Search

• Understanding why counting formulae are used for different problem types requires focus on the set of outcomes • Students can leverage lists of outcomes to relate counting processes to formulae. • Tasks that target the structure of a list of outcomes can help students relate counting processes and formulae. Research has shown that solving counting problems correctly can be difficult for students at all levels, and mathematics educators have sought to identify strategies and interventions to help students reason conceptually about combinatorial tasks. A set-oriented perspective (Lockwood, 2014) is a way of thinking about counting problems that emphasizes the importance of reasoning about the set of outcomes being counted. From a set-oriented perspective, one possible type of intervention is to have students focus on the sets of outcomes rather than formulas and expressions, and specifically to reason about the structure of the set of outcomes. Yet, reasoning about sets of outcomes is not sufficient for students to make connections between outcomes and counting processes. In this paper, we investigate tasks where students wrote computer code to enumerate the set of outcomes in a specific order by implementing listing processes, and they were then asked to determine a specific numbered outcome in their list by using the structure of their enumeration scheme. We clarify particular aspects of a set-oriented perspective that were productive for students, and we demonstrate that tasks that asked students to name a specific outcome in their list elicited meaningful connections between counting processes and sets of outcomes. Further, such tasks reinforce desirable mathematical practices such as leveraging structure and connecting representations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]