Search

Topic Importance: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are information provided by patients on their condition, function, well-being, or experience. Instruments to quantify PROs, called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), allow standardized assessment of a unique dimension of health that cannot be measured physically. Herein, we discuss how to appraise PROMs critically and provide an update on their use in asthma clinical practice and research., Review Findings: Asthma-specific PROMs have been developed to measure a wide array of disease characteristics, including symptoms, medication use, exacerbations, and impairments to emotional and physical function. Some PROMs also include spirometry or expand questions to overlap with rhinitis symptoms. Use of PROMs to understand asthma control is included in management guidelines, yet real-world evidence of their effectiveness in improving asthma care remains limited. These instruments may be less accurate in characterizing patients with poorly controlled asthma and have modest correlation with exacerbation risk. Two new PROMs are highlighted, the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire as an instrument to assess asthma control that incorporates domains related to exacerbation risk and impairment, and the CompEx as a composite of daily diary reporting combined with exacerbation events as an early efficacy signal for interventional trials., Summary: PROMs are fundamental to asthma assessment. Novel instruments may improve the detection of patients at risk for poor outcomes and shorten the drug discovery pipeline. However, urgent research is needed to understand their practical utility in clinical settings., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: Z. D. received speaker or consultant honoraria and/or served on advisory boards at: Antabio, Arcede, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Hippo-Dx, QPS-Netherlands, and Sanofi-Genzyme-Regeneron, all outside the submitted work. During the last 3 years of Z. D.’s assignment as Research Director Respiratory and Allergy, QPS-Netherlands received a European grant from ERA4TB and funding from Foresee Pharmaceuticals for early clinical studies. She served/serves as associate editor for Allergy and Respiratory Medicine and is past chair of the asthma expert panel at EUFOREA (2000-2023) and past chair of the EAACI Asthma Section (2017-2019). N. A. H. has received honoraria for serving as consultant/advisor from Sanofi/Regeneron, Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, GSK, and Boehringer Ingelheim. His institution receives research grant support on his behalf from Genentech, Astra Zeneca, GSK, and Sanofi. None declared (T. D. W.)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design., (© 2024 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Bronchial asthma is a heterogeneous respiratory condition characterized by chronic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness and airway structural changes (known as remodeling). The clinical symptoms can be evoked by (non)specific triggers, and their intensity varies over time. In the past, treatment was mainly focusing on symptoms' alleviation; in contrast modern treatment strategies target the underlying inflammation, even during asymptomatic periods. Components of airway remodeling include epithelial cell shedding and dysfunction, goblet cell hyperplasia, subepithelial matrix protein deposition, fibrosis, neoangiogenesis, airway smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia. Among the other important, and frequently forgotten aspects of airway remodeling, also loss of epithelial barrier integrity, immune defects in anti-infectious defence and mucociliary clearance (MCC) dysfunction should be pointed out. Mucociliary clearance represents one of the most important defence airway mechanisms. Several studies in asthmatics demonstrated various dysfunctions in MCC - e.g., ciliated cells displaying intracellular disorientation, abnormal cilia and cytoplasmic blebs. Moreover, excessive mucus production and persistent cough are one of the well-recognized features of severe asthma and are also associated with defects in MCC. Damaged airway epithelium and impaired function of the ciliary cells leads to MCC dysfunction resulting in higher susceptibility to infection and inflammation. Therefore, new strategies aimed on restoring the remodeling changes and MCC dysfunction could present a new therapeutic approach for the management of asthma and other chronic respiratory diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest ZD: received consultancy fees/lecture fees/fees for attending advisory boards from ALK, Antabio, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Hippo-Dx, QPS-Netherlands, Sanofi-Genzyme; she served as Director Respiratory & Allergy at QPS-NL and this CRO received research grants for clinical trials from HAL Allergy, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Patara pharma, Cerbios, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Foresee Pharmaceuticals and ERA4TB (IMI-project). MJ: ALK, Stallergenes-Greer, Chiesi, GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca and SANOFI. NH: Received honoraria for serving as advisor or consultant for