Search

Background: Accessing healthcare services is a multifaceted phenomenon involving various elements, encompassing the demand, identification, reach, and utilization of healthcare needs. The literature offers methods for capturing patients' perceptions of healthcare access. However, to accurately measure patient perceptions, it is imperative to ensure the validity and reliability of such instruments by designing and implementing localized language versions. Aim: The primary aim of this study was to validate the Amharic version of the perceived access to health-care services among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in Ethiopia. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among cervical cancer patients at oncology centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A consecutive sampling approach was used and data collection took place from January 1 to March 30, 2023. Following initial validation and pretesting, a KoboCollect mobile phone application was employed for data collection. Subsequently, the collected data underwent cleaning in Microsoft Excel and analysis through Amos software v.26 and R programming. Various validity and reliability tests, such as content validity, convergent validity, face validity, divergent validity, known-group validity, and reliability tests, were executed. A second-order confirmatory factor analysis was developed to calculate incremental model fit indices, including CFI and TLI, along with absolute measures, namely SRMR and RMSEA. Results: A total of 308 participants were involved in the study, with 202 (65.6%) being patients referred from outside Addis Ababa. The initial evaluation of content validity by expert panels indicated that all criteria were met, with a CVR range of 0.5 to 1, I-CVI values ranging from 0.75 to 1, an S-CVI value of 0.91, and face validity values ranging from 2.4 to 4.8. The internal consistency of items within the final constructs varied from 0.76 to 0.93. Convergent, known-group, and most divergent validity tests fell within acceptable fit ranges. Common incremental fit measures for CFI and TLI were achieved with corresponding values of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. The absolute fit measures of SRMR and RMSEA were 0.04 and 0.07, indicating good and moderate fit, respectively. Conclusion: The study indicated a high internal consistency and validity of items with good fit to the data, suggesting potential accuracy of the domains. A five-domain structure was developed which enables adequate assessment of perceived access to health-care services of patients with cervical cancer in Ethiopia. We suggest that the tool can be utilized in other patient populations with a consideration of additional constructs, such as geographic accessibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In areas where children have multiple environmental exposures to enteric pathogens, identifying the sources of exposure by measuring external and internal exposures to enteric pathogens and complementing by questionnaire and observational checklist to capture behaviors resulting risk of exposure is critical. Accordingly, this study was conducted to design valid and reliable questionnaire to assess behaviors and environmental conditions resulting exposure to enteric pathogens in the rural northwest Ethiopia. We began with a thorough exploration of relevant literature to understand the theoretical framework on the research objectives to identify variables to highlight what the questionnaire is measuring. We then generated items in each domain that can effectively address the study objectives and we refined and organized the items in a suitable format. Then after, we conducted face and content validity by involving experts on the research subject. After pre-testing a pre-final version of the instrument generated in the content validity study, we conducted a pilot study in 150 randomly selected rural households to test the internal consistency reliability. We used content validity ratio (CVR), item-level content validity index (I-CVIs), scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/UA), and modified kappa statistics to measure content validity of items. Moreover, we used agreement and consistency indices (i.e., Cronbach's alpha) to assess the internal consistency of items. The content validity test result showed that the value of CVR was 0.95, I-CVIs was 0.97, and modified kappa was 0.97 for the whole items, indicating all the items are appropriate. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/UA) was 0.95 for the whole items indicating the agreement among judges to each items is higher. The internal consistency reliability test result indicated that Cronbach's alpha for the pre-final version of the pre-final tool was 0.85, indicating the strong reliability of the tool. The final version of the questionnaire was, therefore, prepared with 8 dimensions and 80 items. In this study, we designed valid and reliable questionnaire to assess behaviors and environmental conditions that result high risk of exposure to enteric infections in rural settings. The questionnaire can be used as a tool in the rural settings of developing countries with some amendments to account local contexts. However, this questionnaire alone does not measure exposure of children to enteric infections. It only complements external and internal exposure assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Positive deviance approach (PDA) was implemented as an intervention strategy to address the poor practice of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in Jimma town, Ethiopia. Understanding the end-users satisfaction and its drivers is essential to determine whether this approach will be viable in the long run. Therefore, we determined the level of users' satisfaction with the intervention and identified multi-level predictors to explain variability. Methods: The data for this follow-up study were collected from September 01 to 25, 2020 among the study participants who were living in the intervention clusters of an earlier trial. A sample of 260 participants were invited to respond to an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire that assessed both individual and community-level variables. The developed tool was refined using experts' view (face validity) and using factor analysis (FA) to validate the satisfaction measurement scales (construct validity). The mean scores were standardized using Percentages Scale Mean Score (PSMS) formulae. Two-level mixed-effects linear regression (linear mixed models) were performed to fit individual, community, and mixed-level variables. All assumptions were checked for each analysis as appropriate and β-estimates at 95% CI and p-value of < 0.05 were considered to declare a level of significance. Results: The overall level of end-users' satisfaction (PSMS) with PDA as an intervention to improve EBF was 50.9% with a maximum score of 99% and a minimum of 8%. Of the emerged satisfaction measuring scales, the standardized mean score for the user empowerment scale was the highest (53.7%). Five scales were emerged with 84.2% of the total variability explained in users' satisfaction. The mixed-effect model revealed that age, occupation, experience of breastfeeding (BF), knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, main source of BF information, previous home visit/support received from HEPs, participation in any social activities, and perceived community support for BF were independent two-level predictors of satisfaction. Conclusion: As an intermediate outcome, more than half of the end-users of the PDA intervention were satisfied. End-users' satisfaction with PDA as an intervention to promote EBF was predicted by multi-level factors. If they chose to use PDA as an intervention, Health program managers should be mindful of the two-level factors identified in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]