Search

Sarcomas constitute a group of rare malignant neoplasms, commonly subcategorized into soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and bone sarcomas. This study aims to describe the treatment modalities and outcome of head and neck sarcoma (HNS) patients in western Denmark and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence in HNS patients. The Aarhus sarcoma registry, The National Danish Sarcoma Database, and the Danish National Pathology Registry were used to identify HNS adult patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2022. Altogether, 291 patients were included in this study. The prevalent histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (16%; 48/291) and leiomyosarcoma (15%; 44/291) for STS patients (n = 230) and chondrosarcoma (10%; 28/291) and osteosarcoma (7%; 19/291) for bone sarcoma patients (n = 61). Surgery with curative intent was performed in 71% (164/230) and 70% (43/61) of STS and bone sarcoma patients, respectively. Clear resection was achieved in 59% (97/164) of STS patients and 44% (19/43) of bone sarcoma patients. Eighty-nine patients relapsed (STS n = 66, bone sarcoma n = 23) after a median time of 2.7/5.5 years for STS/bone sarcoma patients. The five-year overall survival rates were 45% for STS patients and 66% for bone sarcoma patients. The following factors were significantly, negatively associated with overall survival in STS patients: Age (hazard ratio (HR)) = 1.02, p < 0.001), tumour size ≥5 cm (HR = 1.75, p = 0.003), metastatic disease (HR = 3.17, p < 0.001), high grade tumour (HR = 2.24, p = 0.004), previous cancer (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), and high Aarhus composite biomarker score (ACBS) (HR = 4.56, p = 0.001). For relapse in STS patients, higher tumour grade (HR = 3.19, p = 0.014), intralesional margins (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), ≥2 previous cancers (HR = 3.00, p = 0.004), and high ACBS (HR = 3.29, p = 0.047), were negatively associated. For bone sarcomas only higher age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.049) and intralesional margins (HR = 2.91, p = 0.042) were significant negative factors for overall survival. Multiple prognostic factors for overall survival and relapse were identified, especially for STS patients. • 5-year survival was 45% for soft tissue sarcoma patients and 66% for bone sarcoma patients. • The Aarhus composite biomarker score is a prognostic factor for soft tissue sarcoma. • A previous cancer diagnosis is negatively associated with overall survival in soft tissue sarcoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has notably improved the 5-year survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This study investigated recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with synchronous versus metachronous PM following complete CRS+HIPEC. Among 310 patients studied from June 2006 to December 2020, the recurrence rate was 79.7%, and sites were most frequently isolated peritoneal and multifocal recurrence. Recurrence locations did not differ between synchronous and metachronous PM groups. Notably, patients with metachronous PM had a shorter disease-free survival compared to synchronous PM (9.4 vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.01); however, the overall survival was similar. Despite frequent recurrence, especially at extraperitoneal sites, long-term survival was achievable after CRS+HIPEC in CRC patients with PM. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has improved the 5-year survival for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). Little is known about recurrence patterns and recurrence rates between synchronous (S) and metachronous (M) PM following CRS+HIPEC. We aimed to describe the recurrence patterns, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in S-PM and M-PM patients after complete CRS+HIPEC. From June 2006 to December 2020, a prospective cohort study included 310 CRC patients, where 181 patients had S-PM (58.4%) and 129 patients had M-PM (41.6%). After a median 10.3-month follow-up, 247/310 (79.7%) patients experienced recurrence, and recurrence sites included isolated peritoneal (32.4%), multifocal (peritoneal and liver and/or lung(s)) (22.7%), isolated liver (17.8%), isolated lung (10.5%) and other (16.6%) sites. Recurrence patterns did not differ between S-PM and M-PM. M-PM patients had an impaired DFS compared to S-PM patients (9.4 months (95% CI: 7.3–12.1) vs. 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2–13.9), p = 0.01). The median OS was similar for S-PM and M-PM (38.4 months (95% CI: 31.2–46.8) vs. 40.8 months (95% CI: 28.8–46.8), p = 0.86). Despite frequent recurrence at extraperitoneal locations, long-term survival was achievable after CRS+HIPEC in CRC patients with PM. The recurrence patterns and OS did not differ between groups, yet M-PM patients had a shorter DFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined the role of receptor profiles and other prognostic factors in survival outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases in breast cancer patients, to help improve selection of candidates for SRS. We included 149 consecutive patients who received SRS between 2012 and 2019 at the University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Overall survival (OS) following SRS was determined through the Kaplan–Meier method, while CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) was determined through competing risk analysis. Prognostic factors for both OS and CNS-PFS were evaluated through uni- and multivariate Cox regression and Fine-Gray models, respectively. The proportional hazards assumptions were tested through Schoenfeld residuals, and non-proportionality was accounted for by the inclusion of time-dependent variables. Median OS was 14.8 months for the entire cohort and was as follows for the four receptor profiles: 33.3 months for ER+/HER2+ (ER: estrogen receptor, HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), 11.0 months for ER+/HER2−, 17.7 months for ER−/HER2+, and 5.3 months for ER−/HER2−. In the multivariate model, the ER−/HER2− receptor profile (hazard ratio (HR): 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–3.67) and the presence of extracranial visceral metastases (HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.53–5.50) were