Search

Introduction: This reviews aim was to explore the evidence base for the use of antipsychotic medications in the management of acute symptoms in patients with emotionally unstable personality disorder. Methods: Relevant databases and grey literature were searched for relevant papers. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied which resulted in the retrieval of eight papers pertinent to the literature review. The papers were critically appraised, and a thematic analysis was undertaken to collate relevant data. Findings: Five themes emerged from this literature review: different outcome measures, symptom domains (anger, impulsivity, mood instability, pseudopsychotic symptoms, self-harm and suicidal behaviours, adverse effects, the quality of the evidence and bias). Conclusions: The evidence base is not robust enough to allow conclusions to be drawn. Any positive results must be weighed up against the potential for adverse events. This review lays the foundations for further research, which is needed to explore antipsychotic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible summary: What is known on this subject?: The physical health of people with serious mental illness (SMI) is an issue of growing concern in New Zealand and internationally.Metabolic syndrome is prevalent among people with severe mental illness and increases the likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease and diabetes.No previous international research has investigated rates of metabolic monitoring in specialist mental health services and in primary care. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: Rates of metabolic monitoring are low in this specialist mental health service and in primary care.Primary care nurses are positive in their views of their role in providing care for people with mental illness, and would value further education in this area. What are the implications for practice?: Services need to consider ways in which nurses can be supported to improve rates of metabolic monitoring.Guidelines may have a role to play in improved monitoring but need service‐level support in order to be effective. Introduction: People with serious mental illness experience significant disparities in their physical health compared with the general population. One indicator of health impairment is metabolic syndrome, which increases the likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease and diabetes. No international studies have reported both primary care and mental health nurses' rates of metabolic monitoring among people with serious mental illness, and no New Zealand studies have investigated rates of metabolic monitoring. Aim: To evaluate metabolic monitoring practices within one of New Zealand's 20 district health board regions. Method: An audit of clinical records in primary care (n = 46) and secondary care (n = 47) settings and a survey of practice nurses were conducted. A survey was sent to 127 practice nurses with a response rate of 19% (n = 24). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: Rates of metabolic monitoring were low in both services. Survey participants expressed positive views towards physical health monitoring and confidence in relating to mental health consumers. Rates of treatment of metabolic abnormalities were low, and communication between primary and secondary services was limited. Conclusion: Despite existence of guidelines and protocols, metabolic monitoring rates in both primary and secondary health services are low. Incorporating metabolic monitoring systems into service delivery, supported by appropriate tools and resourcing, is essential to achieve better clinical outcomes for people experiencing mental illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Qualitative research methods can be used to obtain a deeper understanding of patient experience by collecting information in the patients’ own words about their encounters, perspectives, and feelings. In this study, patients with schizophrenia were interviewed to capture their voice and to complement the quantitative data typically obtained in clinical trials. Methods: Semi-structured exit interviews were conducted with 41 patients who completed or prematurely discontinued from a phase 3, open-label trial (NCT02873208). The interview guide included open-ended questions on current and prior disease burden, symptoms, quality of life, and treatment experiences. Steps taken to reduce interview stress and secure the validity of data included interviewer sensitivity training specific to mental health conditions and schizophrenia, use of in-person interviews whenever possible and use of videoconferencing for remote interviews to promote trust and comfort, and working closely with clinical site staff to identify patient eligibility and willingness to participate. Transcripts based on audio recordings were content coded and analyzed using thematic analysis; a post-hoc quantitative content analysis was conducted. Results: Patients reported that the symptoms of schizophrenia negatively impacted their work, relationships, self-esteem, emotional health, and daily activities. Most patients had positive experiences with medications that alleviated hallucinations, depression, and anxiety. However, side effects of medications were associated with negative impacts on physical, emotional, behavioral, and cognitive health. Lack of energy/drowsiness, weight gain, mood changes, and involuntary movements were the most common side effects reported with the use of antipsychotic medications. Patients reported unmet treatment needs related to better symptom control and to improved social and physical functioning. Conclusion: Collection of qualitative information within a schizophrenia clinical development process provides value and insights into patients’ views on burden of illness, experiences with previous medications, and experiences following participation in a clinical trial and can inform design for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and purpose Cariprazine is an atypical antipsychotic drug approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, as well as manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder. It functions as a dopamine multifunctional agent, a partial agonist at dopamine and serotonin receptors. Unlike the majority of antipsychotics, which primarily target positive symptoms through dopaminergic antagonism, often neglecting negative, cognitive, and affective symptoms, the unique cariprazine's pharmacological profile, particularly potent blockade of D3 dopamine receptors, suggests the potential for numerous clinical applications. The aim of this study is to present current knowledge of cariprazine, focusing particularly on its mechanism of action, potential applications, adverse effects, and pharmacokinetic properties that could impact its clinical use. Methods and materials A review of the literature available in the PubMed database was performed using the key words: cariprazine; atypical antipsychotic drug; antipsychotic medication; schizophrenia treatment; bipolar disorder treatment; mania treatment; depression treatment, dopamine agonist. Conclusions Cariprazine demonstrates a unique pharmacological profile, offering potential benefits in managing a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (mania, depression, mixed episodes), unipolar depression, and co-occurring substance use disorders. Clinical studies have shown efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving negative and cognitive function, with a favorable metabolic profile, minimal impact on cardiovascular system, and generally mild adverse effect profile. However, further research is necessary to explore its full therapeutic potential and optimize its clinical use in diverse patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: 80% of patients value information on treatment options as an important part of recovery, further patients with a history of psychotic episodes feel excluded from decision making about their antipsychotic treatment, and on top of that, mental health staff is prone to be reluctant to support shared decision making and medication tapering for patients with schizophrenia. This case series aims to demonstrate the tapering of antipsychotic medication and how guided tapering affects the patient's feeling of autonomy and psychiatric rehabilitation. Case presentation: We present six patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (International Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders– 10th Edition codes F20.0–5, F20.7–9) who underwent professionally guided tapering in our clinic. The clinic aims to guide the patients to identify the lowest possible dose of antipsychotic medication in a safe setting to minimise the risk of severe relapse. Two patients completely discontinued their antipsychotic medication, two suffered a relapse during tapering, one chose to stop the tapering at a low dose, and one patient with treatment resistant schizophrenia, which is still tapering down. Conclusions: Reducing the antipsychotic dose increased emotional awareness in some patients (n = 4) helping them to develop better strategies to handle stress and increased feelings of recovery. Patients felt a greater sense of autonomy and empowerment during the tapering process, even when discontinuation was not possible. Increased awareness in patients and early intervention during relapse may prevent severe relapse. Impact and implications: Some patients with schizophrenia might be over medicated, leading to unwanted side effects and the wish to reduce their medication. The patients in our study illustrate how guided tapering of antipsychotic medication done jointly with the patient can lead to improved emotional awareness and the development of effective symptom management strategies. This may in turn lead to a greater sense of empowerment and identity and give life more meaning, supporting the experience of personal recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Decision aids (DAs) are promising tools to foster evidence‐based shared decision‐making between practitioners and service users. Nevertheless, it is still obscure how an evidence‐based DA for people with severe mental illness, especially psychosis, should look in an inpatient treatment setting to be useful and feasible. Therefore, we conducted focus groups with psychiatrists and service users to collect and assess their expectations and wishes regarding an evidence‐based DA. From these findings, we derived immediate recommendations for the future development of DAs. Methods: We held two group interviews with service users (n = 8) and three group interviews with psychiatrists (n = 10). We used an open, large‐scale topic guide. First, we presented data from a current meta‐analysis on antipsychotics to the interviewees and, in a second step, asked for their expectations and wishes towards a DA that integrates these data. Results: Our thematic analysis revealed six key themes addressed by the respondents: (1) general considerations on the importance and usefulness of such a DA, (2) critical comments on psychiatry and psychopharmacotherapy, (3) communicative prerequisites for the use of a DA, (4) form and content of the DA, (5) data input, data processing and output as well as (6) application of the DA and possible obstacles. Conclusions: Participants identified several important features for the development of DAs for selecting antipsychotics in inpatient psychiatric treatment. The digital format was met with the greatest approval. Especially the adaptability to different needs, users and psychopathologies and the possibility to outsource information dissemination via app seemed to be a decisive convincing argument. Further research is required to test specific features of DAs to be developed in clinical settings. Patient or Public Contribution: The entire project is supported by an advisory board, including also experienced users. The members are regularly updated about the process and give important feedback. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are many case reports of seizures apparently associated with the prescription of antipsychotics. This study aimed to examine whether there is an association between the prescription of antipsychotics and incident seizures in individuals with autism spectrum disorder using retrospective data based on patients' chart review. A cohort study was conducted to compare the rate of incident seizure between 3923 users of antipsychotics with 10,086 users of other psychotropics. This was followed by a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis of 149 patients to eliminate the effect of time-invariant confounders. The results showed no evidence of increased risk of seizure after exposure to antipsychotic agents (Hazard Ratio 1.28, 95% CI 0.74–2.19) compared to other psychotropics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated whether a functional insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) influenced antipsychotic treatment. At baseline, and after 8 weeks of treatment with various antipsychotic medications, we assessed patients' Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores, PANSS factors, and metabolic-syndrome-related parameters (fasting plasma lipid and glucose levels, and body mass index). A total of 186 antipsychotic-naïve first-episode psychosis patients or nonadherent chronic psychosis individuals (99 males and 87 females) were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction analysis. The ACE-I/D polymorphism was significantly associated with changes in PANSS psychopathology only (p < 0.05). Compared to ACE-II homozygous males, ACE-DD homozygous and ACE-ID heterozygous males manifested significantly greater decreases in PANSS positive score, PANSS excitement factor, and PANSS cognitive factor. ACE-DD homozygous females manifested higher decreases in PANSS depression factor compared to ACE-II homozygous and ACE-ID heterozygous females. The polymorphism's effect size was estimated as moderate to strong, while its contribution to the PANSS psychopathology ranged from ~5.4 to 8.7%, with the lowest contribution observed for PANSS positive score changes and the highest for PANSS depressive factor changes. Our results indicate that ACE-I/D polymorphism had a statistically significant but weak gender-specific impact on psychopathology data, and showed no association between ACE-I/D polymorphism and metabolic-syndrome-related parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies that examine course and outcome in psychosis have reported considerable heterogeneity in terms of recovery, remission, employment, symptom presentation, social outcomes, and antipsychotic medication effects. Even with demonstrated heterogeneity in course and outcome, prophylactic antipsychotic maintenance therapy remains the prominent practice, particularly in participants with schizophrenia. Lack of efficacy in maintenance antipsychotic treatment and concerns over health detriments gives cause to re-examine guidelines. Methods: This study was conducted as part of the Chicago follow-up study designed as a naturalistic prospective longitudinal research study to investigate the course, outcome, symptomatology, and effects of antipsychotic medication on recovery and rehospitalization in participants with serious mental illness disorders. A total of 139 participants with 734 observations were included in the analysis. GEE logistic models were applied to adjust for confounding factors measured at index hospitalization and follow-ups. Results: Our data show that the majority of participants with schizophrenia or affective psychosis experience future episodes of psychosis at some point during the 20-year follow-up. There was a significant diagnostic difference between groups showing an increase in the number of future episodes of psychosis in participants with schizophrenia. Participants with schizophrenia not on antipsychotics after the first 2 years have better outcomes than participants prescribed antipsychotics. The adjusted odds ratio of not on antipsychotic medication was 5.989 (95% CI 3.588–9.993) for recovery and 0.134 (95% CI 0.070–0.259) for rehospitalization. That is, regardless of diagnosis, after the second year, the absence of antipsychotics predicted a higher probability of recovery and lower probability of rehospitalization at subsequent follow-ups after adjusting for confounders. Conclusion: This study reports multiple findings that bring into question the use of continuous antipsychotic medications, regardless of diagnosis. Even when the confound by indication for prescribing antipsychotic medication is controlled for, participants with schizophrenia and affective psychosis do better than their medicated cohorts, strongly confirming the importance of exposing the role of aiDSP and antipsychotic drug resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is a term for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) that highlights its association with components of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). MAFLD is becoming a clinically significant problem due to its increasing role in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic cirrhosis of the liver. Material and methods: The resulting work is a review of the most important information on the risk of MAFLD development in the context of the use of particular groups of psychotropic drugs. The study presents the epidemiology, with particular emphasis on the population of psychiatric patients, pathophysiology and scientific reports analyzing the effect of the psychotropic medications on MAFLD development. Results: The drugs that can have the greatest impact on the development of MAFLD are atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine, and mood stabilizers (MS) - valproic acid (VPA). Their effect is indirect, mainly through dysregulation of organism's carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Conclusions: The population of psychiatric patients is particularly vulnerable to the development of MAFLD. At the root of this disorder lies the specificity of mental disorders, improper dietary habits, low level of physical activity and tendency to addictions. Also, the negative impact of the psychotropic drugs on the systemic metabolism indirectly contributes to the development of MAFLD. In order to prevent fatty liver disease, it is necessary to monitor metabolic and liver parameters regularly, and patients should be