Search

Background: Dysphagia is a common sequela in individuals with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. However, the prevalence and predicting factors for pretreatment dysphagia have not been well identified in the literature. A priori knowledge of the presence of a pretreatment dysphagia is advantageous and can have clinically significant implications for management of this patient population. The ability to predict pretreatment dysphagia in this population would allow more targeted interventions and potential improvements in clinical outcomes. Participants: This pilot study investigated the prevalence and predicting factors of pretreatment dysphagia in 67 veterans with head and neck cancer through the West Haven, CT, Veterans Affairs cancer database. Method: Data for this study were acquired via retrospective medical record review. Results: The prevalence of pretreatment dysphagia in our sample was found to be 49.3%. Age and pretreatment percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement were found to have a statistically significant relationship with pretreatment dysphagia. Stage of cancer diagnosis and the diagnosis of pretreatment dysphagia were found to have a statistically significant relationship with posttreatment dysphagia. Conclusions: Findings offer important preliminary data and clinical considerations about this issue and serve as a foundation for future research. There are a limited number of factors associated with pretreatment dysphagia, and clinicians should consider a conservative referral approach when considering the need for dysphagia assessment prior to the initiation of oncologic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcome measures (OMs) have been emphasized by healthcare professions to optimize patient examination; however, a lack of regular use of OMs exists. The purpose of this study was to describe the outcome of a knowledge translation (KT) intervention to increase the use of OMs by physical therapists in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. A quasi-experimental pre-post study design was used. A multi-component KT intervention including education, organizational support, documentation, and environmental changes to increase the use of five OMs was implemented. Audit and feedback (A&F) was added to the KT intervention at month 6. Documented use of OMs was determined through manual chart audit (n = 864) and electronically (n = 2599). Regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with OMs use across time and diagnoses. Following the addition of A&F to the KT intervention at month 6, there was a significant increase in the odds of OMs use across all time intervals (months 6–12, 12–18, 18–24)(Odds Ratio (OR) 5.9, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.1–8.5; OR 8.5, 95% CI 6.0–12.1; OR 10.8, 95% CI 7.6–15). There was also a significant increase in the odds of documenting OMs on individuals with neurological diagnoses (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.5–0.8). This KT intervention increased and sustained OMs use over 24-months. This intervention can be replicated to improve the evidence-based practices of physical therapists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]