associated with worse OS. The ER+/HER2+ receptor profile (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19–0.96) and 5+ lines of treatment (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20–0.82) were both associated with improved OS. For CNS-PFS, 5+ lines of treatment (sub-distributional hazard ratio (SHR): 2.88, 95% CI: 1.06–7.81) was associated with worse CNS-PFS, while extracranial visceral metastases (SHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30–0.97) was associated with reduced risk of CNS progression – which is primarily due to patients with extracranial metastases dying before developing new CNS progression. Extracranial visceral disease and the ER−/HER2− receptor profile were associated with poor survival outcomes following SRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is associated with increased mortality and postoperative complications. In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), postoperative complications are a risk factor for cancer recurrence and disease-free survival. This study investigates the association between MINS and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with CRC in an ERAS setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Zealand University Hospital, Denmark, between June 2015 and July 2017. Patients undergoing CRC surgery were included if troponin was measured twice after surgery. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrence, and disease-free survival within five years of surgery. Results: Among 586 patients, 42 suffered MINS. After five years, 36% of patients with MINS and 26% without MINS had died, p = 0.15. When adjusted for sex, age and UICC, the hazard ratio (aHR) for 1-year all-cause mortality, recurrence, and disease-free survival were 2.40 [0.93–6.22], 1.47 [0.19–11.29], and 2.25 [0.95–5.32] for patients with MINS compared with those without, respectively. Further adjusting for ASA status, performance status, smoking, and laparotomies, the aHR for 3- and 5-year all-cause mortality were 1.05 [0.51–2.15] and 1.11 [0.62–1.99], respectively. Similarly, the aHR for 3- and 5-year recurrence were 1.38 [0.46–4.51], and 1.49 [0.56–3.98] and for 3- and 5-year disease-free survival the aHR were 1.19 [0.63–2.23], and 1.19 [0.70–2.03]. Conclusion: In absolute numbers, we found no difference in all-cause mortality and recurrence in patients with and without MINS. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, the hazard was increased for all-cause mortality, recurrence, and disease-free survival in patients with MINS without reaching statistical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Convincing results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have led to increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as part of standard therapies in real-world (RW) scenarios. However, RW patients differ clinically from RCT populations and might have reduced long-term survival. Currently, only sparse data on 3-5-year survival rate for RW patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI exist. A multicenter study was performed including 729 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving monotherapy with ICI (retrospective data (n = 566) and prospective data (n = 163)). Detailed baseline clinical characteristics, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS), and baseline haematological count were registered. Kaplan–Meier estimates and log-rank test were used for survival analyses, Cox regression for determination of prognostic factors. Median time of follow-up (FU) was 48.7 months (IQR 37.2–54.3). Median overall survival (OS) in first line treatment was 20.4 months (IQR 8.5–45.0) compared to 11.4 months (IQR 4.6–27.1) in ≥2nd line (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.25–1.75). Estimated probability of OS was 30% at 3 years, 23% at 4 years, and 13% at 5 years in first line compared to 17, 13, and 11% in ≥2nd line, respectively. For those with performance status (PS) 2, the 2-year OS rate was 32% (95% CI 0.22–0.43) compared to 5% (95% CI 0.01–0.15) in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% versus <50%, respectively. Compared to RCTs, long-term OS and PFS rates are lower in real-world patients treated with ICI in first line but much improved compared to historic rates on chemotherapy. A promising flattening of both the OS and progression free survival curves illustrates that also a subset of real-world patients obtain long-term remission. Patients with PS 2 and PD-L1 ≥ 50% may obtain clinically meaningful 2-year PFS and OS rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose was to investigate the treatment flow of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) across treatment lines and adherence to guidelines (defined as trastuzumab, pertuzumab and chemotherapy first line, where 85% received vinorelbine as backbone and T-DM1 second line). Furthermore, we identified clinical markers to predict the risk of developing brain metastases. Patients with HER2-positive mBC, diagnosed between 01.01.2014–31.12.2019, registered in the database of the Danish Breast Cancer Group were included in this real-word study. Clinical follow-up was assessed until 01.10.2020 and complete follow-up for overall survival until 01.10.2021. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with guidelines adherence analyzed as a time-varying covariate, and the risk of CNS metastasis was estimated by the cumulative incidence function. 631 patients were included. 