Search

Pull voting is a random process in which vertices of a connected graph have initial opinions chosen from a set of $k$ distinct opinions, and at each step a random vertex alters its opinion to that of a randomly chosen neighbour. If the system reaches a state where each vertex holds the same opinion, then this opinion will persist forthwith. In general the opinions are regarded as incommensurate, whereas in this paper we consider a type of pull voting suitable for integer opinions such as $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$ which can be compared on a linear scale; for example, 1 ('disagree strongly'), 2 ('disagree'), $\ldots,$ 5 ('agree strongly'). On observing the opinion of a random neighbour, a vertex updates its opinion by a discrete change towards the value of the neighbour's opinion, if different. Discrete incremental voting is a pull voting process which mimics this behaviour. At each step a random vertex alters its opinion towards that of a randomly chosen neighbour; increasing its opinion by $+1$ if the opinion of the chosen neighbour is larger, or decreasing its opinion by $-1$, if the opinion of the neighbour is smaller. If initially there are only two adjacent integer opinions, for example $\{0,1\}$, incremental voting coincides with pull voting, but if initially there are more than two opinions this is not the case. For an $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$, let $\lambda$ be the absolute second eigenvalue of the transition matrix $P$ of a simple random walk on $G$. Let the initial opinions of the vertices be chosen from $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$. Let $c=\sum_{v \in V} \pi_v X_v$, where $X_v$ is the initial opinion of vertex $v$, and $\pi_v$ is the stationary distribution of the vertex. Then provided $\lambda k=o(1)$ and $k=o(n/\log n)$, with high probability the final opinion is the initial weighted average $c$ suitably rounded to $\lfloor c \rfloor$ or $\lceil c\rceil$., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2305.15632

Time-dependent scheduling with linear deterioration involves determining when to execute jobs whose processing times degrade as their beginning is delayed. Each job i is associated with a release time r_i and a processing time function p_i(s_i)=alpha_i + beta_i*s_i, where alpha_i, beta_i>0$ are constants and s_i is the job's start time. In this setting, the approximability of both single-machine minimum makespan and total completion time problems remains open. Here, we take a step forward by developing new bounds and approximation results for the interesting special case of the problems with uniform deterioration, i.e.\ beta_i=beta, for each i. The key contribution is a O(1+1/beta)-approximation algorithm for the makespan problem and a O(1+1/beta^2)-approximation algorithm for the total completion time problem. Further, we propose greedy constant-factor approximation algorithms for instances with beta=O(1/n) and beta=Omega(n), where n is the number of jobs. Our analysis is based on a new approach for comparing computed and optimal schedules via bounding pseudomatchings.

We consider a type of pull voting suitable for discrete numeric opinions which can be compared on a linear scale, for example, 1 ('disagree strongly'), 2 ('disagree'), $\ldots,$ 5 ('agree strongly'). On observing the opinion of a random neighbour, a vertex changes its opinion incrementally towards the value of the neighbour's opinion, if different. For opinions drawn from a set $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$, the opinion of the vertex would change by $+1$ if the opinion of the neighbour is larger, or by $-1$, if it is smaller. It is not clear how to predict the outcome of this process, but we observe that the total weight of the system, that is, the sum of the individual opinions of all vertices, is a martingale. This allows us analyse the outcome of the process on some classes of dense expanders such as clique graphs $K_n$ and random graphs $ G_{n,p}$ for suitably large $p$. If the average of the original opinions satisfies $i \le c \le i+1$ for some integer $i$, then the asymptotic probability that opinion $i$ wins is $i+1-c$, and the probability that opinion $i+1$ wins is $c-i$. With high probability, the winning opinion cannot be other than $i$ or $i+1$. To contrast this, we show that for a path and opinions $0,1,2$ arranged initially in non-decreasing order along the path, the outcome is very different. Any of the opinions can win with constant probability, provided that each of the two extreme opinions $0$ and $2$ is initially supported by a constant fraction of vertices., Comment: 27 pages, 2 figures

We propose a simple model of influence in a network, based on edge density. In the model vertices (people) follow the opinion of the group they belong to. The opinion percolates down from an active vertex, the influencer, at the head of the group. Groups can merge, based on interactions between influencers (i.e., interactions along `active edges' of the network), so that the number of opinions is reduced. Eventually no active edges remain, and the groups and their opinions become static.

We consider two simple asynchronous opinion dynamics on arbitrary graphs where every node $u$ has an initial value $\xi_u(0)$. In the first process, the NodeModel, at each time step $t\ge 0$, a random node $u$ and a random sample of $k$ of its neighbours $v_1,v_2,\cdots,v_k$ are selected. Then, $u$ updates its current value $\xi_u(t)$ to $\xi_u(t+1) = \alpha \xi_u(t) + \frac{(1-\alpha)}{k} \sum_{i=1}^k \xi_{v_i}(t)$, where $\alpha \in (0,1)$ and $k\ge 1$ are parameters of the process. In the second process, the EdgeModel, at each step a random pair of adjacent nodes $(u,v)$ is selected, and then node $u$ updates its value equivalently to the NodeModel with $k=1$ and $v$ as the selected neighbour. For both processes, the values of all nodes converge to $F$, a random variable depending on the random choices made in each step. For the NodeModel and regular graphs, and for the EdgeModel and arbitrary graphs, the expectation of $F$ is the average of the initial values $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{u\in V} \xi_u(0)$. For the NodeModel and non-regular graphs, the expectation of $F$ is the degree-weighted average of the initial values. Our results are two-fold. We consider the concentration of $F$ and show tight bounds on the variance of $F$ for regular graphs. We show that, when the initial values do not depend on the number of nodes, then the variance is negligible, hence the nodes are able to estimate the initial average of the node values. Interestingly, this variance does not depend on the graph structure. For the proof we introduce a duality between our processes and a process of two correlated random walks. We also analyse the convergence time for both models and for arbitrary graphs, showing bounds on the time $T_\varepsilon$ required to make all node values `$\varepsilon$-close' to each other. Our bounds are asymptotically tight under assumptions on the distribution of the initial values., Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures

A garden $G$ is populated by $n\ge 1$ bamboos $b_1, b_2, ..., b_n$ with the respective daily growth rates $h_1 \ge h_2 \ge \dots \ge h_n$. It is assumed that the initial heights of bamboos are zero. The robotic gardener maintaining the garden regularly attends bamboos and trims them to height zero according to some schedule. The Bamboo Garden Trimming Problem (BGT) is to design a perpetual schedule of cuts to maintain the elevation of the bamboo garden as low as possible. The bamboo garden is a metaphor for a collection of machines which have to be serviced, with different frequencies, by a robot which can service only one machine at a time. The objective is to design a perpetual schedule of servicing which minimizes the maximum (weighted) waiting time for servicing. We consider two variants of BGT. In discrete BGT the robot trims only one bamboo at the end of each day. In continuous BGT the bamboos can be cut at any time, however, the robot needs time to move from one bamboo to the next. For discrete BGT, we show tighter approximation algorithms for the case when the growth rates are balanced and for the general case. The former algorithm settles one of the conjectures about the Pinwheel problem. The general approximation algorithm improves on the previous best approximation ratio. For continuous BGT, we propose approximation algorithms which achieve approximation ratios $O(\log \lceil h_1/h_n\rceil)$ and $O(\log n)$., Comment: 34 pages; 3 figures. A preliminary version appeared in the proceedings of SOFSEM 2017