GSK, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Genentech, Novartis and Teva. His institution received research grant support of his behalf from GSK, Genentech, Sanofi, Teva, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. LH: Has received grant funding, participated in advisory boards and given lectures at meetings supported by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Hoffmann la Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Theravance, Evelo Biosciences, Sanofi, and Teva; he has received grants from MedImmune, Novartis UK, Roche/ Genentech Inc, and Glaxo Smith Kline, Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, Astra Zeneca, MedImmune, Glaxo Smith Kline, Aerocrine and Vitalograph; he has received sponsorship for attending international scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK and Napp Pharmaceuticals; he has also taken part in asthma clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann la Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline for which his institution received remuneration; he is the Academic Lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in Severe Asthma which involves industrial partnerships with a number of pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann la Roche, and Janssen. RD: Declares consulting fees from Synairgen, Sanofi and Galapagos, lecture fees from GSK, AZ and Airways Vista and he holds shares from Synairgen. DR: No COIs related to this work. SQ: ALK, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Leti, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. VB: Has worked as advisor, supervisor, investigator of pharmaceutical studies, unrestricted grants, and others with: AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD & Shering Plough, ALK-Abello; Chiesi,Novartis, Pharmaxis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aerocrine, Teva, Sanofi, Birk NPC as. MG: No COIs related to this work. IP: In the last 5 years IDP has received speaker’s honoraria for speaking at sponsored meetings from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aerocrine, Almirall, Novartis, Teva, Chiesi, Sanofi/Regeneron, Menarini and GSK and payments for organising educational events from AZ, GSK, Sanofi/Regeneron and Teva. He has received honoraria for attending advisory panels with Genentech, Sanofi/ Regeneron, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Merck, Circassia, Chiesi and Knopp and payments to support FDA approval meetings from GSK. He has received sponsorship to attend international scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Teva and Chiesi. He has received a grant from Chiesi to support a phase 2 clinical trial in Oxford. DAA: Has received honoraria as grants/contracts from Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología Clínica (SEAIC), as consulting fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca, Chiesi and Gebro, as speaker from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Gebro, GSK, Leti Pharma, Mundipharma, Novartis, Roxall, Sanofi. AS: GSK support for an asthma biologic clinical trial 2021-ongoing. PB: Has received honoraria for presentations and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, ELPEN, GSK, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi, and Gilead. AB: Takeda, Novartis, Viatris, ALK, Zentiva, MERCK, Stallergenes Greer, Ewopharma, Astra Zeneca, Chiesi, S&D Pharma, Mundipharma, Berlin Chemie. WB: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Regeneron. JK: Grants and/or personal fees from ALK, Chiesi, GSK, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Boerhinger, Teva, Viatris, Stallergen, Abbot, all outside the submitted work. SL: Honorarium AstraZeneka, GSK, Chiesi Hellas, Sanofi, Elpen, Menarini, Guidoti. MVM: No COIs related to this work. PP: ALK, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes. HP: No COIs related to this work. AS: Reports lecture fees and/or consultancies from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, B.I., GSK, Merck, Novartis, Zambon, Sanofi. HS: No COIs related to this work. IS: No COIs related to this work. BT: No COIs related to this work. MKV: GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca. Diego Conti: No COIs related to this work. WF: The department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Amsterdam University Medical centre, location AMC received grants for research in Rhinology from: ALK, AllergyTherapeutics, Novartis, EU, GSK, MYLAN, Sanofi-Aventis, and Zon-MW; personal COIs: for consultation and/or speaker fees from Dianosic, GSK, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis/Regeneron. SL: Advisory Board Sanof-Aventis, GSK and Leo-Pharma. Honoraria by DBV Technologies, Allergopharma, Leti, Nutricia, Sanofi-Aventis. GKS: Honoraria for articles, speaker and advisory boards: ALK, AstraZeneca, Capnia, Church & Dwight, Circassia, Noucor, GSK, Meda/Mylan/Viatris, Merck, Sanofi- Regeneron, Stallergenes. Scientific Chief Editor, Rhinology Section, Frontiers in Allergy. Board Member, Lead for Allergic Rhinitis, EUFOREA. Chair of Data Monitoring Board for Paediatric AR trials of HDM SLIT. EVS: No COIs related to this work. PH: Recipient of research grants, honoraria and/or lecture fees of Sanofi, Regeneron, Viatris, GSK, and Novartis. LB: No COIs related to this work.

Since its global invasion in 2019, COVID-19 has affected several aspects of patients' lives and posed a significant impact on the health care system. Several patient populations were identified to be at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or developing severe COVID-19-related sequelae. Conversely, anyone who has contracted SARS-CoV-2 is at risk to experience symptoms and signs consistent with post-COVID manifestations. Patients with asthma were initially thought to be at increased risk and severity for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, accumulating evidence demonstrates that asthma endotypes/phenotypes and comorbidities influence the risk stratification in this population. Furthermore, initial concerns about the potentially increased risk of poor outcomes with asthma treatments such as inhaled corticosteroids and biologics have not been substantiated. In this review, we provide an update on COVID-19 and asthma, including risk of susceptibility, clinical manifestations and course in this population as well as discuss recommendations for management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SA: Her institution received research support on her behalf as site PI for a GSK clinical trialHS: No COIs related to this workMJ: ALK, Stallergenes-Greer, Chiesi, GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca and SANOFISPT: No COIs related to this workNAH: Received honoraria for serving as advisor or consultant for GSK, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Genentech, Novartis and Teva. His institution received research grant support of his behalf from GSK, Genentech, Sanofi, Teva, Novartis, and AstraZenecaZD: received consultancy fees/lecture fees/fees for attending advisory boards from ALK, Antabio, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Hippo-Dx, QPS-Netherlands, Sanofi-Genzyme; she served as Director Respiratory & Allergy at QPS-NL and this CRO received research grants for clinical trials from HAL Allergy, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Patara pharma, Cerbios, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Foresee Pharmaceuticals and ERA4TB (IMI-project)., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Linda Rogers receives research funding including salary support from Sanofi (Global) and Gene DX (formerly Sema 4). She has served on advisory boards and performed consulting work for Astra Zeneca, Sanofi (US) and Teva Pharmaceuticals. She has received travel funding and lecture honoraria from the American College of Chest Physicians. Dr. Sven Seys company receives grants/contracts from Sanofi, Novartis, GSK, and is an employee of Galenus Health and Hippo Dx, and received speakers fee from Teva Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Milos Jenesak has performed consulting for Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Astra Zeneca, and GSK, has received payment/honoraria for lectures, presentatinos, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sanofi Genzyme and Novartis. Dr. Hanania's institution receives grants or contract from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Genentech, and Teva and consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Genentech, Teva, and Amgen, andspeaking fees from Regeneron. Dr. Bjermer has no conflicts to declare in relation to this manuscript. Dr. Zuzana Diamant received speaker or consultant honoraria and/or served on advisory boards at: Antabio, Arcede, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Hippo-Dx, QPS-Netherlands, Sanofi-Genzyme-Regeneron, all outside the submitted work. During the last 3 years of her assignment as Research Director Respiratory and Allergy, QPS-Netherlands received European grant from ERA4TB and funding from Foresee Pharmaceuticals for early clinical studies. She serves as associate editor for Allergy and Respiratory Medicine and acts as Chair of the Asthma Expert Panel at EUFOREA. submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In allergic asthma patients, one of the more common phenotypes might benefit from allergen immunotherapy (AIT) as add-on intervention to pharmacological treatment. AIT is a treatment with disease-modifying modalities, the evidence for efficacy is based on controlled clinical trials following standardized endpoint measures. However, so far there is a lack of a consensus for asthma endpoints in AIT trials. The aim of a task force (TF) of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is evaluating several outcome measures for AIT in allergic asthma., Methods: The following domains of outcome measures in asthmatic patients have been evaluated for this position paper (PP): (i) exacerbation rate, (ii) lung function, (iii) ICS withdrawal, (iv) symptoms and rescue medication use, (v) questionnaires (PROMS), (vi) bronchial/nasal provocation, (vii) allergen exposure chambers (AEC) and (viii) biomarkers., Results: Exacerbation rate can be used as a reliable objective primary outcome; however, there is limited evidence due to different definitions of exacerbation. The time after ICS withdrawal to first exacerbation is considered a primary outcome measure. Besides, the advantages and disadvantages and clinical implications of further domains of asthma endpoints in AIT trials are elaborated in this PP., Conclusion: This EAACI-PP aims to highlight important aspects of current asthma measures by critically evaluating their applicability for controlled trials of AIT., (© 2023 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There is no conflict of interest.

Asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) are chronic respiratory diseases. These two disorders often co-exist based on common anatomical, immunological, histopathological, and pathophysiological basis. Usually, asthma with comorbid CRSwNP is driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation which predisposes to more severe, often intractable, disease. In the past two decades, innovative technologies and detection techniques in combination with newly introduced targeted therapies helped shape our understanding of the immunological pathways underlying inflammatory airway diseases and to further identify several distinct clinical and inflammatory subsets to enhance the development of more effective personalized treatments. Presently, a number of targeted biologics has shown clinical efficacy in patients with refractory T2 airway inflammation, including anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab)/anti-IL5R (benralizumab), anti-IL-4R-α (anti-IL-4/IL-13, dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab). In non-type-2 endotypes, no targeted biologics have consistently shown clinical efficacy so far. Presently, multiple therapeutical targets are being explored including cytokines, membrane molecules and intracellular signalling pathways to further expand current treatment options for severe asthma with and without comorbid CRSwNP. In this review, we discuss existing biologics, those under development and share some views on new horizons., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal therapeutic option for allergic airway diseases including asthma and allergic rhinitis. AIT has been shown to restore the allergen immune tolerance, can modify both the early and late-onset allergen-specific airway hyperreactivity, helps to achieve disease control/remission and prevents new sensitisations. Recent real life data on long-term effectiveness of house dust mite (HDM) AIT in a large group of patients with HDM-driven asthma further underscored its unique therapeutic potential as well as confirmed previous data with pollen AIT. More widespread use of this causal treatment in select patient populations should further move this promising therapeutic field. In this mini-review, we discuss updates on new insights based on real world patient data., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Allergic asthmatics with both an early (EAR) and a late allergic reaction (LAR) following allergen exposure are termed 'dual responders' (DR), while 'single responders' (SR) only have an EAR. Mechanisms that differentiate DR from SR are largely unknown, particularly regarding the role and phenotypes of neutrophils. Therefore, we aimed to study neutrophils in DR and SR asthmatics., Methods: Thirty-four allergic asthmatics underwent an inhaled allergen challenge, samples were collected before and up to 24 h post-challenge. Cell differentials were counted from bronchial lavage, alveolar lavage and blood; and tissue neutrophils were quantified in immune-stained bronchial biopsies. Lavage neutrophil nuclei lobe segmentation was used to classify active (1-4 lobes) from suppressive neutrophils (≥5 lobes). Levels of transmigration markers: soluble (s)CD62L and interleukin-1Ra, and activity markers: neutrophil elastase (NE), DNA-histone complex and dsDNA were measured in lavage fluid and plasma., Results: Compared with SR at baseline, DR had more neutrophils in their bronchial airways at baseline, both in the lavage (p = .0031) and biopsies (p = .026) and elevated bronchial neutrophils correlated with less antitransmigratory IL-1Ra levels (r = -0.64). DR airways had less suppressive neutrophils and more 3-lobed (active) neutrophils (p = .029) that correlated with more bronchial lavage histone (p = .020) and more plasma NE (p = .0016). Post-challenge, DR released neutrophil extracellular trap factors in the blood earlier and had less pro-transmigratory sCD62L during the late phase (p = .0076) than in SR., Conclusion: DR have a more active airway neutrophil phenotype at baseline and a distinct neutrophil response to allergen challenge that may contribute to the development of an LAR. Therefore, neutrophil activity should be considered during targeted diagnosis and bio-therapeutic development for DR., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The allergen provocation test is an established model of allergic airway diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis, allowing the study of allergen-induced changes in respiratory physiology and inflammatory mechanisms in sensitised individuals as well as their associations. In the upper airways, allergen challenge is focused on the clinical and pathophysiological sequelae of the early allergic response, and is applied both as a diagnostic tool and in research settings. In contrast, bronchial allergen challenge has almost exclusively served as a research tool in specialised research settings with a focus on the late asthmatic response and the underlying type 2 inflammation. The allergen-induced late asthmatic response is also characterised by prolonged airway narrowing, increased nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness and features of airway remodelling including the small airways, and hence allows the study of several key mechanisms and features of asthma. In line with these characteristics, allergen challenge has served as a valued tool to study the cross-talk of the upper and lower airways and in proof-of-mechanism studies of drug development. In recent years, several new insights into respiratory phenotypes and endotypes including the involvement of the upper and small airways, innovative biomarker sampling methods and detection techniques, refined lung function testing as well as targeted treatment options further shaped the applicability of the allergen provocation test in precision medicine. These topics, along