screened by ultrasound examination of the liver. There are also important preventive actions from the medical professionals, including education of patients and sensitizing to healthy lifestyle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The natural efficacy based trials of the atypical antipsychotics are required to yield extensive information concerning the efficiency, security, tolerance and safety among the patients suffering from schizophrenia who are treated in the hospital-based outpatient care centre based practice. In this study, the men and women were taken with the age range of 14 to 90 y with recognition of schizophrenia. There were a total of 103 patients considered for this study, who were enrolled between July 2017 to August 2021. This study analyzed the treatment with aripiprazole along with the standard of care based treatment procedure. The patient data reviewed in this study during the screening process moved closer to an interactive voice response system after obtaining informed consent. In the aripiprazole treatment group (n=49), the results were significantly better and effective in comparison to the standard of care treatment group (n=54; p<0.001; w 26, last observation carried forward) as reflected by the interactive voice response system total score. Similar results were noted in patients who duly completed the study design where aripiprazole was significantly associated with effectiveness at all phases in comparison to the standard of care group. The patients treated with aripiprazole also showed a significantly higher increase in quality of life and lesser adverse effects at w 26 (p<0.001). A high percentage of patients who received aripiprazole as a study medication was termed as “much better’’ on the preference scale of the medication questionnaire in comparison to the standard of care. The schizophrenia trial of aripiprazole provides a detailed overview of the real-world rendering and the enhanced benefits of aripiprazole compared to other major atypical antipsychotics advised in the hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: More than half of people who use antipsychotic medication for psychosis report having sexual dysfunction. The REMEDY trial aimed to find out if switching antipsychotic medication provides an effective way to reduce sexual dysfunction among people with psychosis. We set out to recruit 216 participants over a two-year period, but recruitment was stopped after an extended 12-month pilot phase, during which we recruited only 10 participants. As part of a nested process evaluation, we conducted qualitative interviews with front-line clinicians to examine barriers to recruitment to the trial. Methods: We developed a semi-structured interview schedule to explore staff views on factors that influenced whether they referred potential participants to the study. We interviewed a purposive sample of 51 staff from four National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, ensuring a range of different backgrounds, seniority, and levels of involvement in the trial. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed for verbatim, and data were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Nine interconnected themes were generated. Six themes concerned barriers to recruitment; including; prioritising patients' mental stability, mutual discomfort and embarrassment about discussing a "taboo" subject, and concerns about unintended consequences of asking people with psychosis about their sexual functioning. Three themes, including the quality of treatment relationships and strategies for opening dialogue suggested ways to improve recognition of these "hidden" side effects. Conclusion: The identification and management of sexual dysfunction among people with psychosis are not priorities for mental health services in England at this time. Many staff working in front-line services feel unprepared and uncomfortable asking people with psychosis about these problems. While greater use of screening tools may improve the identification of sexual dysfunction among people with psychosis, the evaluation and implementation of interventions to manage them will continue to be challenging unless NHS leaders and senior clinicians demonstrate greater commitment to changing current clinical practice. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12307891. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing of discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs for patients with first episode psychosis. Although most guidelines recommend maintenance therapy for at least 1 or 2 years after reaching remission, study results indicate that early discontinuation may be beneficial for at least a subsample of patients. To date, little is known about which medication strategies are applied in patients recovering from a first psychotic episode. In this study, we examined the beliefs and practices of clinicians on medication discontinuation. Methods: We performed a survey among 50 experienced Dutch psychiatrists to assess how often specific treatment strategies have been applied in the past 12 months, as well as their knowledge and expectations with respect to medication discontinuation. Results: Psychiatrists estimated that, after remission, they continued medication at the same dose for at least 12 months in 51.2% of cases, continued in a reduced dose in 33.8% of cases and discontinued medication in 9.1% of cases after 4.4 months of remission on average. Although the medication is discontinued in only a relatively small proportion of patients, almost half of all clinicians (45.9%) used this strategy at least once in the past 12 months. Conclusions: There is substantial practice variation in antipsychotic medication strategies after remission from a first psychotic episode. Future research on long‐term effects of early medication discontinuation can guide clinicians in making evidence‐based decisions when treating first‐episode patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provide the first national description across the US of variations in healthcare measures in 2018 among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia. Adult