revenues for a lower circuit specific energy with a hybrid criterion that penalizes power draw. • The work compares different control systems on an HPGR grinding circuit. • A decentralized PI control system can generate equivalent revenues to an EMPC. • EMPC can trade revenues for a lower circuit specific energy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advanced process control can benefit to the operation efficiency and quality of tablets produced by wet granulation lines. Following the development of a new fully continuous fluidized bed reactor as a potential substitute for the current batch dryer design, this paper examines the energy and product quality performances of two predictive control strategies using an experimentally validated simulator. The first one proposes an economic model predictive controller explicitly minimizing the dryer energy consumption. The second one follows the same objective, but uses a simpler classical predictive control framework implementing targets on manipulated variables to drive them toward low energy consumption operating points. Both controllers lead to similar performances, and consume about 20% less energy than a reference feedback scheme without manipulated variable setpoints. Results also show that tracking the product quality attribute significantly benefits from a feedforward action because of the long residence time. This article addresses a subject little explored by the literature, the control of continuous fluidized bed dryers, and clearly demonstrates that a standard linear strategy can reduce the operating costs with an appropriate design. • Predictive control is applied on a simulated continuous fluidized bed dryer. • An economic model predictive controller (EMPC) minimizes the energy consumption. • A more standard predictive controller (MPC) also aims for low-energy actions. • Both EMPC and MPC results in low-energy operations. • Feedforward compensation improves the product quality in both cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]