with descriptions of subject populations and safety, in line with the updated Global Initiative for Asthma 2021 document, will be addressed in this review., Competing Interests: G.M. Gauvreau declares grants from AstraZeneca, Biohaven, Novartis and Genentech; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biohaven, Novartis, Sterna Biologicals and Certior Consulting; and payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Genzyme and Genentech, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. B.E. Davis declares no competing interests. G. Scadding declares support from ALK-Abelló (provision of active and placebo medication for the GRASS clinical trial referenced in the article) and the Immune Tolerance Network (NIAID, NIH, USA; sponsor of the GRASS clinical trial) related to the present manuscript; as well as payment for lectures from ALK-Abelló in 2020 and 2021; and support from GlaxoSmithKline for attendance at the 2021 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology meeting. L-P. Boulet declares research grants for participation in multicentre studies or research projects proposed by the investigator from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron; royalties from UptoDate and Taylor & Francis; lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Covis, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck and Sanofi, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and the following unpaid contributions: Chair of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Board of Directors; President of the Global Asthma Organisation (Interasma); Member of the Canadian Thoracic Society Respiratory Guidelines Committee; and Laval University Chair on Knowledge Transfer, Prevention and Education in Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health. L. Bjermer declares no competing interests. A. Chaker declares grants or contracts, via Technical University Munich, from EIT Health (European Institute of Technology), BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research), AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline and ALK-Abelló; payments or honoraria, via Technical University Munich, from ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunotek, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Leti, Zeller and Bencard; travel reimbursement to attend European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology meetings (2018 and 2021 from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2019 from ALK-Abelló); patents, via Technical University Munich, relating to allergen-specific immunotherapy and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection; participation, via Technical University Munich, on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunotek, Novartis, Regeneron and Sanofi-Genzyme; and the following unpaid roles: Past Chair of the Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Environmental Medicine Section of the German ENT Society; board member at large of the German Allergy Society (DGAKI); scientific advisor/board member to the German Society for Applied Allergy (AeDA); board member of the Allergen Immuntherapy Interest Group, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. D.W. Cockcroft reports the following research grants in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission: research grant Dept of Medicine University of Saskatchewan (Effect of tiotropium on airway response to allergen); Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (The effect of deep inhalation on mannitol responsiveness); AstraZeneca (A phase 2a double blind randomised parallel group placebo controlled multicentre study to evaluate the effect of AZD8154 administered via nebuliser once daily on allergen-induced inflammation in subjects with mild allergic asthma challenged with inhaled allergen); AllerGen NCE (Methacholine challenge comparison of a jet nebuliser and vibrating mesh nebuliser); Novartis (Inhaled CSJ117 in adult asthmatics with mild atopic asthma). B. Dahlén declares payment to their institution in 2004 for a clinical trial by AstraZeneca, related to the present work; and grants to support the Karolinska Severe Asthma Centre from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; consulting fees from Teva, AstraZeneca and Sanofi; and payment for lectures from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. W. Fokkens declares grants to their institution from ALK, Mylan, Allergy Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Novartis and Chordate; consulting fees from Sanofi and Bioinspire; payment or honoraria from Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Lyra, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and that they are Secretary General of the European Rhinologic Society. P. Hellings declares no competing interests. N. Lazarinis declares no competing interests. P.M. O'Byrne reports grants from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Biohaven, Merck, Bayer and Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Covis, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen and Novartis; and payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Covis and Novartis, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and that they are a Section Editor of the European Respiratory Journal. E. Tufvesson declares no competing interests. S. Quirce declares consulting fees and payment or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and AstraZeneca; and payment or honoraria from Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma and Teva, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. M. Van Maaren declares payment or honoraria from ALK-Abelló, Takeda and CSL Behring, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and an unpaid role as Chairman of the Dutch Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology since 2020. F. H. de