1. Undermining a Rival Party's Issue Competence through Negative Campaigning: Experimental Evidence from the USA, Denmark, and Australia.
- Author
-
Seeberg, Henrik Bech and Nai, Alessandro
- Subjects
NEGATIVE campaigning ,POLITICAL parties ,GOVERNMENT policy ,POLITICAL competition ,VOTER attitudes ,UNITED States politics & government, 2017-2021 ,DANISH politics & government, 1972- ,AUSTRALIAN politics & government, 1945- - Abstract
Much party communication encourages voters to lower issue-related evaluations of rival parties. Yet, studies of such influence are rare. Drawing on research on political parties' negative campaigning, this article starts to fill this gap. We triangulate evidence from four survey experiments across six issues in Denmark, the US, and Australia, and show that a party's negative campaigning decreases voters' evaluations of the target party's issue-handling competence (i.e. issue ownership), but does not backlash on voters' evaluations of the sponsor. Such attack on the target party does not have to be tied to a negative policy development like the crime rate to undermine the target party's competence evaluations. At the same time, a negative policy development only undermines a party's evaluations when it is accompanied by a rival party's negative campaigning attack. The implications for party competition and the mass-elite linkage are important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF