Search

With the success of immunotherapy in cancer, understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has become increasingly important; however in pediatric brain tumors this remains poorly characterized. Accordingly, we developed a clinical immune-oncology gene expression assay and used it to profile a diverse range of 1382 samples with detailed clinical and molecular annotation. In low-grade gliomas we identify distinct patterns of immune activation with prognostic significance in BRAF V600E-mutant tumors. In high-grade gliomas, we observe immune activation and T-cell infiltrates in tumors that have historically been considered immune cold, as well as genomic correlates of inflammation levels. In mismatch repair deficient high-grade gliomas, we find that high tumor inflammation signature is a significant predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition, and demonstrate the potential for multimodal biomarkers to improve treatment stratification. Importantly, while overall patterns of immune activation are observed for histologically and genetically defined tumor types, there is significant variability within each entity, indicating that the TIME must be evaluated as an independent feature from diagnosis. In sum, in addition to the histology and molecular profile, this work underscores the importance of reporting on the TIME as an essential axis of cancer diagnosis in the era of personalized medicine. The tumour immune microenvironment remains poorly characterised in paediatric brain tumours. Here, the authors develop a clinical immune-oncology gene expression assay to profile 1382 paediatric brain tumour samples, and reveal immune profiles and biomarkers that can contribute to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-grade diffuse glioma (HGG) is the leading cause of brain tumour death. While the genetic drivers of HGG have been well described, targeting these has thus far had little impact on survival suggesting other mechanisms are at play. Here we interrogate the alternative splicing landscape of pediatric and adult HGG through multi-omic analyses, uncovering an increased splicing burden compared with normal brain. The rate of recurrent alternative splicing in cancer drivers exceeds their mutation rate, a pattern that is recapitulated in pan-cancer analyses, and is associated with worse prognosis in HGG. We investigate potential oncogenicity by interrogating cancer pathways affected by alternative splicing in HGG; spliced cancer drivers include members of the RAS/MAPK pathway. RAS suppressor neurofibromin 1 is differentially spliced to a less active isoform in >80% of HGG downstream from REST upregulation, activating the RAS/MAPK pathway and reducing glioblastoma patient survival. Overall, our results identify non-mutagenic mechanisms by which cancers activate oncogenic pathways which need to accounted for in personalized medicine approaches. Targeting genetic drivers of high grade diffuse glioma (HGG) has not improved patient survival, suggesting the involvement of other mechanisms. Here, across cancer types, the authors identify increased alternative splicing burden in cancer drivers compared to mutation rate as an alternative mechanism for activation of oncogenic pathways such as RAS/MAPK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment personalization via tumor molecular testing holds promise for improving outcomes for patients with pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG). We evaluate the health economic impact of employing tumor molecular testing to guide treatment for patients diagnosed with PLGG, particularly the avoidance of radiation therapy (RT) for patients with BRAF-fusion.Methods: We performed a model-based cost-utility analysis comparing two strategies: molecular testing to determine BRAF fusion status at diagnosis against no molecular testing. We developed a microsimulation to model the lifetime health and cost outcomes (in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 2018 CAD, respectively) for a simulated cohort of 100,000 patients newly diagnosed with PLGG after their initial surgery.Results: The life expectancy after diagnosis for individuals who did not receive molecular testing was 39.01 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 32.94;44.38) years and 40.08 (95% CI: 33.19;45.76) years for those who received testing. Our findings indicate that patients who received molecular testing at diagnosis experienced a 0.38 (95% CI: 0.08;0.77) gain in QALYs and $1384 (95% CI: $-3486; $1204) reduction in costs over their lifetime. Cost and QALY benefits were driven primarily by the avoidance of long-term adverse events (stroke, secondary neoplasms) associated with unnecessary use of radiation.Conclusions: We demonstrate the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of molecular testing in guiding the decision to provide RT in PLGG. While our results do not consider the impact of targeted therapies, this work is an example of the value of simulation modeling in assessing the long-term costs and benefits of precision oncology interventions for childhood cancer, which can aid decision-making about health system reimbursement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]