Jongh declares an unpaid role as European Respiratory Society Assessment Director. Z. Diamant reports that until May 2020 they worked as Research Director Respiratory & Allergy at a CRO (QPS-NL), which received funding from biotech and several pharma companies for conduct of phase I–II clinical studies (drug development); and declares consulting fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca, Antabio, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL Allergy, QPS-NL and Sanofi-Genzyme; and payment or honoraria from BMR, Boehringer Ingelheim, European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA), Merck Sharp & Dohme and Sanofi-Genzyme, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and unpaid roles as the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Asthma Section Chair (2017–2019) and EUFOREA Asthma Expert Panel Chair (since 2020)., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other eicosanoid pathway modifiers are among the most ubiquitously used medications in the general population. Their broad anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic effects are applied against symptoms of respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2, as well as in other acute and chronic inflammatory diseases that often coexist with allergy and asthma. However, the current pandemic of COVID-19 also revealed the gaps in our understanding of their mechanism of action, selectivity, and interactions not only during viral infections and inflammation, but also in asthma exacerbations, uncontrolled allergic inflammation, and NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD). In this context, the consensus report summarizes currently available knowledge, novel discoveries, and controversies regarding the use of NSAIDs in COVID-19, and the role of NSAIDs in asthma and viral asthma exacerbations. We also describe here novel mechanisms of action of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), outline how to predict responses to LTRA therapy and discuss a potential role of LTRA therapy in COVID-19 treatment. Moreover, we discuss interactions of novel T2 biologicals and other eicosanoid pathway modifiers on the horizon, such as prostaglandin D2 antagonists and cannabinoids, with eicosanoid pathways, in context of viral infections and exacerbations of asthma and allergic diseases. Finally, we identify and summarize the major knowledge gaps and unmet needs in current eicosanoid research., (© 2022 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: A subset of individuals with allergic asthma develops a late phase response (LPR) to inhaled allergens, which is characterized by a prolonged airway obstruction, airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the plasma proteome and circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells associated with the LPR following inhaled allergen challenge., Methods: Serial plasma samples from asthmatics undergoing inhaled allergen challenge were analyzed by mass spectrometry and immunosorbent assays. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Mass spectrometry data were analyzed using a linear regression to model the relationship between airway obstruction during the LPR and plasma proteome changes. Data from immunosorbent assays were analyzed using linear mixed models., Results: Out of 396 proteins quantified in plasma, 150 showed a statistically significant change 23 h post allergen challenge. Among the most upregulated proteins were three protease inhibitors: alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin and plasma serine protease inhibitor. Altered levels of 13 proteins were associated with the LPR, including increased factor XIII A and decreased von Willebrand factor. No relationship was found between the LPR and changes in the proportions of classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocytes., Conclusions: Allergic reactions to inhaled allergens in asthmatic subjects were associated with changes in a large proportion of the measured plasma proteome, whereof protease inhibitors showed the largest changes, likely to influence the inflammatory response. Many of the proteins altered in relation to the LPR are associated with coagulation, highlighting potential mechanistic targets for future treatments of type-2 asthma., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) test is a point-of-care test that is used in the assessment of asthma. Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on whether FE NO testing is indicated to optimize asthma treatment in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered. Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to form a consensus document regarding a single question relevant to the use of FE NO . The question was selected from three potential questions based on the greatest perceived impact on clinical practice and the unmet need for evidence-based answers related to this question. The panel performed systematic reviews of published randomized controlled trials between 2004 and 2019 and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members evaluated and approved the recommendations. Main Results: After considering the overall low quality of the evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation for FE NO -based care. In patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered, we suggest that FE NO is beneficial and should be used in addition to usual care. This judgment is based on a balance of effects that probably favors the intervention; the moderate costs and availability of resources, which probably favors the intervention; and the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in daily practice. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider this recommendation to measure FE NO in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered based on current best available evidence.