Search

The current consensus holds that optically‐cleared specimens are unsuitable for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); exhibiting absence of contrast. Prior studies combined MRI with tissue‐clearing techniques relying on the latter's ability to eliminate lipids, thereby fostering the assumption that lipids constitute the primary source of ex vivo MRI‐contrast. Nevertheless, these findings contradict an extensive body of literature that underscores the contribution of other features to contrast. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether non‐delipidating clearing methods can produce MRI‐compatible specimens or whether MRI‐contrast can be re‐established. These limitations hinder the development of multimodal MRI‐light‐microscopy (LM) imaging approaches. This study assesses the relation between MRI‐contrast, and delipidation in optically‐cleared whole brains following different tissue‐clearing approaches. It is demonstrated that uDISCO and ECi‐brains are MRI‐compatible upon tissue rehydration, despite both methods' substantial delipidating‐nature. It is also demonstrated that, whereas Scale‐clearing preserves most lipids, Scale‐cleared brain lack MRI‐contrast. Furthermore, MRI‐contrast is restored to lipid‐free CLARITY‐brains without introducing lipids. Our results thereby dissociate between the essentiality of lipids to MRI‐contrast. A tight association is found between tissue expansion, hyperhydration and loss of MRI‐contrast. These findings then enabled us to develop a multimodal MRI‐LM‐imaging approach, opening new avenues to bridge between the micro‐ and mesoscale for biomedical research and clinical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-modal imaging, by light-microscopy (LM) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), holds promise for examining the brain across various resolutions and scales. While MRI acquires images in three dimensions, acquisition of intact whole-brain by LM requires a process of tissue clearing that renders the brain transparent. Removal of lipids (delipidation) is a critical step in the tissue clearing process, and was previsouly suggested to be the cause for absence of MRI contrast in cleared brains. Yet, the association between MRI contrast, delipidation and the different clearing techniques is debatable. Here, we provide datasets concerning lipid-content in cleared brain tissues obtained by various approaches. Fixed mouse and rat brains were cleared by CLARITY, Sca l e, uDISCO and ECi clearing techniques. Lipid-content was assessed at various intermediate steps of the different clearing methods, as well as at the end of the processes. Methods employed included whole brain MRI acquisition, Oil Red O (ORO)- and carbocyanine DiI-staining of cryosections, and DiI-washout assay from brain slices. MRI contrast-to-noise ratio, staining intensities and integrity of tissue were systematically analyzed. We demonstrate that lipid electrophoresis, an essential step of the CLARITY approach, engenders progressive reduction in MRI contrast in non-cleared (PFA-fixed) control brains, as well as strongly reduces contrast from uDISCO and ECi-cleared brains. ORO minimally stained CLARITY-cleared brains, however efficiently labelled uDISCO and ECi-cleared brains. Conversely, and in contrast to ORO-staining, DiI equally stained control, CLARITY, ECi and uDISCO-cleared brains. Both ORO- and DiI-staining demonstrated impairment in brain tissue integrity following CLARITY, but less so in uDISCO and ECi brains. DiI-washout assay demonstrated that each of the solvents employed along the process of uDISCO and ECi are highly delipidating, as well as the SDS-electrophoresis employed during CLARITY clearing. However, Sca l e treatment preserved most of the DiI dye. These data emphasize the variability in lipid assessment of cleared tissues by common techniques, and may help to resolve the contribution of lipids in brain MRI contrast., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article., (© 2023 The Author(s).)