Search

Background: The optimal timing of vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines after cellular therapy is incompletely understood. The objectives of this study are to determine whether humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ if initiated <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 30 cancer centers in the United States. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was administered as part of routine care. We obtained blood prior to and after vaccinations at up to 5 time points and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) IgG in all participants and neutralizing antibodies for Wuhan D614G, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529 strains, as well as SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell receptors, in a subgroup., Results: We enrolled 466 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (n = 231), autologous HCT (n = 170), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy (n = 65) recipients between April 2021 and June 2022. Humoral and cellular responses did not significantly differ among participants initiating vaccinations <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy. Anti-S IgG ≥2500 U/mL was correlated with high neutralizing antibody titers and attained by the last time point in 70%, 69%, and 34% of allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell recipients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were attained in 57%, 83%, and 58%, respectively. Pre-cellular therapy SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and baseline B-cell count were key predictors of post-cellular therapy immunity., Conclusions: These data support mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination prior to, and reinitiation 3 to 4 months after, cellular therapies with allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell therapy., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . J. A. H—research funding: AlloVir, Geovax, Merck; consulting: Pfizer, Gilead, Moderna, Geovax, AlloVir. J. H. Y.—research funding: AlloVir, Ansun, Cidara, F2G, GSK, NobelPharma, Pulmocide, Scynexis, Shire/Takeda. L. W. L.—employment and equity holder in Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation. M. V. D.—research funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech. R. N.—consulting: Ono Pharmaceutical, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bluebird Bio, Omeros Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Pfizer. J. M.—consulting: Evision, Kite, Allovir, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, CRISPR, Nektar, Caribiou Bio, Sana Technologies, Legend Biotech. S. D.—research funding: MSK Leukemia SPORE Career Enhancement Program and MSK Gerstner Physician Scholar program. J. J. A.—employment: National Marrow Donor Program; Advisory Board: AscellaHealth, Takeda. M. H.—research support/funding: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, ADC Therapeutics, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma; consultancy: Incyte Corporation, MorphoSys, SeaGen, Gamida Cell, Novartis, Legend Biotech, Kadmon, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, AbbVie, Caribou, CRISPR, Genmab, Kite; Speaker’s Bureau: Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, ADC Therapeutics, Kite; Data Monitoring Committee: Myeloid Therapeutics, Inc. M. L. R.—research funding from Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Atara Bio-Pharma; employment by IQVIA Biotech and Kura Oncology; stock in Kura Oncology. M. M. H.—research funding from Astellas Pharma, CSL Behring, Incyte, Sanofi; consultancy: Sobi, Inc. M.-A. P.—honoraria from Adicet, Allogene, Allovir, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Equilium, Exevir, ImmPACT Bio, Incyte, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Omeros, OrcaBio, Sanofi, Syncopation, VectivBio AG, and Vor Biopharma; he serves on Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for Cidara Therapeutics and Sellas Life Sciences, and the scientific advisory board of NexImmune; he has ownership interests in NexImmune, Omeros, and OrcaBio; he has received institutional research support for clinical trials from Allogene, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Nektar Therapeutics, and Novartis. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: In November 2020, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for disease progression., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 38 adult hematology patients who received mAbs from 11/2020 to 2/2021., Results: Thirty (79%) patients received bamlanivimab and 8 (21%) casirivimab-imdevimab. Four (11%) patients were hospitalized due to COVID-19, two (5%) progressed to severe disease and one patient (3%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 disease. Most patients (n = 34, 89%) ultimately tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, with 34% (n = 13) clearing the virus within 14 days after mAb infusion. The median time to clearance of viral shedding was 25.5 days (range: 7-138). After mAb infusion, most patients with hematological malignancies (HM) (n = 10/15; 67%) resumed therapy for underlying disease with a median delay of 21.5 days (range: 12-42). We observed a significant difference in hospitalization among patients who received a HCT versus non-HCT (0% n = 0/26 and 36% n = 4/11, respectively; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specific mAb was safe and may reduce hospitalization compared to what is reported in malignant hematology patients at high risk for disease progression. Our HCT cohort patients had less hospitalization rate compared with HM cohort patients., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In the current post-pandemic era, recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) deserve special attention. In these vulnerable patients, vaccine effectiveness is reduced by post-transplant immune-suppressive therapy; consequently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) is often associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Characterizing SARS-CoV-2 adaptive immunity transfer from immune donors to HCT recipients in the context of immunosuppression will help identify optimal timing and vaccination strategies that can provide adequate protection to HCT recipients against infection with evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. We performed a prospective observational study (NCT04666025 at ClinicalTrials.gov) to longitudinally monitor the transfer of SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral immunity from HCT donors, who were either vaccinated or had a history of COVID-19, to their recipients via T-cell replete graft. Levels, function, and quality of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses were longitudinally analyzed up to 6 months post-HCT in 14 matched unrelated donor/recipients and four haploidentical donor/recipient pairs. A markedly skewed donor-derived SARS-CoV-2 CD4 T-cell response was measurable in 15 (83%) recipients. It showed a polarized Th1 functional profile, with the prevalence of central memory phenotype subsets. SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ was detectable throughout the observation period, including early post-transplant (day +30). Functionally experienced SARS-CoV-2 Th1-type T cells promptly expanded in two recipients at the time of post-HCT vaccination and in two others who were infected and survived post-transplant COVID-19 infection. Our data suggest that donor-derived SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses are functional in immunosuppressed recipients and may play a critical role in post-HCT vaccine response and protection from the fatal disease., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04666025., Competing Interests: CLR received consulting fees and research funding from Helocyte Inc. DJD received consulting fees, patent royalties, research funding, and fees for serving on the advisory board of Helocyte Inc. In addition, DJD has two patents, 8,580,276 and 9,675,689, that are licensed to Helocyte. DJD and FC are co-inventors of the Patent Cooperation Treaty PCT application that covers the development of a COVID-19 vaccine PCT/US2021/032821 licensed to GeoVax Labs Inc. DD receives consulting fees and research support from GeoVax Labs Inc. RN is a consultant for Omeros, Bluebird, Viracor Eurofins, Magenta Therapeutics, Kadmon, and Napajen Pharma; received research funding from Helocyte, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical; and receives travel, accommodations, expenses from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Alexion Pharmaceuticals. SD is a consultant for Merck, Allovir, and Aseptiscope; an Advisory board for Merck and Aseptiscope; an investigator for Allovir, Merck, Ansun, Gilead, Janssen, Shire/Takeda; and on the speaker’s bureau of Merck, Takeda, and Astellas. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 La Rosa, Chiuppesi, Park, Zhou, Yang, Gendzekhadze, Ly, Li, Kaltcheva, Ortega Francisco, Gutierrez, Ali, Otoukesh, Amanam, Salhotra, Pullarkat, Aldoss, Rosenzweig, Aribi, Stein, Marcucci, Dadwal, Nakamura, Forman, Al Malki and Diamond.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has emerged as a global pandemic that upended existing protocols and practices, including those for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Here, we describe the successful clinical course and multiple key interventions administered to an acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient, who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on day -1 of matched unrelated donor (SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G negative) T-cell-replete HCT. This experience allowed for implementing a virologic and immunomonitoring panel to characterize the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the recipient's nascent humoral and cellular immune response. The finding of robust, functional, and persistent levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, starting early after transplant was unexpected, and in combination with the clinical strategy, may have contributed to the favorable outcome. Additionally, it is plausible that preexisting cross-reactive endemic coronavirus immunity in the allogeneic graft reduced recipient susceptibility to COVID-19 disease. This case supports the critical role that T-cell responses may play in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the context of transplant immunosuppression, in which reconstitution of humoral response is commonly delayed. Interventional approaches to transfer SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity such as HCT donor vaccination and adaptive cellular therapy could be of benefit., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The safety and efficacy of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) emergency-use authorized (EUA) vaccines have been confirmed in the general population. However, there are no data on its safety and tolerability or efficacy in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). We performed this study to identify the incidence of adverse events following SARS-CoV2 EUA vaccines, the incidence of new-onset graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or worsening of existing GVHD after EUA vaccine administration, and the incidence SARS-CoV2 positivity in vaccinated HCT patients. We retrospectively reviewed 113 HCT patients who received at least one dose of EUA vaccine to describe the safety and tolerability, any impact on GVHD, and the incidence of SARS-CoV2 PCR positivity after vaccination. Patients received either Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccines. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older and had received at least one dose of vaccine in the post-HCT setting. Most patients presented with myalgias/arthralgias (first dose, 7.7%; second dose, 14.6%), fatigue (first dose, 15.4%; second dose, 29.2%), and injection site pain (first dose, 40.4%; second dose, 43.8%). Other side-effects experienced by patients included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and injection-site rash and swelling. Liver function abnormalities occurred in 18.6% of patients. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia occurred in 13.3%, 11.5%, and 8.8% of patients, respectively. Forty percent of patients had active chronic GVHD at the time of vaccination, and worsening chronic GVHD occurred in 3.5% of the patients. New chronic GVHD developed in 9.7% of patients after vaccination. The SARS-CoV2 EUA vaccines were well tolerated in allogeneic HCT recipients., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant may experience graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in which donor immune cells cause an immune reaction in host tissues. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are highly effective in prevention of severe coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) disease, but the vaccine can result in immune activation and GVHD. Herein, we report 4 cases of oral manifestations that may have been stimulated by COVID-19 or vaccination with Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. We believe this study is the first to report oral changes driven by an inflammatory/immune mechanism leading to oral symptomatic cGVHD. The clinical impact of this study is early recognition and appropriate management of oral symptomatic cGVHD following COVID-19 disease or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]