beneficiaries with ≥2 diagnoses for schizophrenia, and continuous enrollment with consistent geographical data in all of 2018 were identified from Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) data for 45 of 50 states. Antipsychotic (AP) utilization rates, including long-acting injectable APs (LAIs), quality metrics, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization and costs for claims submitted to Medicaid were reported nationally and by state. Pearson correlation evaluated associations between LAI utilization and total healthcare costs at state and county levels. Across the US 688,437 patients with schizophrenia were identified. The AP utilization rate was 51% (state range: 24–77%), while the LAI utilization rate was 13% (range: 4–26%). The proportion of patients adherent to any AP was 56% (range: 19–73%). Within 30 days post-discharge from an inpatient admission, 22% (range: 8–58%) of patients had an outpatient visit, and 12% (range: 4–48%) had a readmission. The proportion of patients with ≥1 inpatient admission and ≥1 emergency room visit was 34% (range: 19–82%) and 45% (range: 20–70%). Per-patient-per-year total healthcare costs averaged $32,920 (range: $717–$93,972). At the county level, a weak negative correlation was observed between LAI utilization and total healthcare costs. This study included Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled with pharmacy and medical benefits, including beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare; results cannot be generalized to the overall schizophrenia population or those with other payer coverage. In 2018, half of beneficiaries with schizophrenia did not submit any claims for APs to Medicaid, nearly half had an emergency room visit, and one-third had an inpatient admission. Moreover, healthcare measures varied considerably across states. These findings may indicate unmet treatment needs for Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that poses a large health, social, and cost burden to patients and society. While treatment with antipsychotic medications can reduce the number of relapses and hospitalizations, many patients do not adhere to treatment, which can lead to poor symptom control and further use of healthcare services. Interestingly, these measures of schizophrenia care seem to vary across US states. Therefore, we ran the first study to describe the regional differences in antipsychotic use, measures of quality of care, healthcare use, and healthcare costs among Medicaid-insured patients across the US in 2018. Our results showed that only half of patients used antipsychotics in 2018 (with a range of 24–77% across states) and the proportion of patients adherent to antipsychotic treatment was low (range of 19–73%). Additionally, nearly half of all patients had an emergency room visit (range of 20–70%), and one-third had an inpatient admission (range of 19–82%). These findings highlight large variations in antipsychotic use, performance measures, and healthcare use, possibly due to regional differences in unmet needs in schizophrenia care for Medicaid-insured patients in the US. Since use of inpatient and emergency room services was consistently high in specific states or regions, and yearly healthcare costs per patient varied from $717–$93,972 (mean = $32,920), there may be a particularly high burden in certain areas of the country where patients with schizophrenia may potentially be experiencing multiple relapses. Further research is needed to identify policies that may help narrow these regional differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Multilevel Facilitation of Long-Acting Antipsychotic Medication Program (MAP) is a novel intervention to increase the appropriate use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in community mental health clinics. The authors investigated the feasibility of MAP, facilitators and barriers to use, and preliminary impact on LAI medication use.Methods: Two clinics in Texas and two in Ohio serving 750 and 617 individuals with schizophrenia receiving oral antipsychotics, respectively, were asked to change clinical procedures for 1 year by using either the not receiving optimum benefit (NOB) checklist or the checklist plus MAP. Providers used the NOB checklist to identify individuals who could benefit from switching to LAI antipsychotics. MAP clinics used the NOB checklist plus nonbranded academic detailing for providers and a shared-decision-making video and tool for consumers. Use of MAP components was tracked, and barriers and facilitators were collected quarterly. Antipsychotic prescription counts were provided by participating clinics.Results: Barriers to use of MAP included loss of local champions and administrators, difficulty with provider buy-in, limited availability of peer specialists, and a lack of infrastructural support to integrate MAP into clinic flow. Higher scores on the NOB checklist were associated with more provider LAI medication offers and greater patient acceptance of LAI antipsychotics. LAI medication use increased in clinics over time, but it is unclear whether this increase was due to MAP.Conclusions: Changing MAP components to fit local procedures and to circumvent unique barriers could aid implementation. Further research should investigate the potential impact of MAP components on LAI medication use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity, diabetes, cardiac disease, severe mental illness (SMI), psychosis, metabolism, depression, antipsychotic medication Given the impact of antipsychotic medications on weight gain and its metabolic complications, it might be reasonable to expect that reducing the dose or discontinuing the antipsychotic or switching to a partial agonist might reverse the weight. Keywords: obesity; severe mental illness (SMI); diabetes; cardiac disease; psychosis; metabolism; depression; antipsychotic medication EN obesity severe mental illness (SMI) diabetes cardiac disease psychosis metabolism depression antipsychotic medication 1 3 3 01/06/22 20220103 NES 220103 "I welcome this I Frontiers i series on a research area that really matters to families like mine. [Extracted from the article]