329 (52%) patients followed the guidelines. The median OS for all patients was 42.3 months (95% Cl, 38.2–48.4), and significantly higher for the patients who followed guidelines; NA (95% CI, 78.2–NA). The median PFS for all patients was 13.4 months (95% Cl, 12.1–14.8), 6.6 (95% Cl, 5.8–7.6) and 5.8 (95% Cl, 4.9–6.9) for first, second and third line of treatment, respectively. Patients with ER-negative mBC had a higher risk of developing brain metastases and patients with high tumor burden had a higher risk of developing brain metastases with an adjusted HR of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49–0.98), p = 0.047 and 2.69 (95% CI, 1.45–5.00), p = 0.002, respectively. We found that only half of the patients with HER2-positive mBC, received first and second-line treatment according to national guidelines. Patients receiving treatment according to guidelines had a significantly higher median OS compared to patients who did not. We also found that patients with ER-negative disease or high tumor burden had a significantly higher risk of developing brain metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recommended first-line treatment for advanced, ER+/HER2 negative breast cancer is a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with an endocrine backbone. This study investigated the use of palbociclib, as first- or second-line therapy for advanced breast cancer patients in a real-world setting. This retrospective, population-based study included all Danish, advanced breast cancer patients with ER+/HER2 negative disease who initiated first- or second-line treatment with palbociclib from January 1st, 2017, until December 31st, 2020. The primary outcomes were PFS and OS. The study included 1054 advanced breast cancer patients with a mean age of 66.8 years. Median OS was 51.7 months (95% CI, 44.9–54.6) for all patients in the first-line setting (n = 728) and median PFS was 24.3 months (95% CI, 21.7–27.8). Patients treated in second line (n = 326) had a median OS of 32.5 months (95% CI, 29.9–35.9) and a median PFS of 13.6 months (95% CI, 11.5–15.7). In first-line setting, the PFS and OS were significantly different for endocrine sensitive patients treated with AI (aromatase inhibitor) (n = 423) vs. fulvestrant (n = 158) as endocrine backbone to palbociclib (median PFS AI 31.3 months vs fulvestrant 19.9 months, p = 0.002 and median OS AI 56.9 months vs. fulvestrant 43.6 months, p = 0.001). In endocrine resistant patients (n = 145), no statistically significant difference in PFS was shown (median PFS AI 21.5 months vs. fulvestrant 12.0 months, p = 0.09), whereas OS was significantly different (median OS AI 43.5 months vs. fulvestrant 28.8 months, p = 0.02). In this real-world study, treatment with palbociclib combination therapy met the standards of efficacy set by the phase III trials, PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3, and the standards set by real-world studies in other countries. The study showed significantly different outcomes in terms of PFS and OS in endocrine sensitive patients comparing AI vs. fulvestrant as endocrine backbone to palbociclib as first-line therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To understand the potential impact of new treatment options for urinary tract cancer, recent population trends in incidence, mortality and survival should be elucidated. This study estimated changes in the incidence, mortality and relative survival of urinary tract cancer in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) between 1990 and 2019. Annual counts of incident cases and deaths due to urinary tract cancer (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes C65–C68, D09.0–D09.1, D30.1–D30.9 and D41.1–D41.9) in Nordic countries were retrieved in 5-year age categories by sex during the study period. Country-specific time trends (annual rate ratios [RRs]) were estimated using Poisson regression, and RRs were compared between sexes. The incidence rate of bladder and upper urothelial tract cancer was >3-times lower in women than men in all countries across all age groups (incidence RR for women to men ranging from 0.219 [95% CI = 0.213–0.224] in Finland to 0.291 [95% CI = 0.286–0.296] in Denmark). Incidence rates were lowest in Finland and highest in Norway and Denmark. Age-adjusted mortality decreased in Finland, Denmark and Norway and in Swedish men, with the greatest decrease seen in Danish men (annual RR = 0.976; 95% CI = 0.975–0.978). In all countries and age groups, women had a lower relative survival rate than men. Between 1990 and 2019, the incidence of urinary tract cancer was stable in the Nordic countries, while mortality rates declined and relative survival increased. This could be due to earlier diagnosis and better treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Health outcomes and Understanding of MyelomA multi-National Study (HUMANS) was a large-scale, retrospective study conducted across Denmark, Finland and Sweden using linked data from national registries. We describe the characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) over 2010–2018. Patients with NDMM who received MM-specific, first-line treatments, were categorised by treatment (autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT] or a combination chemotherapy regimen based on bortezomib, lenalidomide or melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide). 11,023 patients received treatment over 2010–2018. Time between diagnosis and treatment was shortest in Denmark (0.9 months), then Sweden (2.9 months) and Finland (4.6 months). Around one third of patients underwent ASCT. Lenalidomide-based regimens were prescribed to 23–28% of patients in Denmark and Finland, versus 12% in Sweden. Patients receiving lenalidomide had the longest wait for treatment, from 3.2 months (Denmark) to 12.1 months (Sweden). Treatment persistence was highest among patients receiving melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide (7–8 months) in Finland and Sweden and lowest among those receiving bortezomib (3.5 months) in Finland. Overall survival (OS) was longest among patients with ASCT (7–10 years). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, OS (from diagnosis/treatment initiation), varied between cohorts. In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with smouldering MM, OS decreased for all; for patients receiving bortezomib or lenalidomide, OS from diagnosis was 40–49 and 27–54 months, respectively. This population-based study of patients with NDMM receiving first-line MM-specific treatment, provides real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes to complement data from randomised clinical trials. • Nordic patient registry data provide real-world evidence on treatments and outcomes. • Over 11,000 patients treated for multiple myeloma (2010–2018) in Nordic countries. • Time from diagnosis to treatment was shortest in Denmark. • Treatment persistence was highest in patients on melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide. • Longest overall survival seen in patients with autologous stem cell transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]