Search

Understanding housing preferences is critical for successful compact city development. However, there is limited research on understanding preference heterogeneity in dwelling type choices. Using the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey, this paper identifies the key housing and built environment characteristics associated with changes in dwelling type choice from detached houses to high-density. A latent class choice model captures the heterogeneity of dwelling type preferences within a traditionally low-density city, Brisbane, Australia. Findings reveal six household classes with distinct dwelling preferences: Class 1 (senior households without children with other family members) and Class 2 (couple families with children) in inner-city areas, Class 3 (high-income young households) and Class 4 (low-income households without children) in middle-city areas, Class 5 (low-income families with children) and Class 6 (middle-income young families without children) in outer-city areas. Residential environments with better access to educational facilities encourage Classes 3 and 6 to change to high-density living. Greater land use diversity encourages Classes 2, 3, and 6 to move towards high-density living. The findings can be used to design and improve high-density housing for targeted population groups across inner-, middle- and outer-city areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Pre-cooling is a method to shift peak air conditioning demand to off-peak and shoulder hours by utilizing energy storage in the thermal mass of buildings. This paper evaluates the pre-cooling potential of a range of residential buildings broadly representative of the Australian housing stock. Pre-cooling in 2-, 6-, and 8-star buildings with light, medium, and heavy construction weights in the cities of Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney is simulated, and its impacts on household bills, thermal comfort and peak air-conditioning demand reduction are assessed. Star rating is the method for rating Australian buildings based on their annual heating and cooling demand. The housing assessment by both star rating and construction weight highlights the varied potential of pre-cooling. Pre-cooling sensitivity to air conditioning size is also evaluated by simulating 5 k W th , 15 k W th , and 25 k W th air conditioning sizes representing typical small, medium, and large units in the Australian air conditioning market. Using an adaptive thermal comfort model, the impact of people's thermal comfort expectations on pre-cooling is also considered. The results highlight that compared with 2-star buildings, the percentage of daily cost savings from pre-cooling is considerably higher in 6-star and 8-star buildings. Moreover, with a small air conditioner, 2-star buildings are prone to negative seasonal cost savings as the air conditioner is not able to achieve thermostat temperature settings and hence runs longer. However, pre-cooling does offer considerable discomfort reduction to household members. A maximum summer seasonal cost savings of around $260 is observed in a 6-star light-weight building in Adelaide, and a 2-star light-weight building in Brisbane. Households that accept wider temperature variations with pre-cooling may not necessarily see cost savings. These households do provide greater peak air conditioning demand reductions. In conclusion, the value of pre-cooling for households and network peak demand reduction depends significantly on the housing type and location but can be highly valuable in many cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]